Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
45201

Case T-17/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — adp Gauselmann v EUIPO — Gameloft (GAMELAND) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GAMELAND — Earlier EU word mark Gameloft — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Restriction of the services covered in the trade mark application)

cjeu_case ·
45202

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MONTANA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-856/19.

cjeu_case ·
45203

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MONTANA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-856/19.

cjeu_case ·
45204

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark MONTANA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-855/19.

cjeu_case ·
45205

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark MONTANA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-855/19.

cjeu_case ·
45206

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2021 (Extracts).#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONTANA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-854/19.

cjeu_case ·
45207

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2021 (Extracts).#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONTANA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-854/19.

cjeu_case ·
45210

Case T-856/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark MONTANA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
45211

Case T-855/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark MONTANA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
45212

Case T-854/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MONTANA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
45214

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid and Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) ‐ Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ – Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ – Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff – Permanent need for temporary regulated staff.#Case C-103/19.

cjeu_case ·
45215

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid and Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) ‐ Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ – Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ – Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff – Permanent need for temporary regulated staff.#Case C-103/19.

cjeu_case ·
45216

Case C-103/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 24 de Madrid — Spain) — Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid, Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5(1) — Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector — Concept of ‘objective reasons’ — Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ — Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff — Permanent need for temporary regulated staff)

cjeu_case ·
45217

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18.

cjeu_case ·
45218

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18.

cjeu_case ·
45219

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of Open Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of financial economics and macroeconomics – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competition to three languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-71/18.

cjeu_case ·
45220

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of Open Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of financial economics and macroeconomics – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competition to three languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-71/18.

cjeu_case ·