Documents : Union européenne

46701

Case T-765/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — The Floow v Commission (Application for interim relief — Grant agreement entered into as part of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) — Recovery of sums paid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46702

Case T-374/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — KM v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Surviving spouse — Survivor’s pension — Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Conditions for eligibility — Duration of the marriage — Plea of illegality — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46703

Case T-354/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 –Kfz-Gewerbes v EUIPO — The Blink Fish (Representation of a fish) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a fish — Earlier national word mark BLINKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46704

Case T-175/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Sanolie (SANOLIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SANOLIE — Earlier national word mark SANODIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46705

Case T-168/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Creaton South-East Europe v EUIPO — Henkel (CREATHERM) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CREATHERM — Earlier international word mark CERETHERM — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46706

Case T-93/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Albert Darboven Holding v EUIPO (WINDSOR-CASTLE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark WINDSOR-CASTLE — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Laudatory character)

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46707

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 March 2021.#smart things solutions GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-681/20 P.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46708

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 March 2021.#smart things solutions GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-681/20 P.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46709

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#SS v MCP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 10 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Abduction of a child – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State – Territorial scope – Removal of a child to a third State – Habitual residence acquired in that third State.#Case C-603/20 PPU.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46710

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#SS v MCP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 10 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Abduction of a child – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State – Territorial scope – Removal of a child to a third State – Habitual residence acquired in that third State.#Case C-603/20 PPU.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46711

Case C-603/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice) (England & Wales), Family Division — United Kingdom) — SS v MCP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 10 — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Abduction of a child — Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State — Territorial scope — Removal of a child to a third State — Habitual residence acquired in that third State)

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46712

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agricultural policy – Organic production – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Production and labelling of organic products – Organic products imported into the European Union – Certification of products by a control body – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-306/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46713

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agricultural policy – Organic production – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Production and labelling of organic products – Organic products imported into the European Union – Certification of products by a control body – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-306/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46714

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-799/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46715

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-799/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46716

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-798/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46717

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-798/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46718

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Power Stars – Partial revocation declaration – Partial lack of genuine use – Proof of genuine use – Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 75(1), first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), first sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 75(1), second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-588/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46719

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Power Stars – Partial revocation declaration – Partial lack of genuine use – Proof of genuine use – Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 75(1), first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), first sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 75(1), second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-588/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021

46720

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a building block from a toy building set – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Features of appearance of a product to be necessarily reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit the interconnection with other products – Designs whose purpose is to allow multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Article 8(1) to (3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-515/19.

cjeu_case · 24 mars 2021