Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
32481

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Allessa GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU word mark CASSELLAPARK – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Lack of descriptive character – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-701/21.

cjeu_case ·
32482

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Zeta Farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EUPHYTOS – Earlier EU figurative mark EuPhidra – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 56(2) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 64(2) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant periods – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Classification of new or complementary evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-515/21.

cjeu_case ·
32483

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Zeta Farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EUPHYTOS – Earlier EU figurative mark EuPhidra – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 56(2) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 64(2) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant periods – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Classification of new or complementary evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-515/21.

cjeu_case ·
32484

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Ian James Bowden and Janey Young v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Europol staff – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Loss of nationality of a Member State – Termination of contract – Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS – Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS – Refusal to grant an exception – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Interest of the service – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-72/21.

cjeu_case ·
32485

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Ian James Bowden and Janey Young v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Europol staff – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Loss of nationality of a Member State – Termination of contract – Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS – Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS – Refusal to grant an exception – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Interest of the service – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-72/21.

cjeu_case ·
32486

Case T-701/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Allessa v EUIPO — Dumerth (CASSELLAPARK) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — EU word mark CASSELLAPARK — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Lack of descriptive character — Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
32487

Case T-515/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Zeta Farmaceutici v EUIPO — Specchiasol (EUPHYTOS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU wordmark EUPHYTOS — Earlier EU figurative mark EuPhidra — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 56(2) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 64(2) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relevant periods — Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
32488

Case T-72/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Bowden and Young v Europol (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Europol staff — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Loss of nationality of a Member State — Termination of contract — Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS — Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS — Refusal to grant an exception — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Length of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Interest of the service — Duty of care — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
32489

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#CWS Powder Coatings GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of studies – Substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer – Calculation of lung overload in particles – Manifest errors of assessment.#Cases T-279/20 and T-288/20.

cjeu_case ·
32490

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#CWS Powder Coatings GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of studies – Substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer – Calculation of lung overload in particles – Manifest errors of assessment.#Cases T-279/20 and T-288/20.

cjeu_case ·
32491

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

cjeu_case ·
32492

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

cjeu_case ·
32493

Joined Cases T-279/20 and T-288/20 and Case T-283/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — CWS Powder Coatings and Others v Commission (Environment and protection of human health — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 — Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1 % or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm — Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic — Reliability and acceptability of studies — Substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer — Calculation of lung overload in particles — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
32494

Case T-275/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for prestressing steel — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee — Payment by instalments on a provisional basis — Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed — Application of payments made on a provisional basis — Default interest — First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU — Unjust enrichment — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Recovery of undue payments — No legal basis — Unlawfulness)

cjeu_case ·
32498

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2306 of 23 November 2022 granting derogations to certain Member States with respect to the transmission of statistics pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards statistics on healthcare facilities, healthcare human resources and healthcare utilisation (notified under document C(2022) 8341) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Irish, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

decision ·