Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
36641

Case C-33/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL), Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Legislation applicable — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14(2)(a)(i) and (ii) — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 11(5) — Article 13(1)(a) and (b) — Concept of ‘operating base’ — Flight and cabin crew — Workers employed in the territory of two or more Member States — Connecting factors)

cjeu_case ·
36642

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Criminal procedure against IR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case.#Case C-569/20.

cjeu_case ·
36643

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Criminal procedure against IR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case.#Case C-569/20.

cjeu_case ·
36644

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods.#Case C-466/20.

cjeu_case ·
36645

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods.#Case C-466/20.

cjeu_case ·
36646

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 19 May 2022.#European Commission v Italian Republic and Kingdom of Spain.#Appeal – Rules on languages – Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators’ functions as investigators and team leaders – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German – Language of communication with the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) – Regulation No 1 – Staff Regulations – Article 1d(1) – Difference in treatment based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Requirement to recruit administrators who are ‘immediately operational’ – Judicial review – Standard of proof required.#Case C-635/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
36647

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 19 May 2022.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Appeal – Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German – Language of communication with the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) – Regulation No 1 – Staff Regulations of Officials – Article 1d(1) – Difference in treatment based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Requirement to recruit administrators who are ‘immediately operational’ – Judicial review – Standard of proof required.#Case C-623/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
36648

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 19 May 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Council Decision (EU) 2019/1754 – Accession of the European Union to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications – Article 3(1) TFEU – Exclusive competence of the European Union – Article 207 TFEU – Common commercial policy – Commercial aspects of intellectual property – Article 218(6) TFEU – Right of initiative of the European Commission – Modification by the Council of the European Union of the proposal from the Commission – Article 293(1) TFEU – Applicability – Article 4(3), Article 13(2) and Article 17(2) TEU – Article 2(1) TFEU – Principles of conferral of powers, of institutional balance and of sincere cooperation.#Case C-24/20.

cjeu_case ·
36649

Case C-569/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against IR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 8 — Right to be present at the trial — Information regarding the holding of the trial — Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities — Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia — Article 9 — Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case)

cjeu_case ·
36650

Case C-466/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH, RW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 9 — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 54, 110 and 111 — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Concept of ‘acquiescence’ — Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Sending of a warning letter — Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated — Effects of limitation — Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods)

cjeu_case ·