Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
31801

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Eurol BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark eurol LUBRICANTS – Earlier national word mark EUROLLUBRICANTS – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Use with the trade mark proprietor’s consent – No alteration of distinctive character – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-636/21.

cjeu_case ·
31804

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#Pierre Lannier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Locus standi – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-530/21.

cjeu_case ·
31805

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#Pierre Lannier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Locus standi – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-530/21.

cjeu_case ·
31808

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#TM v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Procedure for filling a post of [confidential] 2 Confidential information redacted. – Selection criteria – Professional experience – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Interests of the service – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-440/21.

cjeu_case ·
31809

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#TM v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Procedure for filling a post of [confidential] 1 Confidential information redacted. – Selection criteria – Professional experience – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Interests of the service – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-440/21.

cjeu_case ·
31812

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#SY v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open Competition EPSO/AD/374/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list – Action for annulment – Amendment of the notice of competition after a part of the admission tests have been carried out – Lack of legal basis – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Force majeure – Equal treatment – Entitlement to special arrangements – Organisation of the tests remotely – High pass rate of internal candidates – Action for failure to act.#Case T-312/21.

cjeu_case ·
31813

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#SY v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/374/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list – Action for annulment – Amendment of the notice of competition after a part of the eligibility tests have been completed – Lack of legal basis – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Force majeure – Equal treatment – Entitlement to special arrangements – Organisation of remote tests – High pass rate of internal candidates – Action for failure to act.#Case T-312/21.

cjeu_case ·
31814

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#SU v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract for a fixed period – Non-renewal – Renewal procedure – Taking into account of appraisal reports – Non-finalised appraisal report – Liability – Material damage – Loss of opportunity – Non-material damage – Unlimited jurisdiction – Implementation of a judgment of the General Court.#Case T-296/21.

cjeu_case ·
31815

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#SU v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract for a fixed period – Non-renewal – Renewal procedure – Taking into account of appraisal reports – Non-finalised appraisal report – Liability – Material damage – Loss of opportunity – Non-material damage – Unlimited jurisdiction – Implementation of a judgment of the General Court.#Case T-296/21.

cjeu_case ·
31816

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Decision taken by a competent authority – Authority of a third State – Review – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-182/21.

cjeu_case ·
31817

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Decision taken by a competent authority – Authority of a third State – Review – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-182/21.

cjeu_case ·
31818

Case T-717/21: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — ICA Traffic v Commission (Action for annulment — Public procurement — Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice — Supply of disinfection robots to European hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 crisis — Maximum quantity of goods to be supplied under a framework contract — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
31820

Case T-636/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Eurol v EUIPO — Pernsteiner (eurol LUBRICANTS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark eurol LUBRICANTS — Earlier national word mark EUROLLUBRICANTS — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Use with the trade mark proprietor’s consent — No alteration of distinctive character — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·