Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
27482

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Rauch Furnace Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a melting crucible – Prior design – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – No different overall impression – Disclosure of prior design – Articles 6, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Evidence filed in a language other than the language of the proceedings – Article 29(1) and (5), and Article 81(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Facts or evidence relied on for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-347/22.

cjeu_case ·
27483

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Rauch Furnace Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a melting crucible – Prior design – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – No different overall impression – Disclosure of prior design – Articles 6, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Evidence filed in a language other than the language of the proceedings – Article 29(1) and (5), and Article 81(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Facts or evidence relied on for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-347/22.

cjeu_case ·
27484

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative marks InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima – Earlier EU and national word marks EVAX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-197/22 and T-198/22.

cjeu_case ·
27485

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative marks InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima – Earlier EU and national word marks EVAX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-197/22 and T-198/22.

cjeu_case ·
27489

Case T-347/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Rauch Furnace Technology v EUIPO — Musto et Bureau (melting crucible) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Community design representing a melting crucible — Prior design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — No different overall impression — Disclosure of prior design — Articles 6, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Evidence filed in a language other than the language of the proceedings — Article 29(1) and (5), and Article 81(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Facts or evidence relied on for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
27490

Joined Cases T-197/22 and T-198/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories v EUIPO — Arbora & Ausonia (InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative marks InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima — Earlier EU and national word marks EVAX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
27491

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in China to imports of certain aluminium foil consigned from Thailand – Anti-circumvention investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sufficient evidence – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-748/21.

cjeu_case ·
27492

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in China to imports of certain aluminium foil consigned from Thailand – Anti-circumvention investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sufficient evidence – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-748/21.

cjeu_case ·
27493

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Importation of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Definition of the product concerned – Determination of the normal value – Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Report finding significant distortions in the exporting country – Burden of proof – Use of a representative country – Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury – Economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration.#Case T-326/21.

cjeu_case ·
27494

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Importation of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Definition of the product concerned – Determination of the normal value – Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Report finding significant distortions in the exporting country – Burden of proof – Use of a representative country – Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury – Economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration.#Case T-326/21.

cjeu_case ·
27495

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Madeira Free Zone – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Meaning of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration – Absolute impossibility of implementation – Limitation – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-131/21.

cjeu_case ·
27496

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Madeira Free Zone – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Meaning of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration – Absolute impossibility of implementation – Limitation – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-131/21.

cjeu_case ·
27497

Case T-748/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group and Others v Commission (Dumping — Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in China to imports of certain aluminium foil consigned from Thailand — Anti-circumvention investigation — Circumvention — Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Sufficient evidence — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
27498

Case T-326/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission (Dumping — Import of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 — Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Definition of the product concerned — Determination of the normal value — Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Report establishing significant distortions in the exporting country — Burden of proof — Reference to a representative country — Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Injury — Economic factors and incices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration)

cjeu_case ·
27499

Case T-131/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Região Autónoma da Madeira v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by Portugal — Madeira Free Zone — Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Meaning of ‘State aid’ — Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of sound administration — Absolute impossibility of implementation — Limitation — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)

cjeu_case ·
27500

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#UG v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination of contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Incompetence – Conduct in the service and attitude at work incompatible with the interests of the service – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Entitlement to parental leave – Article 42a of the Staff Regulations – Application of the minimum requirements in Directives 2010/18/EU and 2002/14/EC to officials and other servants of the European Union – Articles 27, 30 and 33 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Workers’ right to information and consultation – Article 24b of the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal – Indirect challenge to definitive acts – Inadmissibility – Principle of proportionality – Misuse of powers – Liability.#Case T-571/17 RENV.

cjeu_case ·