Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
5841

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Pollinis France v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance boscalid – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Delay in the renewal procedure – Reasons beyond the control of the applicant – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.#Case T-94/23.

cjeu_case ·
5842

Case T-1122/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Nouryon Functional Chemicals and Others v ECHA (REACH – Substance di-tert-butyl 1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetramethylene diperoxide – Compliance check of registrations – Request for additional toxicity studies – Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of fact – Proportionality – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA – Admissibility of the arguments directed against the decision of ECHA)

cjeu_case ·
5843

Case T-565/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Aurelia Stiftung v Commission (Plant protection products – Active substance glyphosate – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Delay in the renewal procedure – Reasons beyond the control of the applicant – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009)

cjeu_case ·
5846

Case T-366/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – YH v ECB (Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Directive 2013/36/EU – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Assessment of acquisitions of qualifying holdings – Opposition to the acquisition of a qualifying holding – Right to be heard – Concept of qualifying holding – Reputation and professional competence of the proposed acquirer – Rights protected by the Charter – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
5847

Case T-94/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Pollinis France v Commission (Plant protection products – Active substance boscalid – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Delay in the renewal procedure – Reasons beyond the control of the applicant – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009)

cjeu_case ·
5848

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#SD v European Medicines Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – EMA documents concerning the messenger RNA vaccine against COVID-19 Comirnaty – Conditional marketing authorisation – Specific obligations – Responses provided by the authorisation holder to the EMA – Partial refusal of access – Communication of partially redacted documents after notification of the contested decision – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings – Correcting decision – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate – Protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Document disseminated on the internet following a cyberattack – Overriding public interest.#Case T-623/22.

cjeu_case ·
5849

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#SD v European Medicines Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – EMA documents concerning the messenger RNA vaccine against COVID-19 Comirnaty – Conditional marketing authorisation – Specific obligations – Responses provided by the authorisation holder to the EMA – Partial refusal to grant access – Communication of partially redacted documents after notification of the contested decision – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings – Correcting decision – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate – Protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Document disseminated on the internet following a cyberattack – Overriding public interest.#Case T-623/22.

cjeu_case ·
5850

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance dimoxystrobin – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Length of the extension – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.#Case T-412/22.

cjeu_case ·
5851

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance dimoxystrobin – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Length of the extension – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.#Case T-412/22.

cjeu_case ·
5852

Case T-623/22: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – SD v EMA (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – EMA documents concerning the messenger RNA vaccine against COVID-19 Comirnaty – Conditional marketing authorisation – Specific obligations – Responses provided by the authorisation holder to the EMA – Partial refusal to grant access – Communication of partially redacted documents after notification of the contested decision – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings – Correcting decision – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate – Protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Document disseminated on the internet following a cyberattack – Overriding public interest)

cjeu_case ·