Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
20263

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#YG and NI v AXA Bank Europe SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-628/23.

cjeu_case ·
20264

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#YG and NI v AXA Bank Europe SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-628/23.

cjeu_case ·
20266

C-628/23, AXA Bank Europe and Others: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék – Hungary) – YG, NI v AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
20267

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#T. S.A. v Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-22/22.

cjeu_case ·
20268

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#T. S.A. v Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-22/22.

cjeu_case ·
20269

Case C-22/22, T. (Audiovisual programmes for children): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – T. S.A. / Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
20270

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy allowing the reopening of civil proceedings closed by a final judgment – Grounds – Subsequent decision of a constitutional court declaring that a provision of national law on the basis of which that judgment was given is incompatible with the Constitution – Loss of the opportunity to take action on account of a breach of the law – Broad application of that remedy – Alleged infringement of EU law resulting from a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice ruling under Article 267 TFEU on the interpretation of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Default judgment – Failure of the court hearing the case to ascertain of its own motion whether contractual terms are unfair.#Case C-582/21.

cjeu_case ·
20271

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy Warszawa-Praga w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy allowing the reopening of civil proceedings closed by a final judgment – Grounds – Subsequent decision of a constitutional court declaring that a provision of national law on the basis of which that judgment was given is incompatible with the Constitution – Loss of the opportunity to take action on account of a breach of the law – Broad application of that remedy – Alleged infringement of EU law resulting from a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice ruling under Article 267 TFEU on the interpretation of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Default judgment – Failure of the court hearing the case to ascertain of its own motion whether contractual terms are unfair.#Case C-582/21.

cjeu_case ·
20273

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2021/1117 – Implementing Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community (2021-2026) – Signing on behalf of the European Union – Institution competent to designate the person empowered to sign – Article 13(2) TEU – Observance by each institution of the limits of the powers conferred on it – Mutual sincere cooperation between the EU institutions – Article 16(1) and (6) TEU – Power of the Council of the European Union to make policies and plan the EU’s external action – Article 17(1) TEU – Power of the European Commission to ensure the external representation of the European Union – Article 218 TFEU.#Case C-551/21.

cjeu_case ·
20274

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2021/1117 – Implementing Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community (2021-2026) – Signing on behalf of the European Union – Institution competent to designate the person empowered to sign – Article 13(2) TEU – Observance by each institution of the limits of the powers conferred on it – Mutual sincere cooperation between the EU institutions – Article 16(1) and (6) TEU – Power of the Council of the European Union to make policies and plan the EU’s external action – Article 17(1) TEU – Power of the European Commission to ensure the external representation of the European Union – Article 218 TFEU.#Case C-551/21.

cjeu_case ·