Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
51381

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments – Tasks entrusted to the ECB – Specific supervision powers of the ECB – Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital – Absence of individual examination.#Case T-143/18.

cjeu_case ·
51382

Case T-565/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — P. Krücken Organic v Commission (Institutional law — Action for damages — Conditions in which the European Union incurs non-contractual liability — Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries — Private inspection body — Concept of appropriate supervision within the meaning of Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 — Attributability of conduct)

cjeu_case ·
51383

Cases T-150/18 and T-345/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BNP Paribas v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme or to the single resolution fund by way of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks conferred on the ECB — ECB’s specific supervision powers — Article 4(1)(f), Article 16(1)(c) and Article 16(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure imposing the deduction of the cumulative sum of outstanding irrevocable payment commitments from Common Equity Tier 1 — Absence of individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
51384

Case T-149/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Arkéa Direct Bank and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
51385

Case T-146/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BPCE and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
51386

Case T-145/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
51387

Case T-144/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Crédit agricole and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
51388

Case T-143/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Société générale v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

cjeu_case ·
51389

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#EM v TMD Friction GmbH and FL v TMD Friction EsCo GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Transfers of undertakings – Directive 2001/23/EC – Articles 3 and 5 – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer – Transfer made by the insolvency administrator of the transferring undertaking subject to insolvency proceedings – Occupational old-age pension benefits – Restriction on the obligations of the transferee – Amount of the benefit payable under the supplementary occupational pension scheme calculated on the basis of the employee’s pay when insolvency proceedings were instituted – Directive 2008/94/EC – Article 8 – Direct effect – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-674/18 and C-675/18.

cjeu_case ·
51390

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#EM v TMD Friction GmbH and FL v TMD Friction EsCo GmbH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Transfers of undertakings – Directive 2001/23/EC – Articles 3 and 5 – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer – Transfer made by the insolvency administrator of the transferring undertaking subject to insolvency proceedings – Occupational old-age pension benefits – Restriction on the obligations of the transferee – Amount of the benefit payable under the supplementary occupational pension scheme calculated on the basis of the employee’s pay when insolvency proceedings were instituted – Directive 2008/94/EC – Article 8 – Direct effect – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-674/18 and C-675/18.

cjeu_case ·
51391

Joined Cases C-674/18 and C-675/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — EM v TMD Friction GmbH (C-674/18), FL v TMD Friction EsCo GmbH (C-675/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Transfers of undertakings — Directive 2001/23/EC — Articles 3 and 5 — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Transfer made by the insolvency administrator of the transferring undertaking subject to insolvency proceedings — Occupational old-age pension benefits — Restriction on the obligations of the transferee — Amount of the benefit payable under the supplementary occupational pension scheme calculated on the basis of the employee’s pay when insolvency proceedings were instituted — Directive 2008/94/EC — Article 8 — Direct effect — Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
51392

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kerkosand spol. s r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia – Regional investment aid – Dismissal of a complaint – Decision not to raise any objections – Conditions for exemption – Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power – Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 – Concept of SME – Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period – Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties.#Case T-745/17.

cjeu_case ·
51393

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kerkosand spol. s r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia – Regional investment aid – Dismissal of a complaint – Decision not to raise any objections – Conditions for exemption – Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power – Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 – Concept of SME – Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period – Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties.#Case T-745/17.

cjeu_case ·
51394

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Designations of origin in the wine sector – Wine labelling – Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin – Prohibition – Exception – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 – Inclusion of the name of the ‘Teran’ wine grape variety in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 – Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union – Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Right to property – Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union – Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making – Institutional balance.#Case T-626/17.

cjeu_case ·
51395

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Designations of origin in the wine sector – Wine labelling – Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin – Prohibition – Exception – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 – Inclusion of the name of the ‘Teran’ wine grape variety in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 – Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union – Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Right to property – Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union – Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making – Institutional balance.#Case T-626/17.

cjeu_case ·
51396

Case T-745/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kerkosand v Commission (State aid — Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia — Regional investment aid — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections — Conditions for exemption — Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power — Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 — Concept of SME — Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period — Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market — Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties)

cjeu_case ·
51397

Case T-626/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Slovenia v Commission (Agriculture — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Designations of origin in the wine sector — Wine labelling — Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin — Prohibition — Derogation — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 — Inclusion of the name of the wine grape variety ‘teran’ in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 — Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union — Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to property — Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union — Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making — Institutional balance)

cjeu_case ·
51398

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit – Knowledge of languages – Limitation of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-437/16.

cjeu_case ·
51399

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit – Knowledge of languages – Limitation of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-437/16.

cjeu_case ·
51400

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain and Italian Republic v European Commission.#Language regime – Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of Investigators and Team leaders – Language skills – Limitation of the choice of second language in the competitions to German, English and French – Eliminatory language-comprehension test in English – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-401/16.

cjeu_case ·