664Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1547 of 1 July 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2026/249 fixing for 2026, 2027 and 2028 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2025/2454 fixing the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea for 2026regulation · June 30, 2026
666Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2026.#QS v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from procurement and award procedures governed by Regulations (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and (EU) 2018/1877 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-108/26 R.cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
667Case T-409/26: Action brought on 30 June 2026 – Total Beauty and Others v EUIPO – Razadi (Shape of a bottle with an elongated cap)cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
668Case T-402/26: Action brought on 30 June 2026 – Innovative Water Care Europe v ECHAcjeu_case · June 29, 2026
669Case T-189/26: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – Falaleiev v Councilcjeu_case · June 29, 2026
670Case T-108/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – QS v Commission (Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from procurement and award procedures governed by Regulations (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and (EU) 2018/1877 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests)cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
671Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 30 juin 2026.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-278/26 P.cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
672Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-278/26 P.cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
673Case C-709/26: Action brought on 30 June 2026 – European Commission v Portuguese Republiccjeu_case · June 29, 2026
674Case C-278/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 June 2026 Appeal brought on 1 April 2026 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026 – T-43/25, Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
675Case T-464/25: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – Tokareva v Councilcjeu_case · June 29, 2026
676Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
677Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 30 juin 2026.#RL contre AL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-555/25.cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
678Case C-555/25, Gutova: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – RL v AL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · June 29, 2026
679Commission Decision (EU) 2026/1447 of 30 June 2026 laying down internal rules concerning the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain data-subjects’ rights in relation to the processing of personal data by the Commission for the purpose of investigation, enforcement and monitoring under Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 of the European Parliament and of the Councildecision · June 29, 2026
680Commission Decision (EU) 2026/1446 of 30 June 2026 laying down internal rules concerning the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain data-subjects’ rights in relation to the processing of personal data by the Commission for the purpose of the investigation, enforcement and monitoring under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Councildecision · June 29, 2026