Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
21945

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 January 2024.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-553/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
21946

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 January 2024.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-553/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
21947

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.

cjeu_case ·
21948

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.

cjeu_case ·
21949

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 25 January 2024.#FV v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Family allowance – Worker having custody of a child placed with that worker by a court order – Resident worker and non-resident worker – Difference in treatment – No justification.#Case C-27/23.

cjeu_case ·
21950

Case C-54/23, Laudamotion and Ryanair: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WY v Laudamotion GmbH, Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(1) — Article 7(1) — Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight — Loss of time — Replacement flight booked by the passenger — Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time — No compensation)

cjeu_case ·
21951

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Proceedings brought by Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, justice and security – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Third indent of Article 1 – Concept of ‘instrumentality’ – Article 2(1) – Obligation for Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities from criminal offences – Vehicle used to transport excise goods without a tax marking in breach of the law.#Case C-722/22.

cjeu_case ·
21952

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Proceedings brought by Sofiyski gradski sad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, justice and security – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Third indent of Article 1 – Concept of ‘instrumentality’ – Article 2(1) – Obligation for Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities from criminal offences – Vehicle used to transport excise goods without a tax marking in breach of the law.#Case C-722/22.

cjeu_case ·
21953

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 98/83/EC – Quality of water intended for human consumption – Article 4(1) – Obligation on Member States to take the measures necessary to ensure that water intended for human consumption is wholesome and clean – Annex I, Part B – Exceedance of limit values for concentrations of trihalomethanes in drinking water – Article 8(2) – Obligation on Member States to take the necessary remedial action as soon as possible to restore the quality of the water and to give priority to their enforcement action.#Case C-481/22.

cjeu_case ·
21954

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 98/83/EC – Quality of water intended for human consumption – Article 4(1) – Obligation on Member States to take the measures necessary to ensure that water intended for human consumption is wholesome and clean – Annex I, Part B – Exceedance of limit values for concentrations of trihalomethanes in drinking water – Article 8(2) – Obligation on Member States to take the necessary remedial action as soon as possible to restore the quality of the water and to give priority to their enforcement action.#Case C-481/22.

cjeu_case ·
21957

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Em akaunt BG ЕООD v Zastrahovatelno aktsionerno druzhestvo Armeets AD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Setting of minimum fee amounts by a lawyers’ professional organisation – Decision by an association of undertakings – Court prohibited from ordering reimbursement of fees in an amount less than those minimum amounts – Restriction of competition – Justifications – Legitimate objectives – Quality of the services provided by the lawyers – Implementation of the judgment of 23 November 2017, CHEZ Elektro Bulgaria and FrontEx International (C‑427/16 and C‑428/16, EU:C:2017:890) – Whether the Wouters case-law may be relied on in a situation involving a restriction of competition by object.#Case C-438/22.

cjeu_case ·
21958

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Em akaunt BG ЕООD v Zastrahovatelno aktsionerno druzhestvo Armeets AD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Setting of minimum fee amounts by a lawyers’ professional organisation – Decision by an association of undertakings – Court prohibited from ordering reimbursement of fees in an amount less than those minimum amounts – Restriction of competition – Justifications – Legitimate objectives – Quality of the services provided by the lawyers – Implementation of the judgment of 23 November 2017, CHEZ Elektro Bulgaria and FrontEx International (C‑427/16 and C‑428/16, EU:C:2017:890) – Whether the Wouters case-law may be relied on in a situation involving a restriction of competition by object.#Case C-438/22.

cjeu_case ·
21959

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Obshtina Pomorie v 'ANHIALO AVTO' OOD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Public service contracts – Public service obligations – Public service compensation – Article 4(1)(b) – Mandatory content of public service contracts – Parameters for calculating public service compensation – Determination of prior, objective and transparent parameters – Absence of competitive tendering procedure – Application of the rules for calculating compensation contained in the annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Conditions laid down by the national legislation for the payment of compensation – Determination of the amount of compensation in the law approving the State budget for the year concerned and payment of that amount to the competent national authority – Setting parameters for calculating compensation by reference to general rules.#Case C-390/22.

cjeu_case ·
21960

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Obshtina Pomorie v 'ANHIALO AVTO' OOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Public service contracts – Public service obligations – Public service compensation – Article 4(1)(b) – Mandatory content of public service contracts – Parameters for calculating public service compensation – Determination of prior, objective and transparent parameters – Absence of competitive tendering procedure – Application of the rules for calculating compensation contained in the annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Conditions laid down by the national legislation for the payment of compensation – Determination of the amount of compensation in the law approving the State budget for the year concerned and payment of that amount to the competent national authority – Setting parameters for calculating compensation by reference to general rules.#Case C-390/22.

cjeu_case ·