Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
42201

Case C-613/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — CS v Eurowings GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Strike by airline staff — Strike by the staff of a subsidiary in solidarity with the staff of the parent company)

cjeu_case ·
42202

Case C-581/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) — Bulgaria) — Skarb Państwa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej reprezentowany przez Generalnego Dyrektora Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad v TOTO SpA — Costruzioni Generali, Vianini Lavori SpA (Request for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Civil and commercial matters — Article 35 — Provisional, including protective, measures — Action based on a contract for the construction of a public expressway concluded between a public authority and two private law companies — Application for interim relief relating to penalties and guarantees arising from that contract — Decision on interim relief already given by a court having jurisdiction as to the substance)

cjeu_case ·
42205

Case C-338/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi — Poland) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and execution of a financial penalty imposed on D.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Mutual recognition — Financial penalties — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution — Article 20(3) — Decision imposing a financial penalty — Observance of the rights of the defence — Notification of documents in a language not understood by the sentenced person — Translation of the essential elements of the decision)

cjeu_case ·
42207

Case C-136/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Járásbíróság — Hungary) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and enforcement of a financial penalty imposed on LU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Enforcement of financial penalties — Principle of mutual recognition — Article 5(1) — Offences giving rise to the recognition and enforcement of penalty decisions without verification of the double criminality of the act — Article 5(3) — Offences in respect of which the Member State has the option of making the recognition and enforcement of penalty decisions subject to the double criminality of the act — Verification by the executing Member State of the legal characterisation given to the offence by the issuing Member State in the certificate accompanying the penalty decision)

cjeu_case ·
42208

Case C-119/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — Līga Šenfelde v Lauku atbalsta dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding — National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 — Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 — Article 19(1)(a) — Business start-up aid for young farmers — Aid for the development of small farms — Cumulation of aid — Possibility to refuse the cumulation)

cjeu_case ·
42209

Case C-35/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus — Finland) — Criminal proceedings against A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Right of Union citizens to move freely within the territories of the Member States — Article 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — Articles 4 and 5 — Obligation to carry an identity card or a passport — Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 (Schengen Borders Code) — Annex VI — Crossing the maritime border of a Member State on board a pleasure boat — Rules on sanctions applicable when moving between Member States without an identity card or passport — Rules on daily fines in criminal cases — Calculation of the fine based on the offender’s average monthly income — Proportionality — Severity of the sanction in relation to the offence)

cjeu_case ·
42210

Case C-13/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Top System SA v Belgian State (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Legal protection of computer programs — Directive 91/250/EEC — Article 5 — Exceptions to the restricted acts — Acts necessary to enable the lawful purchaser to correct errors — Concept — Article 6 — Decompilation — Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
42213

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 – Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Concept of ‘aid’ – State resources – Selectivity.#Case T-238/19.

cjeu_case ·
42214

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 – Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Concept of ‘aid’ – State resources – Selectivity.#Case T-238/19.

cjeu_case ·
42215

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources.#Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19.

cjeu_case ·
42216

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources.#Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19.

cjeu_case ·
42217

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#AZ v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Selectivity – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-196/19.

cjeu_case ·
42218

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#AZ v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Selectivity – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-196/19.

cjeu_case ·
42219

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (Extracts).#Tempus Energy Germany GmbH and T Energy Sweden AB v European Commission.#State aid – Polish electricity market – Capacity mechanism – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Concept of doubts – Article 4(3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-167/19.

cjeu_case ·
42220

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (Extracts).#Tempus Energy Germany GmbH and T Energy Sweden AB v European Commission.#State aid – Polish electricity market – Capacity mechanism – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Concept of doubts – Article 4(3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-167/19.

cjeu_case ·