Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
51142

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 September 2020.#JR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Scope – Article 8(1)(c) – Concept of ‘enforceable judgment’ – Offence giving rise to a conviction by a court of a third State – Kingdom of Norway – Judgment recognised and enforced by the issuing State by virtue of a bilateral agreement – Article 4(7)(b) – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Extra-territorial offence.#Case C-488/19.

cjeu_case ·
51143

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 17 September 2020.#Maksu- ja Tolliamet v Heavyinstall OÜ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/24/EU – Article 16 – Recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures – Mutual assistance – Request for precautionary measures – Judicial decision of the applicant Member State for the purpose of implementing precautionary measures – Jurisdiction of the court of the requested Member State to assess and reassess the justification of those measures – Principles of mutual trust and of mutual recognition.#Case C-420/19.

cjeu_case ·
51144

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 17 September 2020.#RTS infra BVBA and Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 57(6) – Optional grounds for exclusion – Measures taken by the economic operator to demonstrate its reliability despite the existence of an optional ground for exclusion – Obligation of the economic operator to provide evidence of such measures on its own initiative – Direct effect.#Case C-387/19.

cjeu_case ·
51145

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 17 September 2020.#QM v Finanzamt Saarbrücken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Saarlandes.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies of services for consideration – Article 26(1) – Transactions treated as supplies of services for consideration – Article 56(2) – Determination of the point of reference for tax purposes – Hiring of means of transport – Making cars available to employees.#Case C-288/19.

cjeu_case ·
51146

Case C-837/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Super Bock Bebidas SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(6) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168 and 176 — Exclusion from the right to deduct — Purchase of accommodation, food, drink, vehicle leases, fuel and tolls services — Standstill clause — Accession to the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
51147

Case C-623/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda v European Commission (Appeal — Action for annulment — Decision to recover a debt — Enforcement order — Principle of res judicata — Adoption of a decision which is enforceable within the meaning of Article 299 TFEU for the recovery of grants awarded under a contract — Grant agreement concluded under the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) (2007-2013))

cjeu_case ·
51148

Case C-540/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WV v Landkreis Harburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 3(b) — Court for the place where the maintenance creditor is habitually resident — Action for recovery brought by a public body subrogated to the claims of a maintenance creditor)

cjeu_case ·
51149

Case C-212/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Concept — Wreck of the oil tanker Erika — Aid scheme for aquaculture and fisheries undertakings — Decision declaring the aid scheme partly incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid out — Assessment of validity — Examination of the Court’s own motion — Admissibility — Failure to bring an action for annulment by the defendant in the main proceedings — Reduction in social security contributions — Employees’ contributions — Advantage — Question of who is liable for repayment)

cjeu_case ·
51151

Case C-12/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 8 — Parliamentary immunity — Activity not connected to parliamentary duties — Publication on the Member’s Twitter account — Article 9 — Parliamentary privilege — Scope — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity)

cjeu_case ·
51152

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Procédure pénale contre JZ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Directive 2008/115/CE – Article 11 – Interdiction d’entrée – Ressortissant d’un pays tiers à l’égard duquel une telle interdiction a été prononcée, mais qui n’a jamais quitté l’État membre concerné – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une peine d’emprisonnement pour le séjour de ce ressortissant dans cet État membre alors qu’il a connaissance de l’interdiction d’entrée émise à son égard.#Affaire C-806/18.

cjeu_case ·
51153

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Criminal proceedings against JZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 11 – Entry ban – Third-country national against whom an entry ban was issued but who never left the Member State concerned – National legislation providing for a custodial sentence in the event of the third-country national staying in that Member State despite notice of the entry ban issued against him.#Case C-806/18.

cjeu_case ·
51154

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Stichting Schoonzicht contre Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Biens d’investissement immobiliers – Déduction de la taxe payée en amont – Régularisation de la déduction initialement opérée – Régularisation en une seule fois de l’intégralité de cette déduction à la suite de la première utilisation du bien concerné – Période de régularisation.#Affaire C-791/18.

cjeu_case ·
51155

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Stichting Schoonzicht v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Immovable property acquired as capital goods – Deduction of input tax paid – Adjustment of the initial deduction – Single adjustment of that deduction in full after the goods in question are first used – Adjustment period.#Case C-791/18.

cjeu_case ·
51158

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Autoritatea naţională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) contre Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Libre circulation des marchandises – Article 35 TFUE – Restrictions quantitatives à l’exportation – Mesures d’effet équivalent – Mesure nationale imposant aux producteurs d’électricité d’offrir l’intégralité de l’électricité disponible exclusivement sur un marché concurrentiel centralisé de l’État membre concerné.#Affaire C-648/18.

cjeu_case ·
51159

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Autoritatea naţională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) v Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market in electricity – Free movement of goods – Article 35 TFEU – Quantitative restrictions on exports – Measures having equivalent effect – National measure requiring electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them exclusively on a centralised competitive market of the Member State concerned.#Case C-648/18.

cjeu_case ·