Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
49481

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SADIA – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-310/19.

cjeu_case ·
49482

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Sadia – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-309/19.

cjeu_case ·
49483

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Sadia – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-309/19.

cjeu_case ·
49484

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Marco Bronckers v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks – Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-166/19.

cjeu_case ·
49485

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Marco Bronckers v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks – Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-166/19.

cjeu_case ·
49486

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.

cjeu_case ·
49487

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.

cjeu_case ·
49488

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BMC Srl v Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development and space – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Procedure for call for proposals H2020-CS 2-CFP08-FRC‑2018-01 – Rejection of the proposal submitted by the applicant – Assignment of non-integer scores – Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Failure to sufficiently examine the proposal – Distortion of the facts.#Case T-71/19.

cjeu_case ·
49489

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BMC Srl v Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development and space – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Procedure for call for proposals H2020-CS 2-CFP08-FRC‑2018-01 – Rejection of the proposal submitted by the applicant – Assignment of non-integer scores – Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Failure to sufficiently examine the proposal – Distortion of the facts.#Case T-71/19.

cjeu_case ·
49496

Case T-310/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — BRF Singapore Foods v EUIPO — Tipiak (SADIA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SADIA — Earlier national word mark SAIDA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Principle of sound administration — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
49497

Case T-309/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — BRF Singapore Foods v EUIPO — Tipiak (Sadia) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Sadia — Earlier national word mark SAIDA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Principle of sound administration — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
49498

Case T-166/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 –Bronckers v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks — Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party)

cjeu_case ·
49499

Case T-107/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — ACRE v Parliament (Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 — Prohibition of the funding of a national political party — Contribution or donation by a national political party — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100 % of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 — Rights of defence)

cjeu_case ·
49500

Case T-71/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — BMC v Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (Research and technological development and space — Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) — Procedure for call for proposals H2020-CS 2 -CFP08-FRC-2018-01 — Rejection of the proposal submitted by the applicant — Assignment of non-integer scores — Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Failure to sufficiently examine the proposal — Distortion of the facts)

cjeu_case ·