Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161293) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43164) directive (8067)
316 838 documents
4821

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

cjeu_case ·
4822

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

cjeu_case ·
4823

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation making the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the co-holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work conditional on all of the co-holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.

cjeu_case ·
4824

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation under which the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the joint holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work is conditional on all the joint holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.

cjeu_case ·
4825

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Art. 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.

cjeu_case ·
4826

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Art. 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.

cjeu_case ·
4827

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.

cjeu_case ·
4828

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.

cjeu_case ·
4829

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
4830

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

cjeu_case ·