Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
50982

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Osório & Gonçalves, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de – Earlier national word mark INFINITE – Admissibility of evidence – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-601/19.

cjeu_case ·
50983

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Osório & Gonçalves, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de – Earlier national word mark INFINITE – Admissibility of evidence – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-601/19.

cjeu_case ·
50984

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Seven SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU figurative mark 7Seven – No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark – Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration – Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee – Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Duty of due care.#Case T-557/19.

cjeu_case ·
50985

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Seven SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU figurative mark 7Seven – No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark – Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration – Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee – Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Duty of due care.#Case T-557/19.

cjeu_case ·
50986

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal products – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan – Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Error of law.#Case T-549/19.

cjeu_case ·
50987

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal products – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan – Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Error of law.#Case T-549/19.

cjeu_case ·
50992

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe – Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)).#Case T-402/19.

cjeu_case ·
50993

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe – Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)).#Case T-402/19.

cjeu_case ·
50994

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and charcoal – Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-401/19.

cjeu_case ·
50995

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and charcoal – Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-401/19.

cjeu_case ·
50996

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#External relations – Technical cooperation – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 – Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications – Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 – Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body – Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo – Concept of third country – Error of law.#Case T-370/19.

cjeu_case ·
50997

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#External relations – Technical cooperation – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 – Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications – Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 – Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body – Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo – Concept of third country – Error of law.#Case T-370/19.

cjeu_case ·
50998

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#UE v European Commission.#Civil service – Temporary members of staff – Health problems alleged to be caused by working conditions – Request for recognition of an occupational disease – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision.#Case T-338/19.

cjeu_case ·
50999

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#UE v European Commission.#Civil service – Temporary members of staff – Health problems alleged to be caused by working conditions – Request for recognition of an occupational disease – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision.#Case T-338/19.

cjeu_case ·
51000

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Development and testing of sensor systems for quality and performance control in baking processes – Bread-Guard Project – Overlap of the project with another project financed under the same programme – Changes to the description of the tasks to be undertaken – Loss of the intellectual property rights required for the execution of the project – Overestimation of the number of people needed each month for the project – Beneficiaries’ duty to provide information – Serious misconduct – Termination by the Commission of the grant agreement.#Case T-314/19.

cjeu_case ·