Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
32261

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#Mendes SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VSL3TOTAL – Earlier EU word mark VSL#3 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-678/21.

cjeu_case ·
32262

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#Mendes SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VSL3TOTAL – Earlier EU word mark VSL#3 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-678/21.

cjeu_case ·
32263

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-612/21.

cjeu_case ·
32264

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-612/21.

cjeu_case ·
32265

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for wireless remote controls – Ground for invalidity – Features of the appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-611/21.

cjeu_case ·
32266

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for wireless remote controls – Ground for invalidity – Features of appearance of a product dictated solely by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-611/21.

cjeu_case ·
32267

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#KN v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the EESC – Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the budget of the EESC for the financial year 2019 – Parliament resolution designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Protection of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Obligation of confidentiality – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-401/21.

cjeu_case ·
32268

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#KN v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the EESC – Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the budget of the EESC for the financial year 2019 – Parliament resolution designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Protection of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Obligation of confidentiality – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-401/21.

cjeu_case ·
32272

Case T-678/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Mendes v EUIPO — Actial Farmaceutica (VSL3TOTAL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark VSL3TOTAL — Earlier EU word mark VSL#3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
32273

Case T-612/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control — Ground for invalidity — Features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

cjeu_case ·
32274

Case T-611/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an accessory for wireless remote control — Ground for invalidity — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

cjeu_case ·
32275

Case T-401/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — KN v Parliament (Institutional law — Member of the EESC — Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the EESC’s budget for the 2019 financial year — Resolution of the Parliament designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment — Action for annulment — Non-actionable measure — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Protection of personal data — Presumption of innocence — Duty of confidentiality — Principle of sound administration — Proportionality — Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

cjeu_case ·
32278

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2022 (Extracts).#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#State aid – Nuclear industry – Aid planned by Hungary for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the Paks site – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Inextricable link – Promotion of nuclear energy – First paragraph of Article 192 of the Euratom Treaty – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Distortion of competition – Proportionality of the aid – Need for State intervention – Determination of the aid elements – Public procurement procedure – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-101/18.

cjeu_case ·
32280

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2022 (Extracts).#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#State aid – Nuclear industry – Aid planned by Hungary for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the Paks site – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Inextricable link – Promotion of nuclear energy – First paragraph of Article 192 of the Euratom Treaty – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Distortion of competition – Proportionality of the aid – Need for State intervention – Determination of the aid elements – Public procurement procedure – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-101/18.

cjeu_case ·