Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
22661

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Sergueï Mndoiants v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-390/22.

cjeu_case ·
22662

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Sergueï Mndoiants v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-390/22.

cjeu_case ·
22663

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Michael Heßler v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – Tax abatement – Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Abatement for a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Claim for annulment – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Partial inadmissibility – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-369/22.

cjeu_case ·
22664

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Michael Heßler v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – Tax abatement – Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Abatement for a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Claim for annulment – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Partial inadmissibility – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-369/22.

cjeu_case ·
22665

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 December 2023.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Application of restriction on entry to a national of a Member State – Free movement of Union citizens.#Case T-313/22.

cjeu_case ·
22666

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 December 2023.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Application of restriction on entry to a national of a Member State – Free movement of Union citizens.#Case T-313/22.

cjeu_case ·
22667

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Vadim Nikolaevich Moshkovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on movement – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintaining of the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Criterion of a leading businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of Russia – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to respect for private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-283/22.

cjeu_case ·
22668

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Vadim Nikolaevich Moshkovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on movement – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintaining of the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Criterion of a leading businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of Russia – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to respect for private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-283/22.

cjeu_case ·
22669

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 December 2023.#Ekaterina Islentyeva v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on any non-Russian-registered aircraft owned, chartered or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in, taking off from, or overflying the territory of the European Union – Article 4e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Lack of locus standi – Inadmissibility.#Case T-233/22.

cjeu_case ·
22670

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 December 2023.#Ekaterina Islentyeva v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on any non-Russian-registered aircraft owned, chartered or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in, taking off from, or overflying the territory of the European Union – Article 4e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Lack of locus standi – Inadmissibility.#Case T-233/22.

cjeu_case ·
22671

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Pharmaselect International Beteiligungs GmbH and OmniActive Health Technologies Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark LUTAMAX – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-221/22 and T-242/22.

cjeu_case ·
22672

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#Pharmaselect International Beteiligungs GmbH and OmniActive Health Technologies Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark LUTAMAX – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-221/22 and T-242/22.

cjeu_case ·
22678

Case T-564/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Pierre Balmain v EUIPO — Story Time (Representation of a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain — Earlier national figurative mark representing a lion’s head encircled by dots — Relative ground for refusal — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·