Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
28701

Case C-102/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023 — HC v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Notice of competition — Assessment by the selection board of the candidate’s answers to the ‘Talent Screener’ — Non-admission to the next stage of the competition — Rules on languages — Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English and French — Plea of illegality relating to the notice of competition — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
28702

Case C-70/22, Viagogo: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Viagogo AG v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic commerce — Directive 2000/31/EC — Article 1 — Scope — Article 2(c) — Concept of ‘established service provider’ — Article 3(1) — Provision of information society services by a provider established on the territory of a Member State — Company established on the territory of the Swiss Confederation — Inapplicability ratione personae — Article 56 TFEU — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Scope — Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year — Provision of services in Italy for a period exceeding 90 days — Inapplicability ratione personae — Article 102 TFEU — Nothing in the order for reference enabling a link to be established between the dispute in the main proceedings and any abuse of a dominant position — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
28703

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Banca A v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Preşedintele ANAF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2009/133/EC – Article 7 – Merger by absorption – Purely domestic operation – Primacy of EU law outside the scope of EU law – None – Interpretation of EU law outside its scope – Jurisdiction of the Court to deliver preliminary rulings – Condition – EU law made applicable by national law directly and unconditionally.#Case C-827/21.

cjeu_case ·
28704

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Banca A v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Preşedintele ANAF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2009/133/EC – Article 7 – Merger by absorption – Purely domestic operation – Primacy of EU law outside the scope of EU law – None – Interpretation of EU law outside its scope – Jurisdiction of the Court to deliver preliminary rulings – Condition – EU law made applicable by national law directly and unconditionally.#Case C-827/21.

cjeu_case ·
28707

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#MJ v AxFina Hungary Zrt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Articles 6 and 7 – Credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency – Legal consequences of a declaration that a loan agreement is invalid because of the unfairness of a term in that agreement – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer.#Case C-705/21.

cjeu_case ·
28708

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#MJ v AxFina Hungary Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Ítélőtábla.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Articles 6 and 7 – Credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency – Legal consequences of a declaration that a loan agreement is invalid because of the unfairness of a term in that agreement – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer.#Case C-705/21.

cjeu_case ·
28709

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Brunswick Bowling Products LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Consumer protection – Directive 2006/42/EC – Protection of the health and safety of consumers and workers from risks arising from the use of machinery – Measures adopted by the Kingdom of Sweden – Prohibition on the placing on the market of a type of pinsetter machine and a supplementary kit – Withdrawal of machines already placed on the market – Decision of the European Commission declaring the measures justified.#Case C-694/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
28710

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Brunswick Bowling Products LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Consumer protection – Directive 2006/42/EC – Protection of the health and safety of consumers and workers from risks arising from the use of machinery – Measures adopted by the Kingdom of Sweden – Prohibition on the placing on the market of a type of pinsetter machine and a supplementary kit – Withdrawal of machines already placed on the market – Decision of the European Commission declaring the measures justified.#Case C-694/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
28711

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#VW v SW and Others and Legea S.r.l. v VW and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade mark law – Directive 89/104/EEC – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Exclusive rights of the trade mark proprietor – Trade mark belonging to two or more persons – Conditions on majority required between joint proprietors for granting and terminating a licence of their trade mark.#Case C-686/21.

cjeu_case ·
28712

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#VW v SW and Others and Legea S.r.l. v VW and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade mark law – Directive 89/104/EEC – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Exclusive rights of the trade mark proprietor – Trade mark belonging to two or more persons – Conditions on majority required between joint proprietors for granting and terminating a licence of their trade mark.#Case C-686/21.

cjeu_case ·
28713

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) v BB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Retirement pension – National legislation providing, with retroactive effect, for a category of civil servants previously advantaged by the national legislation relating to retirement pension rights to be treated in the same way as a category of civil servants previously disadvantaged by that legislation.#Case C-681/21.

cjeu_case ·
28714

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) v BB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Retirement pension – National legislation providing, with retroactive effect, for a category of civil servants previously advantaged by the national legislation relating to retirement pension rights to be treated in the same way as a category of civil servants previously disadvantaged by that legislation.#Case C-681/21.

cjeu_case ·
28715

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Fluvius Antwerpen v MX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Article 2(1)(a) – Concept of ‘supply of goods for consideration’ – Article 9(1) – Economic activity – Article 14(1) and (2)(a) – Supply of goods – Unlawful consumption of electricity – Principle of neutrality of VAT – Charging the consumer for compensation including the price of the electricity consumed – Regional legislation of a Member State – Taxable person – Sui generis entity mandated by municipalities – Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 13(1), third subparagraph, and Annex I – Principle of taxability of electricity distribution – Concept of ‘negligible activity’.#Case C-677/21.

cjeu_case ·
28716

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Fluvius Antwerpen v MX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Article 2(1)(a) – Concept of ‘supply of goods for consideration’ – Article 9(1) – Economic activity – Article 14(1) and (2)(a) – Supply of goods – Unlawful consumption of electricity – Principle of neutrality of VAT – Charging the consumer for compensation including the price of the electricity consumed – Regional legislation of a Member State – Taxable person – Sui generis entity mandated by municipalities – Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 13(1), third subparagraph, and Annex I – Principle of taxability of electricity distribution – Concept of ‘negligible activity’.#Case C-677/21.

cjeu_case ·
28718

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#TB v Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and 'Knor' Sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Right of information – Locus standi – Need to establish the existence of an intellectual property right in advance.#Case C-628/21.

cjeu_case ·