Documents : Union européenne

316836 documents
341

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigations – Confidentiality – Non-authorised disclosure of the investigation report to the press – Imputability of the leaks – Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Material and non-material damage – Burden of proof – Limitation period for actions for damages – First paragraph of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Confidentiality of legal opinions.#Case C-559/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
342

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigations – Confidentiality – Non-authorised disclosure of the investigation report to the press – Imputability of the leaks – Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Material and non-material damage – Burden of proof – Limitation period for actions for damages – First paragraph of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Confidentiality of legal opinions.#Case C-559/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
343

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.

cjeu_case ·
344

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.

cjeu_case ·
345

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#FT and RRC Sports GmbH v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) Football Agent Regulations – Rules on agents’ remuneration, agent licences, multiple representation, making an approach and the communication of certain information to FIFA, other agents, clubs and players – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices – Restrictions on competition – Concepts of anticompetitive ‘object’ and ‘effect’ – Exception to the prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) TFEU – Conditions – Exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – Conditions – Concept of ‘efficiency gains’ – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Justification – Conditions – Article 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom to provide services – Objectives – Proportionality – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing.#Case C-209/23.

cjeu_case ·
346

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#FT et RRC Sports GmbH contre Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur – Concurrence – Football professionnel – Réglementation de la Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) relative aux agents – Règles portant sur la rémunération des agents, la licence d’agent, la représentation multiple, les “approches” ainsi que sur la communication de certaines informations à la FIFA, aux autres agents, aux clubs et aux joueurs – Article 101, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Interdiction des ententes – Accords entre entreprises, décisions d’associations d’entreprises et pratiques concertées – Restrictions de la concurrence – Notions d’“objet” et d’“effet” anticoncurrentiels – Exception à l’interdiction énoncée à l’article 101, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Conditions – Exemption au titre de l’article 101, paragraphe 3, TFUE – Conditions – Notion de “gains d’efficacité” – Article 102 TFUE – Abus de position dominante – Justification – Conditions – Article 56 TFUE – Entrave à la libre prestation des services – Objectifs – Proportionnalité – Protection des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 6, paragraphe 1, premier alinéa, sous f) – Licéité du traitement – Conditions.#Affaire C-209/23.

cjeu_case ·