Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
27861

Case T-339/22: Judgement of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Chocolates Lacasa Internacional v EUIPO — Esquitino Madrid (Conguitos) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Conguitos — Earlier EU word mark Conguitos — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relative ground for invalidity — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27865

Joined Cases T-218/22 and 219/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Roxtec and Wallmax v EUIPO — Wallmax and Roxtec (Representation of a blue square containing eight concentric black circles) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative trade mark representing a blue square containing eight concentric black circles — absolute ground of invalidity — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27867

Case T-63/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Brooks England v EUIPO — Brooks Sports (BROOKS ENGLAND) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark BROOKS ENGLAND — Earlier EU word mark BROOKS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27870

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Luigi Aprile and Commerciale Italiana Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU trade mark representing a bat in an oval surround – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Distinctive character – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Restriction of the goods covered by the application for a declaration of invalidity – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-735/21.

cjeu_case ·
27871

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Luigi Aprile and Commerciale Italiana Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU trade mark representing a bat in an oval surround – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Distinctive character – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Restriction of the goods covered by the application for a declaration of invalidity – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-735/21.

cjeu_case ·
27872

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aliaksandr Bakhanovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of the sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-583/21.

cjeu_case ·
27873

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aliaksandr Bakhanovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of the sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-583/21.

cjeu_case ·
27874

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarhei Rubnikovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-582/21.

cjeu_case ·
27875

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarhei Rubnikovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-582/21.

cjeu_case ·
27876

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarheï Skryba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into and transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-581/21.

cjeu_case ·
27877

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarheï Skryba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into and transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-581/21.

cjeu_case ·
27878

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 June 2023.#TC v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Reasonable time – Burden of proof – Right to be heard – Protection of personal data – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations.#Case T-309/21.

cjeu_case ·
27879

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 June 2023.#TC v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Reasonable time – Burden of proof – Right to be heard – Protection of personal data – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations.#Case T-309/21.

cjeu_case ·
27880

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aleksandr Vasilevich Shakutin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-141/21.

cjeu_case ·