Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 946 documents
30706

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 – Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Interdependence between factors.#Case T-141/22.

cjeu_case ·
30707

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 – Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Interdependence between factors.#Case T-141/22.

cjeu_case ·
30710

Case T-141/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — Sport1 v EUIPO — SFR (SFR SPORT1) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 — Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Interdependence between factors)

cjeu_case ·
30712

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
30713

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
30716

Case T-787/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
30718

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 February 2023.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Regulatory act – Individual concern – Substantial effect on competitive position – Direct concern – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Selective nature – Advantage – Private operator test.#Case T-522/20.

cjeu_case ·
30719

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 February 2023.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Regulatory act – Individual concern – Substantial effect on competitive position – Direct concern – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Selective nature – Advantage – Private operator test.#Case T-522/20.

cjeu_case ·
30720

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Aquind Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Energy – Trans-European energy infrastructure – Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 – Delegated regulation amending the list of projects of common interest – Second paragraph of Article 172 TFEU – Refusal of a Member State to give its approval to a proposed electricity interconnector with a view to granting the status of a project of common interest – Non-inclusion by the Commission of the project in the amended list – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty.#Case T-295/20.

cjeu_case ·