Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
33181

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#EKOFRUKT v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Article 25(1) – Article 26 – Annex I – Legal effects of electronic signatures – Requirements relating to an advanced electronic signature – Administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature not meeting the requirements for a ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Cumulative requirements – Consequences – Article 3(15) – Absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’ – Entry of a qualified electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider – Effect – Names of the holder of the electronic signature which have been transliterated using Latin script rather than being written in Cyrillic script as they normally are.#Case C-362/21.

cjeu_case ·
33182

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Komisia za zashtita na lichnite danni and Tsentralna izbiratelna komisia v Koalitsia „Demokratichna Bulgaria - Obedinenie“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Article 2(2)(a) – Concept of ‘activity which falls outside the scope of Union law’ – National and European elections – Article 6(1)(e) – Lawfulness of processing – Article 58 – Measure adopted by the supervisory authorities which limits or, where appropriate, prohibits the video recording of the vote count at polling stations.#Case C-306/21.

cjeu_case ·
33183

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Komisia za zashtita na lichnite danni and Tsentralna izbiratelna komisia v Koalitsia „Demokratichna Bulgaria - Obedinenie“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Article 2(2)(a) – Concept of ‘activity which falls outside the scope of Union law’ – National and European elections – Article 6(1)(e) – Lawfulness of processing – Article 58 – Measure adopted by the supervisory authorities which limits or, where appropriate, prohibits the video recording of the vote count at polling stations.#Case C-306/21.

cjeu_case ·
33184

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others v YF and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 2(1) and (2) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – National legislation which leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges is higher than that of other judges of the same rank and performing the same work – Article 1 – Purpose – Exhaustive nature of the discrimination referred to.#Case C-301/21.

cjeu_case ·
33185

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others v YF and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Oradea.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 2(1) and (2) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – National legislation which leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges is higher than that of other judges of the same rank and performing the same work – Article 1 – Purpose – Exhaustive nature of the discrimination referred to.#Case C-301/21.

cjeu_case ·
33186

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Allianz Benelux SA v État belge, SPF Finances.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 90/435/EEC – Article 4(1) – Exemption in favour of a parent company of the dividends paid by its subsidiary – Carrying over definitively taxed income surpluses to subsequent tax years – Absorption of a company with definitively taxed income surpluses by another company – National legislation limiting the transfer of those surpluses to the absorbing company.#Case C-295/21.

cjeu_case ·
33187

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Allianz Benelux SA v État belge, SPF Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 90/435/EEC – Article 4(1) – Exemption in favour of a parent company of the dividends paid by its subsidiary – Carrying over definitively taxed income surpluses to subsequent tax years – Absorption of a company with definitively taxed income surpluses by another company – National legislation limiting the transfer of those surpluses to the absorbing company.#Case C-295/21.

cjeu_case ·
33189

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#BT v Laudamotion GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Liability of air carriers for death or bodily injuries sustained by passengers – Concept of ‘bodily injury’ – Post-traumatic stress disorder suffered by a passenger during the emergency evacuation of an aircraft.#Case C-111/21.

cjeu_case ·
33190

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(b) and (e) – Principle of ‘purpose limitation’ – Principle of ‘storage limitation’ – Creation, from an existing database, of a database to carry out tests and correct errors – Further processing of the data – Compatibility of the further processing of those data with the purposes of the initial collection – Retention period in the light of those purposes.#Case C-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
33191

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(b) and (e) – Principle of ‘purpose limitation’ – Principle of ‘storage limitation’ – Creation, from an existing database, of a database to carry out tests and correct errors – Further processing of the data – Compatibility of the further processing of those data with the purposes of the initial collection – Retention period in the light of those purposes.#Case C-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
33192

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#O.T. E. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Directive 2004/81/EC – Article 6 – Scope – Third-country national claiming to be the victim of an offence related to the trafficking in human beings – Entitlement to the reflection period provided for in Article 6(1) of that directive – Prohibition on enforcing an expulsion measure – Definition – Scope – Calculation of that reflection period – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person – Transfer to the Member State responsible for examining that application for international protection.#Case C-66/21.

cjeu_case ·
33193

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#O.T. E. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Directive 2004/81/EC – Article 6 – Scope – Third-country national claiming to be the victim of an offence related to the trafficking in human beings – Entitlement to the reflection period provided for in Article 6(1) of that directive – Prohibition on enforcing an expulsion measure – Definition – Scope – Calculation of that reflection period – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person – Transfer to the Member State responsible for examining that application for international protection.#Case C-66/21.

cjeu_case ·
33195

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 20 October 2022.#Dual Prod SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca - Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Satu Mare.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Paragraph 16(1) – Authorisation to operate as a tax warehouse for products subject to excise duty – Successive suspension measures – Whether criminal in nature – Articles 48 and 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the presumption of innocence – Principle ne bis in idem – Proportionality.#Case C-412/21.

cjeu_case ·
33196

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 20 October 2022.#Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey GmbH v Arik Air Limited and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 23(c) – Stay of enforcement of a judgment certified as a European Enforcement Order – Exceptional circumstances – Concept.#Case C-393/21.

cjeu_case ·
33197

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 20 October 2022.#Criminal proceedings against MR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Bamberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 55(1)(b) – Exception to the application of the principle ne bis in idem – Offence against the security or other essential interests of the Member State – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Compatibility of a national declaration providing for an exception to the principle ne bis in idem – Criminal organisation – Financial crime.#Case C-365/21.

cjeu_case ·
33198

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 20 October 2022.#DIGI Communications NV v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) – Article 4(1) – Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) – Article 7 – Award of rights to use frequencies – Auction procedure – Holding company not registered as a provider of electronic communications services in the Member State concerned – Exclusion from the award procedure – Right of appeal against the award decision.#Case C-329/21.

cjeu_case ·
33199

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 20 October 2022.#Proceedings brought by Starkinvest SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure – Conditions for issuing a preservation order – Article 4 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Article 7 – Concept of ‘judgment requiring the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim’ – Judgment ordering a party to make a penalty payment for breach of a prohibitory order – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 55 – Scope.#Case C-291/21.

cjeu_case ·
33200

Case C-374/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v AB, CD and EF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Own resources of the European Union — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Proceedings relating to irregularities — Article 4 — Adoption of administrative measures — Article 3(1) — Limitation period for proceedings — Expiry — Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure — Article 3(2) — Period for implementation — Applicability — Starting point of the limitation period — Interruption and suspension)

cjeu_case ·