Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 documents
57721

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-614/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
57722

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 24 octobre 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-613/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
57723

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-613/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
57724

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
57725

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
57726

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Porr Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings.#Case C-292/19.

cjeu_case ·
57727

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Porr Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings.#Case C-292/19.

cjeu_case ·
57734

Case C-292/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — PORR Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
57736

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#ZPC Flis sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FLIS Happy Moreno choco — Earlier national figurative marks MORENO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Substitution of the list of goods covered by the earlier national figurative marks — Rectification of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Legal basis — Previous decision-making practice — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-708/18.

cjeu_case ·
57737

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#ZPC Flis sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FLIS Happy Moreno choco — Earlier national figurative marks MORENO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Substitution of the list of goods covered by the earlier national figurative marks — Rectification of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Legal basis — Previous decision-making practice — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-708/18.

cjeu_case ·
57738

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-560/18.

cjeu_case ·
57739

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-560/18.

cjeu_case ·
57740

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-559/18.

cjeu_case ·