Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
53041

Case T-561/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Lípidos Santiga v Commission (Action for annulment — Energy — Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources — Limit on biofuels and biomass fuels produced from food and feed crops — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 — Definition of raw materials presenting a high indirect land-use change (ILUC) risk — Palm oil — Standing to bring proceedings — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
53042

Case T-553/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT BAR) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark PERFECT BAR — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
53043

Case T-516/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — VDV eTicket Service v Commission and INEA (Arbitration clause — ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ (2014-2020) — Project ‘European Travellers Club: Account-Based Travelling across the European Union — ETC’ — Grant agreement — Decision of INEA declaring ineligible certain costs incurred in the context of subcontracts — Misidentification of the defendant — Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable — Legitimate expectations — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
53044

Case T-294/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIB staff — Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system — Remuneration simulation tool — Act not open to challenge — Purely confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Non-material harm — No causal link — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
53047

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#Vert Marine SAS contre Premier ministre et Ministre de l'Économie et des Finances.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure de passation de contrats de concession – Directive 2014/23/UE – Article 38, paragraphe 9 – Régime des mesures correctrices destinées à prouver le rétablissement de la fiabilité d’un opérateur économique concerné par un motif d’exclusion – Réglementation nationale interdisant aux opérateurs économiques faisant l’objet d’un motif d’exclusion obligatoire de participer à une procédure de passation de contrats de concession pendant cinq ans – Exclusion de toute possibilité, pour de tels opérateurs, d’apporter la preuve des mesures correctrices prises.#Affaire C-472/19.

cjeu_case ·
53048

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Vert Marine SAS v Premier ministre and Ministre de l'Économie et des Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Concession contract award procedure — Directive 2014/23/EU — Article 38(9) — System of compliance measures to demonstrate the reliability of an economic operator affected by a ground for exclusion — National legislation prohibiting economic operators which are the subject of a ground for compulsory exclusion from participating, for a period of 5 years, in a concession contract award procedure — Impossible for such operators to demonstrate that compliance measures have been taken.#Case C-472/19.

cjeu_case ·
53049

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#WT contre Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Statut des ressortissants de pays tiers résidents de longue durée – Directive 2003/109/CE – Article 12 – Adoption d’une décision d’éloignement à l’encontre d’un résident de longue durée – Éléments à prendre en considération – Jurisprudence nationale Absence de prise en considération de ces éléments – Compatibilité Directive 2001/40/CE Reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions d’éloignement des ressortissants de pays tiers Pertinence.#Affaire C-448/19.

cjeu_case ·
53050

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#WT v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Directive 2003/109/EC — Article 12 — Adoption of a decision to expel a long-term resident — Elements to be taken into consideration — National case-law — Failure to take those elements into consideration — Compatibility — Directive 2001/40/EC — Mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals — Relevance.#Case C-448/19.

cjeu_case ·
53051

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#Procédure engagée par Prezident Slovenskej republiky.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 35, paragraphes 4 et 5 – Indépendance des autorités de régulation – Législation nationale transférant le pouvoir de désignation du président de l’autorité de régulation nationale du chef de l’État au gouvernement – Participation de ministères nationaux aux procédures de fixation des prix.#Affaire C-378/19.

cjeu_case ·
53052

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Proceedings brought by Prezident Slovenskej republiky.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ústavný súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 35(4) and (5) – Independence of the regulatory authorities – National legislation transferring the power to appoint the chairperson of the national regulatory authority from the Head of State to the government – Participation of national ministries in the tariff regulation procedures.#Case C-378/19.

cjeu_case ·
53053

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#CHEP Equipment Pooling NV contre Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti – Serviciul soluţionare contestaţii et Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti – Administraţia fiscală pentru contribuabili nerezidenţi.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 17, paragraphe 2, sous g) – Transfert de biens meubles à l’intérieur de l’Union européenne en vue d’une prestation de services – Articles 170 et 171 – Droit au remboursement de la TVA aux assujettis non établis dans l’État membre du remboursement – Directive 2008/9/CE – Notion d’“assujetti non établi dans l’État membre du remboursement” – Assujetti non identifié à la TVA dans l’État membre du remboursement.#Affaire C-242/19.

cjeu_case ·
53054

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#CHEP Equipment Pooling NV v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti – Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti – Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 17(2)(g) – Transfer of movable property within the European Union with a view to the supply of services – Articles 170 and 171 – Right to VAT refund of taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Directive 2008/9/EC – Concept of ‘taxable person not established in the Member State of refund’ – Taxable person not identified for VAT purposes in the Member State of refund.#Case C-242/19.

cjeu_case ·
53055

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#Parsec Fondazione Parco delle Scienze e della Cultura contre Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti et Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marchés publics de travaux, de fournitures et de services – Directive 2014/24/UE – Procédure d’adjudication d’un marché de services – Services d’architecture et d’ingénierie – Article 19, paragraphe 1, et article 80, paragraphe 2 – Législation nationale limitant la possibilité de participer aux seuls opérateurs économiques constitués sous certaines formes juridiques.#Affaire C-219/19.

cjeu_case ·
53056

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Parsec Fondazione Parco delle Scienze e della Cultura v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti and Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Procurement procedure for the award of a service contract — Architectural and engineering services — Article 19(1) and Article 80(2) — National legislation limiting participation solely to economic operators in certain legal forms.#Case C-219/19.

cjeu_case ·
53057

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#« KOB » SIA contre Madonas novada pašvaldības Administratīvo aktu strīdu komisija.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Articles 49 et 63 TFUE – Liberté d’établissement et libre circulation des capitaux – Directive 2006/123/CE – Acquisitions de terrains agricoles en Lettonie aux fins de leur exploitation – Régime d’autorisation préalable pour les personnes morales – Conditions spécifiques s’appliquant uniquement aux personnes morales contrôlées ou représentées par des ressortissants d’un autre État membre – Exigences de résidence et de connaissance de la langue officielle de la République de Lettonie – Discrimination directe en raison de la nationalité.#Affaire C-206/19.

cjeu_case ·
53058

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#SIA „KOB” v Madonas novada pašvaldības Administratīvo aktu strīdu komisija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 63 TFEU — Freedom of establishment and the free movement of capital — Directive 2006/123/EC — Acquisition of agricultural land in Latvia for the purpose of use — System of prior authorisation for legal persons — Specific conditions applying only to legal persons controlled or represented by nationals of another Member State — Requirements for residence and knowledge of the official language of the Republic of Latvia — Direct discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-206/19.

cjeu_case ·
53059

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#SCT d.d contre République de Slovénie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 90 et 273 – Base d’imposition – Réduction – Refus – Non-paiement – Assujetti n’ayant pas déclaré sa créance dans la procédure de faillite engagée à l’encontre du débiteur – Principes de neutralité fiscale et de proportionnalité – Effet direct.#Affaire C-146/19.

cjeu_case ·
53060

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#SCT, d.d v Republic of Slovenia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 90 and 273 — Taxable amount — Reduction — Refusal — Non-payment — Taxable person who did not lodge a claim in insolvency proceedings commenced against the debtor — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality — Direct effect.#Case C-146/19.

cjeu_case ·