Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161293) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43164) directive (8067)
316 838 documents
4861

Case C-245/24, Lukoil Bulgaria and Lukoil Neftohim Burgas: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast – Bulgaria) – Lukoil Bulgaria EOOD, Lukoil Neftohim Burgas AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure)

cjeu_case ·
4862

Case C-184/24, Sidi Bouzid: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia – Italy) – AF, acting in his own name and as legal representative of his minor child BF v Ministero dell’Interno – U.T.G. – Prefettura di Milano (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre)

cjeu_case ·
4863

Case C-182/24, SACD and Others: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris – France) – RB, as successor in title to Claude Chabrol, and Others v Société des auteurs et compositeurs dramatiques (SACD), Radio Days SARL, Brinter Company Ltd, BS, MW, Artedis SA, Panoceanic Films SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation under which the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the joint holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work is conditional on all the joint holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
4864

Case C-168/24, PMJC: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – PMJC SAS v [W] [X], [M] [X],[X] Créative SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief)

cjeu_case ·
4865

Case C-161/24, OSA: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně – Czech Republic) – OSA, z.s., formerly OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices)

cjeu_case ·
4866

Case C-136/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025 – Hamoudi v Frontex (Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case)

cjeu_case ·
4867

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence aspects – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

cjeu_case ·
4868

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

cjeu_case ·
4869

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive EU 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation.#Case C-731/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4870

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation.#Case C-731/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4871

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4872

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4873

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Electrabel SA and Others v Commission de Régulation de l’Electricité et du Gaz (CREG).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of ‘market revenues’ – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-633/23.

cjeu_case ·
4874

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Electrabel SA and Others v Commission de Régulation de l’Electricité et du Gaz (CREG).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of ‘market revenues’ – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-633/23.

cjeu_case ·
4875

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.

cjeu_case ·
4876

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Flygtningenævnet København.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.

cjeu_case ·
4877

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

cjeu_case ·
4878

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

cjeu_case ·
4880

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

cjeu_case ·