India - Third National Highway Project : environmental assessment (Vol. 9 of 10) : Environmental management plan - Construction package 5-C

E-339 VOL. 9 INDIA THIRD NATIONAL HIGHWAY WORLD BANK PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE V-C NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA NEW DELHI (Ministry of Surface Transport) March, 2000  TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ......................................I B. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT ...................................... I C. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................... 2 C. I INTRODUCTION ................. .......................................................................................................................... 2 C." OBJEcriVESOF ni EMP ..................................................................... 2 C. -. I. Design .Stage ......................................................................................................................................7 C. 2. 2 ConstructionSuge ..................................................................S. I C.2.3 Operation Stage ....... ............................................................ . C . MlI H\NG THIE EMP O hlJ E s I I X s..................................................................... 3 (C. 3 1 Commitment t) addrL?ss cunironmnentul leulth. safeny and social impucts .. 3 C. 3.2 Comnmitment/or f Cnst1ant dlialogue with the public and interested stuaAchoiders .......... .................... 3 C . 3.3 Commitment relatedi to training .................................................................. 3 C . 3. 4 Comm itment to meet legal requirements ...........3....................................................... 3 D. CRITICAL IMPACTS TO BE ADDRESSED- PACKAGE V-C .............................................................. 3 E. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) .................................................................. 4 F. MONITORING PROGRAMME .................................................................. 19 F. I PERFORMANCE INDIC ATORS (PIS) ..................................................................... 1 9 F.2 SEIECTION OF INDICATORS FOR MONITORING .......................... ................... : . .................... 19 F. 2. 1 .4mbient .4ir Qualit .4.40 Mo .onitoring ............................ 19 . 2. 2 $uter Qua/int Monitoring ................. 20 F 2.3 .Noise level .lonitoring .................. F. 2.4 Success of Revegetation ................. 23 F. .5 Soil Contamnination ................. 23 F.3 MONITORING PLAN ..23 G. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT-BUDGET ....................................... 25  Following is the scope of work as stated in the ToR for feasibility studies and detailed engineering consultancy services, The scope will consist mainly widening of the existing two lane to four lane within the RoW, inter alia including flxation of alignment alignment5 of the proposed widening work, improvements, if any. Required to the existing alignment, identification and fixation of alignments of short bypasses, identilfcation of locations of service roads, identification, location and design of toll plazas etc. necessary arboriculture along the highway and plantation on the median strips compatible with the surrounding landscape shall be suttably suggested. "..T he Consultant shall undertake a detailed environmental study in accordance with the standards prescribed by GoZ and World Sank and will make suitable recommendations and prepare appropriate, mitigation plan and resettlement action plans The Engineering design of the project wlll absorb all acceptable recommendations emerging out of the environmental studies." C. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN C.1 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) consists of the set of mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during the design, construction and operation stages of the project to eliminate adverse environmental impacts, to offset them, or to reduce them to acceptable levels. The plan also includes the actions needed for the implementation of these measures. The major components of the Environmental Management Plan are * Mitigation of potentially adverse impacts & Monitoring during project implementation and operation * Institutional Capacity Building and Training - Implementation Schedule and Environmental Cost Estimates Integration of EMP with Project planning, design, construction and operation. C.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE EMP The main aim of the Environmental Management Plan is to ensure that the various adverse impacts are mitigated and the positive impacts are enhanced. The objectives of the EMP at various stages of the project planning and implementation are as follows: C.2.1 Design Stage * To have minimum impact on road side trees, forestation and ground cover . To keep land acquisition and building demolition at a minimum * To provide maximum safety to the highway users and road side communities as well as segregation of local and slow moving traffic in the congested areas * To develop a design that incorporates environmental safeguards and * To provide mitigation measures to all expected environmental degradation C.2.2 Construction Stage * To prevent and reduce the negative environmental impacts of the project by implementable mitigation measures, to be carried out by the Contractor. . To ensure that the provisions of the EMP are strictly followed and implemented by strengthening implementation arrangements. C.2.3 Operation Stage * To prevent deterioration of environment components of air, water, soil, noise etc. * To improve the safety of the highway users and road side communities 2  L,.3 MEETING THE EMP OBJECTIVES The following commitments are important to effectively implement the EMP and have been adopted to address the various objectives of the EMP. C.3.1 Commitment to address environmental health, safety and social impacts To improve the environmental conditions, including areas such as environmental health, safety and social impacts, measures have been suggested and included as part of the EMP. Such measures will be continuously developed as an interactive process. C.3.2 Commitment for constant dialogue with the public and interested stakeholders The community consultation process was carried out right from the inception stage of the project. Continuous dialogue with local inhabitants and stakeholders inciuding public agencies has been established on various environmental issues to obtain their feedback. Consultation would continue throughout the implementation Stage of the project. C.3.3 Commitment related to training For the effective implementation of the EMP measures proposed, sustainable institutional arrangements have been proposed. To educate and train the PIU, the personnel of the Construction Supervision Consultants and the Contractors, an extensive training schedule has been worked out as part of the EMP. The training programme will be implemented as per the schedule proposed. C.3.4 Commitment to meet legal requirements The legal requirements, procedures, etc., that are necessary or mandatory for the commencement of the project have been met. The conditions stipulated by the various-Statutory Authorities as the State Pollution Control Boards, Forest Departments etc. will be complied with. D. CRITICAL IMPACTS TO BE ADDRESSED - PACKAGE V-C On the basis of the assessment of the potential impacts, the critical environmental components that need to be addressed in the Environmental Management Plan have been identified. The most critical issues to be addressed at various locations along the project corridor are described in Table 2 below. Table 2: Critical Environmental Issues to be Addressed Critical Environmental Issues | Location High Pollutant Concentrations - Poor Air Quality Along the congested settlements and intersections Continuous exposure to high noise levels Along the congested settlements and sensibve land uses. Affecting water resources Community and village ponds in the direct influence area Removal of vegetative cover/ roadside tree plantations Along the whole stretch Encroachment onto forest areas Protected Forest (KM 326- KM329.6) Loss of productive agricultural lahds | Marginal in Bypass Soil erosion along the highway Not anticipated Soil Contamination Not anticipated Pedestnan and Traffic Safety More pronounced in major settlements Traffic congestion due to encroachment within the existing RoW Environmental Quality at Sensitive Receptors Hospitals, educational institutions and other sensitive iand uses 3  E~. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) --he Environmental Management Plan is meant for mitigation/management/avoidance of the negative Impacts and the enhancement of the various environmental components along the project package. For each measure on the various environmental components to be taken, its location, timeframe, implementation and overseeing/supervising responsibilities are listed. The measures adopted and/or to be adopted during the different stages of the project have been detailed in Table 3. 4  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.PLAN P.ACKAGE V-C Table 3: Environmental Management Plan - Package VC Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional re!.por. :E i ity issue/ to contract l component W _ documents j.. ___________ { __ .. _______ _ Implementation Supei-vision DESIGN/ PRE-CONSTRUCTION STAGE 1. ALIGNMENT . ._._._. D.1.1. 1.2 km Service roads on both sides with raised CW. Km. 332.45-333.65, During the Project Design PIU, NHAI Constricted At grade level pedestrian crossing has been provided Bagodiar Design Stage preparation cost Consultant,Forest sections/ Department settlements 5.2 km. diversion road as a bye-pass has been Km. 352.25-357.60 at suggested to avoid the most critically congested Dumri-Isri Bazar area. 1100 m service road provided at grade level. Km. 375.15-376.25, Topchanchi 2. LAND D.2.1. At all critical slopes along the roadsides, turfing has 79 Kms During the Project Design Consultant PIU, NHAI Embankment been suggested to protect the slopes. This will Design Stage preparation cost slopes follow the recommended practice for treatment of embankment slopes for erosion control, IRC: 56- 1974. D.2.2 Road The raising of the proposed pavement by 0.6 to 1.5 Along settlements Inunclation m from the existing level in market places will avoid inundation D.2.3. Quarries Existing licensed quarries that are already in All selected quarry and During the Project Design PIU, NHAI and Borrow operation have been recommended. borrow pits given in Design Stage preparation cost Consultant, Forest Areas Non-productive, barren lands, raised lands, river Appendix 1. Department beds, waste lands have been recommended for borrowing earth. Through community consultation with the villagers and interactions with State Department of Fisheries, low lying areas, wastelands that have a potential of being developed into fish ponds/ pisciculture have been recommended for borrow areas. 5  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents Implementation Supervision D.2.4 Borrow pit will be selected from wasteland outside All borrow areas identified Modrification of the roadlandl; for the project given in Laiidforini Fronri lihiimps above the general giotind level within Table 1. the roadland; By excavating tank; From land acquired temporary outside the roadland; From mounds resulting from the digging of well and lowering of fields in vicinity of the road. When it becomes necessary to borrow earth from temporarily acquired cultivated lands, the depth of borrow pits will not exceed 45cm. If the land is in use for agricultural purpose and has become highland and having irrigation problem, in such cases with the consent of the land owner it could be used as borrow and excavated maximum up to a depth of o00 cm. 3. WATER D.3.i. Water Compensatory Km. 334, 338,24, 348.9m During the Project Design Consultant PIU, NHAI SOuices Sonie of the water bodies which are community 381.8, 387.75, 389.50 Design Stage preparation cost pond and perennial in nature. These will be protected with 2m high embankment. Particularly on the highway side. These ponds will be excavated to increase the depth of the pond. Protection Some ponds are close to pavement shoulder; less Km. 347.77, 351.65 than Oim distance. These slopes of these ponds 3Km 13, 351.25, 2 have to be modified so that the water bodies are at 68. 381.325 384.1 least lOm away from the pavement shoulder. Enhancement Some ponds are close but beyond 10m from the pavement shoulder. These ponds only need Im high Km. 324.75, 353.5, 383.9, earthen pavement so that surface water does not 386.02, 388.15, 395.35, contaminate these water bodies. 397.350 6  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component . . ... . _. _ ... ...... . . documents ___ . . . . . . .... . Implementation Supervision D.3.2. Draina(le The (drains will be suitably modified so that highway All the During the Project Design Consultant PIU, NHAI does not obstruct these drains. It has been rivers/streams/canals Design Stage preparation cost incorporated in the enqlineering design. ftun(l below standard. The proposed project alignment has been adequately provided with necessary engineering solution. This has been done on the basis of highest flood level data for the past 50 years. 4. FLORA AND FAUNA D.4.1. Roadside Trees saved by expanding the road on one side in Throughout Project During the Rs. 15.30 lacs DFO, Design li ' 'Al plantation uninhabited stretches. Corridor within ROW Design Stage + 6.75 lacs for Consultant, PIU, Trees will be removed with prior approval of DFO. additional tree NHAI Compensatory afforestation as per Forest plantation if land conservation Act 1980 will be adopted available. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL QUAULTY D.5. 1. Air Quality Improving road geometry and widening of road to Throughout Project During the Project Design Consultant PIU, NHAI smoothen traffic flow. Corridor, especially at Design Stage preparation cost sensitive locations Pavement roughness condition will be improved to Bagodar at km., 333 Isri a level less than 3000 mm / KM. This will be done Bazaar at km. 356, Barwa through appropriate pavement designs Adda at km. 398, Plantation will be done on both sides of the road Topchanchi at km. 375, with trees with suitable leaf area like Neem to RaiganI at km,. 389 reduce the SPM and noise levels. Median verges will be planted with shrubs, which will act as absorbent to keep the traffic air quality at low level. 7  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN eACKAGc V C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents . Implementation Supervision D.5.2, Noise Removal of bottlenecks and relieving congestion in Throughout Project Dur-ing the Project Design Consultant PIU, NHAI levels built-up stretches through improved design. Corridor, especially at Design Stage preparation cost limprovement of junctions/intersections. sensitive locations Segregation of slow and fast moving traffic. Plantation will be done with mixed and large leaf Low at: area, evergreen species with some deciduous Kim. 349, KUlgo village species on the slope portion of the proposed Km. 385, Agricultural Field hlighway. Km. 333, Bagodar Places that are categorised as highly critical will be Km. 353, Dumri provided with a noise barrier like a boundary wall . 3 along with shrubs plantation in front of them, such Km. 375, topchanchi as Schools and Hospitals. Km. 388, Rajganj Km. 398, Barwa Adda Places that are categorised as critical will be planted with shrubs to provide the required noise barrier. igh.ly_Criticl: K_. 323.56 K.m. 37Q.15 Km. 377l75 6. UTILITIES D.6.1. All utilities, likely to be impacted will be relocated As per the utility relocation During the Project PIU, NHAI, PIU, NHAI Utility lines / with prior approval of the concerned agencies. drawings prepared Design Stage preparation cost Concerned community All community utilities likely to be impacted, such as separately for this project. Government utilities sources of water will be relocated to suitable places, Departments identified based on community needs. 7. CULTURAL HERITAGE D.7,1. Alignment will be suitably rerouted to At locations of cultural During the Project PIU, NHAI, NGOs PIU, NHAI Cultural avoid/minimize impact to cultural property properties listed in Design Stage preparation cost and R&R unit properties Engineering solutions to be designed to minimize Appendix 4 ____ ____ ____ im pact_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8. ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 8  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V- Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsiv ty | issue/ to contract component . .. documents. ......... . .. _ . .... ... . ._ u _. __ _ __ Implemenbtion .............mpeetation Supervision D.8.1. Accidents Design Improvemrents at curves, KM 180 to KM 398.75 During the Project Design Consultant PIU, NHAI Segregating slow moving traffic in the market places Design Stage preparation cost by service lanes. Service road at: Provision of wider median in rural stretches and KM 332.45 to 333.65 plaritation of shrubs/uridertrees to avoid the glare of KM 352.25 to 357.60 vehicles moving in opposite directions during night. KM 375.15 to 376.25 Provision of proper signage. Proper lighting arrangerments will be made. CONSTRUCTION STAGE 1. SOIL - . C.li. Soil In borrow pits, the depth of the pit will be regulated Throughout Project During Contractor SC, Erosion that the sides of the excavation will have a slope not corridor, borrow pits and construction PIU,NHAI steeper than 1: 4, from the edge of the final section service roads of bank. Soil erosion checking measures such as the formation of sediment basins, slope drains, etc, will be carried out. Wherever there are earth materials to be cut for the road alignment, care will be taken in the rolling terrain where the slope grades are more than 1.5 percent so that cut side of the earth is not absolutely vertical. It will have gentle slope while __ __. _ cutting. C.1.2. Loss of Normally agricultural areas will be avoided for All throughout project During Contractor - SC, topsoil borrowing of materials. corridor construction PIU,NHAI C.1.3. Construction vehicles, machinery and equipment will Throughout Project During Engineering cost Contractor SC, Compaction of move, or be stationed in the designated RoW, to . Corridor construction PIU,NHAI soil avoid compaction of soil. _ .___._._._._._. 9  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents Implementation u oisic C.1.4. Borrowing No eartlh will be borrowed from within the RoW All boirow areas selected During Contracto. of Earth Non-productive, barren lands, raised lands, river construjction IL beds, waste lands have been recommended for borrowing earth. If new borrow areas are selected, there will be no loss of productive soil, and environmental considerations are to be met with. If vehicles carrying materials from borrow areas are passing through some villages, the excavation and carrying of earth will be done during day time only. The unpaved surfaces used for the haulage of borrow materials will be maintained properly Precautionary measures as the covering of vehicles will be taken to avoid spillage during transport of borrow materials. To avoid any embankment slippages, the borrow areas will not be dug continuously Replantation of trees in borrow areas will be carried out if desired C.1.5. Quarry The quarry material will be obtained frori licensed All quarry sites selected During Engineering cost Contractor SC, sites. construction PIU,NHAI C. 1.6. Construction vehicles and equipments will be Throughout Project During Engineering cost Contractor SC, Contamination of maintained and refuelled in such a fashion that Corridor borrow areas construction PIU,NHAI soil from fuel oil/diesel spillage does not contaminate the soil. and lubricants Fuel storage and refuelling sites will be kept away Service stations from drainage channels and important water bodies. construction sites and ._____ _______________________________ camps _ __________. 10  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents Implemenaion 1 Sup- sio| C. 1.7. Earth, if required, will be dumped in selected & All construction sites During Engineering cost Contractor l Contanination of approved area by the engineers All spoils will be Throtighiout Project construction P[l. . soil from disposed off as desired and the site will he fully Corridor construction cleaned before handing over. wastes and The construction wastes including bituminous waste quarry materials will be dumped in selected pits, developed on infertile land. Non-bituminous wastes from construction activities can be dumped in borrow pits and covered with a layer of the conserved topsoil. Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an ________.___ identified dumping site approved by the SC 2. WATER C.2.1. Water Water sources as ponds etc. impacted will be As per Appendix 3 Durinig Rs. 0.6 million Contractor . SC, bodies replaced and compensated for immediately. construction for enhancement PIU,NHAI Desired measures to prevent temporary or of ponds permanent damage to water bodies identified C.2.2. Other Any community water source as wells, tube-wells, All community/private During Engineering cost Contractor SC, Water sources etc. lost incidentally will be replaced Immediately. water sources construction + Rs. 0.56 PIU,NHAI millions for Before and protection works during the for Ponds commencem + 0.98 millions ent of for relocation of .____ construction Handpumps,etc. C.2.3. Drainage At cross drainage structures, the earth, stone or any Throughout Project During Engineering cost Contractor SC, and run-off other construction material will be properly disposed Corridor construction PIU,NHAI . off so as not to block the flow of water. 11  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component . . . . . documents .. . .. . . . . Implementation Supervision C. 2.4 ConstrLction work close to the streams or other Throuighout Project During Engineering cost Contractor SC, Contaminiation of water bodies will be avoided, especially during Corridlor near water construction PIU,NHAI water from monsoon period. sources and after construction All necessary precautions will be taken to construct waste temporary or permanent devices to prevent water pollution due to increased siltation and turbidity. All necessary measures will be taken to prevent earthworks and stone works from impeding rivers, streams and water canals or existing drainage system. Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approved disposal site. Water quality to be monitored as per monitoring Kulgo Nadi (349) Pond at Water quality plan Bagodar (334) to be monitored at Gorhar River (317) Kulgo 349) Pond at Bagodar (kmn _____ ____________ __ _. _. _ _ ___ __ __ 334) C.2.5. To avoid contamination from fuel and lubricants, the Throughout Project During Engineering cost Contractor SC, Contamination of vehicles and equipments will be properly maintained Corridor, near water construction PIU,NHAI water from fuLfl and refueled. sources and lubricants Oil and grease traps will be provided at fuelling locations, to prevent contamination of water. The slopes of embankment leading to water bodies Rs. 70,000 per will be modified and rechanelised so that Rs7, contatminants do not enter the water body. pond C.2.6. Sanitationm The construction camps will be located away from At Construction camp During Engineering cost Contractor SC and waste the habitation. locations, wherever located construction PIU,N -Al disposal in The sewage system for such camps will be properly along the Project corridor construction designed and built so that no water pollution takes camps place to any water body or watercourse, The workplace will have proper medical facilites. 12  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental l Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigatlon Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents . Implemeneriltation Supervision C. 2./. Uste of The clonraclor will make anrangemients for water Thtiortigliotit Project Dtjintgo Engineering cost Conttactot SC, w rter for rr(lqrrred for constructioln in stich a way that the Cori(kor colistriictiorr PIU,NHAI ron,islrction water availability and supply to nearby commnunities winaini rirraffe(ted. Wastage of water during the construction will be minimized. 3. AIR C.3.1. Emission All vehicles, equipment and machinery used for Bagodar (333) During Contractor SC, from construction will be regularly maintained to ensure construction PIU,N I Al construction that the pollution emission levels conform to the Rajganj (389) and after vehicles and SPCB norms. machinery Reguiar monitoring of SPM/RSPM/Pb/CO/HC/Nox Rs. 0.072 million once every 3 months during the construction, will be for air quiality coiidLicted. f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nariagerrlent The asphalt plants, crushers and the batching plants will be sited at least 800 m in the downwind direction from the nearest human settlement. All precautions to reduce the level of dust emissions Throughout Project During Engineering cost Contractor SC, C.3.2. Dust and from the hot mix plants, crushers and batching Corridor construction PIU,NHAI its treatment plants will be taken up. The hot-mix plants, crushers and batching plants will be sited at least 800m downwind from the nearest habitation. The hot mix plant will be fitted with dust extraction units. Water will be sprayed in the lime/cement and earth mixing sites, asphalt mixing site and temporary service and access roads. After compacting, water will be sprayed on the earthwork regularly to prevent dust. Vehicles delivering material like cement will be covered. 4. NOISE LEVELS ______ _ 13  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost institutional responsititity issue/ to contract component documents Implementation Supervision CA. I. Noise The plants and equjiprnent used for construction will Throriojhout Project During the Contractor SC, froni vehildes, strictly conforimi to CPCB noise standards. Corridor conistruction, PIU,NHAI asphalt plants Vehicles and equipments used will be fitted with till the and equipnienis silencer. closure of Noise standards of industrial enterprises will be such sites strictly enforced to protect construction workers from severe noise impacts. Bagodar (km. 333) Noise level to be rnonitored as per monitoring plan Rajganj (km. 389) Rs. 0.036 millron for noise .________ management C.4.2. Noise Blasting as per Indian Explosives Act will be Quarry sites During Engineering cost Contractor SC, from blasting adopted. construction PlU,NHAI operations People living near such blasting sites will have prior information of operational hours. Blasting will not be undertaken in night hours. Material haulage roads will be properly regulated. Workers at blasting sites will be provided with __________ earpfugs. C.4.3 Noise Construction of noise barriers in form of walls and Sensitive locations During Rs. 0.5 million Contractor SC, barriers vegetation at locations with high noise levels identified construction PIU,NHAI ._____ exceeding CPCB norms 5. FLORA C.5.1. Loss or Area of tree plantation cleared will be replaced Throughout Project Just before Rs. 0.158 million Forest SC, damage to according to compensatory Afforestation Policy Corridor the for tree cleaning Department UP PIU,NHAI vegetation under Forest Conservation Act-1980. beginning of + Rs. 0.945 Apart from trees earmarked for felling, no additional the million for tree clearing within the RoW will be carried out. construction plantation in Replantation of tree species along ne-w ROW. median Plantation of shrubs and under trees in the median. 14  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component ... . .... . . .. .. documents ... ... ... . . . . . Implementation Supervision C.'.7. Construction vehicles, machinery and equipment will Throughout Project Jujst before Forest SC, Compaction of move or be stationed in the designated area only Corridor commenicemin Department UP PIU,iIAI veletdlinon (RoW or Col, as applicable), to prevent comlpdction ent of of vegetation. construction While operating on temporarily acquired land for traffic detours, storage, material handling or any other construction related or incidental activities, it will be ensured that the trampling of soil and damage to naturally occurring herbs and grasses will be avoided. 6. FAUNA C.6.1. Loss, Construction workers will be directed not to disrupt Thlroughout Project LDuring Not needed Contractor SC, damage or or damage the fauna. Corridor construction PIU,NHAI disruption to Hunting will be striclly prohibited faunia _.._. 7. SAFETY AND ACCIDENT RISKS To ensure safe construction in the temporary Throughout Project l During Engineering Cost Contractor SC, C.7.1. Accideni accesses during construction, lighting devices and Corridor constrLuction PIU,NHA1 risks from safety signal devices will be installed. construction Traffic rules and regulations will be strictly adhered activites to. At blasting sites, the blasting time, signal and guarding will be regulated. Prior to blasting the site will be thoroughly inspected. Blasting will not be carried out during rush hours Safety of workers undertaking various operations during construction will be ensured by providing helmets, masks, safety goggles, etc The electrical equipment will be checked regularly At every work place, a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials, a mode of transport (ambulance), nursing staff and an attending doctor will be provided. 15  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTF PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure. Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents ImIplementation Supervision C.7.2. Healthi At every workplace, good, and sufficient water Throughout Project During Engineering Cost Contractor SC, ISSues supply will be maintained to avoid Corridor construction PIU,NHAI watetborne/water-related and water- baseed diseases and to secure the health of workers Consti uction camps Adequate drainage, sanitation and waste disposal will be provided at workplaces. Preventive Medical care will be provided to workers. 8. CULTURAL PROPERTIES C.8. 1. Damage Relocation of cultural properties Throughout Project Before Covered in RAP Contractor and SC, or loss of cultural If any valuable or invaluable articles.such as fabrics, Corridor construction . Archaeology PIU,NHAI properties coins, artefacts, structures, or other archaeological starts Department U.P. relics are discovered, the excavation will be stopped and Arclaeology Department Bihar. will be intimated. During construction 9. ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT . C.9.1. Roadside Avenue plantation of foliage shade trees mixed with Throughout Project During Rs. 0.945 Contractor SC, landscape flowering trees, shrubs and aromatic plants as per Corridor construction millions PIU,NHAI development detailed schemes prepared, will be carried out. C.9.2. Roadside Restoration and improvement of bus shelters, bus Throughout Project During Engineering Cost Contractor SC, amenities bays and truck lay byes as per detailed design will . Corridor construction P IUNHAT be carried out Road furniture including footpaths, railings, traffic signs, speed zone signs, etc. will be erected as per design __. ___ _ __ _ _ _ _. C.9.3. Cultural Enhancement of all cultural properties and the Throughout Project During Rs. 0.98 millions Contractor SC, properties access roads will be completed as per design. Corridor construction PIU,NHAI OPERATION STAGE 16  L NVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENI PLAN PACKA(, V C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component documents . Implementation Supervision 0. 1. 1. The spills at the accident sites will be cleared Throughout Project Operation Enginieering Cost Local Govt. Bodies NHAI Contamination immediately corridor period including State from spills due to The left over spills will be scrapped to small lined PWD traffic and confined pits nearby, within thie ROW accidents 0.1.2. Dust Roadside tree plantations planted will be Throughout Project Operation Engineering Cost Forest NHAI, Forest Generation maintained corridor period Department Bihar Department Afforestation will be taken up at new sites (for Rs,15.3 millions Bihar example, gram panchayat land, etc.) near the road. for compensatory plantation + Rs. 6.75 millions for additional Tree plantation if land available. 0.1.3. Air Vehicular emissions of critical pollutant parameters Rajganj (km.389) Operation Rs. 0.048million Motor Vehicle NHAI, Motor pollution (SPM, RSPM, CO, SO2, No, and Pb) will be Isri Bazar (356) period for air quality Department, and Vehicle monitored, once every six months. . Nimiaghat (361) management SPCB Department Roadside tree plantation will be maintained Bgodar (333) and SPCB Vehicular air pollution will be managed and monitored at the proposed toll plaza locations Public awareness will be generated _________.__ _ 0.1.4. Noise Noise pollution will be monitored Bagodar (km 333) Operation Rs. 0.03 million Motor Vehicle NHAI, Motor pollution Public awareness programme will, be launched. Rajganj (km. 389) period for noise Department and Vehicle . Topchanchi ( 371 ) management SPCB Department Isri Bazar (356) and SPCB Nimiaghat (361) 0.1 .5. Watel Thrge system will be periodically cleaned Kulgo Nadi (km. 349) Operation Rs. 0.009 million Local Govt. Bodies NHAI and Water quality will be monitored as per the Bagodar (km. 334) Stage SPCB monitoring plan. l Gorhar river (km. 317) Public awareness programmes will be launched for maintaining water resources __ _ 17  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Environmental Remedial Measure Reference Location Timeframe Mitigation Cost Institutional responsibility issue/ to contract component docurnents . Inmplementation Supervision 0.1.6. Flora and The replantation scheme, containing keystone Throughout Project Operation Rs. 15.3 million Forest Forest Fauna (key stone species will be strictly monitored for first 3 years Corridor Stage for plantation of Department Bihar Department species) compensatory Bihar, NHAI Tree plantation + Rs. 6.75 for additional plantation if land available 0.1.7. Accidenits The 'rtiles' as defined in Environmential (Protection) Throurghout Projec:t Operdtioii Motor Vetiicle Motor involving Act, 1986 will be complied. Corridor Stage Department and Vehicle hazardous For delivery of hazardous substances, three SPCB Depailtment materials certificates issued by transportation department, 3nc SPU(B S namely permit license, driving license and guarding NHA license will be required, Vehicles delivering hazardous substances will be printed with appropriate signs. In case of spillage, the report to relevant departments will be made and instructions followed in taking up the contingency measures. 0. 1.8. Safety Traffic management plan will be developed, Throughout Project Operation Engineering Local Government Local measures especially in congested locations corridor stage Cost. Bodies Government Traffic control measures incLiding speed limits will Bodies, be eiiforced strictly. Police Further growth of encroachment and squatting Department within the ROW will be discouraged Developmeni No school or hospital will be allowed to be &NHAI established within 200 m of the project highway. &NHAI 0.1.9 Soil monitoring to be conducted as per monitoring As per monitoring plan Operation Rs. 0.03 million NHAI NHAI, SPCB pll,,l - - .i. stage 18  F. MONITORING PROGRAMME The purpose of the monitoring programme is to ensure that the envisaged objectives of the project is achieved and results in desired benefits to the target population. To ensure the effective implementation of the EMP, it is essential that an effective monitoring programme be designed and carried out. The broad objectives are To evaluate the performance of mitigation measures proposed in the EMP To evaluate the adequacy of Environmental Impact Assessment To suggest improvements in management plan, if required To enhance environmental quality * To satisfy the legal and community obligations. F.1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIS) The physical, biological and social components identified as of particular significance in affecting the environment at critical locations have been suggested as Performance Indicators (PIs), and are listed below. Air quality * Water quality * Noise levels around sensitive locations. Replantation success / survival rate Soil contamination * Erosion indices Restoration of borrow pits Sedimentation rate in the downstream where bridges, culverts, etc are built * Vital statistics on health * Accident frequency F.2 SELECTION OF INDICATORS FOR MONITORING The environmental parameters that may be qualitatively and quantitatively measured and compared over a period of time, due to their importance and the availability of standardised procedures and expertise, have been selected as Performance Indicators (PIs). . Air Quality * Noise levels * Water Quality Flora * Soil Contamination Following sub-sections describe each of these PIs in detail. F.2.1 Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) Monitoring Ambient air quality parameters recommended for monitoring road transportation developments are Respirable Particulate Matter (RPM), Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Oxides of Nitrogen (NO,), Hydro-Carbons (HC), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) and Lead (Pb). These are to be monitored at designated locations starting from the commencement of construction activity. Data will be generated over three days at all identified locations in accordance to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.(Table 4) The location, duration and the pollution parameters to be monitored and the responsible institutional arrangements are detailed out in the Monitoring Plan (Table 7)  Table 4: Nationai Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutants . Time Sensitive Industrial Residential WPightpd ayprage Arja Arpa Riral Pnthpr Arpa Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Annual* 15 pg/m3 80 pg/M3 60 pg/M3 24 hours" 30 pg/r3 120 pg/M3 90 ag/rn3 Oxides of Nitrogen (No.) Annual& 15 pg/m3 80 pg/M3 65 pg/rM3 24 hours" 30 ug/rm3 120 pg/M3 91 pg/m3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 8 hours** 1000 Pg/m3 5000 pg/m3 2000 ug/m3 1 hour 2000 pg/M3 1000 l g/m3 4000 pg/m3 Lead (Pb) Annual, 0.50 pg/M3 1.0 pg/rn3 0.75 Pg/rM3 24 hours" 0.75 Pg/M3 1.5 pg/M3 1.00 pg/M3 Respirable Particulate Matter Annual* 50 pig/mr3 120 pg/m3 60 pg/M3 (RPM)- Size less then 10 pm 24 hours" 75 itg/m3 150 tg/rn 100 pg/rM3 Suspended Particulate Annual* 70 pkg/rn3 360 pg/M3 140 pg/M3 Mattsr (<PM) 24 hours-" 100 ug/M3 500 Pg/M3 200 pg/M3 Source Anon 1996-97, National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Series NAQMS/a/1996-97, Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi. *Average Arithmetic mean of minimum 104 measurement in a year taken for a week 24 hourly at uniform interval. **24 hourly/8 hourly values should meet 98 percent of the time in a year F.2.2 Water Quality Monitoring The physical and chemical parameters recommended for analysis of water quality relevant to road development projects are pH, total solids, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, oil and grease, COD, chloride, lead, zinc and cadmium. The location, duration and the pollution parameters to be monitored and the responsible institutional arrangements are detailed out in the Environmental Monitoring Plan (Table 7) The monitoring is to be carried out in accordance to the Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification - 1510500: 1991 (Table 5) Table 5: Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification-IS 10500:1991 Si. Substance or Requirement Undesirable Effect Outside Permissible Methods of Remarks No. Characteristic (Desirable the Desirable Limit Limit in the Test (Ref. To Limit) Absence of IS) Alternate Source Essential Characteristics 1 Colour, Hazen 5 Above 5, consumer acceptance 25 3025 (Part 4) Extended to 25 only if toxic units, Max. decreases 1983 substances are not suspected, in absence of altemate sources 2 Odour Unobjectionable 3025 (Parts a) Test cold and when 5):1984 heated --___ b) Test at several dilutions 3 Taste Agreeable 3025 (Part 7 Test to be conducted only and 8) after safety has been 1984 established 4 Turbidity NTU, 5 Above 5, consumer acceptance 10 3025 (Part 10) Max. decreases 1984 5 pH Value 6.5 to 8.5 Beyond this range the water will No relaxation 3025 (Part 11) affect the mucous membrane 1984 and/or water supply system 6 Total hardness (as 300 Encrustation in water supply 600 3025 (Part 21) CaCO-) MG/1, Mal structure an adverse effects on 1983 domestic use  Si. Substance or Requirement Undesirable Effec; ,,... Permissible Methods of Remarks No. Characteristic (Desirable the Desirable Limit Limit in the Test (Ref. To Limit) Absence of IS) Alternate Source 7 Iron (as Fe) mg/I, 0.3 Beyond this limit 1 32 of 3025: Max taste/appearance are affected, 1964 has adverse effect on domestic uses and water supply structures, and promotes iron bacteria 8 Chlorides (as CI) 250 Beyond this limit, taste, 1000 3025 (Part mg/1, Max corrosion and palatability are 32) affected 1988 9 Residual, free 0.2 . 3025 (Part 26) To be applicable only when chlorine, mg/I, 1986 water is chlonnated. Tested I Mm at consumer end. When protection against viral infection is required, it should be Min 0.5 mg/i Desirable Characteristics 1 Dissolved solids 500 Beyond this palatability 2000 3025 (Part 16) mg/1, Max decreases and may cause gastro 1984 intestinal irritation 2 !CaIcium (as Ca) 75 Encrustation in water supply 200 3025 (Part 40) - Img/i, Max . structure and adverse effects on 1991 F domestic use 3 Magnesium (as 30 Encrustabon to water supply 100 16, 33, 34 of - Mg), mg/il, Max structure and adverse effects on IS 3025: 1964 domestic -use 4 Copper (as Cu) 0.05 Astringent taste, discoloration 1.5 36 of 3025: - mg/I, Max and corrosion of pipes, fitting 1964 and utensils will be caused beyond this 5 Maganese (as Mn) 0.1 Beyond this limit 0.3 35 of 3025: - mg/I, Mlax taste/appearance are affected, 1964 has adverse effect on domestic uses and water supply structures 6 Sulphate (as 200 200 Beyond this causes gastro 400 3025 (Part 24) May be extended up to 400 SO") mg/I, Max intestinal imtation when 1986 provided (as Mg) does not magnesium or sodium are exceed 30 _______________ ~present _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 'Nitrate (as NO,) 45 Beyond this 100 3025 (Part 34)- mg/l, Max methaemoglobinemia takes 1988 place 8 Fluoride (as F) 1 Fluride may be kept as low as 1.5 23 of 3025: mg/i, Max possible. High fluoride may 1964 cause fluorosis 9 Phenoiic 0.001 Beyond this, it may cause 0.002 54 of 3025: compounds (As objectionable taste and odour 1964 CH;OH) mg/l, Mtax ;0 Mercury (as Hg) 0.001 Beyond tnis, the water becomes No relaxation (see note) To be tested when pollution mg/i, Max toxic Mercury ion is suspected analyser 11 Cadmium (as Cd), 0.01 Beyond this, the water becomes No relaxation (See note) To be tested when pollutior mg/l, Mtax toxic is suspected .2 Selenium (as Se), 0.01 Beyond this, the water becomes No relaxation 28 of 3025: To be tested when pollution mg/i, Max toxic 1964 is suspected 13 Arsenic (As) mg/1, 0.05 Beyond this, the water becomes No relaxation 3025 (Part 37) To be tested when pollution  SI. Substance or Requirement Undesirable Effect Cc0 -- Permissible Methods of Remarks No. Characteristic (Desirable the Desirable Limit Limit in the Test (Ref. To Limit) Absence of IS) Alternate Source max toxic 1988 is suspected 14 Cyanide (As CN), 0.05 Beyond this limit, the water No relaxation 3025 (Part 27) To be tested when pollution mg/i, Max becomes toxic 1986 is suspected 15 Lead (as Pb), 0.05 Beyond this limit, the water No relaxation (see note) To be tested when pollution mg,l, Max becomes toxic is suspected 16 Zinc (As Zn). 5 Beyond this limit it can cause 15 39 of 3025: To be tested when poilution Mg/I, Max astringent taste and an 1964) is suspected opalescence in water 17 Anionic detergents 0.2 Beyond this limit it can cause a 1 Methylene- To be tested when pollution (As MBAS) mg/I, light froth in water blue is suspected Max extraction method 18 Chromium (As 0.05 May be carcinogenic above this No relaxation 38 of 3025: To be tested when pollution _ Crf-.) mg/i, Max limit 1964 is suspected 19 Polynuclear - May be carcinogenic above this aromatic limit hydrocarbons (as PAH) g/1, Max 20 Mineral oil mg/1, 0.01 Beyond this limit undesitable 0.03 Gas Max taste and odour after Chromatograp chlorination take place hic method 21 Pesticides mg/I, Absent Toxic 0.001 - Max _ 22 Radioactive matenals: 58 of - 3025:01964 23 a) Alpha emiters - 0.1 - Bq/l, Max 24 Beta emiters 1 - pci/i, Max 25 Aluminium (as Al), 200 Beyond this limit taste becomes 600 13 of - mg/I, Max unpleasant , 3025:1964 26 Aluminium (as 0.03 Cumulative effect is reported to 0.2 31 of 3025: - Al), mg/l, Max cause demenba 1964 27 Boron, mg/I, Ma 1 5 29 of 3025: - 11964 Source: Indian StB.dard Dnnkxng Water SpecIfication-I51050:1991 F.2.3 Noise level Monitoring The measurements for monitoring noise levels would be carried out at all designated locations along all contract packages in accordance to the Ambient Noise Standards formulated by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in 1989 (refer Table 6) Sound pressure levels would be monitored on twenty-four hour basis. Noise should be recorded at a "A" weighted frequency using a " slow time response mode" of the measuring instrument. The location, duration and the noise pollution parameters to be monitored and the responsible institutional arrangements are detailed out in the Environmental Monitoring Plan (Table: 7)  Table 6: Noise Level Standards (CPCB) Zone Noise level for Noise level for | _ + Day Night TimeN| Industnal area 75 70 'Commercial area I 65 55 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -J1;--4 iResidential area 55 45 Sience zone 5 40 _Residential __ _ 50 ,Commercial 70 - Day time - 6.00 am - 9.00 pm (15 hours) Night time - 9.00 pm - 6.00 am (9 hours) F.2.4 Success of Revegetation To ensure the proper maintenance and monitoring of the compensatory afforestation being carried out, a regular maintenance and monitoring of the survival rate of the planted trees is being proposed upto a period of 3 years from the operationalisation of the project. The responsible institutional arrangements are presented in the Environmental Monitoring Plan (Table 7). F.2.5 Soil Contamination Contamination of the soil, especially due to increased levels of Pb, Cd and Cr are likely due to the increased traffic movement on the project corridor. The comparison of the concentrations of these parameters before and after the project coming up would aid in arriving at the increase in concentrations of these heavy metals, if any. F.3 MONITORING PLAN The monitoring plan for the various performance indicators of the project in the construction and operation stages, is summarised in Table 7 below.  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PACKAGE V-C Table 7: Environmental Monitoring Plan Environmental Project Institutional responsibility component Stage Parameters Location (ch.) Frequency Standards Approx cost Implementation Supervision (Rs.)/year Air Construction SPM/RPM/NO,/CO Construction site near Bagodar 3 times in a year for Air quality standards 2x4000x3x3 Contractor through PIU,NHAI/SC stage (333) and Raganj (389) 3 years by CPCB = Rs. 72000 approved monitoring .._________________ _ ____________________________ ___________________ ag en cy Operation SPM/RPM/NO,JCO/H Rajganj (389), Isri Bazar (356), 3 times a year for 1 Air quality standards 4x4000x3x1 NHAI NHAI stage C/Pb/SO2 Nimiaghat (361), Bagodar (333) year by CPCB Rs. 48000 Water Quality Construction All the parameters Kulgo Nadi (349), Pond at Three times in a Water quality 4x1000x3x3 Contractor through PIU,NHAI/SC stage for inland surface Bagodar (334), Gorhar River year for 3 years standard by CPCB = Rs. 36000 approved monitoring water quality (317) agency standard for Class-D to be tested Operation All the parameters Kulgo Nadi (349), Pond at 3 times a year for 1 Water quality 3x1000x3x1 NHAI NHAI stage for inland surface Bagodar (334), Gorhar River year standard by CPCB = Rs. 9000 water quality (317) standard for Class-D to be tested Noise levels Construction Noise level Gazett Construction site near Bagodar 3 times a year for 3 8-hourly in two 3x2000x3x3 Contractor through PIU,NHAI/SC stage Notification 643 dt. (333) and Raganj (389) year shifts: 6 am to 2pm; = Rs. 90000 approved monitoring 26/12/89 of MoEF . 3pm to 11pm agency Operation Noise level Gazett Rajganj (389), Isri Bazar (356), 3 times a year for 1 8-hourly in two 5x2000x3x1 NHAI NHAI stage Notification 643 dt. Nimiaghat (361), Bagodar year shifts: 6am to 2pm; = Rs. 30000 26/12/89 of MoEF (333), Topchachi (375) 3pm to 11 pm Flora Operation Maintain the species Entire stretch For 3 years Density Coverage Rs.20000 NHAI NHAI stage at 75% survival rate After plantation should be 75% Soil Operation Monitoring of Pb, Cr, At congested sections identified 3 years once in Rs. 30000 NHAI NHAI stage Cd year during winters R.300NA Total Monitoring Cost Rs. 3,35,000 - 24 -  G. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - BUDGET The environmental budget for the various environmental management measures proposed in the EMP are detailed in Table 8 below. Table 8: Environmental Budget - Package V-C Component Item Unit Quantity Rate Amount (million Rs CONSTRUCTION STAGE Flora * Clearing of Roadside plantation km 78.750 Rs.2000/- 0.158 * Compensatory afforestation (Minimum no. 2266 Rs. 675/no 1.530 of 2 trees planted for every tree cut) * Landscaping / Plantation in the median no. 78.75 Rs.12,000/ 0,945 * Additional trees plantation if land no 10000 Rs. 675/no 6.75 available I I Slope * Turfing of embankment with grasses Covered in engineering costs 0.00 /Embankment and herbs protection _ Borrow areas * Redevelopment of borrow areas by tree Covered in engineering costs 0.00 plantation and fisheries Water * Relocation of hand pumps No 49 Rs.20,000/- 0.98 Noise * Provision of noise barriers/Walls m 500 Rs.1000/- 0.50 Cultural properties * Relocation of cultural properties Covered in RAP 0.00 * Protective measures for cultural Covered in RAP 0.00 properties Environmental * Ambient air quality management Costs as mentioned in the Monitonng plan 0.072 issues at construction sites * Noise level management 0.09 * Water quality Management 0.036 * Sewage Disposal Covered in Contract Dorcument 0.00 * Waste disposal at service centres Covered in Contract Document 0.00 * Accident rsks in construction activity Covered in Contract Document 0.00 * Health issues Covered in Contract Document insurance clauses 0.00 Environmental * Enhancement of ponds no 6 Rs.1,00,000/ 0.60 Enhancements _I . Enhancement of cultural properties no 14 Rs.70,000/ 0.98 * Provision of pond protection work no 8 Rs.70,000/ 0.56 * Pilgrimage pathways km. 0 Rs.1,48,000/- 0.00 OPERATION STAGE Monitoring of * Air quality 0,048 performance Cost/year as mentioned in the Monitoring plan for indicators * Noise quality a h oioigpa o 0 Performance Indicators * Water quality 0.009 * Vegetation . 0.02 * Soil 0.03 TRAINING * Mobilisation for Pollution Monitoring Lump sum - - 0.10 Training * Environmental training Lump sum As per training I details Il SUB TOTAL 13.438 CONTINGENCIES @ 5 % on total Environmental Costs 0.672 Grand Total 14.110  Appendix 1: Recommended Soil Borrow Areas S.No lKm |illage |Distance from NH-2 1 320 Atka l10Dm 2 322 Banwari 1500m 3 t324 Banwari li50Dm 4 ,326 Soneturpi 500m 5 1330 Soneturpi 1500m 6 1337 Haisla 100Dm 7 338 |Haisla i10Dm 8 339 Haisla 500m 9 342 11000m 10 344 |hanghari 10ooom 11 348 !Kulgu 105m 12 ;350 'Kulgu 11000m 13 352 Ghoutwaii 20D0m 14 354 Khakikala !500m 15 .360 Balutunda 200Dm 16 363 Baltharia *2000m 17 365 Vikhnidihi .100Dm 18 067 galagi j1OOOm 19 368 j Kalyanpur 150Dm 20 370 Chalkaric 200m 21 l371 Chalkaric 300m 22 3 75 Rangnitam 200Dm 23 , 386 iBartanr '500m 24 395 Udaypur 1500m 25 397 Banglatanr i500m  34 r Madaldih river at km 379.750 35 A stream from nara reserved forest on mounds at km 385.300 36 Nakati stream at km 389.389  Appendix 3: Water Sources likely to be impacted/relocated/enhanced S Si. No. Water Sources 1 Pond at km 334.000 2 Pond at km 338.240 3 Pond at km 348.900 , 4 Pond at km 381.800 l 5 Pond at km 387.750 6 Pond at km 389.500 7 l Pond at km 347.770 8 Pond at km 351.650 9 Pond at km 368.130 10 Pond.at km 381.325 11 Pond at km 384.120 12 Pond at km 324.75 13_Pond_at_km353500 i 13 Pond at km 353.500 14 l Pond at km 383.900l 15 Pond at km 386.020 16 IPond at km 388.150 17 Pond at km 395.350 18 Pond at km 397.350 19 Atak nala stream at km 325.070 20 Baghlata stream at km 327.700 21 Manthitila and Khero stream at km 328.190 22 Khedo river at km 328.580 23 Awara stream 342.200 24 Ghanghri stream at km 347.290 25 Kulgo river at km 348.660 26 Isri and canal stream at km 356.570 27 Rehna stream at km. 358.810 28 Rasaria stream at km 359.020 29 Sita river at km 363.010 30 | Praiyia stream at km 363.950 i31 Murlidhar stream at km 368.700 32 Banka river at km 372.690 33 Stream flowing from small mounds at km 378.860  Appendix 2: Recommended Quarry Areas SI. No. Km. |Place 1 1124-50 2 1210-17 3 11222-32 -aya 4 1222-50 'Bela 5 222-65 BEarwar Pahar 283-27 lAmbadah 7 283-33 Purnadi 8 1283-36 i l 9283-49 j_ 10 ~ 62-3 -  Appendix 4: Reiigious Structures likely to be impacter, --ted S. No. Km. Type Distance from Carriaueway 1 322.300 Temple IEdge of the shoulder 2 329.650 Temple 7m from the edge of the proposed shoulder 3 333.900 Mosque 5m away from the proposed NH alignment 4 ! 333.975 Temple 5 i 334.350 Temple Inside at the edge of the proposed shoulder 6 _ 334.940 Temple _ 7 _ 337.580 Temple 8m from the proposed pavement 8 l 338.060 Mosque T3m from the edge of the proposed shoulder 9 j 338.260 Temple j5m from the pavement edge 10 342.420 Temple __ 1 1 342.470 Temple ] 12m from the proposed pavement 12 347.760 Temple iOm from the shoulder of the proposed pavement 13 350.870 Temple 15m from the shoulder edge 14 352.930 Temple 3m away from the edge 15 353.300 Temple Edge of the shoulder 16 355.200 Temple 14m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 17 358.500 1 i 18 360.150 Temple 6m away from the edge of proposed shoulder 19 361.800 ! _ 0 364.350 Temple Edge of the proposed shoulder I1 366.150 Temple 8m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 22 366.150 Temple Sm away from the edge of the proposed shoulder i23 368400 Temple 16m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 4 368.400 Temple 120m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 25 374.800 Gurudwara 12m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 26 375.000 Temple t8m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 27 376.700 Temple 28 376.850 Temple 24m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 29 ' 383.400 Mosque i16m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 30 f 385.950 Temple | 16m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 31 387.200 Temple 12m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 32 L 387.900 Temple 116 m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 33 389.850 Mosque 8m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 34 390.250 Temple 4m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 35 1390.300 Temple |6m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 36 390.750 Temple |m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 37 390.750 r Temple 101m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 38 391.750 i Temple 120m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 8q 394.300 I Temple 25m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 39________F 394.300 i Temple t25m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder 40 396.200 Temple i25m away from the edge of the proposed shoulder