India - Forestry Research Education and Extension Project

LI-z- M A - /iv The World Bank FOR OFFIClAL USE ONLY Repmo No. P-6239-IN MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO SDR 33.8 MILLION TO INDIA FOR A FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT FEBRUARY 1, 1994 MICROGRAPHICS Report No: P- 6239 IN Type: MOP This document has a restricted distribution and may be used bv recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its cor.ents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit = Rupee US$1.00 = Rs. 30 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES The metric system is used throughout the report FISCAL YEAR GOI: April 1 - March 31 ABBREVIATIONS GHNP Great Himalayan National Park GNP Gross National Product GOHP Government of Hiiachal Pradesh GOTN Government of Tamil Nadu KMTR Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve ICEFRE Indian Council for Forestry Research and Education MOEF Ministry of Environment and Forests NGO Non-Governmental Organization PA Protected Area SDR Special Drawing Rights SFD State Forest Department  FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY INDIA FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT CREDIT AND PROJECT SUMMARY Borrower: India, Acting by its President Executing Agendes: The Indian Council for Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) and the States of Hichal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu Amount: IDA Credit of SDR 33.8 million (US$47.0 million equivalent) Terms: Standard with 35 years maturity Financing Plan: Foreig Local Total .................. .US$ miiion IDA 22.8 24.2 47.0 GOI 0.0 9.4 9.4 v/ Total 33.6 56.4 I/ Includes duties and taxes of US$3.4 milion Economic Rate of Return: Not applicable Poverty Category: Not applicable Staff Appraisal Report: No.12176-IN Maps: IMRD No. 24927 IBRD No. 24928 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT TO INDIA FOR A FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT 1. I submit for your approval the following report and recommendation on a proposed development credit to India for SDR 33.8 million, the equivalent of US$47.0 million, on standard IDA terms with a maturity of 35 years, to help finance a Forestry Research Education and Extension Project. 2. Background. About 19 percent of the land area of India, or about 64 million hectares, is covered by forests which play an important role in the conservation of environmental quality. The contribution of the forestry sector to GNP has been estimated at less than two percent, but this does not take into account non-market and external benefits, illegally-harvested fuelwood and timber, nor the importance of the forests to supporting the catde population. Most of India's forests are degraded and productivity is poor. Forest degradation is increasing with the rising population and over-exploitation of grazing resources in forested areas. Government is addressing the problems of the forestry sector through policy reforms, legislation and afforestaton. The National Forest Policy, revised in 1988, teats forests: first as an ecological necessity; second as a source of goods for use by local populadons, with particular emphasis on non-timber forest products; and third as a source of wood and other products for industries and other non-local uses. The policy encourages industies to obtain raw materials from farm forestry. The Eighth Five Year Plan (1992-97) further emphasizes investments for rehabilitation of degraded forests and fann forestry. 3. Forestry research has an important contribution to make to the successful implementation of this policy, through the development of forest management systems and technologies to improve productivity and the utilization of forest products. The Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), established in 1986, is responsible for 6 Institutes and a number of research centers, undertaking research in various ecological zones. ICRE research supports the sector as a whole, and provides an important source of the improved technology required for successful implementation of IDA supported state forestry projects. There is a well qualified cadre of research staff in India, and the State Forest Deparments, Forest Development Corporations, and the private sector, provide a strucure for the application of research results. However, forestry research is constained by the lack of a systematic method for determining research priorities and a lack of coordination among the various agencies involved in research, which has sometimes meant that research results have not been of immediate practical application. In addition, analysis of the social and economic implications of policies is sometimes incomplete, or has not been kept up-to- date. Other constraints have included frequent rotation of staff, inadequate investment in facilities, equipment, and library and information services, and inadequate operational research funding. 4. There are formal forestry education programs in a number of state agicultural and general universities. The Forest Research Institute in Dehra Dun was recently granted Deemed Forest University status. The major constraints to formal forestry education relate to  2 curricula that do not adequately reflect the requirements of the new forest policy, the need for a cadre of professional trainers, and a requirement for adequate facilities for post-graduate research. Forestry extension is primarily the responsibility of State For:stry Departments (SEDs), though some commercial companies and NGOs run successful extension programs. The focus of ICFRE's activity in extension is, therefore, the development of research extension linkages. The main constraints to improved forestry extension services include the lack of linkages between the research institutions, the state forest services and the private sector, lack of resources to mount effective extension campaigns, and the lack of experience of many staff in research institutes and SFDs. 5. India has a broad range of ecosystems within ten biogeographic zones that support a wide range of flora and fauna. Many species are endemic and some are endangered. A growing appreciation within India of the importance of the conservation of biodiversity has led to the establishment of a large number of Protectd Areas (PAs), including 75 national parks and over 400 sanctuaries. Although they are widely distributed thoughout India, they represent less than 4 percent of the total land area. Rapidly growing human and livestock populations impose considerable pressures on the PAs, resulting in degradation of vegetative cover and a loss of biodiversity. Past PA management, based on exclusion and policing, has not been effective in arresting degradation. Attempts are now being made to involve local communities in the planning and implementation of ecodevelopment prgrams to generate altenative incomes for those dependent on PA resources and to create an awareness of the benefits of preserving the PAs. 6. Rationale for IDA Involvement and Country Assstance Strategy. Development of the forestry research system is part of a long-term stategy to improve the productivity and sustainable use of forests. The project should be seen as part of such a long- term strategy and the Bank is one of the few institutions that could provide the necessary continuity of support. The Bank is also well plaed to assist in developing inks with international forestry research initiatives. In addition, the success of other GOI and Bank initiatives in the forestry sector in Idia is at least partially dependent on the continuing development of improved technologies. The Bank's support for research and development of effective methods for conservation of biodiversity in India, including ecodevelopment activities, is mandated by its strong commitment to improving environmental management. The proposed project would be consistent with the overall country assistance strategy, including the strategy for Bank assistance to the agricultural seo in India, which seeks to promote increased productivity through better selection of investments and more efficient public sector management. It is also consistent with the objectives of the Bank's new forestry policy and the Asia Region's strategy for forestry lending which link policy dialogue with major investments m the forest sector. Finally, the recently completed Expenditure Review concluded that further investment it forestry research deserves priority, 7. Project Objectives The main objectives of the project are to strengthen the capacity of national and state institutions to plan and underauke prinoity research programs, to improve the system of forestry education in research and academic institutions, and to improve the extension of research findings. Supplementary objectives are to improve the policy analysis and project prparation capabilities within MOEF, and develop a supportng forestry statistical service. The project would also aim to develop and test, on a pilot bads,  3 methods for conservation of biological resources in protected areas through ecodevelopment. 8. Project Description. The project would be implemented over five years and would have five main components: (i) Research Management (US$5.8 million) based on the development of ICFRE to improve the management and coordination of forestry research and extension, through staff training, studies and 4;onsultancies to develop priority setting methodologies and a management information system, the establishment of an extension support fund, and provision of a headquarters building and equipment; (ii) Research Program Support (US$37.8 million) providing necessary infrastructure, equipment and operating expenses for selected research programs in ICFRE institutes, the establishment of a research grant fund to commission research by public and private sector agencies, measures to mprove the quality of plantng stock, human resource development through staff training, scientific review of institutes and programs, and improvement of library and information systems and stadstical services; (iii) Foresby Educaton (US$1.8 million) involving the development and vaidation of forestry cumcula in formal education through provision of funds for review and revision work, and development of the Deemed Forestry Univursity at Dehra Dun, primarily by financing post-graduate research and teaching awards; (iv) Forestry Policy nd Prearation (US$2.2 million) which would strengthen capabilities within MOEF for the analysis of forest policies and preparation of future forestry projects, through staff training and provision for studies and consultancies; (v) Conservaon of Blodiversil (US$5.3 million) which would support development and implementation of programs for ecodevelopment and resource management around two protected areas, the Great Hmaayan National Park (GHNP) in the State of Himachal Pradesh and the Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve (KMTR) in the State of Tamil Nadu. Ecodevelopment would involve communities in the planning and implementation of programs for alternative natual or soci resource creation or income generation. Improved planning and management within the PAs, and associated research and monitoring programs would also be financed. 9. The total cost of the project is estimated at US$56.4 million, with a foreign exchange component of US$22.8 million (40 percent of total project costs). The IDA credit would be for US$47.0 milion, or 88 percent of project costs, excluding duties and taxes. The breakdown of costs and financing is shown in Schedule A. The proposed p nt arrangements and the disbursement schedule are given in Schedule B. A timetable of key project processing events and the status of Bank Group operations are given in Schedules C and D, respectively. Maps are also attached. The Staff Appraisal Report No. 12176-IN dated February 1, 1994, is being distributed separately. 10. Project Implementation. The organization of the project would be fuly integrated with the coordination and management of forestry research, education and extension systems at national, state, research institute and program levels. ICFRE would have overall responsibility for management of forestry research, and the ICFRE headquarters staff would provide project administration, procurement and disbursement services. Detailed research program management would be the responsibility of the Diectors of Institutes, and other agencies undertaing the research. Mass extension programs are primarily the responsibility of the State Forestry Departments, but ICFRE institutes would provide support and advice. ICFRE also has a role in forestry educadon, directly through the Deemed Forestry University, and indirecdy through its role in curriculum development and validaton  4 of forestry degrees in universities. Policy analysis and the oganization of forestry project prepartion would be undertaken by MOEF. Responsibility for ecodevelopment activides would lie with MOEF and the SFDs of GOHP and GOIN. Project Steering Committees for Forestry Research Education and Extension and for Conservation of Biodiversity would be established to ensure coordination of activities amongst the implementing agencies and that obligatons and assurances agreed during project negotiations are met. 11. Project Sustainability. The sustainability of the project is dependent on the long-term GOI commitment to forestry research and the conservation of biodiversity. This is evidenced by the clear recognition in the new forest policy of the role of research in improving forest management and productivity. GO0 commitment is further reflected in the increased budget for forestry research in 1991 and 1992. The growing awareness in India of the importance of biodiversity conservation is evident in government policy statements and amendments to the Wild Life Protection Act. In addition, there would be a phased increase in the GOI contribution to incremental recurrent expenditure during the project. 12. Lessons from Previous BankJIDA Involvement. There has been no Bank lending specifically for forestry research in India, but there is a portfolio of projects in the forestry sector, some of which have components to support research and technology development. These components have seldom been successfully implemented, partly because states have not assigned priority to research within the wide range of responsibilities that they cary. For GOI and the states, this lack of commitment to research has pointed to the need for a project with a specific focus on forestry research. A review of experienc' gained during the implementaton of Bank-funded forestry projects indicates the need to movw towards a comprehensive approach to the sector on a national or state-wide basis '. The review highlights the need to raise the productivity of the sector, dtrough improved planting materials and practices, a strengthened research system, and an effective forestry extension service. Experience in India with Bank support for agricultural research is also relevant and shows the need for research policy to reflect national priorites for the sector, for improved management of the research system and associated human resources, based on an effective management information system and a sectoral human resource development plan. 13. Nor has there been Bank or IDA lending specifically for ecodevelopment activities in India. Recent forestry projects have included funds for the conservation of biodiversity, but there is litde implementation experience, as the projects have been effedve for only a short period of time. There is experience with ecodevelopment in Iltegrated Conservation-Development Projects supported by the Bank and IDA in other countries. A recent review of this experience shows that to be successful, they must form part of a larger framework that includes political support, enabling legislation, realistic insdtutional anrangements, and compatibility with regional development. These lessons have been taken into account in the design of the proposed project. I India. Forest Sector Review. World Bank Report No. 10965 - IN. 1992.  5 14. Agreed Actions. During negotiations with Government, the following assurances and agreements were obtained: Conditon of Project Effetiveness: An institution, acceptable to IDA, to provide technical specialists would be identified and a contract for the provision of their services agreed. Conditon of Disbursement: Disbursement of funds under the Research Grant Fund, the Extension Support Fund and the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would depend on the agreement with IDA on criteria for assessing proposals for funding. Other Asswunces. These relate to actions to ensure dmely implementation of project activides and amongst others include: (a) A methodology for setdng research priorides would be developed by ICFRE, discussed with IDA and approved by the ICFRE Board of Governors by June 30, 1995. Drafts of the National Forestry Research Plan and associated Human Resources Development Plan would be completed by June 30, 1996, and agreed with IDA as part of the mid-term review no aer than February 28, 1997; (b) The fomat of the Indian Forestry Research Information System would be agreed with IDA by December 31, 1994, and udlized to introduce program budgeting during FY 195-96, for prepartion of the 1996-97 budget to the extent pruaicable and fully utilized for the preparadon of the FY 1997- 98 budget; (c) The first three proposals for funding under the Extension Support Fund, the Research Grant Fund, and the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would be submited to IDA for approval; (d) Annual taining plans, acceptable to IDA, for project-financed training would be prepared not later than September 30, 1994, for the first year of the project and not later than April 30 of each subsequent year, (e) Review of the sciendfic activities of at least two ICFRE institutes would be undertken during each year of the project based on Terms of Reference to be agreed with IDA and the recommendations of the reviews would thereafter be implemented; (f) In consultation with IDA, the review of the curicula for forestry education in Indian universities would be completed by June 30, 1996; (g) The posts of PA Director in both GHNP and KMTR would be filled and staff of the Ecodevelopment Planning teams in both PAs appointed, and responsibility for Forest Rangers and Forest Guards in the ecodevelopment areas transferred to the PA Director by September 30, 1994. 15. Environmental Aspects. The project would support research programs aimed at increasing the sustainability of the use of forest resources within different ecological zones. Project support for research into the management and conservation of these resources, through involvement of communities and tribal peoples would reduce degradation, whilst improvements to the productivity of plantings on farms, plantations and natural forests would reduce exploitation. Proje't support for conservation of biodiversity would have direct benefits for the selected PAs and suroundings and wider benefits, in the long term, for other protected areas. The project would, therefore, have beneficial effects on the envirnment. Ecodevelopment planning and implementation would be based on a participatory, micro-level process. Programs would be small and site specific and it is not envisaged that they would involve resettlement or impact on tibals. They would inmorporate local communites environmental concerns and agreement on the criteria for udizaion of the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would be a condition of disbursement. The criteria would include the need for proposals to take into account Bank policies on the environment, involuntary resetdement and indigenous people.  6 16. Project Benefits. The project would support a key element of the Government's stategy for the forestry sector as articulated in the Nadonal Forest Policy. Improvements to the researh management system would lead to the identification of research priorities that reflect the tequirements of that policy and the needs of the users of forest resources. Better research/extension linkages and infomation flows would further wprove the relevance and quality of on-going and planmed research programs. In addition, project support for forestry education would lead to a cadre of forestry staff with improved capabilities to apply reseawch results and manage forests in a sustainable manner with the active pardcipation of communities. Project support for the conservation of biodiversity on a pilot basis would have long-term future benefits by developing effective methods for involving communites in the planning and implementaton of progams that reduce the pressures on PA resources. Associated research programs would have important benefits for the management of protected areas as they would provide basic information on the balance between resource use and habitat preservation. No economic rate of return has been calculated for the project as the nature of research achieven ents and rate and extent of their adoption is impossible to predict and will vary from one agro-ecological zone to another 17. Risks. The main risks affecting the project, as with many reseach projects, are: (i) that resewch findings generated may be irrelevant to the needs of users, either because their needs have not been properly identified, or because changes in economic policies render new technologies unsuitable, that is, not economically viable; (ii) that coordination between research agencies and between those agencies and the users of rch results may not be efective and; (iii) that goverment commitment to funding research may not be sustained. The project is designed to mininize these risks through providing suprort for an improved methodology for settng research priorities that explicidy takes into account socio-economic factors and involves state and private sector ganiions in deciding on priorities. There are a number of ris associated with any program for the conservation of biodiversity through ecodevelopment activities as the process is not well developed and is likely to need adaptation for specific sites. The pilot nature of project support for ecodevelopment minimizs these risks. 18. Reconmendation. I am satisfied that the proposed credit would comply with the Articles of Agreement of the Association and recommend that the Executive Directos approve it. Lewis T. Preston President Attachments Washington, D.C. Febra 1, 1994  Schedule A Pa,e 1 of 1 INDIA FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT Estimated Cosb and Financing Plan Estmted Costs Foreign Local Toal FE ......... (US$ million) ....... % Research Management A. Development of ICFRE 0.9 3.4 4.3 21 B. Extension 0.3 1.2 1.5 17 Research Program Support A. Institute Progrm Support 6.4 8.7 15.1 43 B. Planting Stock Improvement 1.1 3.5 4.6 25 C. Research System Support 6.7 5.7 12.4 54 D. Libry and Infomation Systems 2.7 2.6 5.3 52 E. Forestry Statistics 0.1 03 0.4 24 Fostry Education 0.2 1.6 1.8 13 ForesryPoLicy ad Prpation OA 1.8 2.2 16 Consevaion of Biodiversiay A. Ecodevelopment 0.3 3.0 33 10 B. PA M gement 0.3 0.8 1.1 30 C. Research, Monitoring and Evaluaton 0.2 0.7 0.9 21 Total Baseline Costs 19.6 33.3 52.9 37 Physica Contingencies 1.6 2.6 42 38 Price Contingencies 1.6 -23 -0.7 0 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 1/ 22.8 33.6 5 40 Fincing Plan Foreien Local Total ..................... iln).................. IDA 22.8 242 47.0 001 0.0 9.4 I/ 9A Total 22.8 33.6 56.4 U Includes duties and axes of US$3.4 million  Schedule B Pa2e 1 of 2 INDIA FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT Procurement Arrangements and Disbursements Amounts and Methods of Procurement Project Element Pro cuemert MeAtod. Total ICB LCB Oths Cost .............................. .US$ Mlion. Works Buildings 10.0 1.0 11.0 (7.5) (0.8) (8.3) Goods Equipment/Supplies 7.6 1.0 1.0 9.6 (6.1) (0.8) (0.8) (7.7) Vehicles 1.1 1.1 (0.9) (0.9) Constcies, Sudies and Training Capacity Building 3.1 3.1 (3.1) (3.1) Studios and Consulancies 4.3 4.3 (4.3) (4.3) Training 8.5 8.5 (8.5) (8.5) Mlaceaeous Research Grant, Extension and Ecodevelopment Support Funds 2.0 6.7 8.7 (1.8) (6.0) (7.8) Plant Establishment 2.6 2.6 (1.9) (1.9) Operating Costs 7.5 7.5 (4.5) (4.5) Total 7.6 13.0 S 56A (6-1) (10.1) (30.8) (47.0) Note. 1. Figs in paess are the respective amounts financed by the IDA CrdL 2. Ote methods include force account, shopping, engagement of consult and training.  Schdule B Pan 2 of 2 Summary Disbursement Schedule Cateyorv Amount Allocated % To be Fmanced ...US$millions.. orin Local 'Works Buildings 83 100 75 Goods Equipment 7.7 100 80 Vehicles 0.9 100 80 Consultancies Cpacity Building 3.1 100 100 Studies and Consultancies 4.3 100 100 Training 8.5 100 100 Miscellaneous Research Grant, Extension and Ecodevelopnent Support Funds 7.8 100 80 Plant Establishment 1.9 100 80 Operating Costs 4.5 100 60 1/ Total 47.0 1/ 85% during the first 30 months of the project period, 50% theafter. Estimated IDA Disbursements FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 .......................... US$ milkon Annual 4.9 11.5 11.5 8.3 7.1 3.7 Cumulative 4.9 16.4 27.9 36.2 43.3 47.0  Schedule C Plae I-of 1 INDIA FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT Timetable of Key Procesing Events Time taken to prepare: 20 months Project prepared by: Government of India with IDA assistance Fi-st IDA Mission: October, 1992 Appraisal Mission February, May, 1993 Negotiations: December, 1993 Planned Date of Effectiveness July, 1994 List of Relevant PPARS and PCRs: None 1/ This report is based on the findings of an apprisal mission that vidted India in March, 1993, with a follow-up mission in May, 1493. The mission compised L Hill (Mission Leder), N. Jones (Fostry Specialist), P. Guhathar (Forestry Specialist), A. Pritchard (Research Management Specalist), MN Jansen (Environmental Spet) and 0. Campbell (Consultant Rural Sociologist). Ms N. Mattson (Financial Analyst) provided support to the mission.  SCHEDULE D ....__...._ . PAGE . of S THE STATUS OF BANK GROUP OPERATIONS IN INDIA A. STATEMENT OF BAN LOANS AND IDA CREDITS (As of December 31, 1993) USS Million (net of cancellations) Loan/ PY of ---------------------------------- Credit * Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/ _--- _--------......._ .. ...._ ............. .................................................... --------- -------...... _-.---.......---------.........._ 1/ 110 Loans/ 8506.0 1/ 168 Credits fully disbursed/cancelled 13098.3 1356-IN 1983 Upper Indravati Hydro Power - 170.00 18.20 2442-IN 1984 Farakka II Thermal Power 278.80 - 36.49 1496-IN 1984 Gujarat Medium Irrigation - 151.17 17.48 SP-20-IN 1984 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.84 17.26 SF-16-IN 1984 Periyar Vaigai II Irrigation - 17.50 3.84 1426-IN 1984 Popul.tion III - 70.00 1.05 1424-I'J 1984 Rainfed Areas Watershed Dev. - 22.35 5.86 SP-12-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 36.50 2.68 1454-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 36.50 18.40 1483-IN 1984 Upper Ganga Irrigation - 105.43 21.58 1544-IN 1985 Bombay Urban Development - 93.70 5.56 2544-IN 1985 Chandrapur Thermal Power 280.00 - 80.60 1613-IN 1985 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.20 17.13 2582-IN 1985 Kerala Power 156.00 - 95.99 2534-IN 1985 National Highways 133.00 - 37.92 1665-IN 1986 Andhra Pradesh II Irrigation - 140.00 64.66 2660-IN 1986 Cement Industry 165.00 - 19.55 2674-IN 1986 Combined Cycle Power 485.00 - 15.25 1643-IN 1986 Gujarat Urban - 50.34 20.19 2661-IN 1986 ICICI - Cement Industry 35.00 - 3.90 1622-IN 1986 Kerala Water Supply and Sanitation - 21.80 5.44 1621-IN 1986 Maharashtra Composite Irrigation - 128.02 109.23 1631-IN 1986 Nattonal Agricultural Research II - 57.21 21.33 1619-IN 1986 West Bengal Minor Irrigation - 45.45 27.47 1623-IN 1986 West Bengal Population - 45.85 10.57 1737-IN 1987 Bihar Tubewells - 22.29 7.65 1750-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply & Sewerage III - 145.00 68.93 2769-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply & Sewerage III 30.00 - 30.00 2796-IN 1987 Coal Mining & Quality Improvement 323.06 - 73.48 1757-IN 1987 Gujarat Rural Roads - 96.75 45.90 2827-IN 1987 Karnataka Power 79.48 - 9.84 2846-IN 1987 Madras Water Supply 53.00 - 29.09 1754-IN 1987 National Agric. Extension III - 66.62 24.95 2844-IN 1987 National Capital Power 408.00 - 137.90 1770-IN 1987 National Water Management - 114.00 46.82 2785-IN 1987 Oil India Petroleum 140.00 - 9.38 2845-IN 1987 Talcher Thermal 367.00 - 20S.06 2813-IN 1987 Telecommunications IX 168.00 - 8.83 1780-IN 1987 Uttar Pradesh Urban Development - 120.95 58.71 1931-IN 1988 Bombay & Madras Population - 57.00 16.26 2928-IN 1988 Indus. Fin. & Tech. Asst. 360.00 - 43.21 2938-IN 1988 Karnataka Power II 41.69 - 17.69 2893-IN 1988 National Dairy II 200.00 - 173.14 2935-IN 1988 Railway Modernization III 270.00 - 33.64  SCHEDULE D PAGE 2 of S USS Million (net of cancellations) Loan/ FY of -------- ----------------------- Credit # Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/ 1923-IN 1988 Tamil Nadu Urban Dev. - 254.73 120.22 3093-IN 1989 Electronics Industry Dev. 8.00 - 7.50 3058-IN 1989 Export Development 120.00 - 16.18 3096-ZN 1989 Maharashtra Power 354.00 - 296.93 3024-IN 1989 Nathpa Jhakri Power 485.00 - 443.57 1952-ZN 1989 National Seeds III - 147.24 59.48 2022-IN 1989 National Sericulture - 133.35 80.06 2057-IN 1989 Nat'l. Family Welfare Trng. - 72.76 51.06 3044-IN 1989 Petroleum Transport 50.00 - 15.00 19S9-IN 1989 States Roads - 80.00 1.75 2994-2N 1989 States Roads 115.00 - 11S.00 2010-IN 1989 Upper Krishna Irrigation II - 160.00 85.02 3050-IN 1989 Upper Krishna Irrigation II 45.00 - 45.00 2008-IN 1989 Vocational Training - 163.8S 109.48 3196-IN 1990 Cement Industry Restructuring 300.00 - 193.17 2115-ZS 1990 Hyderabad Water Supply - 79.90 51.76 2064-IN 1990 industrial Technology Development - 55.00 47.93 3119-IN 1990 Industrial Technology Development 145.00 - 92.46 3237-IN 1990 Northern Region Transmission 485.00 - 448.59 2133-IN 1990 Population Training VII - 63.96 48.26 3239-IN 1990 Private Power Utilities I (TEC) 98.00 - 42.54 2076-IN 1990 Punjab Irrigation/Drainage - 145.28 115.56 2158-ZN 1990 Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition II - 67.52 52.69 2130-IN 1990 Technician Education I - 210.74 156.55 2100-IN 1990 Watershed Development (Hills) - 75.00 64.03 2131-ZN 1990 Watershed Development (Plains) - 55.00 51.64 3260-IN 1991 A.P. Cyclone Emergency Reconstruction 40.00 - 11.85 3325-IN 1991 Dam Safety 23.00 - 23.00 2241-ZN 1991 Dam Safety - 130.00 121.S6 3364-IN 1991 Gas Flaring Reduction 450.00 - 159.13 2173-ZN 1991 ICDS I (Orissa & Andhra Pradesh) - 74.35 57.02 3334-ZN 1991 Industrial Pollution Control 124.00 - 92.87 2252-ZN 1991 Industrial Pollution Control - 31.60 30.32 2234-ZN 1991 Maharashtra Rural Water Supply - 109.90 89.83 3258-IN 1991 Petrochemicals II 12.00 - 11.00 3259-IN 1991 Petrochemicals II 233.00 - 149.05 3344-ZN 1991 Private Power Utilities 2I (ESES) 200.00 - 107.58 2215-IN 1991 Tamil Nadu Agricultural Development - 92.80 71.32 3300-IN 1991 Tamil Nadu Agricultural Development 20.00 - 20.00 2223-IN 1991 Technician education I2 - 255.73 215.33 2300-IN 1992 Child Survival and Safe Motherhood - 214.50 174.92 2394-IN 1992 Family Welfare (Urban Slums) * - 79.00 79.69 2328-ZN 1992 Maharashtra Forestry - 124.00 114.74 2350-ZN 1992 National AIDS Control - 84.00 73.10 3436-IN 1992 Power Utilities Bfficiency 265.00 - 250.98 3498-IN 1992 Second Maharashtra Power 350.00 - 330.49 3470-IN 1992 Second National gighway 153.00 - 153.00 2365-IN 1992 Second National Nighway - 153.00 1SO.01 2329-IN 1992 Shrimp and Fish Culture ^ 85.00 82.31 2341-IN 1992 West Bengal Forestry ^ 34.00 24.67 2433-ZN 1993 Agricultural Development Rajasthan ^ 106.00 95.96 2439-ZN 1993 Bihar Plateau Development - 117.00 105.47 3627-IN 1993 External Sector & Znvestment 300.00 - 21.76 2450-IN 1993 jharna Mine Fire Control - 12.00 11.39 2483-IN 1993 Karnataka Rural Water Supply * ^ 92.00 91.56 2528-ZN 1993 National Leprosy Elimination * - 85.00 82.86 3632-IN 1993 NTPC Power Generation * 400.00 ^ 400.00 3630-ZN 1993 Power Finance Corporation 20.00 ^ 20.00 3577-ZN 1993 Powergrid System Development 350.00 ^ 323.13  SCHEDULE D PAGE 3 of S USS Million (net of cancellations) Loan/ FY of Credit # Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/ 3___-IN 1993 Rene_abl _ Re_o-r-es Develo_p--t 75___ _ ......... ------- 57.73--------- 3S44-IN 1993 Renewable Resources Development 75.00 - 17.73 2449-IN 1993 Renewable Resources Development -115.00 109.7S 2409-IN 1993 Rubber * - 92.00 91.70 2470-IN 1993 Sepond Integrated Child Dev. - 194.00 195.56 2448-IN 1993 Social Safety Net Sector Adjustment - 296.20 244.94 2509-IN 1993 Uttar Pradesh Basic Education - 165.00 154.12 2510-IN 1993 Uttar Pradesh Sodic Lands Reclam. - 54.70 52.61 Total 17699.0 19501.7 9181.85 of which has been repaid 4243.8 1086.1 Total now outstanding 13455.2 18415.6 Amount Sold 133.8 of which has been repaid 133.8 Total now held by Bank and IDA 13455.15 18415.56 Total undisbursed (excluding ) 4508.5 3925.4 1/ IDA Credit amounts for SDR-denominated Credits are expressed in terms of their US dollar equivalents, as established at the time of Credit negotiations and as subsequently presented to the Board. 2/ Undisbursed amounts for SDR-denominated IDA Credits are derived as the undisbursed balance expressed in SDR equivalents (in turn derived as the difference between the original principal expressed in SDRa (based on the exchange rate as established at the time of Credit negotiations) and the cumulative disbursements converted to SDR equivalents at the exchange rates prevailing at the respective dates of disbursements less cancellations expressed in SDR equivalents converted to US dollar equivalents at the SDR/US dollar exchange rate in effect on Dec. 31, 1993. e Not yet effective. Source: Statement of Loans & Credits (LOALA) of December 31, 1993.  SCHEDULE D PAGE 4 OF S S. STATEMENT OF IFC INVESTMENTS (As of December 31, 1993) Amount (US$ million) Fiscal Year Company Loan Equity Total 19S9 Repub.ic Forge Company Ltd. 1.50 _ 1.50 1959-92 Xirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. 0.85 _ 0.85 1960 Assam Sillimanite Ltd. 1.36 __ 1.36 1961 K.S.B. Pumps Ltd. 0.21 0.21 1963-66 Precision Bearings India Ltd. 0.65 0.38 1.03 1964 Fort Gloster Industries Ltd. 0.81 0.40 1.21 1964 Lakahmi Machine Works Ltd. 0.96 0.36 1.32 1964-75-79/90 Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. 11.81 2.84 14.65 1967 Indian Explosives Ltd. 8.60 2.86 11.46 1967 Jayshree Chemicals Ltd. 1.0S 0.10 1.1S 1969-70 Zuari Agro-Chemicals Ltd. 15.15 3.76 18.91 1977-87 Escorts Limited 15.55 _ 15.55 1978-87/91/93 Housing Development Finance Corp. 106.29 4.05 110.34 1980/82/87/89 Deepak Fertilizer and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. 7.50 4.23 11.73 1981-82 Nagarjuna Coated Tubes Ltd. 1.50 0.24 1.74 1981-82 Nagarjuna Steels Limited 2.88 0.24 3.12 1981-86-89 Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. 72.14 24.49 96.63 1981-90/93 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 29.71 9.30 39.01 1982 Ashok Leyland Limited 28.00 -- 28.00 1982 Coromandel Fertilizers Limited 15.88 _ 15.88 1982 The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 18.80 _ 18.80 1982-87/91-93 ITh Signode 2.99 1.01 4.00 1982-87 The Indian Rayon Corp. Ltd. 14.57 __ 14.57 1983 Bharat Forge Company Ltd. 15.90 _ 15.90 1984-86 The Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. 15.95 -_ 15.95 1985 Bajaj Auto Ltd. 23.93 -- 23.93 1985 Modi Cement 13.05 -- 13.05 1985-86/90-91 India Lease Development Ltd. 8.50 0.78 9.28 1985/91 Bihar Sponge 15.24 0.68 15.92 1986 Bajaj Tempo Limited 30.54 -- 30.54 1986/93 India Equipment Leasing Ltd. 5.50 0.30 5.80 1986 Larsen and Toubro Ltd. 21.78 -_ 21.78 1982-87-93/94 The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd. 68.00 13.89 81.89 1987 Export-Import Bank of India 15.45 IS 15.45 1987 Gujarat Fusion Glass Ltd. 7.52 1.70 9.22 1987 Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer 38.07 __ 38.07 1987 Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 7.74 -- 7.74 1987 Hindustan Motors Ltd. 39.14 __ 39.14 1987 The Gujarat Rural Housing Finance Corp. -- 0.19 0.19 1987 Wimco Limited 4.70 -- 4.70 1987-89/90 Titan Watches Limited 22.02 1.15 23.17 1988 Invel Transmissions Ltd. -- 1.07 1.07 1989 Ahmedabad Electricity Company, Ltd. 20.83 -- 20.83 1989 WTI Advanced Technology -- 0.20 0.20 1989-90/92 Keltron Telephone Instruments, Ltd. -- 0.56 0.56 1989-92 Gujarat State Fertilizer 40.46 -- 40.46 1990 JSB India Securities Firms -- 0.37 0.37 1990 UCAL Fuel Systems Ltd. -- 0.63 0.63 1990-91 Tata Electric 111.88 -- 111.88 1991 ATIC Industries Export Pinance 0.28 -- 0.28 1991 Bombay Electric 68.00 -- 68.00 1991-93 CESC Ltd. 82.S1 -- 82.51 1991 Export Finance - AFDC 0.35 -- 0.35 1991 Herdilla Oxides and Electronics Ltd. -- 0.29 0.29 1991 Indust. Credit & Investment Corp. of India -- 26.60 26.60 1991/93 Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services 15.00 4.92 19.92 1991 TDICI Development Finance Companies -- 2.05 2.05 1991/93 TRIVeNI -- 1.68 1.68 1991 Varun Transport, Storage & Communications 17.04 3.06 20.10 1992-93 Arvind Mills '22.13 19.16 41.29  SCHEDULE D _ . _ _ _ _ PAGE 5 OF 5 Amount (USS million) Fiscal Year Company Loan Equity Total 1992 Block KG-OS-IV -- 8.20 8.20 1992 INDUS VC Mgmt. Co. -- 0.01 0.01 1992 INDUS VCF -- 1.01 1.01 1992 Kot,k Mahindra 0.66 -- 0.66 1992 Nippon Denro 40.00 5.77 45.77 1992 SK? Bearings 11.50 -- 11.50 1993 Creditcapital VF -- 0.51 0.51 1993 PICCO-UCO 3.00 0.25 3.25 1993 20th CENTURY 16.00 -- 16.00 1994 Gujarat Ambuja 35.14 8.23 43.37 1994 Indo Rama Spinning & Weaving 35.00 9.94 44.94 1994 CRD Cap. Asset Management -- 0.32 0.32 1994 Information Technology Fund -- 0.64 0.64 1994 Taurus Strshr. -- 7.17 7.17 TOTAL GROSS COMMITMENTS 1230.52 175.48 1405.99 Less: Cancellation, Terminations, Exchange Adjustments. Repayments, Writeoffs and Sales 649.30 33.85 683.15 Novw Held by IFC 581.14 141.63 722.77 Undisbursed 125.55 40.81 166.36 Soe: Ju........ ........ .. . Source: IPC, January 7, 1994.  IBRD 24927 77-15 7l73 77-45' 78-00' KANAWAR |L, g soe \ , WILDLIFE SANCTUARY PIN' VA;.LLY NAI ICON,Al. PARK POSSIBLE EXTENSION O KANAWAR WILDLI FE POSSIBLE EXTENSION Or GREAT HIMALAYAN \0 / __ _ _ 568 vk > NIATIONAL PARK X t : f; 0 0 {t wl l k '.' '~~~~~~~~~~~/, ' xh> 5 - %-s FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT { -' HIMACHAL PRADESH GREAT HIMALAYAN NATIONAL PARK (9 _____ WIWLIPE SANCTUARIES SANCTUARYb *44on Approximth \ HM_ PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY \ 5 ofmrJp C J ju NATIONAL PARKS ~ RIVERS -31-30' 313N N 2A IDIE ACURE SELECTED ELEVATIONS IMETERSI