Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
46361

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Swedish air transport market – Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-379/20.

cjeu_case ·
46362

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Danish air transport market – Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-378/20.

cjeu_case ·
46363

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Danish air transport market – Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-378/20.

cjeu_case ·
46364

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Berebene Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GHISU – Earlier collective national figurative mark CHIANTI CLASSICO – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctiveness or reputation of the earlier mark.#Case T-201/20.

cjeu_case ·
46365

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Berebene Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GHISU – Earlier collective national figurative mark CHIANTI CLASSICO – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctiveness or reputation of the earlier mark.#Case T-201/20.

cjeu_case ·
46367

Case T-388/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair I; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — State guarantee on a loan — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Duty to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
46368

Case T-379/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Sweden; Covid-19) (State aid — Swedish air transport market — Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Guarantee — Decision not to raise any objections — Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
46369

Case T-378/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Denmark; COVID-19) (State aid — Danish air transport market — Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Guarantee — Decision not to raise any objections — Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
46370

Case T-201/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GHISU — Earlier collective national figurative mark CHIANTI CLASSICO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctiveness or reputation of the earlier mark)

cjeu_case ·
46371

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Casa di Cura Città di Parma SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53(2) and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 17(2)(a) – Mixed taxable person – Deductible proportion – Public or private health structures carrying out exempt activities – National legislation excluding the deduction of VAT relating to the purchase of goods or services used for the requirements of those exempt activities.#Case C-573/20.

cjeu_case ·
46372

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Casa di Cura Città di Parma SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53(2) and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 17(2)(a) – Mixed taxable person – Deductible proportion – Public or private health structures carrying out exempt activities – National legislation excluding the deduction of VAT relating to the purchase of goods or services used for the requirements of those exempt activities.#Case C-573/20.

cjeu_case ·
46373

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA Paris v T.G.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10 – Information to be included in consumer credit agreements – Article 22 – Level of harmonisation – National measure requiring credit institutions to present all components of a consumer credit agreement using the same font type, the same font format and the same font size.#Case C-535/20.

cjeu_case ·
46374

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA Paris v T.G.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad - Razgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10 – Information to be included in consumer credit agreements – Article 22 – Level of harmonisation – National measure requiring credit institutions to present all components of a consumer credit agreement using the same font type, the same font format and the same font size.#Case C-535/20.

cjeu_case ·
46375

Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 14 avril 2021.#Lukáš Wagenknecht contre Conseil européen.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne – Lutte contre la fraude – Réunions du Conseil européen – Cadre financier pluriannuel – Demande d’exclusion du représentant de la République tchèque en raison d’un prétendu conflit d’intérêts – Réponse affirmant une absence de compétence – Recours en carence – Prétendue absence d’action du Conseil européen – Irrecevabilité – Prise de position – Qualité pour agir – Intérêt à agir.#Affaire C-504/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
46376

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Council.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Combating fraud – European Council meetings – Multiannual Financial Framework – Request for exclusion of the representative of the Czech Republic due to an alleged conflict of interest – Reply claiming lack of competence – Action for failure to act – Alleged failure to act by the European Council – Inadmissibility – Definition of position – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-504/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
46377

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#HR v Finanzamt Wilmersdorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167 and 168 – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Tax evasion – Supply chain – Refusal of the right to deduct where the taxable person knew or should have known that, by his or her purchase, he or she was participating in a transaction connected to VAT fraud.#Case C-108/20.

cjeu_case ·
46378

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#HR v Finanzamt Wilmersdorf.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167 and 168 – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Tax evasion – Supply chain – Refusal of the right to deduct where the taxable person knew or should have known that, by his or her purchase, he or she was participating in a transaction connected to VAT fraud.#Case C-108/20.

cjeu_case ·
46379

Case C-573/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma — Italy) — Casa di Cura Città di Parma SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Mixed taxable person — Deductible proportion — Public or private health structures carrying out exempt activities — National legislation excluding the deduction of VAT relating to the purchase of goods or services used for the requirements of those exempt activities)

cjeu_case ·
46380

Case C-108/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Germany) — HR v Finanzamt Wilmersdorf (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct input VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Supply chain — Refusal of the right to deduct where the taxable person knew or should have known that, by his or her purchase, he or she was participating in a transaction connected to VAT fraud)

cjeu_case ·