Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
42601

Case T-503/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — T i D kontrolni sistemi v EUIPO –Sigmatron (Signalling apparatuses and devices) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing signalling apparatuses and devices — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Declaration of invalidity of a prior design — No effect — Disclosure of the earlier design — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — No different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
42603

Case T-250/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Moviescreens Rental v EUIPO — the airscreen company (AIRSCREEN) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark airscreen — Absolute grounds for refusal — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
42606

Case T-173/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Henry Cotton’s Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear (Henry Cotton’s) (EU trade mark — Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries — Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO — Trade marks involved in insolvency proceedings — Registration of the transfers of the marks — Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings — Competence of EUIPO — Duty of diligence — Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848)

cjeu_case ·
42607

Case T-169/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Marina Yachting Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear (MARINA YACHTING) (EU trade mark — Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries — Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO — Trade mark involved in insolvency proceedings — Registration of the transfer of the mark — Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings — Competence of EUIPO — Duty of diligence — Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848)

cjeu_case ·
42608

Case T-128/20 and T-129/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Collibra v EUIPO — Dietrich (COLLIBRA and collibra) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU word mark COLLIBRA and figurative mark collibra — Earlier national word mark Kolibri — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
42609

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Healios KK v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Healios – Earlier EU word mark HELIOS – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-591/19.

cjeu_case ·
42610

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Healios KK v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Healios – Earlier EU word mark HELIOS – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-591/19.

cjeu_case ·
42611

Case T-591/19: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Healios v EUIPO — Helios Kliniken (Healios) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Healios — Earlier EU word mark HELIOS — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
42612

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Altice Europe NV v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Telecommunications sector – Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Gravity of the infringements – Implementation of the infringements – Exchange of information – Amount of fines – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-425/18.

cjeu_case ·
42613

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Altice Europe NV v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Telecommunications sector – Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Gravity of the infringements – Implementation of the infringements – Exchange of information – Amount of fines – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-425/18.

cjeu_case ·
42614

Case T-425/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Altice Europe v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Telecommunications sector — Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised — Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Principle of legality — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Gravity of the infringements — Implementation of the infringements — Exchange of information — Amount of fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
42615

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#PAO Severstal v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Calculation of the normal value, the export price and the dumping margin – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of the existence of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Injury elimination – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-753/16.

cjeu_case ·
42616

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#PAO Severstal v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Calculation of the normal value, the export price and the dumping margin – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of the existence of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Injury elimination – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-753/16.

cjeu_case ·
42617

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Elimination of injury – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-752/16.

cjeu_case ·
42618

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Elimination of injury – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-752/16.

cjeu_case ·
42619

Case T-753/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Severstal v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Calculation of the normal value, the export price and the dumping margin — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of the existence of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Injury elimination — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
42620

Case T-752/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Elimination of injury — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Principle of good administration — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·