Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
41143

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Variable interest rate – Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) – Review of transparency by the national court – Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms – Consequences of a declaration of nullity – Judgment of 3 March 2020, Gómez del Moral Guasch (C‑125/18, EU:C:2020:138) – New questions.#Case C-655/20.

cjeu_case ·
41144

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia n° 38 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Variable interest rate – Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) – Review of transparency by the national court – Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms – Consequences of a declaration of nullity – Judgment of 3 March 2020, Gómez del Moral Guasch (C‑125/18, EU:C:2020:138) – New questions.#Case C-655/20.

cjeu_case ·
41145

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#„AKZ - Burgas“ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security contributions – Repayment of contributions wrongly paid – Limitation of interest on repayment – National procedural autonomy – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-602/20.

cjeu_case ·
41146

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#„AKZ - Burgas“ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ - Burgas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security contributions – Repayment of contributions wrongly paid – Limitation of interest on repayment – National procedural autonomy – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-602/20.

cjeu_case ·
41147

Case C-655/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 38 de Barcelona — Spain) — Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Variable interest rate — Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) — Review of transparency by the national court — Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms — Consequences of a declaration of nullity — Judgment of 3 March 2020, Gómez del Moral Guasch (C-125/18, EU:C:2020:138) — New questions)

cjeu_case ·
41148

Case C-602/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘AKZ — Burgas’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Burgas (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security contributions — Repayment of contributions wrongly paid — Limitation of interest on repayment — National procedural autonomy — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
41149

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Think Schuhwerk GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU Trade Mark – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing red shoe lace aglets – Rejection of application – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Essentially identical previous application – No res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-298/19.

cjeu_case ·
41150

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Think Schuhwerk GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU Trade Mark – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing red shoelace aglets – Rejection of application – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Essentially identical previous application – No res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-298/19.

cjeu_case ·
41151

Case T-298/19: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Think Schuhwerk v EUIPO (Representation of red shoe lace aglets) (EU Trade Mark — Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing red shoe lace aglets — Rejection of application — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Essentially identical previous application — No res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
41152

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Nikolaos Anastassopoulos and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Restructuring of Greek public debt – Private sector involvement – Collective action clauses – Private creditors – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Natural and legal persons – Limitation periods – Whether European Union answerable for the measures at issue – Admissibility – Strict liability – Unusual and special damage.#Case T-147/17.

cjeu_case ·
41153

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Nikolaos Anastassopoulos and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Restructuring of Greek public debt – Private sector involvement – Collective action clauses – Private creditors – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Natural and legal persons – Limitation periods – Whether European Union answerable for the measures at issue – Admissibility – Strict liability – Unusual and special damage.#Case T-147/17.

cjeu_case ·
41154

Case T-147/17: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Anastassopoulos and Others v Council and Commission (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Restructuring of Greek public debt — Private sector involvement — Collective action clauses — Private creditors — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Equal treatment — Natural and legal persons — Limitation periods — Whether European Union answerable for the measures at issue — Admissibility — Strict liability — Unusual and special damage)

cjeu_case ·
41156

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 of 17 November 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2021) 8168) (Only the Croatian, Czech, Dutch, Estonian, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovene, and Spanish texts are authentic)

decision ·