Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
52721

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Dermavita Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Use with the proprietor’s consent – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-104/19.

cjeu_case ·
52729

Case T-295/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State has been taken in compliance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·
52732

Case T-104/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVÉDERM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVÉDERM — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Use with the proprietor’s consent — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
52734

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2013/11/EU — Alternative dispute resolution — Article 13(1) and (2) — Mandatory information — Accessibility of information.#Case C-380/19.

cjeu_case ·
52735

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Commission v CX.#Appeal – Civil service – Disciplinary proceedings – Rights of defence – Right to be heard – Annex IX of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4 – Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented – Article 22 – Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty – Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented – Assessment of the medical evidence – Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance.#Case C-131/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
52736

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Commission v CX.#Appeal – Civil service – Disciplinary proceedings – Rights of defence – Right to be heard – Annex IX of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4 – Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented – Article 22 – Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty – Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented – Assessment of the medical evidence – Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance.#Case C-131/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
52737

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Reassignment – Legal basis – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Interests of the service – Substantial changes in tasks – Qualification – Transfer – Change – Misuse of power – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Right to a fair hearing – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-116/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
52738

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Reassignment – Legal basis – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Interests of the service – Substantial changes in tasks – Qualification – Transfer – Change – Misuse of power – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Right to a fair hearing – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-116/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
52739

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions.#Case C-24/19.

cjeu_case ·
52740

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vergunningsbetwistingen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions.#Case C-24/19.

cjeu_case ·