Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 022 documents
55542

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark LaTV3D — Earlier national word mark TV3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Distinctive character — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-135/19.

cjeu_case ·
55543

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark LaTV3D — Earlier national word mark TV3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Distinctive character — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-135/19.

cjeu_case ·
55547

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 6 février 2020.#Rieco SpA contre Comune di Lanciano e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Marchés publics – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 12, paragraphe 3 – Législation nationale favorisant la passation de marchés publics au détriment des contrats in house – Liberté des États membres quant au choix du mode de prestation de services – Limites – Législation nationale excluant la possibilité pour un pouvoir adjudicateur de prendre, dans le capital d’un organisme détenu par des pouvoirs adjudicateurs, des participations qui sont insusceptibles de garantir le contrôle de cet organisme ou un pouvoir de blocage.#Affaires jointes C-89/19 à C-91/19.

cjeu_case ·
55548

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Rieco SpA v Comune di Lanciano and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12(3) – National legislation favouring public procurement procedures to the detriment of in-house contracts – Freedom of the Member States as to the choice of how services are to be provided – Limits – National legislation excluding the possibility for a contracting authority to acquire, in a body owned by contracting authorities, a shareholding which cannot guarantee control of that body or a power of veto.#Joined Cases C-89/19 to C-91/19.

cjeu_case ·
55549

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 6 février 2020.#Azienda ULSS n. 6 Euganea contre Pia Opera Croce Verde Padova.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Marchés publics – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 10, sous h) – Article 12, paragraphe 4 – Exclusions spécifiques pour les marchés de services – Services de défense civile, de protection civile et de prévention des risques – Organisations ou associations à but non lucratif – Service de transport sanitaire ordinaire et d’urgence – Législation régionale imposant prioritairement de recourir à un partenariat entre pouvoirs adjudicateurs – Liberté des États membres quant au choix du mode de prestation de services – Limites – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire C-11/19.

cjeu_case ·
55550

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Azienda ULSS n. 6 Euganea v Pia Opera Croce Verde Padova.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 10(h) – Article 12(4) – Specific exclusions for service contracts – Civil defence, civil protection, and danger prevention services – Non-profit organisations or associations – Ordinary and emergency medical transport services – Regional legislation requiring priority to be given to recourse to a partnership between contracting authorities – Freedom of the Member States to choose how services are provided – Limits – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-11/19.

cjeu_case ·
55552

Joined Cases C-89/19 to C-91/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Rieco SpA v Comune di Lanciano, Ecolan SpA (C-89/19), Comune di Ortona, Ecolan SpA (C-90/19), Comune di San Vito Chietino, Ecolan SpA (C-91/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 12(3) — National legislation favouring public procurement procedures to the detriment of in-house contracts — Freedom of the Member States as to the choice of how services are to be provided — Limits — National legislation excluding the possibility for a contracting authority to acquire, in a body owned by contracting authorities, a shareholding which cannot guarantee control of that body or a power of veto)

cjeu_case ·
55553

Case C-11/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Azienda ULSS No 6 Euganea v Pia Opera Croce Verde Padova (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10(h) — Article 12(4) — Specific exclusions for service contracts — Civil defence, civil protection, and danger prevention services — Non-profit organisations or associations — Ordinary and emergency medical transport services — Regional legislation requiring priority to be given to recourse to a partnership between contracting authorities — Freedom of the Member States to choose how services are provided — Limits — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
55554

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Compañía de Tranvías de la Coruña, SA v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission documents relating to the interpretation of a provision of EU law — Documents originating from a third party — Documents originating from a Member State — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Partial refusal to grant access — Total refusal to grant access — Obligation to state reasons — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings — Overriding public interest.#Case T-485/18.

cjeu_case ·
55555

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Compañía de Tranvías de la Coruña, SA v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission documents relating to the interpretation of a provision of EU law — Documents originating from a third party — Documents originating from a Member State — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Partial refusal to grant access — Total refusal to grant access — Obligation to state reasons — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings — Overriding public interest.#Case T-485/18.

cjeu_case ·
55557

Case T-485/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2020 — Compañía de Tranvías de la Coruña v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission documents relating to the interpretation of a provision of EU law — Documents originating from a third party — Documents originating from a Member State — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Partial refusal to grant access — Total refusal to grant access — Obligation to state reasons — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings — Overriding public interest)

cjeu_case ·
55560

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 6 February 2020.#SI and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech / Get2Get.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de l'entreprise de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Articles 2 to 5 — Scope — Utilitarian object — Concept of ‘work’ — Copyright protection of works — Conditions — Shape of a product which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Folding bicycle.#Case C-833/18.

cjeu_case ·