Uganda Transport Sector Memorandum - Sustainable Development and Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s (Vol. 2 of 2) : Volume 2

Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED Report No. 9 36 4 -UG MAR O9 2020 WBG ARCHIVES .. UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE PRIORITIES FOR THE 1990s Volume II February 8, 1991 •. Infrastructure Operations Division Eastern Africa Department Africa Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY CONFIDENTIAL UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Ma i ntenance Priorities for the 1990s Volume II: Annexes CLA SIFIED r AR O9 2020 Annex I. Rehabilitation of the Kampala - Kasese Rail Link WBG RCHIVE -. Annex Annex II. III. URC Organization Char Uganda Railways Track Network Annex IV. URC Availability: Targets and Performance Annex v. URC Traffic 1983 - 1989 Annex VI. Wagon Ferry/Barge Costs Annex VII. Organization of Ministry of Works Annex VIII. Balanced Investment and Maintenance Program for the Roads Sector Annex IX. Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links Annex XI. National Highway Rehabilitation Annex XII. Summary of On-going Road Development Projects Annex XIII. Ministry of Works Road Maintenance Annex XIV. Projected Future Traffic on Major Highways Annex xv. Potential Main Highway Investments 1991-2000 Annex XVI. Inventory of Feeder Road Network Annex XVII. Feeder Road Rehabilitation Annex XVIII. Fuel Imports and Private Vehicle Fleet Annex XIX. Air Sector: Traffic Statistics Annex xx. Uganda Airlines Corporation: Operating Options MAP IBRD •••••• .• This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of the ir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  - 1 - Annex I Page 1 of 14 Rehabilitation of the Kampala - Kasese Rail Link Introduction The rehabilitation of the Kampala~ Kasese rail link has been given high priority by the Government and URC management. The link was originally constructed to serve the Kilembe copper mine and was built using secondhand materials with the expectation of a limited working life. Traffic on the line is, at the present time, minimal in terms of conventional rail traffic norms: in 1989 20 000 tons and 217 000 passengers, the equivalent to about 10 medium sized trucks and 12 buses per day. Rehabilitation of the Hima cement factory and significant growth in ' agricultural surpluses in the area will, however, expand potential rail traffic. Kasese was also an important transit transhipment center for the ZBR countries and it has been suggested that this role would be re- established with a rehabilitated rail service. At the same time as seeking funding for the rehabilitation of the Kasese rail line the Government has also been financing, through barter arrangements, the construction of a new paved highway between Mityana - Mubende and Fort Portal. In addition, rehabilitation of a more southerly road route via Masaka, Mbarara, Bushenyi and Katunguru has been funded and work is nearing completion. In view of the total aggregate traffic demand for Western Uganda and the need to allocate scarce resources carefully because of the very large total rehabilitation and maintenance needs of the transport sector, it must be questioned whether both the new road route and a reconstructed rail route are required at this time and, if not, which would offer the economically cheaper and more efficient transport services to the economy. This section briefly reviews the economics of the road - rail investment choice. On the basis of the information presently available the analysis cannot be definitive and has thus been built around a number of scenarios to test under what circumstances rehabilitation of the Kasese line might be economically justified. Broadly two rail cost scenarios have been prepared; a present scenario based on current URC efficiency and a more optimistic scenario which assumes significant reductions in both capital and operating costs. Kasese Line Costs Rehabilitation Costs : The capital cost of the presently proposed rehabilitation of the line is estimated at US $160 million. This includes a large element of technical assistance and for this review a total cost of i US$ 120 million is used. A second cost scenario, based on URC undertaking the work at lower cost than a contractor, has also been tested. For this scenario a total cost of US$ 75 million has been assumed.  - 2 - Annex I Page 2 of 14 Track and Station Costs : on the basis of the 1990 URC budget the cost of station staff on the line was estimated at Ush 24.4 million and track maintenance Ush 144 million. Overall fixed annual URC costs of maintaining the infrastructure necessary for rail services is assumed at US$ 0.25 million. Rehabilitation of the line and a more streamlined approach to train operations could be expected to reduce both station and maintenance costs. Under the optimistic scenario a fixed annual cost of US$ o.16 is assumed which rises to US$ 0.31 after Year 10 when some re-ballasting of the line would become necessary, Line Haul Costs : the costs of operat ing train services on the Kasese line ' have been developed on the basis of URC data and standard benchmarks and parameters : Locomotive Costs Present Optimistic Capital cost US $1. 8mn US $1.Smn Average life 20 years 25 years Annual repair cost 5% of capital cost 5% of capital cost Annual utilization 60 000km 87 500 Fuel consumption 7 liters/km 4 liters/km Oil consumption 6 liters/lOOkm 6 liters/lOOkm Crew costs us $500 us $500 Wagon Cost Capital cost us $0.055 mn Average life 30 years Annual repair cost 3% of capital cost Annual utilization 30 000km Freight trains on the Kasese line are assumed to be operated by one locomotive, 11 wagons and a brake-van. It could be argued that, URC already possesses too large a fleet of locomotives and wagons for domestic demand and as the secondhand market for such assets is very limited, the capital costs of the locomotives and rolling stock can be ignored as sunk costs - a recent estimate suggested a domestic demand for 11 locomotives to haul freight while the available fleet would be around 40 locomotives. This argument is based on the assumpti on that URC equipment cannot be leased to the other railways in the region - Kenya Railways and the Tanzania Railway Corporation. Line haul costs for the Kasese Line are I shown below, both with and without capital charges :  - 3 - Annex I Page 3 of 14 Line Haul Freight Train Costs : US$ per Km (Present Operating Scenario) Locomotive Wagons Brake-van Total Capital charge 3.51 2.13 0.10 5.74 Fuel/oil(net tax) 3.43 3.43 Repair/maintenance 1.50 0.61 0.06 2.17 Crew 0.01 0.01 Total 8.46 2.74 0.16 11.36 (Without capital) (4.95) (0.61) (0.06) (5.62) ' Line Haul Freight Train Costs US$ per Km (Optimistic Operating Scenario) Locomotive Wagons Brake-van Total Capital charge 2.26 2.13 0.10 4.49 Fuel/oil(net tax) 1.80 1.80 Repair/maintenance 1.02 0.61 0.06 1.69 Crew 0.01 0.01 Total 5 .19 2.74 0.16 7.99 (Without capital) (2.83) (0.61) (0.06) (3.50) Train Marshalling Costs : these have been estimated from the 1989 Statistical Digest which indicates an average 8 hours of shunting for each train dispatched. Unit shunting costs have been assumed as 50 percent of the class 73 locomotive km-costs, US $4.23/km or US$ 293 per train (US$ 171 without capital charges) under present conditions and US$ 179 (US$ 98 without capital charges) with improved URC performance. Total Freight Cost/ton: it is assumed that trains along the Kasese line will operate with a net payload of 395 tons. Ton-km costs and ton costs for the Kasese-Kampala line are estimated as follows : Total Direct Rail Freight Train Costs : Kasese Line (Us$) With Capital Charges Without Capital Charge Present Optimistic Present Optimistic Train shunting 293 179 171 98 Train movement 3783 2637 1872 1155 Total cost 4076 2816 2043 1253 us $ per ton-km 0.031 0.022 0.015 0.010 us $ per ton 10.31 7.13 5.17 3.17  - 4 - Annex I Page 4 of 14 General/administrative charges are assumed to add an additional 10 percent to costs (the present level of such charges is 26 percent). Road Option Costs Road Improvement Cost : completion of the remaining kms for the Mityana - Fort Portal road is estimated to cost US$ 38.4 million ($240 000 per km) for the remaining 160 kms and rehabilitation of the Fort Portal to Kasese Link US$ 8.88 million($ 120 000 per km). Total road improvement costs will, therefore, total US$ 47.28 million. I Cement Road Freight Costs if the Kasese Line is not rehabilitated it is assumed that cement from Hima will be moved to Kampala by large truck- trailer combinations or semi-trailers with load capacities of 35 tons, costing around US$ 150 000. On a conservative estimate, each truck should be able to complete 120 round trips per year. The operating life of a truck on this type of operation would be 6 years and would probably have a terminal resale value of 30 percent of its ordinal cost. The operating costs for such trucks are shown below: Operating Costs 35 ton Truck-Trailer (US$ per Km) Fuel net of tax (2 km/liter) 0.24 Oil (10% of fuel cost) 0.02 Maintenance (10% of capital cost/year) 0.16 Tyres ($378/tyre life 35 000km) 0.24 Crew 0.01 Running Cost 0.67 General Overheads 25% 0.17 Total Cost 0.84 One-way trip costs are estimated at US $330 or$ 9.43/ton. Other Ro~d Freight Costs : it is unlikely that other freight traffic from the Kasese area would be carried in trucks similar to an organized cement movement operation. It is thus assumed that other traffic will be carried largely in Tata trucks with an average load of 7 tons and an operating cost of US$ 0.36 per km. Road transport for commodities other than cement is likely to avoid the need for short distance transport and doublehandling at • the railheads. To take this into account, in a very approximate fashion, the same trip lengths for road and rail are assumed i.e. 333 km. Other freight costs will thus be US$ 17.12 per ton. Operating Cost Benefits to Existing Road Traffic upgrading the road route fully from Kampala to Kasese will not only provide capacity for the new traffic which is expected to be generated in the west of Uganda but  - 5 - Annex I Page 5 of 14 will also reduce operating costs for those vehicles already operating on the route. Estimates of existing traffic on the unimproved sections of the route were obtained from the Transport Data Base : Average Daily Traffic: 1990 Route Section Car Pick-up Mini-bus Bus 2axle Truck Mubende - Kyenjojo 17 20 1 7 16 Kyenjojo - Fort Portal 59 85 1 11 45 Fort Portal - Kasese 88 275 12 9 76 • Existing traffic along the route is assumed to grow at an average 5 percent per annum. This is, however, only a very partial estimate of the likely benefits to the road improvement as it does not take into account traffic which is uses the longer road route from Western Uganda via Katunguru and Mbarara. Estimates of vehicle operating cost savings were made from the operating cost data held by the Transport Data Base and a model which combines the cost relationships of the World Bank's HAM and the TRRL's RITM cost models. Additional Road Maintenance Costs : upgrading the 160kms of existing unpaved road is expected to result in increased annual fixed road maintenance costs of US$ 1500 per km. In addition the heavy traffic generated by Rima Cement and other developments will increase variable maintenance costs. The Road User Charge Study estimated that variable road maintenance costs on the Mityana road were Ush 21.6 per equivalent standard axle (ESA) per km, estimated at a F/E rate of Ush 385 = $1. Assuming that approximately 75 percent of road maintenance costs are foreign exchange this would be equal US$ 0.05 per ESA-km. A six axle truck-trailer or semi-trailer, loaded with 35 tons of cement, would generate just over 10 ESA and a loaded 2 axle truck approximately 2 ESA. Each cement truck from Hima to Kampala would thus result in total road damage of approximately US $ 200. Kasese Line Traffic URC has prepared a demand scenario for the rail system for 1995 which has been basically used in this preliminary re-appraisal of the Kasese line. The URC scenario is based on the assumption that Kasese - Kampala can be considered long-haul and thus basic commodities will be attracted to use rail. For siding-to-siding cement traffic this is probably a justifiable assumption but for 'other' traffic, which involve collection and delivery, transport distances of 300 - 400 kms cannot really be considered as long haul and it is highly probable that transport cost savings, as measured in this analysis, will actually overestimate the true level of benefits as they do not fully take into account the service advantages of road transport.  - 6 - Annex I Page 6 of 14 1995 Kasese Line Traffic (tons) From Kasese To Kasese Cement 160 000 Gypsum 60 000 Coffee 30 000 Salt, sugar 20 000 Maize, beans 50 000 Total 260 000 Total 80 000 URC have also included in their analysis 50 000 tons of transit traffic for the ZBR countries. Considerable further market and cost analysis is required before the potential and rehabilitation costs for re- ' establishing Kasese as a major transit center can be assessed. There is clear potential for Zaire traffic but, for Rwanda and Burundi traffic, Kampala has both administrative and cost advantages at the present URC tariffs. In this analysis transit traffic has been assumed to be carried as a back-haul at marginal additional cost for either road or rail. Consequently total transport operating costs are calculated on the basis of the round trip costs for traffic originating in Western Uganda. The cost for additional road maintenance is, however, calculated on the assumption that 50 percent of the return traffic will be carried by the large trucks and 50 percent by the lighter Tata trucks. Hima cement traffic is assumed constant but other rail traffic and return cargo traffic is assumed to grow at 5 percent per annum from the levels estimated for 1995, the same rate of growth is applied to vehicle flows on the Fort Portal - Mityana road. Economic Analysis The economic feasibility of the rehabilitation of the Kases e Line was tested using the following scenarios: Present URC Performance Scenarios Scenario 1: present locomotive utilization, availability and fuel consumption, general charges 10 percent of direct costs, Kasese rehabilitation US$ 120 million, road cost US$ 48 million. Scenario 2: as scenario 1, except locomotives and wagons are assumed to have no zero opportunity cost. Scenario 3: as scenario 1, except capital cost of Kasese rehabilitation is I reduced to US$ 75 million Scenario 4: as scenario 2, except Kasese cost reduced to US$ 75 million  - 7 - Annex. I Page 7 of 14 Improved URC Performance Scenarios Scenarios 5 - 8: as scenarios 1 - 4, except significantly improved URC performance and rail costs reduced Scenarios 9 - 12: as scenario 5 - 8, except Mityana - Fort Portal road is assumed to be constructed irrespective of the decision upon the Kasese rail link and can therefore be considered as a sunk cost. The results of the analysis for each of the scenarios are shown in the accompanying Tables and are sUIIDI1arized below. ' Net Economic Benefits of Kasese Line Rehabilitation URC Capital Kasese Road Net Present Value(10%) IRR Scenario Costs Charges Cost Built (US $ million) (%) 1 High Yes 120 No -53.6 Neg 2 High No 120 No -35.1 Neg 3 High Yes 75 No -19.5 Neg 4 High No 75 No - 1.0 8.7 5 Low Yes 120 No -42.3 Neg 6 Low No 120 No -28.1 Neg 7 Low Yes 75 No - 8.2 Neg 8 Low No 75 No 6.0 17.2 9 Low Yes 120 Yes -55.1 Neg 10 Low No 120 Yes -40.9 3.1 11 Low Yes 75 Yes -21.0 4.5 12 Low No 75 yes - 6.8 8.3 For the Kasese line to be justified economically it is essential that a) rehabilitation costs are reduced well below the present estimates, b) the Mityana - Fort Portal road is not completed, c) URC operating performance improves substantially and finally, d) the capital cost of the locomotives and wagons can be effectively considered as zero because without the Kasese Line these assets would be idle. The viability of the project is, of course, also totally dependent upon the successful rehabilitation of Hima Cement which is expected to generate a very large proportion, almost 70 percent, of total rail traffic. Each one of these conditions may be possible but the probability of all being achieved does appear more remote. Even if they are achieved the return on the investment is fairly marginal and must be considered in relation to the returns being achieved elsewhere in the transport rehabilitation program. Even if construction costs were reduced to US$ 75 million this would still be the equivalent of rehabilitating over 6 000 kms of rural feeder roads.  - 8 - Annex I Page 8 of 14 In view of the massive expenditures proposed and the uncertainty of the funding it is essential that a full study of transport to the west of Uganda should be undertaken as a matter of the highest priority. Specific benefits to transit traffic have not been included in the analysis as the costs of rehabilitating Kasese as a transit center are not known, the benefits for Rwanda and Burundi using Kasese rather than Kampala negligible and the level of Zaire traffic uncertain. The proposed study should develop an overall transport strategy to serve the needs of Western Uganda and neighboring countries - population, agriculture, industry etc - taking into account the costs and potential of both road and rail and the standards to which they should be improved. •  .... ... UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM kASESE LINE REHABILITATION: Scenar;oa 1 and 2 Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s PV I•; 11 NPV looi 11 IRR Hi . . Traffic Other Rail Traffic 160000 tona 80000 tone I<•••••• capital 129 . 41 110.95 -S3.60 9lR K•••s• wo capital -35 . 14 -4.2 R•t.u rn Traffic 80000 ton• Road solution 75 .81 Ra i I Crow th 5 I Crow th Bue ADT 5 I Capital Coat.a I<••••• Road Hi11a Hi- Traffic Coab Othar Traffic Coat.. Kea• .. RoadHaint Voe.Be" Tot.al I<••••• Coat Net. Roa4 Net. kaaeae Benefit. -3 Unit 24 . 00 Option 9.60 T ruclta Ra; I (1) Ra i I (2) Trude: Rail(!) Ra; I (2) Truclr Fi •edCoa\ Coate 8HeADT Rai I 24. CU, Rai I (2) 24.00 Coat. 9.60 Rai I -14. (!l, Rai I (2) -14.40 -2 24.00 19.20 1.90 24.00 24.00 21 . 10 -2.'IO -2.'IO -I 24.00 19 . 20 0 . 95 1.21 0.81 1.00 0.80 0.30 0 . 91 0.18 O.CIO 25.97 25.07 22 . 97 -3.01 -2.10 0 24.00 1. 43 1. 81 0 . 91 1.S1 0 . 91 0.45 1.37 0.18 1.25 3 .08 28.811 25.52 2.49 -24.39 -23 .03 1 24.00 1.43 2 .72 1.36 2 . 28 1.38 0.88 2.05 0 . 18 1.80 3.22 28.24 26.21 4 . 33 -23.92 -21.88 2 3 .63 1.82 3.02 1.81 0.91 2.74 0.18 2.37 3.38 5.60 2.89 4.75 -0 . 85 1 .86 3 3 . 63 1.82 3 . 02 1 . 91 0 . 98 2.88 0 . 18 2.43 3 . !,S &.69 2.94 4.78 -0 . 91 1.84 4 3.63 1.82 3.02 2.00 1.00 3.02 0 . 18 2 . !iO 3 . 72 5. 79 2 . 911 4 . 111 -0 . 98 1 .83 5 1.33 3.63 1.82 3.02 2 . 10 1.0I> 3 . 17 0.18 2.1>8 3 . 91 &.89 3.03 8.17 0.28 3 . 14 8 0 . 67 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 2 . 21 1.11 3.33 0 . 18 2 . 63 4 . 11 5 . 99 3.09 5 . 54 -0.45 2 . 45 7 1.00 3.63 1.82 3.02 2 . 32 1.18 3 . 50 0.18 2.70 4.31 8.11 3 . 14 &. 91 -0 . 20 2.77 8 1.00 3.63 1.82 3.02 2 . 43 1 .22 3 . 17 0 . 18 2. 78 4 . S3 6 . 22 3.20 5 . 94 -0 . 28 2 . 74 9 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 2 . 55 1.28 3.85 0 . 18 2 .118 4 . 75 6 . 34 3.28 4 . 98 -1.38 1. 72 10 3 . 63 1.82 3.02 2.88 1.34 4 .05 0 .31 2.95 4.99 8 . 62 3.47 5 .02 -1.60 1. !,S 11 1 . 33 3 .63 1.82 3.02 2 .81 1.41 4 . 25 0 . 31 3 .04 5 . 24 8 . 75 3 . 54 8 . 39 -0 . 36 2 . 85 12 0.67 3 . 63 1.82 3 . 02 2.96 1.48 4.46 0.31 3.13 5.50 6.89 3 . 61 5 . 77 -1.12 2.16 13 1.00 3 . 63 1.82 3.02 3.10 i.se 4 . 68 0.31 3 . 23 &. 78 7 . 04 3.69 6 .15 -0 .89 2.46 14 1.00 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 3.28 1.83 4.92 0.31 3 . 33 8 . 07 7 . 20 3. 78 8.20 -1.00 2.43 15 3.63 1.82 3.02 3 . 42 1. 72 5.17 0 .31 3.44 6 . 37 7 . 38 3 . 85 5.25 -2 . 11 1.40 18 3.63 1.82 3.02 3 . 5'1 1.80 5.42 0 . 31 3.55 8.6'1 7.S3 3.93 5.30 -2 . 23 1 . 37 17 1.33 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 3.77 1.8'1 5 . 69 0 .31 3.67 7 . 02 7 . 71 4 . 02 8.69 -1.02 2 .87 18 0.67 3 .63 1.82 3 . 02 3 . 96 1.9'1 5.98 0.31 3 . 79 7.37 7 . 'IO 4.12 6.08 -1.82 1.97 19 1.00 3.63 1.82 3.02 4 . 18 2.0'I 8.28 0.31 3.92 7.74 11 . 10 4 . 22 6.48 -1.62 2.26 '° Rail(l~ • rai I operating coat.a inclu4in1 capital char1•• on loco-,tivaa an4 ••gon• Rail~2 • rail 09erating coat.a without capital charge• on loco1110ti••• an4 ••oon• Net oad Coat• t.otal coat.a of the road 0ption •inua the vehicle operating coat ~enefite to e•iating t.reffic  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s KASESE LINE REH.\BILITATION : Scena,;oa 3 and• PV I•; 11 NPV l•i 11 IRR Hi . . Traffic 160000 t.ona k••••• • cap i tal 95 . 29 -19 . • 8 8lR Other Rai I Traffic 80000 t.one M••••• •o capital 76 83 -1.02 8.7 Return Traffic 80000 tone Road solution 75 . 81 Ra i I Croeth 5 I Cro-t.h 8aae AOT 5 I Capital Coat.a I<••••• Link Road Hi•• Hi•• Traffic Coate R•i I (l) Rail(2) Other Tra,fic Coet.a I<••••• RoadHaint. Voe.Ben Tot.al~••••• Coet Net Ro•d Net k••••• Benefit. Opt.ion True .. • Trucli: R•il(l) R•i I (2) Truell Fi•edCoat Coat.a BneAOT R•il (M R•i I (2) Coet R•i I (1) Ra i I (2) -3 15 . 00 9 . 60 15 . 15 .00 9.60 -5 . •0 -5 . ,o -2 15.00 19 . 20 1.90 15.00 15.00 21 . 10 6 . 10 8.10 -1 15.00 19.20 0.95 1. 21 0 . 61 1.00 0 .60 0 . 30 0 . 91 0. 18 0 .90 16 . 97 16 . 07 22 . 97 5.99 8 . 90 0 15 . 00 1 . 43 1 . 81 0.91 1.51 0.91 0.45 1.37 0 . 18 1.25 3.08 17 . 88 16.52 2 . '9 -15.39 -14 .03 1 15 . 00 I. •3 2 . 72 1.36 2.26 1.38 0 . 68 2 . 05 0 . 16 1 .80 3 . 22 1'.24 17 .21 4 . 33 -14 . 92 -12 .88 2 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 1.81 0 . 91 2. 74 0 . 18 2.37 3 . 38 5 . 60 2 . 119 4 . 75 -0.85 1.M 3 3.63 1 . 82 3.02 1.91 0.91 2 . 88 0.11 2 . 43 3 . 55 5.69 2. '14 4 . 78 -0 . 91 1.84 4 3 . 63 1.82 3 .02 2.00 1.00 3 .02 0.18 2 .50 3 . 72 5 . 7'1 2 . '18 4.81 - 0.98 1.83 5 1.33 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 2.10 1.05 3 . 17 0.18 2 .5' 3. '11 5 . 119 3.03 8 . 17 0 . 28 3 . 14 8 0.67 3.63 1.82 3 . 02 2.21 1.11 3 . 33 0.18 2 . 63 4.11 5 . 9'1 3 .09 5 . 54 -0 . 45 2 . 45 7 1.00 3.63 1 . 82 3.02 2.32 1.16 3.50 0 . 11 2.70 4 . 31 1.11 3 . 14 5 . •n - 0 . 20 2.77 II 1.00 3 . 63 1.82 3 . 02 2 . 43 1.22 3 . 67 0 . 16 2. 71 4.53 1 .22 3 . 20 5 . '14 -0 . 28 2 . 74 9 3 . 63 1.82 3 . 02 2 . 55 1.28 3 . 85 0 . 18 2 .811 4 . 75 8 . 34 3.28 4 . 98 -1 . 36 1.72 10 3 . 63 1.82 3.02 2 . 611 1.34 4 . 05 0.31 2 .95 4 . 9'1 6.62 3 . 47 5 .02 -1. 60 1 . 55 11 1.33 3.63 1 . 82 3 . 02 2 .11 1. 41 4 . 25 0 . 31 3 .04 5 . 24 6.75 3 . 54 8 .39 -0.38 2 . 85 12 0 . 67 3.63 1 . 82 3 .02 2 . 91 1.48 4 . 48 0 . 31 3.13 5 . 50 1 . 89 3.11 5 . 77 -1.12 2 . 16 13 1.00 3 . 63 1 .82 3.02 3.10 1 . 58 4 . 68 0 . 31 3.23 5 . 78 7.04 3.H 8 . 15 -0.89 2 . 46 14 1.00 3 . 63 1.82 3 . 02 3 . 28 1 . 63 4. '12 0 . 31 3 .33 6 . 07 7.20 3.78 6 . 20 -1.00 2 . 43 15 3 . 63 1.82 3 . 02 3 . 42 I. 72 5 . 17 0.31 3 . 44 8.37 7 .341 3 . 85 5.25 -2.11 1.40 18 3 . 63 1.82 3 .02 3.59 1.80 5 . 42 0 . 31 3.55 6.69 7 . 53 3.93 5 .30 -2.23 1.37 17 1 . 33 3 . 63 1 . 82 3 . 02 3.77 1.89 5 .H 0 . 31 3 .67 7.02 7. 71 4.02 1.69 -1.02 2.67 111 0 . 67 3.63 1 . 82 3 . 02 3.98 1.9' 5 . 98 0 . 31 3 . 79 7.37 7 . 90 4.12 8 .08 -1 . 82 1.97 19 1.00 3 . 63 1 . 82 3.02 4 . 18 2 . 09 8 .28 0 . 31 3.92 7 . 74 8.10 4 . 22 6 . 48 -1.62 2 . 26 ...... 0 Raft(t) • rail operating coat.a including capital charge• on loco-.:,t i wea and ••eon• Rail(7) • rail o,,erat.ing coat.a without. capital charge• on locOMOtiv•• and ••eon• Net ~oed Coet • t.ot•I coat• of the road option •fnue the vehicle operating coat ~enefit.a to •• i a\ing traffic "d :i:> p.i ::, (IQ ::, fl) fl) ...... >: 0 H 0 H) ...... .. ~  .. UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s kASESE LINE REHABILITATION Scenario• 5 and I PV lai 11 "1PV l•i 11 IRR Hi•• Traffic 1110000 t.on• t<1•••• •cap it.a I 118 . 10 -•2. 29 -11.4 Other R•il Traffic 80000 ton• kas•s• •o capital 103 . 91 -28 . 10 -0.2 Retu,.n Traffic 80000 t.on• Road aolution 75 .81 fl• i I Croet.h 5 I Crowlh Bue AOT 5 I Capihl Coat.• t< ••••• flo..i Hi•• Hi•• Traffic Coat.a Olher Tr•ffic Co•t. k••••• RoaclMaint Voe . Ben Total ka•••• Coat. Nel Rod Net k••••• Benefit Link Opli- Truclca Roi I (1) Roi I (2) Truclr Rail(l) R•il(2) Truclr Fi••dCoat Co•lo BaaeAOT Ro i l(~ Rail(~ Cool Ro i l(l) Ila i I (2) -3 24.00 9 . 60 24. 24. 9 . SO -14 . 40 -14 . .CO -2 24.00 19.20 1.90 24.00 24 .00 21 . 10 -2 . 90 -2 . 90 -1 24 . 00 19 . 20 0 . 95 0 . 84 0 .38 1.00 0 . 42 0.19 0.91 0 . 16 0.90 25 . 42 24.72 22 . 97 -2.45 -1. 76 0 24 . 00 1. •3 I. 26 0 . 56 1.51 0.63 0.28 1.37 0 . 16 1 . 25 3 . 0I 21 . 05 25.01 2 . 49 - 23 . 51 -22 .51 1 24 . 00 1. •3 1.89 0.85 2 . 21 0 . 95 0.42 2 .05 0 . 16 1.80 3.22 27.00 25 . 43 4 .33 -22 . 67 -21.11 2 2.52 1 . 13 3 . 02 1.21 0 . 511 2 . 74 0 . 111 2.37 3.38 3.94 1.85 4 . 75 0 . 81 2 . 90 3 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 1.32 0 . 59 2 . 88 0.16 2 . 43 3 . 55 4.00 1.88 4 . 78 0 . 78 2 . 90 4 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 1.39 0 . 62 3 . 02 0 . 11 2.50 3.72 4 .07 1. 91 4 .81 0. 74 2 . 90 5 1.33 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 1.46 0.65 3 . 17 0 . 111 2.51 3 . 91 4 . 14 1.94 11 . 17 2 . 03 4 . 23 I 0 . 67 2.52 1.13 3.02 1.53 0 . 69 3 . 33 0 . 16 2.63 4 . 11 4 . 21 1. 'HI 5.54 1 . 33 3 . 56 7 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 1. 61 0.72 3 . 50 0. 111 2 . 70 4.31 4 . 2'I 2 .01 5 . 91 1.62 3 .90 8 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 1.69 0. 76 3 . 67 0 . 16 2.78 4 . 53 4 . 37 2 .05 5 . 94 1 . 57 3 . 90 9 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 1. 77 0.79 3 . 85 0 . 16 2 . 86 4 . 75 4 . 45 2 . 08 4 . 98 0.53 2 . 90 10 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 1.86 0 . 83 4 . 05 0.31 2.95 4 . 99 4 . 69 2.27 5.02 0 . 33 2. 75 11 1.33 2 . 52 1.13 3.02 1. 95 0.88 4.25 0 . 31 3 .0• 5.24 4.79 2 .32 6.39 1 . 61 4 .08 12 0 . 67 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 05 0.92 4 . 46 0 . 31 3 . 13 5 . 50 4 . 88 2 .36 5 . 77 0 . 89 3 . 41 13 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3.02 2 . 16 0 . 97 4 . 68 0 . 31 3 . 23 5.78 4 . 99 2 . 41 11 . 15 1.17 3. 74 14 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 211 1.01 4 . 92 0 . 31 3 . 33 1 . 07 5 .09 2.45 1.20 1.11 3 . 74 15 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 38 1 .07 5 . 17 0 . 31 3.44 8.37 5 . 21 2.51 5 .25 0 . 04 2 . 74 11 2 . 52 1 . 13 3.02 2.50 1 . 12 5 . 42 0 . 31 3 . 55 1.69 5.33 2.541 5.30 -0 . 02 2.74 17 1 . 33 2 . 52 1. 13 3 . 02 2 . 62 1.17 5 . 69 0.31 3 . 67 7.02 5.45 2 . 61 1 . 69 1 . 24 4 . 08 18 0.67 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 2 . 75 1.23 5 . 98 0 .31 3 . 79 7 . 37 5.58 2.67 11 . 08 0 . 50 3 . 41 .._. 19 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3.02 2.89 1.29 6 . 28 0 . 31 3 . 92 7 . 74 5.72 2 . 73 6 . 48 0 . 76 3. 74 .._. flailll~ • rail o,,•raling co•l• including capitol charg•• - locOMOtiw•• and wagon• Rail 2 • rail operating coat.a without capital charge• on locoaot.i••• and ••c,on• Net. oa4 Coat• tot.al coat.a of the road opt.ion •lnua the ••hicle operating coat. benefit.a to aaiat.ing traffic .._. H 0 H)  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development .& Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s KASESE LINE REHABILITATION : Scenario• 7 and 8 PY l•i II NPV l• i II IRR l-4t•• Tr•ffic 150000 ton• K•••• • • c1oit.al 83 . '18 -8 . 17 -2 . 3 Oth•r Reil Traffic 80000 ton• K••••• •o capita l 6'1 . 80 6.01 17 .1 Return Traffic 80000 ton• Road aolution 75 . 81 Rei I Cro•t.h 5 I Crowth Bue AOT 5 I Cap i tel Coet.a I<••••• Link Road Opt.ion Hi •• Truclca H i aa Traff i c Coat.a Rai I (1) Rai I (2) Truclr Othar Traffic Coet• Rai I (1) Rai I (2) Trude K••••• Ro•clHaint. Voc.B.n FiHdCoat Coat.a BHeADT Tot.al KaHee Coet. Rail(M Rail(~ Net. Road Coat. Net. Ka•••• Benef i t. Rail(l) Rai I (2) -3 15.00 9.60 15. 15. 9. IIO -5.40 -5 . 40 -2 15.00 l'l . 20 1. 'lO 15.00 15. 00 21.10 1 . 10 1 . 10 -1 15 .00 19.20 0 . '15 0.84 0 .38 1.00 0.42 0.1, 0.91 0 . 11 0.90 11 . 42 15. 72 22 . 97 1 . 55 7.24 0 15 . 00 l . 43 1.21 0 . 56 l.51 0.13 0 . 211 l.37 0 . 11 1 . 25 3 . 0I 17 .05 11 .0l 2.49 -14 . 511 -13 . 51 l 15 . 00 1 . 43 1 . 8'1 0 . 85 2.28 0 . 95 0 . 42 2.05 0 . 11 1.IIO 3.22 18 .00 11 . 43 4.33 - 13. 67 -12 .11 2 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 1.28 0.51 2 . 74 0 . 11 2.37 3 . 38 3.94 l.85 4.75 0 . 81 2 . 'IO 3 2 . 52 l.13 3 .02 1 .32 0 .5'1 2 . 88 0.111 2 . 43 3.55 4 . 00 1.88 4 . 78 0 . 78 2 . 'IO 4 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 1.39 0 . 62 3.02 0 . 111 2 . 50 3 . 72 4.07 l.91 4 . 81 0 . 74 2 . 'IO 5 1.33 2 . 52 1.13 3.02 1. 48 0 . 65 3 . 17 0 . 11 2.51 3.91 4.14 1.94 1.17 2 . 03 4.23 I 0 . 67 2 .52 1 . 13 3 . 02 1.53 0.19 3.33 0 . 11 2 . 63 4.11 4 . 21 1 . 91 5 . 54 1.33 3 . 51 7 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 1.11 0 . 72 3 . 50 0.111 2 . 70 4.31 4 . 2'1 2 . 01 5 . 91 1.62 3.'IO I 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3.02 1.19 0 . 71 3.S7 0 . 111 2.78 4 . 53 4 . 37 2 .05 5.94 1 . 57 3.'IO 9 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 l. 77 0 . 79 3 . 85 0 . 11 2 . 811 4 . 75 4 . 45 2 . 08 4.98 0 . 53 2 . 'IO 10 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 l.811 0 .83 4.05 0.31 2 . 95 4 . 99 4 . 69 2 . 27 5.02 0.33 2 . 75 11 1 . 33 2.52 1 . 13 3.02 1.'15 0 .88 4.25 0.31 3 . 04 5 . 24 4 . 79 2 . 32 1 . 39 1.61 4 .0I 12 0 .67 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 05 0 . 92 4 . 41 0 .31 3 . 13 5 . 50 4.88 2 . 31 5 . 77 0.89 3 . 41 13 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 2.16 0.'17 4.68 0 . 31 3 . 23 5.71 4 . 9'1 2 . 41 1 . 15 1.17 3 . 74 14 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3.02 2 . 28 1.01 4 . 92 0.31 3 . 33 1.07 5 . 09 2 . 45 1 . 20 1.11 3 . 74 15 2 . 52 1 . 13 3.02 2.31 l.07 5 . 17 0 . 31 3.44 6 . 37 5 . 21 2 . 51 5 . 25 0.04 2 . 74 JI 2.52 1.13 3 .02 2 . 50 J . 12 5 . 42 0 . 31 3 . 55 1.89 5 . 33 2.511 5 . 30 -0 .02 2 . 74 l7 1.33 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2.62 1 . 17 5.69 0 . 31 3 . 67 7 . 02 5 . 45 2.11 1.69 1.24 4 . 06 18 19 0 .67 1.00 2 . 52 2 . 52 1.13 l . 13 3.02 3 . 02 2 . 75 2.89 1.23 l. 2'I 5 . '18 6 . 28 0.31 0 . 31 3 . 7'1 3.92 7 .37 7 . 74 5 . 58 5 . 72 2 . 67 2. 73 1.08 6 . 48 0 . 50 0.76 3 . 41 3 . 74 ..... N Ra i lr~ • r•il operating coata includ i ng capital char. .a on locoaotivea an4 wagon• Rail 2 • rail operating coat.a without capital charo•• on locoaotiwaa an4 wagon• Met oad Coat• tot.at coat.a of th• road opt i on a i nua the veh i cle o,.arating coa\ ~enefita to ea i eting treffic •.  • UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s l<ASESE LINE REHABILITATION Sconor i oa 9 an~ 10 PV 1,.; 11 "-"V l•i 11 IRR Hi•• Traffic 110000 t.ona k••••• • capi t.al 118 . 10 -SS . 14 0.0 Other Rail Traffic 80000 ton• K••••• wo capft.al 103 . 91 - 40.95 3.1 Return Traffic 80000 t.ona Roacf solution 62 . 96 Rei I C,-ow t.h 5 I Cr o-t.h 8••• ADT 5 I Capi t.al Costa k••••• Linlic Road Opt.ion Hi•• Truclr:e Hi . . Traffic Coat.a Rai I (1) Rei I (2) T,-uclr: Ot.her Tnffic Coat.a Rail(l) Ra i I (2) Truclr: k••••• RoadMain, Yoe . Ben F i •edeoat. C:O.t.e 8aaeAOT Tot.al K••••• Coat Rail(l) Rail(2) Net Ro. . Coat Net I<••••• Rail(l) Rail(2) Benef i t -3 24 .00 24.00 24.00 0 .00 -24.00 -24 . 00 -2 24 . 00 1 . 'IO 24 . 00 24 . 00 1.90 -22 . 10 - 22 . 10 -1 24 . 00 0.95 0 . 84 0.38 1.00 0 . 42 0.19 0 .91 0.H O.H 25 . 42 24 . 72 3.53 -21.89 -21. 20 0 24 . 00 1.43 1 . 2t 0 . 511 1 . 51 0 . 113 0.28 1.37 0 . 111 1.01 211 . 05 25 . 01 5.32 - 20.73 -19 . 89 1 24.00 1.43 1.89 0 . 85 2.26 0 . 95 0 . 42 2.05 o. 111 I. 58 77 . 00 25 . 43 7 . 30 -19 . 69 - 18.13 2 2.52 1.13 3.02 1 . 2S 0 . 511 2 . 74 0. 15 2.13 3 . 94 1 . 85 7 . 89 3 . 95 11 .03 3 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 1.32 0 . 59 2 .88 0.18 2.19 4 .00 1 . 88 8 . 09 4.08 8 . 20 4 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 1.39 0 . 112 3 .02 0 . 16 2.28 4 .07 1. 91 8 . 29 4 . 22 6 . 38 5 1 . 33 2.52 1 . 13 3 .02 1.46 0 . 65 3.17 0 . 18 2 .32 4 . 14 1.94 9 . 84 5 . 70 7 . 90 II 0.117 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 1.53 0.119 3 .33 0 . 111 2.39 4.21 1 . 98 9 . 41 5.19 7 . 43 7 1 . 00 2 . 52 1. 13 3 . 02 I.Ill 0.72 3 .50 O. H 2 . 411 4 . 29 2 . 01 9 . 98 5 . 119 7 . 97 8 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 1 . 119 0.78 3 . 117 0.H 2.54 4 . 37 2 . 05 10 . 23 5 . 811 11 . 18 9 2 . 52 1 . 13 3.02 1 . 77 o. 79 3 .85 0 . 111 2.62 4 . 45 2.08 9.49 5 .04 7 . 41 10 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 1.811 0 . 83 4.05 0 . 31 2 . 71 4 . 119 2 . 27 9 . 77 5.08 7.50 11 1 . 33 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 1 . 95 0 . 88 4.25 0 . 31 2.80 4 . 79 2 .32 11.39 8 . Sl 9 . 08 12 0 . 67 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2 .05 0.92 4 . 4S 0 . 31 2 .99 4 .88 2 . 38 11.04 11 . 15 11 . 118 13 1.00 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 111 0.97 4 . 118 0 . 31 2 . 99 4 . 99 2 . 41 11.69 8 . 70 9 . 28 14 1.00 2.52 1.13 3.02 2 . 211 1.01 4 . 92 0.31 3.09 5 . 09 2.45 12.03 8.93 9 .57 15 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 2 .38 1.07 5 . 17 0.31 3 . 20 5 . 21 2 . 51 11 . 38 8 . 17 8 . 87 111 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 2.50 1 . 12 5 . 42 0 . 31 3 . 31 5 .33 2 . 58 11 . 75 8 . 43 9 . 19 17 1.33 2 . 52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 62 1.17 5 .119 0.31 3 . 43 5.45 2 . 111 13. 47 8 .02 10 . 811 18 O.S7 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 2 . 75 1.23 5 . 98 0 . 31 3 . 55 5 . 58 2.117 13. 22 7.U 10.55 19 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 . 02 2 . 89 1 . 29 11 . 28 0 . 31 3.118 5 . 72 2.73 13 . 98 8.26 11.:15 Railll) • rai I c,perat. i ng coat.a includino capital chara•• on locoaotivee and ••gon• Ra i l 2) • rail operat i ng cost.a without. capital chara•• on 1ocoaot.i••• and ••oon• Net. oad Coat.• tot.al coat.a oft.he road opt.ion ainua the veh i cle operating coat. henafit.a to ••iat.ino traffic '"d :i,.. Ill ::l OQ ::l ro ro ...... >: w H 0 1-11 ...... .i:--  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s l<ASESE llNE REHABlUTATJON : Scenor ;oa 11 •nd 12 PV lai II NPV l• i II IRR Hi"'• Trerf i c IISOOOO t.on• k••••• • capital 83 . 98 -21 .02 4 .5 Ot.l,er Reil Traffic 80000 t.on• k••••• wo capital 59 .80 -5 . 84 8 .3 Retur"n Traffic 80000 t.on• Road 90Jutton 62 . 98 Ra i I Cro- th 5 !I Croeth B••• ACT 5 !I Capital Co•h t< . . . . . Ro•d Hi•• Hi1a11 Traffic Coat.a Ot.her Traffic Coat.a K••••• Roa4Haint Yoe.Ben Total K•••. . Coet N,,t Road Nat Ka . .•• Benefit Link Option Trucl.a Rai I (I) R•; I (2) Truell Reil(!) Rai I (2) Truck Fi,a4C-t Coet.a 8HeAOT Rail(~ Ra i l(~ Coet Re i l(~ Rail(~ -3 15.00 15 . 15. 0.00 -15 . - 15. -2 15 . 00 1. 90 15 .00 15.00 l. 90 -13.10 -13. 10 -1 15 . 00 0.95 0 . 84 0 . 38 1.00 0 . 42 0 . 19 0 . 91 0.11 0.11 18 . 42 15.72 3.53 -12.8'1 -12 .20 0 15. 00 1.43 1.25 0 . 51 1 .51 0 .83 0 . 211 1 . 37 0 . 11 1.01 17 .05 11 .01 5.32 -11 . 73 -10.89 1 15.00 I. 43 1.89 0 .85 2.21 0.95 0 . 42 2 .05 o. 18 1 . 51 111 . 00 11.43 7 . 30 - 10. H -9. 13 2 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 1.21 0.51 2 . 74 0 . 18 2.13 3 . 94 1.85 7 . 8' 3 . 95 1.03 3 2 .52 1 . 13 3 .02 1.32 0 . 59 2 .118 0.11 2 . 19 4 .00 1.1111 11.0CI 4 . 08 1 .20 4 2 .52 l . 13 3 .02 1.39 0 . 12 3 . 02 0 . 11 2 . 28 4.07 1 . Cll II . 2CI 4.22 8.38 5 1.33 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 1.41 0 . 15 3 . 17 0.11 2.32 4 . 14 l. Cl4 Cl . 84 5 . 70 7 . 90 5 0 . 87 2 . 52 1.13 3 .02 1.53 0 .H 3 . 33 0 . 11 2.39 4 .21 l.'111 9 . 41 5.19 7 . 43 7 1.00 2 . 52 1 . 13 3.02 1.61 0 . 72 3 . 50 0 . 11 2 . 41 4.29 2.01 9 . '18 5.H 7 . 97 II 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 .02 1.89 0 . 71 3 . 87 0 . 11 2 .54 4 . 37 2 . 05 10.23 5 . 111 8.111 Cl 2 .52 1.13 3 .02 1.77 0.79 3 . 115 0 . 11 2.82 4.45 2.08 9 . 49 5 .04 7 . 41 10 2 .52 1 . 13 3 .02 1.81 0 .113 4.05 0 . 31 2 . 71 4 .89 2.27 Cl . 77 5.08 7 . 50 11 1 . 33 2.52 1.13 3 .02 l . 95 0 . 1111 4 . 25 0 . 31 2 .80 4 . 79 2 . 32 11 . 39 I.Ill Cl .OIi 12 0.57 2 .52 1.13 3 .02 2.05 0 . 92 4 . 41 0 . 31 2.8' 4.1111 2 . 31 11.04 15.15 8.158 13 1.00 2 .52 1.13 3 .02 2 . 115 0 . 97 4 . 811 0 . 31 2 .CICI 4.CICI 2 . 41 11 . H 1 . 70 Cl . 211 14 1.00 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 . 02 2.21 1.01 4 . 92 0 . 31 3 .0CI 5.09 2.45 12 .03 8 . 93 Cl . 57 15 2.52 1 . 13 3.02 2 .38 1.07 5 . 17 0 . 31 3 . 20 5 . 21 2 . 51 11 . 311 1 . 17 8 .87 18 2.52 1.13 3 .02 2 .50 1 . 12 5 . 42 0.31 3.31 5 . 33 2 . 51 11 . 75 l . '3 Cl . !Cl 17 1 . 33 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 .02 2 .82 1 . 17 5 .H 0 . 31 3.43 5 . 45 2 . 11 13. 47 11 . 02 10. 815 18 0 . 57 2 . 52 1 . 13 3 .02 2.75 1.23 5 . CIII 0 . 31 3 .55 5.58 2.17 13. 22 7 . 14 10.55 !Cl 1.00 2.52 1.13 3 .02 2 .89 l . 2CI • . 211 0.31 3 . 111 5 . 72 2.73 13. Cl8 11.21 11 . 25 ...... ~ R• i l11~ • ra i l .,..arat i ng coat.a including capital charg•• on locoaoti••• and ••gc,n• Rail 2 • rail operating coat.a without capital chara•• on locoaot i ••• and ••aon• Net oad Coat• total coat.a of the road option •inua the ••hi c le operating coat benefit.a to •• i ating traffic '"d > ::, Ill ::, (JQ ro ro X ...... H ~ 0 Hl ...... . .. ~  - 15 - Annex I I UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Uganda Railways Corporation Organization Chart IChief Mechanical Engineer !Chief Civil Engineer .. !Chief Signals & Telecoms Engineer !Chief Supplies Manager 'Chief Traffic Manager Managing Chief Director Coordinating Manager jchief Accountant jchief Personnel Manager Legal Secretary Corporation Secretary Public Relation Officer Principal Planning & Development Officer .y Principal Internal Auditor  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s URC Track Network Section Km. Year Rail Max. Trains/Day Ruling Cradient Opened (lb/yard) l9ll ~ !fil Down Malaba - Tororo 14 1927 75 56 23 8 1.0% 1.0% Tororo - Busumbatia 77 1927 80 56 14 6 1.0% 1.0% Busumbatia - Jinja 67 1960 80 56/48 14 6 1.0% 1.0% Jinja - Kampala 91 1928 80 48 18 9 2.0% 2.0% ...... Kampala - Kasese 333 1952-6 50 32/24 7 3 1.5% 1.18% "' Jinja - Mbulamati 55 1911 50 n.a. 14 2 1.25% 1 .25% Mbulamati - Busumbatia 91 1928 50 n.a. 14 2 1.0% 1.0% Tororo - Soroti 161 1928 50 48 8 4 1.5% 1.5% Soroti - Lira 113 1962 45 40 8 4 1.0% 1.0% Lira - Gulu 99 1963 40/32 40 8 4 1.0% 1.0% Gulu - Pakwach 128 1964 40/32 40 8 4 1.0% 1.0% :i,. tj tj ro X H H H ..  .. UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s URC Availability(%): Targets and Performance ~ 1989 1990 1991 (Actual) (Target) (Actual) (Target) (Actual) (Target) Locomotives Mainline: Heavy: Class 82 19 11 15 0 4 33 Standard: Class 71 50 0 34 40 15 50 Class 73 37 60 49 69 59 70 Light: Class 61 34 40 37 55 37 45 Class 62 67 65 67 70 65 71 Overall fleet 39 55 43 55 47 60 ...... -..J Shunting: Class 35 23 40 18 45 0 25 Class 36 17 25 45 60 58 66 Overall fleet 19 32 31 52 29 46 Wagons 72 72 76 75 n.a. 80 Passenger coaches 60 65 66 62 n.a. 60 Wagon ferries 80 80 80 85 n.a. 85  - 18 - Annex V UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s URC Traffic 1983 - 1989 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 Freight (000 mt) coffee • 81 85 76 92 156 170 187 cement 14 17 28 33 40 57 66 fuel 2 10 15 28 34 12 16 grain 46 56 27 29 26 34 19 salt 80 36 28 22 24 27 23 sugar 48 41 32 37 39 32 19 timber 1 3 3 6 * 3 6 other 72 95 55 69 58 69 79 Total 344 343 264 316 377 404 415 Passengers (000) first/upper 83 82 61 36 108 61 29 economy 1,837 1,362 1~061 1,040 1,170 569 403 commuter 822 703 656 402 471 266 149  Annex VI - 19 - Page 1 of 2 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Wagon Ferry Costs Fuel 228 U1h/lt Safari•• 400000 /111onth Capital I 13 11i II ion F/E 480 Life 30 year• Load 36 ton•/wagon Intere•t 10" Load 60" wagon• Trip Co•t• Ki•u111u Wwanza Fuel 2.464 3.277 Oi I 0.123 0.184 Maintenance 0.387 0.428 Provi•ion• 0.080 0.080 Trip Bonu• 0.064 0.064 Total 3.078 4.003 Annual Co•t• SalariH 4.800 Maintenance 31.200 ln•urance 77.378 Total 113.378 Depreciation 208.000 Capital Charge 881.936 Av•r•g• Trip Co•t• Ki•u•u Wwanz• Trip• Avoidable • Depr Fut I Co•t Avoidable • Depr Ful I Co•t 80 4.496 7.096 12.770 6.420 8.020 13.894 110 4.109 8.000 10.128 6.034 8.926 11.061 140 3.888 6.374 8.818 4.813 8.299 9 . 641 170 3.746 4,989 7.839 4.870 6.894 8.684 200 3.846 4.886 8.966 4.670 6.810 7.880 Ton/coat• Kiauau Mwanza Avoid•ble • Depr Full Co•t Avoidable • Depr Full Coat 80 6838 9216 18684 7039 10418 17786 110 6338 7792 13161 8637 8993 14362 140 6049 8979 11190 8261 8180 12391 170 4884 8463 9921 8086 7864 11122 200 4734 8084 9032 6936 7288 10233 USI Ton/Coata Kiauau Wwanza Avoidable • Depr Full Coat Avoidable • Depr Full Coat 80 12.2 19.2 34.6 14.7 21. 7 37.1 110 11.1 18 . 2 27.4 13.8 18.7 29 . 9 140 10. 6 14.6 23.3 13 . 0 17 . 0 26.8 170 10.1 13.4 20.7 12.8 16.9 23 . 2 200 9.9 12.7 18.8 12.4 16 . 2 21.3  - 20 - Annex VI Page 2 of 2 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Barge Costs Fuel 228 U•h/lt Salal'ie• 3eeee8 /11onth Capital Life • 2.6 21 yea,.. F/E Load 488 701 tona Intel'e•t 11 I Tl'ip Coat• Kiau111u Mwanza Fuel 1.434 1.679 Oi I 1.122 1.129 Maintenance Pl'oviaiona Tl'ip Bonua 1.128 1.141 1.141 ...... 1.147 1 .141 Total 1.882 1.836 Annual Coate Sa lal'iea 3.801 Maintenance e.011 Inaul'ance 14 . 881 Total 24.481 Depl'ec:iation 81.IN Capital Chal'ge 141.962 Avel'age Tl'ip Coate Kisuau lilwanza Tl'ips Avoidable + Dep,. Ful I Cost Avoidable + Oep,. Ful I Coet 61 1.162 2.362 3.971 1.324 2.624 4 . 143 76 1.n8 1.788 2.888 1.181 1.Nl 3. 841 16 1.961 1.8se 2.818 1.123 1.829 2.781 96 8.928 1.661 2.413 1.HI 1,724 2,678 186 8.196 1.487 2.237 1.888 1.839 2.418 Ton/costs Kisuau lilwanza Avoidable + Depl' Full Cost Avoidable + Oepl' Fu 11 Cost 61 1846 3369 6872 1892 aeee 6919 76 1412 2666 4197 1869 2812 4344 86 1367 2386 3728 1884 2812 3971 96 1314 2218 3433 1681 2483 3888 11& 1279 2196 31N 1628 2342 3443 USI Ton/Costa Kiauau lilwanza Avoidable + Depl' Ful I Coat Avoidable + Oepr Full Cost &I.I 3.4 7.1 11.8 I.I 3.9 7.6 12.3 76.1 2.9 6.a 8.6 I.I 3.6 6.8 9.1 86.8 2.8 4.9 7.8 8.8 a.a 6.4 8.3 96.1 2.7 4.8 7.2 I.I a.a 6.1 7.7 116.8 2.7 4.4 8.7 8.8 3.2 4.9 7.2  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Organization of the Ministry of Works MINISTER DEPUTY MINISTER ENGINEER- IN-CHIEF N ...... DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL FINANCE AND SUPPLIES DIVISION DIVISION ADMINISTRATION SECTION DEPUTY ENGINEER- DEPUTY ENGINEER- UNDER CHIEF SUPPLY IN-CHIEF IN-CHIEF SECRETARY OFFICER PLANNING DESIGN CONSTRUC- AIRPORT ROAD MAINTE- TRAINING MATERIALS LABO- MECHANICAL SECTION SECTION TION SECT. SECTION NANCE SECTION SECTION RATORY SECTION SECTION  - 22 - Annex VIII Page 1 of 31 Balanced Investment and Maintenance Programs for the Roads Sector Program Unconstrained by Finance Pages 2 - 8 Programs constrained by total Government and Donor resources: Government funding assumed to grow from base of US$ 20 million at an annual rate of 5 percent: Case 1 Annual Donor Funding US$ 30 million Pages 9 - 15 Case 2 Annual Donor Funding US$ 40 million Pages 16 - 22 Case 3 Annual Donor Funding US$ 50 million Pages 23 - 31  - L.) - -ABLE 1. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PRCGRAM - ANNUAL ROAD PROGRAM - PHYSICAL TARGETS Annex VIII '.Page 2 of 31 UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/9B 98/99 99/00 --------------------------------------(kilometers)-------------------------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Standard maintenance 50 683 1,262 1,833 2,233 2,633 2,936 3,236 3,486 3,686 Lesser maintenance 50 100 153 203 103 3 0 0 0 0 Upgrading 0 0 10 20 40 50 50 50 50 50 Rehabilitation 134 134 100 100 100 3 0 0 0 0 GRAVEL Standard maintenance 962 1,442 2, 160 3,363 4,063 4,647 4,852 4,552 4,302 4,102 Lesser maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2,389 1,389 505 0 0 0 0 Upgraai ng 0 20 40 300 300 300 300 250 200 200 Rehabilitation 100 400 1,000 1,000 884 505 0 0 0 0 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Standard maintenance 1,012 2, 126 3,422 5,196 6,296 7,280 7,788 7,788 7, 7'88 7,788 Lesser maintenance 1,050 1,600 2,403 2,592 1,492 508 0 0 0 0 Upgrading 0 20 50 320 340 350 350 300 250 250 Rehabilitation 234 534 1, 100 1,100 984 508 0 0 0 0 FEEDER ROADS Standard maintenance 29 407 975 1,921 2,521 3, 121 3,721 4,321 4,921 5,521 Lesser maintenance 0 0 2,100 5,900 10,200 15,900 16,613 16,013 15,413 14,813 Rehabilitation 300 450 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Culvert Installation 0 100 800 1,600 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 TOTAL ALL ROADS Standard maintenance 1,040 2,533 4,397 7, 117 8,817 10,401 11,509 12, 109 12,709 13,309 Lesser maintenance 1,050 1,600 4,503 8,492 11,692 16,408 16,613 16,013 15,413 14,813 Upgrading 300 470 650 920 940 950 950 900 850 850 Rehabilitation 234 634 1,900 2,700 2,984 2,508 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Culvert Installation 0 100 800 1,600 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 @ Unconstrained case is (1) a 10-year program of full bitumen and gravel highway rehabilitation, (2) a program of traffic-required upgrading, and (3) 600 km/yr of feeder road rehabilitation and extensive culverting of unrehabilitated feeder roads. N:ite: De"tailed assumptions and calculat ions ,n Table :5.  - 24 - Annex VIII TABLE 2. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNME~T ROAD PROGRAM - ROAD INVENTORY, END OF PERIOD Page 3 of 31 UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ Oct 1 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 -------------------------------------------(kilometers)------------------------------------------ HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Rehabilitated-Maintained 50 184 837 1,402 2,233 2,633 2,936 3,236 3,486 3,686 3,886 -Not Maintained 1,355 1,355 856 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 1,405 1,539 1,693 1,833 2,233 2,633 2,936 3,236 3,486 3,686 3,886 Unrehabi litated 571 437 303 203 103 3 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,976 1,976 1,996 2,036 2,336 2,636 2,936 3,236 3,486 3,686 3, 886· GRAVEL Rehabilitated-Maintained 962 1,062 1,822 3,120 4,063 4,647 4,852 4,552 4,302 4,102 3, 902~ -Not Maintained 961 961 581 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 1,923 2,023 2,403 3,363 4,063 4,647 4,852 4,552 4,302 4,102 3,902 Unrehabi litated 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,389 l, 389 505 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 5,812 5,812 5,792 5,752 5,452 5, 152 4,852 4,552 4,302 4,102 3,902 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,012 l, 246 2,660 4,522 6,296 7,280 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 -Not Maintained 2,316 2,316 1,437 674 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,328 3,562 4,097 5,196 6,296 7,280 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 Unrehabi litated 4,460 4,226 3,692 2,592 1,492 508 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 7,788 7,788 7,789 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 29 329 857 1,575 2,521 3, 121 3,721 4,321 4,921 5,521 6, 121 -Not Maintained 542 542 464 346 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 571 871 1,321 1,921 2,521 3, 121 3, 721 4,321 4,921 5,521 6, 121 Culverted 0 0 100 900 2,200 3,900 5,600 7,300 9,000 10,700 12,213 Unrehabilitated/unculverted 19,763 19,463 18,913 17,513 15,613 13,313 11,013 8,713 6,413 4, 113 2,000 TOT-AL 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 TOTAL ALL ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,040 1,574 3,517 6,097 8,817 10,401 11,509 12, 109 12,709 13,309 13,909 -Not Maintained 2,858 2,858 1,901 l, 020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,899 4,433 5,418 7, 11 7 8,817 10,401 11,509 12, 109 12,709 13,309 13,909 Culverted 0 0 100 900 2,200 3,900 5,600 7,300 9,000 10,700 12,213 Llnrehabilitated/unculverted 24,223 23,689 22,605 20,105 17,105 13,821 11,013 8,713 6,413 4, 113 2,000 TOTAL 28, 122 28, 122 28, 123 28,122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 ~ Unconstrained case is (1) a 10-year program of full bitumen and gravel h'ghway rehabil,tation, (2) a program of traffic-required upgrading, and (3) 600 km/yr of feeder road rehabilitation and extensive culverting of unrehabi litated feeder roads. Note: Deta i lec assumptions and calculations in Tacle 5.  - ,_.., - TABLE 3. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED ROAD EXPENDITURES& Annex VIII Page 4 of 31 UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 ------------------------(billion constant 1990 Ush))----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Maintenance 0.2 1. 7 3.6 5. 7 6.7 7.5 8.0 B. 7 9.3 9.8 Upgrading 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1. 7 2. 1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2. 1 Rehabilitation 11. 3 11. 3 7.7 7.7 7.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 11. 4 13.0 11. B 14.2 16.1 9.8 10. 1 10.8 11. 4 11. 9 GRAVEL Maintenance 1. 9 3.2 5.6 8.0 8.3 8.4 8.0 7.3 6.7 6.2 Upgrading 0.0 1.0 2.0 14.7 14.7 14.7 14. 7 12. 3 9.8 9.8 Rehabilitation 1. 6 6.4 14.9 14.3 11. 7 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3.6 10.6 22.5 37.0 34.8 29.3 22.7 19.5 16.5 16.0 • TOTAL HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2.1 4.9 9.3 13.7 15. 1 15.8 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Upgrading 0.0 1. 0 2.4 15.5 16.4 16.8 16.8 14.4 11. 9 11. 9 Rehabilitation 12.9 17.7 22.6 22.0 19.4 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 15.0 23.6 34.2 51. 2 50.9 39. 1 32.8 30.3 27.9 27.9 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.3 1. 0 2.4 3.6 5.0 5. 7 6.2 6.8 7. 3 Rehabilitation 2.5 3.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 3 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Total 2.5 4.2 7.4 10.0 11. 6 13. 1 13.8 14.3 14.8 15.4 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.1 5.2 10. 3 ~6. : 18. 6 20.8 21. 7 22.2 22.8 23.3 Upgrading 0.0 1. 0 2.4 15.5 16.4 16.8 16.8 14.4 11. 9 11. 9 Rehabilitation 15.4 21. 5 27.6 27.0 24.5 11. 5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 3 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Total Road Ex pend i tu re (bi l. 1990 Ush) 17.5 27.B 41. 6 61.2 62.5 52.2 46.5 44.6 42.7 43.3 ------------------------(million constant 1990 us$)----------------------------------- Total Road Expenditure (mil. 1990 us$) 25.1 39.8 59.4 87.4 89.3 74.5 66.5 63.8 61. l 61.8 Exchange Rate 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 & Expenditure table, originally priced in us$, was translated to shillings using imports priced at the indicated exchange rate. @ Unconstrained case is (1) a 10-year program of full bitumen and gravel highway rehabilitation, (2) a program of traffic-required upgrading, and (3) 600 km/yr of feeder road rehabilitation and extensive culverting of unrehabilitated feeder roads. ~ate: Detailed assumptions and calculations in Table 5.  .cl..1.U.J.1.,...A 'w .i...L.i. - 26 - Page 5 of 31 TABLE 4, UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND UGANDA SHILLING REQUIREMENTS UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 FOREIGN EXCHANGE COMPONENT ------------------------(million constant 1990 US$)----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2.2 5.0 9.3 14.0 15.7 16.8 17. 1 17. 1 17.2 17.2 Upgrading 0.0 1. 2 2.9 18.9 19.9 20.4 20.4 17.4 14.5 14. 5 Rehabilitation 15.4 20.6 25.3 24.7 21. 9 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 17.6 26.8 37.5 57.5 57.5 44.2 37.5 34.6 31. 6 31. 7 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.3 0.8 1. 8 2.6 3.6 4.1 4.6 5.0 5. 5 Rehabilitation 2.7 4. 1 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 1. 2 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2. 8. Total 2.7 4.5 7.4 9.6 10.8 11. 8 12. 3 12.8 13.2 13.7 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.2 5.3 10. 1 15.8 18.4 20.4 21. 2 21. 7 22.2 22.7 Upgrading 0.0 1. 2 2.9 18.9 19.9 20.4 20.4 17.4 14.5 14. 5 ' Rehabilitation 18.1 24.6 30.7 30. 1 27.3 12. 4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Culvert Program 0.0 0.1 1. 2 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 TOTAL 20.3 31. 2 44.9 67. 1 68.4 56.0 49.8 47.3 44.9 45.3 UGANDA SHILLING COMPONENT HIGHWAYS Maintenance 0.9 2.0 4.0 5.5 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 Upgrading 0.0 0.2 0.5 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6 3. 1 2.6 2.6 Rehabilitation 3.0 4.7 7.0 6.8 5.8 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3.9 6.9 11. 4 15.6 15.2 11. 7 9.3 8.8 8.2 8.2 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitation 0.9 1. 4 1. 8 1.8 1. 8 1. 8 1. 8 1. 8 1. 8 1. 8 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 0.6 1. 3 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 Total 0.9 1. 6 3. 1 4.7 5.8 6.9 7.3 7.7 8.0 8.3 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 0.9 2.2 4.6 7. 1 8.3 9.4 9.8 10.0 10.3 10. 6 Upgrading 0.0 0.2 0.5 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6 3 .1 2.6 2.6 Rehabilitation 3.9 6.1 8.8 8.6 7.6 4. 1 1. 8 1. 8 1.8 1.8 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 0.6 1. 3 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 1.5 1. 5 1. 5 TOTAL 4.8 8.5 14.5 20.3 20.9 18.6 16.7 16.4 16.2 16.5 TOTAL EXPENDITURE HIGHWAYS Maintenance 3.0 7.0 13.3 19.5 21. 5 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.9 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 22.2 23.4 24.0 24.0 20.5 17.0 17.0 Rehabilitation 18.4 25.3 32.3 31. 4 27.8 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 21. 4 33.7 48.9 73. 1 72.7 55.9 46.8 43.3 39.8 39.9 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.4 1. 5 3.4 5. 1 7. 1 8.2 8.9 9.7 10. 4 Rehabilitation 3.6 5.4 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Culvert Program c.o 0.2 1. 8 3.7 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Total 3.6 6.1 10. 5 14.3 16.6 18. 6 19.7 20.4 21. 2 22. 0 • TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 3.1 7.5 14.7 22.9 26.6 29.8 31. 0 31. 7 32.5 33.3 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 22.2 23.4 24.0 24.0 20.5 17.0 17 .0 Rehabilitation 22.0 30.7 39.5 38.6 35.0 16.5 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 8 3. 7 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 TOTAL 25. 1 39.8 59.4 87.4 89.3 74.5 66.5 63.8 61. 1 61. 8 @ Unconstrained case is (1) a 10-year program of full bitumen and gravel highway rehabilitation, (2) a program of traffic-required upgrading, and (3) 600 km/yr of feeder road rehabilitation and extensive culverting of unrehabi litated feeder roads. Note: Detailed assumpt ions and calculations 1n Table 5.  - 27 - TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS Annex VIII Page 6 of 31 UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ 90 / 91 91 / 92 92 / 93 93 / 94 94 / 95 95 / 96 96 / 97 97 / 96 96 / 99 99 / DD MAINTENANCE' Asphalt concrete highway km in existence - start period 72 72 72 82 102 142 192 242 292 342 km under maintenance 0 72 72 82 102 142 192 242 292 342 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 $ cost resealing / km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 X km resealed/yr ox ox 5X lOX 15X 15X 15X 15X 15X 15X average $ cost/km/ yr 0 2,000 3,600 5,100 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 total $ cost ('ODO) 0 144 259 416 576 602 1,065 1,367 1,650 1,932 foreign exchange component 70X 70X 73X 74X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 2 Bitumen highway - ZBR km in existence - start period 682 716 750 740 720 680 630 580 530 480 km under maintenance 50 278 512 740 720 680 630 580 530 480 $ cost routine maint / km/ yr 2 , 000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 $ cost resealing / km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 X km resealed / yr ox 5X lOX l5X 15X l5X l5X l5X 15X l5X average $ cost/ km/ yr 2,000 3,600 4,650 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 total$ cost ('ODO) 100 1,000 2,382 3,867 3,762 3,553 3,292 3,031 2,769 2,508 foreign exchange component 70X 73X 75X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 3 Bitumen highway - other km in existence - start period 651 751 871 l, 011 l, 411 1,811 2,114 2,414 2,664 2,864 km under maintenance 0 334 677 1,011 1,411 l, 811 2, 114 2,414 2,664 2,864 $ cost routine maint / km/ yr 2,000 2,000 2,000 2 , 000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ cost resealing/ km 13,000 13,000 13 , 000 13,000 13,000 13 , 000 13 , 000 13 , 000 13 , 000 13,000 X km resealed/ yr l2X l2X l2X 12X l2X 12X 12X l2X l2X l2X average $ cost/ km/ yr 0 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3 , 320 3,320 3,320 3,320 total $ cost ( ' ODO) 0 1,108 2,249 3,357 4,685 6,013 7,018 8,014 8,844 9,508 foreign exchange component 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 4 Unrehabilitated bitumen highway km in existence - start period 571 437 303 203 103 3 0 0 0 0 km under maintenance 50 100 153 203 103 3 0 0 0 0 $ cost routine maint / km/ yr 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $ cost resealing / km 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 X km resealed / yr OX ox ox OX ox ox ox ox ox ox average$ cost / km/ yr 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 total$ cost ("ODO) 150 150 301 458 609 309 9 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 5 Gravel highway-Class A km in existence - start period 1,005 1,072 1,320 1 , 780 1,880 l, 764 1,464 1,164 914 714 km under maintenance 503 754 1, 131 1,780 1,880 1,764 1,464 1,164 914 714 $ cost routine / km / yr 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ cost regravelling / km 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 km reg ravel Led (every 3 yrs) 168 251 377 593 627 588 488 388 305 238 average $ cost/km/ yr 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 total $ cost ( ' 000) 1,575 2,513 3,769 5,933 5,257 5,880 4,880 3,880 3,047 2,380 foreign exchange component 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 6 Gravel highway-Class B km in ex i stence - start period 573 598 698 948 1,230 1,563 1,836 1,836 1,836 1,835 km under maintenance 287 430 645 948 1,230 1,563 1, 836 1,836 1,836 1, 836 $ cost routine / km/ yr 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 $ cost regravelling/ km 6 , 500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6 , 500 6,500 6,500 6,500 km regravelled (every 4 yrs) 72 107 161 237 308 391 459 459 459 459 average $ cost / km/ yr 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 total $ cost ( ·ooo) 637 956 1,434 2,109 2,737 3,477 4,085 4,085 4,085 4,085 foreign exchange component 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 7 Gravel highway-Class C km in existence - start period 345 353 385 635 953 l, 321 1,552 1,552 1,552 1,552 km under maintenance 173 259 385 635 953 l , 321 1,552 1,552 1,552 1,552 $ cost rout i ne / km/ yr 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 $ cost regravelling/ km 5,500 5 , 500 5 , 500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 km regravelled (every 5 yrs) 35 52 77 127 191 264 310 310 310 310 average $ cost / km/ yr 1,580 1, 580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 total $ cost ( ' ODO) 273 409 608 1 , 003 1,506 2,086 2,452 2,452 2,452 2,452 foreign exchange component 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X  - Lb - Annex VIII TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) Page 7 of 31 UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 8 Unrehabilitated gravel hi9£1way km in existence 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,389 l, 389 505 0 0 0 0 km under maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2,389 1,389 505 0 0 0 0 $ cost routine-average/km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost spot improvements-avg/km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 average$ cost/km/yr 200 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 total$ cost ('000) 200 750 2,250 2,389 1,389 505 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 50" 50" 50" 50" 50" 50" 50" 50" 50" 50" 9 Rehabilitated feeder road km in existence - start period 571 871 l, 321 l, 921 2,521 3, 121 3,721 4,321 4,921 5, 52 l km under maintenance 29 407 975 1,921 2,521 3, 121 3,721 4,321 4,921 5,521 $ cost routine/km/yr 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost regravelling/km 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 km regravelled (every 6 yrs) 5 68 162 320 420 520 620 720 820 920 average$ cost/km/yr 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 l, 083 l, 083' total$ cost ('000) 31 441 1,056 2,081 2,731 3,381 4,031 4,681 5,331 5,981 foreign exchange component 62" 62" 62" 62" 62" 62" 62" 62" 62" 62" 10 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program km in existence - start period o 0 50 450 1,100 1,750 2,400 3,050 3,700 4,350 km under maintenance o 0 50 450 1,100 1,750 2,400 3,050 3,700 4,350 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 total$ cost ('000) o 0 20 180 440 700 960 1,220 1,480 1,740 foreign exchange component 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 11 Unrehabilitated feeder road - basic culvert program km in existence - start period O 0 50 450 1,100 2,150 3,200 4,250 5,300 6,350 km under maintenance O 0 50 450 1,100 2,150 3,200 4,250 5,300 6,350 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 total$ cost ('000) o 0 15 135 330 645 960 1,275 1,590 1,905 foreign exchange component 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 12 Unrehabilitated feeder road, no culvert program km in existence - start period 19, 763 19,463 18,913 17,513 15,613 13,313 11,013 8,713 6,413 4, 113 km under maintenance 0 0 2,000 5,000 8,000 12,000 11,013 8,713 6,413 4,113 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 total$ cost ('000) 0 0 400 1,000 1,600 2,400 2,203 1,743 1,283 823 foreign exchange component 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" 40" UPGRADING 13 Bitumen highway - AC overlay km bitumen highway strengthened 0 0 10 20 40 50 50 50 50 50 $ cost/km 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 total~ cost ('000) 0 0 600 1,200 2,400 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 foreign exchange component 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 14 Gravel highway-Class A - bituminize km gravel highway bituminized 0 20 40 300 300 300 300 250 200 200 $ cost/km 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 1,400 2,800 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 17,500 14,000 14,000 foreign exchange component 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" REHABILITATION 15 Bitumen highway - ZBR km bitumen highway rehabi Litated# 34 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o' $ cost/km 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 l~C,000 total$ cost ('000) 5, 100 5, 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 16 Bitumen highway - other km ~itumen highway rehabilitated# 100 100 100 100 100 3 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 total$ cost ('000) 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 330 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85" 85"  - 29 - i-1.llll~h Page 8 of 31 V .I. .I. .I. TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAilED ASSUMPTIONS ANO CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) UNCONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE@ 90/91 91 / 92 92/93 93/ 94 94/95 95 / 96 96 / 97 97 / 98 98/ 99 99/ 00 17 Gravel highway-Class A km gravel highway rehabilitated 67 268 500 400 184 o 0 o o o $ cost/km 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25 ,000 25,000 25,000 total$ cost ('000) 1,675 6,700 12,500 10,000 4,600 0 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 751' 751' 75% 751' 75% 751' 75% 751' 751' 7 5% 18 Gravel highway-Class B km gravel highway rehabilitated 25 100 250 282 333 274 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 total$ cost ('000) 500 2 , 000 5,000 5,640 6,650 5,470 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 751' 75% 751' 751' 751' 75% 75% 75" 751' 75" 19 Gravel highway-Class C km gravel highway rehabilitated 8 32 250 318 368 232 0 0 0 0 $ cost/ km 15,000 15,000 15,0DO 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 total$ cost ('000) 120 480 3,750 4,770 5,513 3,473 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 751' 7 5% 751' 751' 7 5" 751' 751' 751' 751' 751' 20 Feeder road km rehabilitated 300 450 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 $ cost/km 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 total$ cost ('000) 3,600 5,400 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7, 200 foreign exchange component 751' 75" 751' 75" 751' 751' 7 51' 7 51' 751' 751' 1001' 1001' 1001' 1001' 1001' 1001' 100% CULVERT PROGRAM 21 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal cu l vert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 400 8DO 800 800 800 800 800 800 $ cost/km 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3 ,000 3 ,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 150 1,200 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 foreign exchange component 65% 65" 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 65% 22 Unrehabilitated feeder road - basic culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 400 800 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 $ cost / km l,600 l, 600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1 , 600 1,600 1,600 total$ cost ( ' 000) 0 80 640 1,280 1,920 1,920 1,920 1 ,920 1,920 1,920 foreign exchange component 65" 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' 651' @ Unconstrained case is Cl) a 10-year program of full bitumen and gravel h i ghway re habilitation, (2) a program of traffic-requ i r ed upgrading, and (3) 600 km/y r of feeder road rehabilitation and extensive culverting of unrehabilitated feede r roads. • Includes minor reconstruction, such as minor reallignment, construction of deter iorated and insufficient structures.  - JU - Annex VIII Tl 9LE •, UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - ANNUAL ROAD PROGRAM - P~YSICAL TARGETS Page 9 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE l@ 90/91 91 / 92 92/93 93/ 94 94 / 95 95 / 96 96/ 97 97 / 98 98/99 99 /00 --------------------------------------(k ilometers)-------------------------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ ASPHALT Standard maintenance 50 681 1,257 l, 827 2,041 2,23 7 2,426 2,612 2 , 792 2,959 Lesser maintenance 50 103 157 209 160 11 l 64 18 0 0 Upgrading 0 0 10 11 22 27 26 37 47 60 Rehabilitation 134 134 94 49 49 47 47 18 0 0 GRAVEL Standard maintenance 962 1,442 2,160 3, 138 3,366 3 ,601 3,829 4,053 4,276 4,526 Lesser maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2,614 2,221 1,839 l, 469 1,105 720 303 Upgrading 0 20 40 165 147 142 140 163 167 193 Rehabilitation 100 400 775 393 382 369 364 385 417 270, TOTAL HIGHWAYS Standard maintenance 1,012 2,123 3,418 4,964 5,40 7 5,838 6,254 6,665 7 , 068 7,485 Lesser maintenance l, 050 1,603 2,407 2 , 824 2,381 l,950 1,534 l,123 720 303 Upgrading 0 20 50 176 169 168 166 199 214 253 Rehabilitation 234 534 868 442 431 416 411 403 41 7 270 FEEDER ROADS Standard maintenance 29 357 850 1,6 72 l,856 2,039 2,216 2 , 39 l 2,635 2 , 948 Lesser maintenance 0 0 2, 100 51755 9,349 14, 102 17,828 17,943 17,699 17 , 386 Rehabilitation 300 450 351 184 184 l 77 175 244 313 361 Culvert Installation 0 100 655 686 844 815 804 l, 123 1,439 l,661 TOTAL ALL ROADS Standard ·maintenance 1,040 2,481 4,268 6,636 7,262 7,877 8,4 71 9,056 9, 70 3 10 ,433 Lesser maintenance l ,050 1,603 4,507 8,573 11, 730 16,052 19,362 19,065 18 , 419 17,689 Upgrad ing 300 470 401 360 352 346 341 443 526 614 Renabi l itation 234 634 1,523 1, 128 1,276 l,232 l,215 1,525 l,85 5 l, 93 1 Culvert Installation 0 100 655 686 844 8 15 804 1,123 l ,439 l,66 1 @ Constra i ned by amount of total government and donor resou rces. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mil lion (1990 dollars) ~Y 5\ p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $30 mi ll ion p . a . Note : Deta i led assumptions and calculations ,n Table 5.  - 31 TAaLE 2. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - ROAD INVENTORY, END OF PERIOD Annex VIII Page 10 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE l@ Oct l June 3D June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 -------------------------------------------(kilometers)---------------------- . ------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ ASPHALT Rehabilitated-Maintained 50 184 835 1,391 2,041 2,237 2,426 2,612 2,792 2,959 3, 152 -Not Maintained 1 , 355 1,355 858 436 D 0 (D) 0 0 (0) 0 -Total 1,405 1,539 1 ,693 1,827 2,041 2,237 2,426 2,612 2,792 2,959 3, 152 Unrehabilitated 571 437 303 209 160 111 64 18 D 0 D TOTAL 1,976 l, 976 l, 996 2,036 2,201 2,348 2,490 2,630 2,792 2,959 3 , 152 GRAVEL Rehabilitated-Maintained 962 l, 062 1,822 2,895 3,366 3 ,60 1 3,829 4,053 4,276 4,526 4,603 -Not Maintained 961 961 581 243 0 0 D D 0 D D -Total 1 ,923 2,023 2,403 3,138 3,366 3,601 3,829 4,053 4,276 4,526 4,603 Unrehabi Li tated 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,614 2,221 l, 839 1,469 1, 10 5 720 303 33 TOTAL 5,812 5,812 5,792 5,752 5,587 5,440 5,298 5,158 4,99 6 4,829 4,63 6 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,012 1,246 2,657 4,286 5,407 5,838 6,254 6,665 7,068 7 ,485 7,755 -Not Maintained 2,316 2,316 1,439 679 D D D 0 0 0 () -Total 3 , 328 3, 562 4,096 4,965 5,407 5 , 838 6,254 6,665 7,068 7,485 7,755 Unrehabilitated 4,460 4,226 3,692 2,824 2,381 l, 950 1,534 1, 123 720 303 33 TOTAL 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,789 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7 ,788 7,788 FEEDER ROADS Rehab ilitated-Maintained 29 329 80 7 1,201 1,856 2,039 2,216 2,391 2, 635 2,948 3,309 -Not Maintained 542 542 514 471 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 571 871 l, 321 1 ,672 1, 85 6 2,039 2,216 2,391 2,635 2,948 3,309 Culverted 0 0 100 755 l, 349 2,102 2,828 3,545 4,545 5,828 7,308 Unrehabilitated/ unculverted 19,763 19 , 463 18,913 17,907 17, 130 16 , 193 15 ,290 14,398 13,153 11,558 9, 717 TOTAL 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 TOTAL ALL ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,040 1 , 574 3,465 5,487 7,262 7,877 8,471 9,056 9, 703 10, 433 11,064 -Not Maintained 2,858 2,858 l, 953 1,150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,899 4,433 5,417 6,637 7,262 7,877 8,4 71 9,056 9,703 10,433 11,064 Culverted 0 0 100 755 1,349 2,102 2,828 3,545 4,545 5,82 8 7 ,308 u~rehabilitated/ unculverted 24,223 23,689 22,605 20,731 19,5 11 18,143 16,823 15 ,521 13,873 11, 861 9,750 TOTAL 28 , 122 28, 122 28 , 122 28,123 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28 ,122 28, 122 28, 12 2 28, 122 @ Constra;ned by amount of total gover nme nt and donor resou r ces . Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mi LL ion ( 1990 dol lars ) by 5% p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $30 million p . a . Note : Detai-Led assumptions and calculations in Tab l e 5 .  - 32 - Annex VIII TABLE 3. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED ROAD EXPENDITURES& Page 11 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE l@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/ 99 99/00 ------------------------(billion constant 1990 Ush))----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Maintenance 0.2 1. 7 3.6 5.7 6.3 6. 7 7.0 7.4 7. 7 8.0 Upgrading 0.0 o.o 0 .4 0.5 0 .9 1. 1 1. 1 1. 5 2.0 2.5 Rehabilitation 11. 3 11. 3 7.2 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.6 1.4 0.0 0.0 Total 11. 4 12.9 11. 3 9.9 11. 0 11. 4 11. 7 10.2 9.7 10.6 GRAVEL Maintenance 1.9 3.2 5. 6 7.8 7. 9 7.9 7.9 8.0 7.9 7 .8 Upgrading 0.0 1.0 2.0 8.1 7.2 6.9 6.9 8.0 8.2 9.4 Rehabilitation 1. 6 6.4 11. 9 5.8 5.4 5.3 5.2 5. 1 5.2 3.0 Total 3.6 10.6 19.5 21. 7 20 . 5 20.1 20.0 21.0 21. 2 20. 2. TOTAL HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2 .1 4.9 9.3 13 . 5 14.2 14.6 15.0 15.3 15.6 15.8 Upgrading 0.0 1. 0 2.4 8.6 8.1 8. 1 8.0 9.5 10. 1 12.0 Rehabilitation 12.9 1 7. 7 19. l 9.6 9.2 8 .9 8.8 6.4 5.2 3.0 Total 15.0 23.6 30. 7 31. 6 31. 5 31. 5 31. 7 31. 3 30 . 9 30. 8 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.3 0.9 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.5 4.7 4.9 5.3 Rehabilitation 2.5 3.8 2.9 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 2.0 2.6 3.0 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 1 1. 1 1. 3 1. 3 1.2 1. 7 2.2 2.6 Total 2.5 4.2 5.0 4 .8 5.7 6.5 7. 2 8.5 9.8 10.9 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.1 5.2 10.2 15.6 17 . 0 18.3 19 . 4 20.0 20.5 21.1 Upgrading 0.0 1. 0 2.4 8.6 8.1 8 .1 8.0 9.5 10. 1 12.0 Rehabilitation 15.4 21. 5 22.0 11. l 10.8 10. 4 10.2 8.5 7.8 6.0 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 1 1. 1 1. 3 1. 3 1.2 1. 7 2.2 2.6 Total Road Expenditure (bil. 1990 Ush) 17.5 27.8 35.7 36.4 37.2 38.0 38.9 39.8 40.7 41. 7 ------------------------(million constant 1990 US$)------------------------- ---------- Total Road Expenditure (mil. 1990 US$) 25.1 39.7 51. 0 52 . 1 53 . 2 54.3 55 . 5 56.8 58.1 59.5 Difference from Unconstrained Case 0.0 -o .1 -8.4 -35.4 -36 . 2 -20.2 -11 . 0 -7.0 -2 . 9 -2.3 Cumulative Difference by 2000 - 123.4 Exchange Rate 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 & Expenditure table, originally priced in US$, was translated to shillings using imports pr i ced at the i ndicated exchange rate. @ Constrained by an-ount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 million (1990 dollars) by 5, p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $30 mil li on p.a . Note: Detailed assumptions and calculations in Table 5.  - 33 - Page 12 of 31 TABLE 4. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND UGANDA SHILLING REQUIREMENTS CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE l!J 90/91 91 / 92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97 / 9B 98/99 99/00 FOREIGN EXCHANGE COMPONENT ------------------------(million constant 1990 us$)----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2.2 5.0 9.3 13.7 14.6 15. l 15.6 16. l 16.5 16.9 Upgrading 0.0 l.2 2.9 10 . 4 9.9 9.8 9.7 l l. 5 12.3 14.5 Rehabilitation 15 . 4 20.6 21. 5 10 . 8 10.4 10.0 9.9 7. 1 5. 5 3.2 Total 17.6 26.8 33.6 34.9 34.8 34.9 35.2 34.8 34.4 34. 6 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.2 0.7 l. 6 2. l 2.6 3. l 3.2 3.4 3.7 Rehabilitation 2.7 4.l 3.2 l. 7 l. 7 l. 6 l. 6 2.2 2.8 3.3 Culvert Program 0.0 0.1 l. 0 l. 0 l.2 l.2 l.2 l. 6 2. l 2.4 Total 2.7 4.4 4.9 4.3 4.9 5.4 5.8 7. 0 8.3 9.3 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.2 5.2 10.0 15.3 16.6 17.7 18 . 7 19.4 20.0 20.6 Upgrading 0.0 l.2 2.9 10.4 9.9 9.8 9.7 l l. 5 12.3 14.5 Rehabilitation 18. l 24.6 24.6 12.5 12 . l ll. 6 l l. 5 9.3 8.3 6.5 Culvert Program 0.0 O.l 1.0 1. 0 l.2 1.2 1.2 l. 6 2.l 2.4 TOTAL 20.3 31.2 38.5 39.2 39.8 40.3 41. 0 41. S 42.7 44.0 UGANDA SHILLING COMPONENT HIGHWAYS Maintenance 0.9 2.0 4.0 5.5 5.7 5.7 5. 7 5.8 5.8 5.7 Upgrading 0.0 0.2 0.5 1. 8 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 2.0 2.2 2.6 Rehabilitation 3.0 4.7 5.8 2.9 2 .8 2.7 2.6 2. 1 l.8 1. l Total 3.9 6.9 10 . 3 10.2 10.2 10. l 10 . l 9.9 9.8 9.4 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitation 0.9 l. 4 l. l 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 1. l Culvert Program 0.0 0. l 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 1. 1 1. 3 Total 0.9 l. 6 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.9 4.5 5. 1 5. 7 6.2 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 0.9 2.2 4.6 7.0 7. 7 8.4 9.1 9.2 9.4 9.6 Upgrading 0.0 0.2 0.5 1. 8 l. 7 1. 7 1. 7 2.0 2.2 2.6 Rehabilitation 3.9 6. 1 6.8 3.4 3.3 3.2 3. 1 2.8 2.8 2.2 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 1. 1 1. 3 TOTAL 4.8 8.5 12 . 5 12.8 13.4 14.0 14 . 5 15 . 0 15 . 5 15.6 TOTAL EXPENDITURE HIGHWAYS Maintenance 3.0 7.0 13.2 19.2 20.2 20.8 21. 4 21. 9 22.3 22.6 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 12 . 2 11. 6 11. 5 11. 4 13.5 14.5 17. 1 Rehabilitation 18.4 25.3 27. 3 13.7 13.2 12. 7 12.5 9.2 7. 4 4.3 Total 21.4 33.7 43.9 45 . 2 45.0 45.0 45.3 44.7 44.l 44.0 FEEDE~ ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.4 1. 4 3.1 4. l 5.3 6.4 6.7 7. l 7. 5 Rehabilitation 3.6 5.4 4 .2 2 .2 2.2 2. 1 2. 1 2.9 3.8 4.3 Culvert Program 0.0 0 .2 1. 5 1. 6 1. 9 1.8 1.8 2.5 3.2 3. 7 Total 3.6 6.0 7.l 6.9 8.2 9.3 10. 3 12. l 14.0 15 . 5 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 3. 1 7.4 14.6 22.3 24.3 26.2 27.7 28.6 29.3 30 .1 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 12.2 11.6 11. 5 11. 4 13.5 14.5 17. 1 Rehabilitation 22.0 30.7 31. 5 15.9 15.4 14.8 14.6 12. 1 11. l 8.6 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 5 1. 6 1. 9 1.8 1.8 2.5 3.2 3. 7 TOTAL 25.1 39. 7 51.0 52. 1 53.2 54.3 55.5 56.8 58.1 59.5 @ Constrained by airount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mill ion (1990 dol Lars) by 5i p.a . Donors assumed to provide a constant $30 mi LL ion p.a. Note : Detai Led assumptions and calculations in Tab l e 5 .  - 34 - Annex VIII TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS ANO CALCULATIONS Page 13 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE l@ 90/91 91 / 92 92/93 93/ 94 94/95 95 / 96 96/97 97/90 90/ 99 99/ 00 MAINTENANCE Asphalt concrete highway km in existence - start period 72 72 72 82 93 115 142 168 204 251 km under maintenance 0 72 72 82 93 115 142 168 204 251 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 $ cost resealing/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 X km resealed/yr OX OX 5X lOX 15X l 5X 15X l 5X l5X 15X average $ cost/km/yr 0 2,000 3,600 5,100 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 total $ cost ('000) 0 144 259 418 526 650 800 948 1, 155 1,420 foreign exchange component 70X 70X 73X 74X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 7€,.~ 2 Bitumen highway - ZBR km in existence - start period 682 716 750 740 729 707 680 654 618 571 km under maintenance 50 278 512 740 729 707 680 654 618 571 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 2,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500" $ cost resealing/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 X km resealed/yr ox 5X lOX l 5X l5X 15X 15X l5X l5X 15X average $ cost/ km/yr 2,000 3,600 4,650 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 total $ cost ( '000) 100 1,000 2,382 3,867 3,809 3,694 3,555 3,418 3,227 2,982 foreign exchange component 70X 73X 75X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 76X 3 Bitumen highway - other km in existence - start period 651 751 871 1,005 1,219 l, 415 1,604 l,790 l,970 2,137 km under maintenance 0 332 673 1,005 1,219 1,415 1,604 l, 790 l, 970 2,137 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 2,000 2 , 000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ cost resealing/ km 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 X km resealed/yr 12X 12X 12X 12X 12X l2X 12X l2X 12X 12X average $ cost/km/yr 0 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 total $ cost ( ' 000) 0 l, 101 2,235 3,335 4,047 4,697 5,324 5,943 6,542 7,096 foreign exchange component 77X 77X 77X 77X 77X 77" 77X 77X 77X 77X 4 Unrehabilitated bitumen highway km in existence - start period 571 437 303 209 160 lll 64 18 0 0 km under maintenance 50 103 157 209 160 111 64 18 0 0 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 3,000 3,000 3 , 000 3,000 3,000 3 , 000 3 , 000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $ cost resealing/ km 13 , 000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 X km resealed/ yr OX OX ox OX ox OX OX OX ox ox average$ cost/km/yr 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 total$ cost ( ' 000) 150 150 308 470 628 481 334 193 53 0 foreign exchange component 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 70X 5 Gravel hignway-Class A km in existence - start period 1,005 1,072 1,320 l, 719 l, 737 1,728 1, 719 1,710 l, 608 1,441 km under maintenance 503 754 l, 131 1,719 1,737 1,728 l, 719 1,710 1,608 1,441 $ cost routine/km/yr 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ cost regravelling/km 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 km regravelled (every 3 yrs) 168 251 377 573 579 576 573 570 536 480 average $ cost/km/yr 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 total $ cost ('000) 1,675 2,513 3,769 5,729 5,790 5,759 5,730 5,701 5,358 4,802 foreign exchange component 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 73X 6 Gravel highway-Class B km in existence - start period 573 598 698 888 1,000 1,133 l, 260 l,386 1 ,562 1, 78 7 km under maintenance 287 430 645 888 1,000 1, 133 l, 260 1,386 l,562 1, 787 . $ cost routine/ km/yr 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 $ cost regravelling/km 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6, 500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6 , 500 km reg ravel led (every 4 yrs) 72 107 161 222 250 283 315 34 7 390 44 7 average $ cost/km/ yr 2,225 2 , 225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 total $ cost ( '000) 637 956 l, 434 l,9 76 2,226 2,520 2,804 3,084 3,475 3,977' foreign exchange component 73X 73X 73% 73% 73X 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 7 Gravel h i ghway-Class C km in existence - start per i od 345 353 385 531 629 741 850 95 7 l, 106 1,298 km under maintenance 173 259 385 531 629 741 850 95 7 1,106 1,298 $ cost routine/km/ yr 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 $ cost regravell i ng/km 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5 , 500 km regravelled (every 5 yrs) 35 52 77 106 126 148 170 191 221 260 average $ cost/km/ yr 1,580 1, 580 1,580 l,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1 , 580 total $ cost ( ' 000) 273 409 608 839 993 l, 171 l,342 1,511 1,748 2, 0 50 foreign exchange component 73X 73% 73% 73X 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73%  Annex VIII - 35 - Page 14 of 31 TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CA LCULATIONS (CONTINUED ) CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE l @ 90 / 91 91 / 92 92 / 93 93/ 94 94 / 95 95 / 96 96/ 97 97 / 98 98 / 99 99/ 00 8 Unrehabilitated gravel h1Q_hway km in existence 3 , 889 3, 789 3,389 2,614 2,221 l, 839 1,469 1, 105 720 303 km under maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2 ,61 4 2,22 1 l, 839 1,469 1,105 720 303 $ cost routine-average/ km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost spot improvements-avg/km/ yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 average$ cost/ km/y r 200 500 1,000 l, 000 1 , 000 1, 000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 total$ cost ( '000) 200 750 2,250 2,614 2,221 1,839 l, 469 1,105 720 303 foreign exchange component 50X 50% 50% 50X 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 9 Rehabilitated feeder road km in existence - start period 571 8 71 1,321 1,672 l , 856 2 ,039 2 ,216 2,39 1 2,635 2,948 km under ma i ntenance 29 357 850 1,672 1,856 2,039 2,216 2,391 2,635 2,948 $ cost routine/ km/y r 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost regravelling/km 4 ,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4 ,000 4,000 4,000 4 ,000 4 ,000 4,000 km regravel l ed (every 6 yrs) 5 60 142 279 309 340 369 399 439 49 1 a verage$ cost/ km/y r 1,083 1,083 1,083 1 , 08 3 1,083 1 , 083 1, 083 1,083 1, 083 l, 083 total"$ cost ( ' 000) 31 387 921 l, 8 11 2, o10 2,209 2,401 2,590 2,855 3 , 194 foreign exchange component 62X 62X 62% 62X 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 10 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program km in existence - start period O o 50 40 l 722 1,044 l, 354 1,660 2,087 2,634 km under maintenance o o 50 40 1 722 l , 044 1, 354 1,660 2,087 2,634 average$ maintenance cost/km/y r 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 total$ cost ('000) o o 20 160 289 417 541 664 835 1,054 foreign exchange compo nent 40X 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 11 Unrehabilitated feeder road - bas i c culvert program km in existence - start period O O 50 354 627 1,058 1,4 74 1,885 2,459 3 ,1 94 km under maintenance o o 50 354 627 l, 058 l, 474 l, 885 2,459 3, 194 average$ maintenance cost/ km/y r 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 total$ cost ('000) o o 15 106 188 3 17 442 566 738 958 fore i gn exchange component 40X 40% 40% 40X 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 12 Unrehabilitated feeder road, no cu lvert program km in existence - start period 19,763 19 ,463 18,913 17,907 17, 130 16,193 15,290 14,398 13,153 11, 558 km under maintenance o o 2 , 000 5 ,000 8 ,000 12,000 15 ,000 14 ,398 13,153 11 ,558 a verage$ maintenance cost/ km/y r 200 200 200 200 20 0 20 0 200 200 200 200 total$ cost c·oooJ 0 0 400 1 ,000 l, 600 2,400 3, 000 2,880 2,63 1 2,3 12 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40X 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% UPGRADING 13 Bitumen highway - AC overlay km bitumen highway strengthened o o 10 11 22 27 26 37 47 60 $ cost /km 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60, 00 0 60,000 60, 000 60,000 60,000 total$ cost ("000) o o 600 66 1 1,322 1,595 l, 574 2,196 2,815 3,598 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstra i ned case lOOX 100% lO OX 55,r; 55% 53% 52% 73X 94% 120% 14 Gr avel highway-C lass A - bituminize km gravel highway bituminized o 20 40 165 147 142 140 163 167 193 $ cost/ km 70,000 70 ,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 7C,OOO total$ cost ('000) 0 l, 40 0 2,80 0 11,572 10,280 9 ,924 9 ,791 11, 388 ll,6 75 13 , 483 fo reign exchange component 85X 85% 85% 85% 85X 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstra i ned case 100% 100% 94% 55% 49% 47% 47% 65% 83% 96% • REHABIL ITATION 15 Bitumen highway - ZBR km bitumen highway rehabilitated• 34 34 o o o 0 0 0 0 o $ cost / km 150, 000 150,000 150 ,000 150 , 000 150,000 150 ,000 150,000 150 , 000 150 ,000 150,000 total$ cost ( ' 000) 5,100 5,100 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 f oreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstra i ned case l OOX 100% 10 5% 55X 55% 53% 52% 73% 94% 108% 16 Bitumen highway - other km bitumen highway rehab ili tated• 100 100 94 49 49 47 47 18 o o $ cost/ km 110,000 110,000 110,000 110 , 000 110,000 11 0, 000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 tota l $ cost ( ' 000) 11,000 11,000 10 , 29 3 5,388 5, 385 5,198 5,129 1,938 0 0 foreign exchange component 85X 85% 8 5X 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 8 5% percentage of unconstr ained case 100% 100% 94% 49% 49% 47% 47% 65% 83% 96%  - _jl) - Annex Vl ll TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUM PT IONS ANO CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) Page 15 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 1~ 90 / 91 91 / 92 92 / 93 93/ 94 94/ 95 95 / 96 96 / 97 97 / 98 98/ 99 99 / 00 17 Gravel highway-Class A km gravel highway rehabilitated 67 268 439 184 138 133 131 60 0 0 $ cost/km 25,000 25,000 25,000 25 ,000 25,000 25 ,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25 ,000 total$ cost ('000) 1,675 6,700 10,965 4,592 3,442 3,323 3 ,278 1,500 0 0 foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX BBX 46X 46X 44X 44X 6 1X 78X 90X 18 Gravel highway-Class B km gravel highway rehabilitated 25 100 190 112 132 128 126 176 225 49 $ cost/km 20 , 000 20 ,000 20,000 20 ,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 total$ cost ('000) 500 2,000 3,801 2,245 2,645 2,553 2,519 3,516 4,506 9n. foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX 76X 40X 40X 38X 38X 53X 68X 78X 19 Gravel highway-Class C km gravel highway rehabilitated 8 32 146 97 112 109 107 149 192 221 $ cost/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 total$ cost ('000) 120 480 2,193 1,460 1,687 l, 628 1,606 2,242 2,873 3,318 foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX 58X 31X 31X 30X 29X 4 1X 52X 60X ' 20 Feeder road km rehabilitated 300 450 351 184 184 177 175 244 313 36 1 $ cost/km 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 total$ cost ('000) 3 , 600 5,400 4,211 2,204 2,203 2,127 2,098 2,928 3, 753 4,334 foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX 58X 3lX 31X 30X 29X 4lX 52X 60X CULVERT PROGRAM 21 Unrehabtlitated feeder road - normal culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 351 367 367 354 350 488 625 722 $ cost/km 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3, 000 3,000 3,000 3 ,000 3 ,000 3,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 150 1,053 1,102 1, 101 1,063 1,049 1,464 1,876 2,16 7 foreign exchange component 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX l OOX 88X 46X 46X 44X 44X 6 1X 78X 90X 22 Unrehabilitated feeder road - basic culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 304 318 477 461 455 634 813 939 $ cost/km 1,600 1,600 l , 600 1,600 1,600 1,600 l,600 1,600 1,600 l ,600 total$ cost ('000) 0 80 487 509 764 737 727 l,015 l, 30 l l. 502 foreign exchange component 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X 65X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX l OOX 76X 40X 40X 3BX 38X 53X 68X 78X ~ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Gover nment funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mi l li on (1990 dollars) by 5X p.a. Donors assumed to prov i de a constant $30 mi llion p . a . # Includes minor reconstruction , such as minor rea llignment, construction of deter io rated and insuff i c i ent st ru ctures .  - 37 - Page 16 of 31 TABLE 1. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - ANNUAL ROAD PROGRAM - PHYSICAL TARGETS ADKINS/11/16/90 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 2@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 --------------------------------------(kilometers)-------------------------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Standard maintenance 50 683 1,262 1,833 2, 115 2,372 2,622 2,888 3, 114 3,385 Lesser maintenance 50 100 153 203 139 74 12 0 0 0 Upgrading 0 0 10 15 29 35 48 45 57 58 Rehabilitation 134 134 100 64 64 63 12 0 0 0 GRAVEL Standard maintenance 962 1,442 2,160 3,363 3,663 3,972 4,259 4,428 4,674 4,403 Lesser maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2,389 1,871 1,369 895 473 0 0 Upgrading 0 20 40 218 193 188 254 227 271 274 Rehabilitation 100 400 1,000 518 502 474 423 473 0 0 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Standard maintenance 1,012 2, 126 3,422 5,196 5, 778 6,345 6,881 7,315 7,788 7,788 Lesser maintenance 1,050 1,600 2,403 2,592 2,010 l, 443 907 473 0 0 Upgrading 0 20 50 232 222 223 301 272 .328 332 Rehabilitation 234 534 1, 100 582 567 536 434 473 0 0 FEEDER ROADS Standard maintenance 29 407 975 1,921 2, 163 2,404 2,638 2,955 3,499 4,371 Lesser maintenance 0 0 2,100 5,900 9,682 14,670 17,696 17,379 16,835 15,963 Rehabilitation 300 450 600 242 241 234 317 544 872 885 Culvert Installation 0 100 800 902 1, 109 1,078 1,458 1,812 2,000 2,000 TOTAL ALL ROADS Standard maintenance 1,040 2,533 4,397 7, 11 7 7,941 8,748 9,519 10, 2 7 1 11,287 12, 159 Lesser maintenance 1,050 1,600 4,503 8,492 11,692 16, 114 18,603 17,852 16,835 15,963 Upgrad1 ng 300 470 650 474 463 457 618 815 1,200 1, 21 7 Rehabi l~tat1on 234 634 1,900 1,484 1,676 1,615 1,893 2,285 2,000 2,000 Culver: Installation 0 100 800 902 1, 109 1,078 1,458 1,812 2,000 2,000 @ Constrained by amount of total gover~men~ and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 million (1990 dollars) by 5~ p.a. Donors assumed to proviae a constant $40 million p.a. Note: Deta i led assumptions and ca l culations in Table 5.  - JO - TABLE 2 . UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - ROAD INVENTORY, END OF PERIOD Annex VIII Page 17 of 31 CONSTRAINED SY FINANCE CASE 2@ Oct l June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 Jc.ne 30 June 30 1990 199 l 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ------------------------------------------- ( kilometers)----------------------- - ------------------ HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Rehabilitated-Maintained 50 184 837 1,402 2,115 2,372 2,622 2,888 3,114 3,385 3,660 -Not Maintained 1,355 1,355 856 431 0 0 (0) (0) 0 0 0 -Total 1,405 1,539 1,693 1,633 2, 115 2,372 2,622 2,888 3, 114 3,385 3,660 Unrehabilitated 571 437 303 203 139 74 12 0 0 0 0 TOTAL l, 976 1,976 l, 996 2,036 2,254 2,446 2,634 2,888 3,114 3,385 3,660. GRAVEL. Rehabilitated-Maintained 962 1,062 1,822 3,120 3,663 3,972 4,259 4,428 4,674 4,403 4,128 -Not Maintained 961 961 581 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 o· -Total 1,923 2,023 2,403 3,363 3,663 3,972 4,259 4,428 4,674 4,403 4,128 Unrehabilitated 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,389 1,871 l, 369 895 473 0 0 0 TOTAL 5,812 5,812 5,792 5,752 5,534 5,342 5,154 4,900 4,6 74 4,403 4 ,1 28 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Rehabilitated-Maintained l, 012 1,246 2,660 4,522 5,778 6,345 6,881 7,315 7,788 7 ,788 7,788 -Not Maintained 2,316 2,316 1,437 674 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,328 3,562 4,097 5,196 5, 778 6,345 6,88 1 7,315 7,788 7 ,788 7,788 Unrehabilitated 4,460 4 , 226 3,692 2,592 2,010 1,443 907 473 0 0 0 TOTAL 7,788 7,788 7,789 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7, 788 7,788 7,788 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 29 329 857 1,575 2, 163 2,404 2,638 2,955 3,499 4,371 5,255 -Not Maintained 542 542 464 346 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 571 871 1,321 l, 921 2, 163 2,404 2,638 2,955 3,499 4,371 5 , 255 Culverted 0 0 100 900 1,682 2,670 3 , 631 4,931 6,471 8,036 9,593 Un~ehabi litated / unculverted l 9, 763 19,463 18,913 17,513 16,490 15,260 14,064 12,447 10,364 7, 928 5,485 TOTAL 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20 , 334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 TOTAL ALL ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,040 1,574 3,517 6,097 7,941 8, 748 9,519 10,271 11,287 12,159 13,043 -Not Maintained 2,858 2,858 1,901 1,020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,899 4,433 5,418 7, 11 7 7,941 8,748 9,519 10,271 11,287 12,159 13,043 Culverted 0 0 100 900 l , 682 2,670 3,631 4,931 6,4 71 8,036 9,593 Unrehabilitated / unculverted 24 , 223 23 , 689 22,605 20, 105 18,500 16,703 14,971 12,920 10,364 7, 928 5,485 TOTAL 28,122 28,122 28, 123 28,122 28, 122 28,122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28,122 @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 million (19 90 dollars) by 5X p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $40 million p.a . Note : Detai Led assumptions and calcu l ations in Table 5.  - 39 - Annex VIII TABLE 3. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED ROAD EXPENDITURES& Page 18 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 2@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/ 95 95 / 96 96/ 97 97 / 98 98/99 99/00 ------------------------ ( billion constant 1990 Ush))----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Maintenance 0.2 l. 7 3.6 5. 7 6.5 6.9 7.4 7.9 8.4 9. l Upgrading 0 .0 0.0 0.4 0 .6 l. 2 l. 5 2 .0 l. 9 2 .4 2.4 Rehabilitation 11.3 11. 3 7. 7 5.0 5.0 4.8 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 11. 4 13.0 11.8 11. 2 12.6 13.2 10.3 9.8 10.8 11. 5 GRAVEL Maintenance l. 9 3.2 5.6 8.0 8.1 8.1 8 .2 7.8 7.6 6.9 Upgrading 0.0 1.0 2.0 10.7 9 .5 9.2 12.4 11. l 13.3 13.4 Rehabilitation l. 6 6.4 14 . 9 7. 6 7. l 6.7 5.2 5.6 0.0 0 .0 Total 3.6 10.6 22.5 26 . 3 24.7 24.0 25 . 8 24.5 20.9 20.4 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2. l 4.9 9.3 13.7 14.5 15. l 15 . 5 15 . 7 16 .0 16 . 0 Upgrading 0 .0 l. 0 2 .4 11. 3 10.7 10. 7 14 . 4 13 . 0 15. 7 15.9 Rehabilitation 12.9 17 . 7 22 . 6 12 . 6 12 . l 11. 5 6 .1 5.6 o.o 0.0 Total 15.0 23.6 34.2 37.5 37.3 37.2 36.l 34 . 3 31. 7 31. 9 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance o.o 0.3 l. 0 2.4 3.2 4.2 4.9 5.2 5.7 6 .4 Rehabilitation 2.5 3.8 5.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.7 4.6 7.3 7.4 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 l. 3 1.5 l. 7 l. 7 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.0 Total 2.5 4.2 7.4 5.9 6.9 7.8 9.8 12 . 5 16.0 16.8 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2. l 5.2 10.3 16 . 1 17 . 7 19 . 2 20.4 20.9 21. 6 22.4 Upgrading 0.0 l. 0 2 .4 11. 3 10 .7 10.7 14.4 13.0 15.7 15.9 Rehabilitation 15 . 4 21. 5 27.6 14 . 6 14. l 13 . 5 8.8 10 . l 7.3 7.4 Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1.3 l. 5 l. 7 l. 7 2.3 2. 7 3.0 3 .0 Total Road Expenditure (bil. 1990 Ush) 17.5 27.8 41. 6 43.4 44.2 45.0 45. 9 46 . 8 47.7 48. 7 --- - ------ - -------------(million consta nt 1990 US$)----------------------- - ----------- Total Road Expenditure (mil. 1990 US$) 25.l 39.8 59.4 62 .1 63.2 64 . 3 65 . 5 66 .8 68. l 69.5 Difference from Unconstrained Case 0.0 0.0 0.0 -25 . 4 -26.1 -10.2 -1.0 3.0 7. 1 7 .7 Cumulative Difference by 2000 -44 . 9 Exchange Rate 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 & Expenditure table, originally priced in US$ , was translated to shillings using imports pr i ced at the indicated exchange rate. @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources . Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mi llion (1 990 dollars) by 5~ p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $40 mill i on p . a. ~ote : Detailed assumptions and calculations in Table 5 .  - 40 - Page 19 of 31 TABLE 4. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED EXPENDITURES : FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND UGANDA SHILLINu REQUIREMENTS CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 2@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93 / 94 94 / 95 95/96 96/ 97 97 / 98 98/ 99 99 / 00 FOREIGN EXCHANGE COMPONENT ------------------------(million constant 1990 US$)-----------------. ----------------- HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2.2 5.0 9.3 14 . 0 15 .0 15.7 16 . 4 16.7 1 7. 1 17.2 Upgrading a.a l. 2 2.9 13 . 7 13 . 0 13.0 17.5 15.8 19. 1 19.3 Rehabilitation 15.4 20.6 25.3 14.2 13 . 7 13.0 6.7 6.0 0.0 0 .0 Total 17.6 26.8 37 . 5 41. g 41. 7 41. 7 40.6 38.5 36.2 36 . 4 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.3 0.8 1. 8 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.6 4. 1 4.6 Rehabilitation 2.7 4. 1 5.4 2.2 2.2 2. 1 2.9 4.9 7.8 8 .0 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 1. 2 1. 4 1. 6 1. 5 2.1 2.5 2.8 2 .a. Total 2.7 4.5 7.4 5.4 6. 1 6.6 8.3 11. 1 14.7 15.4 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.2 5.3 10 . 1 15.8 17.4 18. 7 19.8 20.4 21.2 21. 8 Upgrading a.a 1.2 2.9 13.7 13 . 0 13.0 17 . 5 15.8 19. 1 19. 3• Rehabilitation 18.1 24.6 30.7 16.4 15 . 8 15. 1 9 .6 10 . 8 7.8 8.0 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 1. 2 1.4 1. 6 1. 5 2 .1 2.5 2.8 2.8 TOTAL 20.3 31. 2 44.9 47 . 2 47.8 48.3 49.0 49 . 5 50.9 51. 9 UGANDA SHILLING COMPONENT HIGHWAYS Maintenance 0.9 2.0 4 .0 5.5 5. 7 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 Upgrading 0.0 0 .2 0.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 3. 1 2.8 3.4 3.4 Rehabilitation 3.0 4.7 7.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 2.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3.9 6.9 11. 4 11. 8 11. 6 11. 5 11.0 10. 5 9. 1 9.1 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitation 0.9 l. 4 1. 8 0 .7 0.7 0.7 1. 0 1. 6 2.6 2.7 Culvert Program 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.9 a.a 1.1 1.4 1. 5 1. 5 Total 0.9 1.6 3. 1 3. 1 3.8 4.5 5 .6 6.7 8.2 8.6 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 0.9 2.2 4.6 7. 1 7. 9 8.8 9.4 9.5 9. 7 10 . 1 Upgrading 0 .0 0.2 0.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 3. 1 2.8 3.4 3.4 Rehabilitation 3.9 6. 1 8.8 4.5 4.3 4 .1 3.0 3.6 2.6 2.7 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.8 1. 1 1. 4 1. 5 1.5 TOTAL 4.8 8.5 14 . 5 14.8 15.4 16.0 16.6 17.3 17.2 17 . 7 TOTAL EXPENDITURE HIGHWAYS Maintenance 3.0 7. 0 13 . 3 19 . 5 20 . 8 21. 5 22 . 2 22.5 22.8 22. 9 Upgrading 0.0 l. 4 3 .4 16. 1 15 . 2 15.2 20 . 6 18.6 22.4 22. 7 Rehabilitation 18 . 4 25 . 3 32 . 3 18 . 0 17.3 16.4 8.8 7. 9 a.a 0 .0 Total 21. 4 33.7 48.9 53 .6 53 . 3 53.2 51. 6 49.0 45 . 2 45 . 5 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.4 1. 5 3.4 4 .5 5.9 6.9 7.4 8.1 9.1 Rehabilitation 3.6 5.4 7.2 2.9 2.9 2.8 3 .8 6.5 10.5 10.6 Culvert Program a.a 0.2 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.4 3.2 3 .9 4.3 4.3 Total 3.6 6 .1 10.5 8.4 9 .9 11. 1 14.0 17. 8 22.9 24 .0 • TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 3.1 7. 5 14 . 7 22. 9 25.3 27.5 29 .l 29 .9 30.9 31. 9 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 16. 1 15.2 15.2 20 . 6 18.6 22 . 4 22.7 Rehabilitation 22.0 30.7 39.5 20 . 9 20.2 19.3 12.6 14.5 10.5 10. 6 . Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 8 2. 1 2.5 2.4 3.2 3.9 4.3 4.3 TOTAL 25.1 39.8 59.4 62 . 1 63 . 2 64 . 3 65.5 6 6 .8 68.1 69.5 @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mi l l i o n ( : 990 dollars) by 5% p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $40 mi l l i on p.a . Note : Detailed assumptions and calculations in Taole 5.  - 41 - TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS Annex VIII Page 20 or 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 2@ 90/91 91 / 92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 MAINTENANCE Asphalt concrete highway km in existence - start period 72 72 72 82 97 125 161 208 253 311 km under maintenance 0 72 72 82 97 125 161 208 253 311 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 $ cost resealing/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 " km resealed/yr average $ cost/km/yr o" 0 2,000 o" 5" 3,600 10" 5,100 15" 5,650 15" 5,650 15" 5,650 15" 5,650 15" 5,650 15" 5,650 total $ cost ('000) 0 144 259 418 545 709 907 1,176 1,432 1,756 foreign exchange component 70" 70" 73" 74" 76" 76" 76" 76" 76" 76" 2 Bitumen highway - ZBR km in existence - start period 682 716 750 740 725 697 661 614 569 511 km under maintenance 50 278 512 740 725 697 661 614 569 511 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 2 , 000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 $ cost resealing/ km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 " km resealed/yr o" 5" 10" 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" average $ cost/km/yr 2,000 3,600 4,650 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 total$ cost ( ' 000) 100 1,000 2,382 3,867 3,791 3,540 3,456 3,207 2,971 2,571 foreign exchange component 70" 73" 75" 76" 76" 76" 76" 76" 76" 76" 3 Bitumen highway - other km in existence - start period 651 751 871 1,011 1,293 1,550 1,800 2,066 2,292 2,563 km under maintenance 0 334 677 1,011 1,293 1,550 1,800 2,066 2,292 2,563 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ cost resealing/km 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 " km resealed/yr 12" 12" 12" 12" 12" 12" 12" 12" 12" 12" average$ cost/km/yr 0 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 total$ cost ( '000) 0 1,108 2,249 3,357 4,293 5,147 5,977 6,858 7,610 8,510 foreign exchange component 77" 77" 77" 77" 77" 77" 77" 77" 77" 77" 4 Unrehabilitated bitumen highway km in existence - start period 571 437 303 203 139 74 12 0 0 0 km under maintenance 50 100 153 203 139 74 12 0 0 0 $ cost routine maint/km/ yr 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $ cost resealing/km 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 " km resealed / yr average $ cost/km/yr 3,000 o" 3,000 o" 3,000 o" 3,000 o" o" 3,000 3,000 o" 3,000 o" 3,000 o" 3,000 o" 3,000 o" total $ cost ( ' 000) 150 150 301 458 609 416 223 35 0 0 foreign exchange component 70" 70" 70" 70" 70" 70" 70" 70" 70" 70" 5 Gravel highway-Class A km in existence - start period 1,005 1,072 1,320 1,780 1,804 l, 792 1,766 1,512 1,286 1,015 km under maintenance 503 754 l, 131 1,780 1,804 1, 792 l, 766 1,512 1,286 1,015 $ cost routine/km/yr 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ cost regravelling/km 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8 , 000 8,000 8,000 km regravelled (every 3 yrs) 168 251 377 593 601 597 589 504 429 338 average $ cost/km/yr 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 total$ cost ( ' 000) 1,675 2,513 3,769 5,933 6,014 5,974 5,887 5,041 4,286 3,383 foreign exchange component 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 6 Gravel hignway-Class B km in existence - start period 573 598 698 948 1,096 1,269 1,438 1,667 1,836 1,836 km under maintenance 287 430 645 948 1,096 l,269 1,438 1,667 1,836 1,836 $ c~st routine/ km/yr 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 BOO 800 800 $ cost regravelling/km 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6 , 500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 km regravelled (every 4 yrs) 72 107 161 237 274 317 360 417 459 459 average $ cost/km/yr 2,225 2,225 2 , 225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 total$ cost ( ' 000) 637 956 1,434 2,109 2,438 2,824 3,200 3,708 4,085 4,085 foreign exchange component 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 73" 7 Gravel highway-Class C km in existence - start per i od 345 353 385 635 763 911 1,054 1,249 1,552 1,552 km under maintenance 173 259 385 635 763 911 1,054 1,249 1,552 1,552 $ cost routine/km/y r 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 $ cost regravelling/km 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 km regravelled (every 5 yrs) 35 52 77 127 153 182 211 250 310 310 average $ cost/ km/yr 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 total$ cost ('000) 273 409 608 1,003 1,206 l, 439 1,666 l, 973 2,452 2,452 foreign exchange component 73" 7 3" 73" 7 3" 7 3" 7 3" 7 3" 7 3" 73" 73"  - 42 - TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) Annex VIII Page 22 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 2@ 90/91 91 / 92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 8 Unrehabil1tated gravel higt,way km in ex1stence 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,389 l, 871 1,369 895 473 0 0 km under maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2,389 l, 871 1,369 895 473 0 0 $ cost routine-average/km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost spot improvements-avg/km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 average$ cost/km/yr 200 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 total$ cost ('000) 200 750 2,250 2,389 1,871 1,369 895 473 0 0 foreign exchange component 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 9 Rehabilitated feeder road km in existence - start period 571 871 1,321 1,921 2, 163 2,404 2,638 2,955 3,499 4,371. km under maintenance 29 407 975 l, 921 2,163 2,404 2,638 2,955 3,499 4,37,. $ cost routine / km/ yr 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost regravelling / km 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 km regravelled (every 6 yrs) 5 68 162 320 360 401 440 493 583 728 average$ cost/km/yr 1 , 083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 l, 083. total$ cost ('000) 31 441 1,056 2,081 2,343 2,604 2,858 3,202 3,791 4,735 foreign exchange component 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 10 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program km in existence - start period 0 0 50 450 873 1,295 1,705 2,260 2,849 3,431 km under maintenance 0 0 50 450 873 1,295 1,705 2,260 2,849 3,431 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 total$ cost ('000) 0 0 20 180 349 518 682 904 1,140 1,372 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 11 Unrehabilitated feeder road - basic culvert program km in existence - start period 0 0 50 450 809 1,375 1,926 2,671 3,622 4,605 km under maintenance 0 0 50 450 809 1,375 l, 926 2,671 3,622 4,605 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 total$ cost ( '000) 0 0 15 135 243 413 578 801 1,087 l, 381 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 12 Unrehabilitated feeder road, no culvert program km in ·existence - start period 19,763 19,463 18,913 17,5 13 16,490 15,260 14,064 12,447 10, 364 7,928 km under maintenance 0 0 2,000 5,000 8,000 12,000 14,064 12,447 10, 364 7,928 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 total$ cost ('000) 0 0 400 1,000 1,600 2,400 2,813 2,489 2,073 1,586 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% UPGRADING 13 Bitumen highway - AC overlay km bitumen highway strengthened 0 0 10 15 29 35 48 45 57 58 $ cost/km 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 0 600 870 1,736 2, 110 2,853 2,718 3,442 3,463 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 73% 72% 70% 95% 91% 115% 115% 14 Gravel highway-Class A - bituminize km gravel highway bituminized 0 20 40 218 193 188 254 227 271 274 $ cost/km 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 1,400 2,800 15,229 13,505 13,128 17,754 15,855 18,972 19,209 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 73% 64% 63% 85% 91% 136% 137~ REHABILITATION 15 Bitumen highway - ZBR km bitumen highway rehabilitated# 34 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 total$ cost ('000) 5,100 5,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 7 3% 7 2% 70% 95% 91% 100% 100% 16 Bitumen highway - other km bitumen highway rehabilitated# 100 100 100 64 64 63 12 0 0 0 $ cost/ km 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110 , 000 110,000 total$ cost ('000) 11,000 11,000 11,000 7,091 7,074 6,876 1,289 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 64% 64% 63% 85% 91% 100% 100%  - 43 - Annex VIII TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS ANO CALCULA TIONS (CONTINUED) Page 22 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 2@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/9 4 94 / 95 95 / 96 96/ 97 97 / 98 98/ 99 99 /00 17 Gravel highway-Class A km gravel highway rehabilitated 67 268 500 242 18 1 161 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25 ,000 total$ cost ('000) 1,675 6,700 12,500 6,043 4,522 4 ,035 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 60% 60% 59% 79% 91% 100% 100% 18 Gravel highway-Class B km gravel highway rehabilitated 25 100 250 148 174 169 228 169 0 0 $ cost/km 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 total$ cost ('000) 500 2,000 5,000 2,954 3,475 3,378 4,568 3,386 0 0 foreign exchange component 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 52% 52% 51% 69% 91% 100% 100% 19 Gravel highway-Class C km gravel highway rehabilitated 8 32 250 128 148 144 194 303 0 0 $ cost/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 total$ cost ('000) 120 480 3,750 1,922 2,216 2,154 2,913 4,551 0 0 foreign exchange component 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 40% 40% 39% 53% 91% 100% 100% 20 Feeder road km rehabilitated 300 450 600 242 241 234 317 544 872 885 $ cost/km 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 total$ cost ('000) 3,600 5,400 7,200 2,901 2,894 2,813 3,804 6,523 10,459 10,615 foreign exchange component 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 40% 40% 39% 53% 91% 145% 147% CULVERT PROGRAM 21 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 . 50 400 483 482 469 634 725 800 800 $ cost/km 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3 ,000 3,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 150 1,200 1,450 1,447 1,407 1,902 2,174 2,400 2,400 foreign exchange component 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 60% 60% 59% 79% 91% 100% 100% 22 Unrehabi litated feeder road - basic culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 400 419 627 609 824 1,087 1,200 1,200 $ cost/km 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 total$ cost ('000) 0 80 640 670 1,003 975 1,319 l, 740 1,920 1, 920 foreign exchange component 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 52% 52% 51% 69% 91% 100% 100% @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mi llion (19 90 dollars)· by 5% p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $40 million p.a. # Includes minor reconstruction, such as minor rea l li9nment, cons truction of dete riorated and insuff ici ent s truc tures.  - 44 - TABLE i. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - ANNUAL ROAD PROGRAM - PHYSICAL TARGETS Annex VIII Page 23 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ 90 / 91 91 / 92 92 / 93 93 / 94 94 / 95 95 / 96 96/ 97 97 / 98 98/ 99 99 / 00 ------------------------ ------- ------- ( ki lometers )--------- ----------------------- ------ HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Standard maintenance 50 683 1 , 262 1,833 2, 187 2,510 2 , 844 3,147 3,424 3,651 Lesser maintenance 50 100 153 203 122 41 0 0 0 0 Upgrading 0 0 10 18 36 50 50 52 52 52 Rehabilitation 134 134 100 Bl 81 41 0 0 0 0 GRAVEL Standarc: mairtenance 962 l, 442 2, 160 3,363 3 ,740 4, 12 8 4 , 376 4 , 64 1 4,364 . 4,137 Lesser maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2 , 389 l, 739 1,109 568 0 0 0 Upgrading 0 20 40 273 242 293 303 277 227 227 Rehabilitation 100 400 1,000 650 630 542 568 0 0 0 . TOTAL HIGHWAYS Standard maintenance l, 012 2,126 3,422 5,196 5,927 6 ,637 7,220 7,788 7,788 7 , 788 Lesser maintenance 1,050 1,600 2,403 2,592 1,86 1 1, 15 1 568 0 0 0 Upgrading 0 20 50 291 278 343 353 329 2 79 2 79 Rehabil itation 234 534 1,100 731 710 583 568 0 0 0 FEEDER ROADS Standard maintenance 29 407 975 1,921 2,22 5 2 ,52 7 2 , 893 3 ,522 4,366 5, 210 Lesser maintenance 0 0 2,100 5,900 9,881 15 , 121 l 7,441 16 , 812 15,968 15,124 Rehab i litation 300 450 600 304 302 366 629 844 844 844 Culvert Installation 0 100 800 l, 133 l, 391 1 , 684 2,000 2,000 2,000 2 ,000 TOTAL ALL ROADS Standard maintenance 1,040 2,533 4,397 7, 11 7 8 , 151 9, 164 10 , 113 11,310 12, 154 12,998 Lesser maintenance 1,050 1,600 4 ,503 8,492 11, 743 16,2 72 18,009 16,8 12 15,968 15,124 Upgrading 300 470 650 595 581 709 982 1, l 73 l, 123 l, 12 3 Rehab i litat i on 234 634 1,900 l, 864 2 , 101 2,267 2,568 2,000 2 ,000 2,000 Culvert Installation 0 100 800 1,133 1 , 391 1,684 2,000 2, 000 2,000 2, 000 @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 mi llion (1 99C dollars) by 5:11: p . a. Donors assumed to prov i de a constant $50 mi LL i on p . a. Note : Detai Led assumptions and calculat i ons in Tab l e 5.  - 45 - TABLE 2 . UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMEN T ROAD PROGRAM - ROAD INV ENTORY, END OF PERIOD Annex VIII Page 24 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ Oct l June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 Ju ne 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ----------------- - ------------------------- (kilometers)------------------------------------------ HIGHWAYS BITUMEN/ASPHALT Rehabilitated-Maintained 50 184 837 l, 402 2,187 2,510 2,844 3,147 3,424 3,651 3,879 -Not Maintained 1,355 1,355 856 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 1,405 1,539 1,693 1,833 2,187 2,510 2,844 3,147 3,424 3,651 3,879 Unrehabilitated 571 437 303 203 122 41 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL l, 976 1,976 1,996 2,036 2,309 2,551 2,844 3, 147 3,424 3,651 3 , 879 GRAVEL Rehabilitated-Maintained 962 1 , 062 1,822 3, 120 3,740 4,128 4,376 4,641 4,364 4, 137 3,909 -Not Maintained 961 961 581 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 1,923 2,023 2,403 3,363 3 , 740 4,128 4,376 4,641 4,364 4,137 3 ,909 Unrehabilitated 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,389 1, 739 l, 109 568 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 5,812 5,812 5,792 5,752 5,479 5,237 4,944 4,641 4,364 4,137 3,909 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,012 1,246 2,660 4,522 5,927 6,637 7,220 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 -Not Maintained 2,316 2,316 l,437 674 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,328 3,562 4,09 7 5, 196 5,927 6,637 7,220 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 unrehabi l i tated 4,460 4,226 3 ,692 2,592 l, 861 l, 151 568 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 7,788 7,788 7,789 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 7,788 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 29 329 857 1,575 2,225 2,527 2,893 3,522 4,366 5,210 6,055 -Not Maintained 542 542 464 346 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 571 871 l, 32 l l, 921 2,225 2,527 2,893 3,522 4,366 5,210 6,055 Culverted 0 0 100 900 1,881 3 , 121 4,622 6,307 7,885 9,463 ll,041 Unrehab1litated/ unculverted 19, 763 19,463 18,913 17,513 16,228 14,686 12,819 10 , 505 8,083 5,661 3 ,238 TOTAL 20 , 334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20,334 20, 334 20,334 TOTAL ALL ROADS Rehabilitated-Maintained 1,040 1,574 3,517 6,097 8,151 9,164 10,113 11,310 12, 154 12,998 13,843 -Not Maintained 2,858 2,858 l, 90 l 1,020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total 3,899 4,433 5,418 7, 11 7 8 , 151 9, 164 10, 113 11,310 12, 154 12 ,998 13,843 Culverted 0 0 100 900 1,881 3, 121 4,622 6,307 7,885 9,463 11,041 Unrehabilitated / uncul verted 24,223 23,689 22,605 20, 105 18 , 089 15,837 13,38 7 10,505 8,083 5,661 3,238 TOTAL 28, 122 28, 122 28, 123 28, 122 28, 122 28,122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 28, 122 @ Constrained by amount of total government and dono r resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 million ( 1990 dol Lars) by 5,: p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $50 million p . a. Note : Detailed assumptions and calculations in Table 5 .  - "+0 - TABLE 3. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED ROAD EXPEN DITURES& Annex VI II Page 25 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ 90 / 91 91 / 92 92 / 93 93/ 94 94 /9 5 95 / 96 96/ 97 97/98 98/ 99 99/ 00 ------------------------(bi lli on constant 1990 Ush))----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS 8ITUMEN/ASPHAL T Maintenance 0.2 l. 7 3.6 5.7 6.6 7.2 7.8 8.5 9. l 9.7 Upgrading a.a 0.0 0 .4 0.8 1. 5 2. 1 2. l 2.2 2.2 2.2 Rehabilitation 11. 3 11.3 7.7 6.2 6.2 3 .2 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 Total 11. 4 13.0 11. 8 12. 7 14.4 12 . 5 10.0 10.6 l l. 3 11 . 8 GRAVEL Maintenance l. 9 3.2 5.6 8.0 8.1 8.2 7. 9 7. 5 6. 9 6.3 Upgrading a.a l. 0 2 .0 13.4 11.9 14.3 14.9 13 . 6 11. 1 l l. l Rehabilitation l. 6 6.4 14.9 9.6 9.0 7.0 6. 7 0.0 0 .0 0 .0 Total 3.6 10. 6 22.5 31. 0 28 . 9 29.5 29 . 5 21. 1 18.0 l 7. 5 TOTAL HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2.1 4.9 9.3 13.7 14.7 15.4 15. 7 16.0 16.0 16.0 Upgrading a.a 1.0 2 .4 14.2 13.4 16.4 17.0 15. 7 13 . 3 13.3 Rehabilitation 12.9 17.7 22 . 6 15 . 8 15.2 10 .2 6. 7 0.0 a.a 0.0 Total 15 .a 23 . 6 34 . 2 43.7 43.3 42 . 0 39.4 31. 7 29.3 29.3 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance a.a 0.3 l. 0 2.4 3.3 4.4 5. 1 5. 7 6.3 7.0 Rehabilitation 2.5 3.8 5.0 2.5 2.5 3. l 5.3 7.l 7.l 7. l Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 3 1. 9 2.2 2.6 3 .0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Total 2.5 4.2 7.4 6.8 8 .0 10.0 13 . 4 15.8 16.5 1 7. 1 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.1 5.2 10. 3 16. 1 18 . 0 19 . 7 20.8 21. 6 22.3 23 . 0 Upgrading 0.0 1.0 2.4 14.2 13.4 16.4 17.0 15. 7 13.3 13 . 3 Rehabilitation 15.4 21. 5 27.6 18.4 17.7 13.3 12.0 7. l 7.l 7.l Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. 3 1. 9 2.2 2.6 3. 0 3. 0 3. 0 3.0 Total Road Expenditure (bil. 1990 Ush) 17.5 27.8 41. 6 50 . 4 51.2 52.0 52.B 47. 5 45. 7 46 . 4 ------------------------(milli on constant 1990 US$)--------------------- - ------------- Total Road Expenditure (mil. 1990 us$) 25.l 39.8 59.4 72.l 73 . 2 74.3 75 .5 6 7 .9 65.3 66.3 Difference from Unconstrained Case 0.0 0.0 0.0 -15 . 4 -16. l -0 .2 9.0 4. l 4.3 4.5 Cumulative Difference by 2000 -9.8 Exchange Rate 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 & Expenditure table, originally priced in US$, was translated to shillings us i ng imports priced at the indicated exc hange rate. @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor r esources. Governm ent funds assumed to grow from a base o f $20 mi l l ion ( 1990 dollars) by 5i p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $50 mi l lion p.a. Note: Detailed assumptions and calculations in Table 5.  - '-ti - Annex \I .l LL TABLE 4. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND UGANDA SHILLING Pa~e 26 o f 31 R-QUIREMENTS CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ 90 / 91 91 / 92 92 / 93 93 / 94 94 /9 5 95 / 96 96 / 97 97 / 98 98 / 99 99/00 FOREIGN cXCHANGE COMPONENT ------------------------(million constant 1990 us$)----------------------------------- HIGHWAYS Maintenance 2.2 5.0 9.3 14.0 15.3 16.2 16.7 17. l 17.2 17.2 Upgrading 0.0 1.2 2.9 17.2 16.2 20.0 20.6 19. l 16. l 16. l Rehabi Litation 15.4 20.6 25.3 17.9 17. l 11. 4 7. 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 17.6 26.8 37.5 49 . 0 48.7 47.5 44.5 36.2 33.3 33.4 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance o.o 0.3 0.8 i. a 2.4 3.1 3.6 4.1 4.6 5.2 Rehabilitation 2. 7 4.1 5.4 2. 7 2. 7 3.3 5. 7 7. 6 7. 6 7.6 Culvert Program 0.0 0.1 1. 2 1. 7 2.0 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 Total 2.7 4.5 7.4 6.3 7. l a.a 12 . l 14.5 15 . 0 15.6 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 2.2 5.3 10. l 15.8 17. 7 19.2 20 . 3 21. 2 21. a 22.4 Upgrading 0.0 1. 2 2.9 17.2 16.2 20.0 20.6 19. l 16.l 16 . l Rehabilitation 18. l 24 . 6 30. 7 20.6 19.9 14.7 12 . 9 7. 6 7. 6 7. 6 Culvert Program 0.0 0. 1 1. 2 1. 7 2.0 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 TOTAL 20.3 31. 2 44.9 55.3 55.8 56.3 56.6 50. 7 48.4 49.0 UGANDA SHILLING COMPONENT HIGHWAYS Maintenance 0.9 2.0 4.0 5.5 5.8 5.8 5.8 5. 7 5. 7 5. 7 Upgrading o.o 0.2 0.5 3 .0 2 .9 3.5 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.8 Rehabilitation 3.0 4.7 7.0 4.8 4.5 3.2 2.4 0 .0 0 .0 0.0 Total 3.9 6.9 11 . 4 13.3 13 . l 12 . 5 11. a 9.1 8.5 8.5 FEEDER ROADS Rehabilitation 0.9 1.4 1. a 0.9 0.9 1. l 1. 9 2.5 2.5 2.5 Culvert Program 0.0 0. l 0.6 0.9 1. l l. 3 l. 5 l. 5 l. 5 l. 5 Total 0.9 l. 6 3.1 3.4 4.3 5.5 7. l a .1 8.5 a.a TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 0.9 2.2 4.6 7. l 8.0 9.0 9.5 9. 7 10. l 10.4 Upgrading 0.0 0.2 0.5 3.0 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.8 Rehabilitation 3.9 6. l a.a 5. 7 5.4 4.3 4.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 Culvert Program 0.0 0. l 0.6 0.9 l. l l. 3 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 1. 5 TOTAL 4.8 8.5 14.5 16.8 17 . 4 18. l 18 . 9 17 . 2 17.0 17.3 TOTAL EXPENDITURE HIGHWAYS Maintenance 3.0 7.0 13.3 19.5 21 . 0 22.0 22.5 22.8 22.8 22.9 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 20.2 19. l 23.5 24.2 22.5 19.0 19.0 Rehabilitation 18.4 25.3 32.3 22.6 21. 7 14.5 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 21.4 33. 7 48.9 62.4 61. a 60.0 56.3 45.3 41. a 41. 9 FEEDER ROADS Maintenance 0.0 0.4 1.5 3.4 4.7 6.2 7.3 a.1 9. l 10 . 0 Rehabilitation 3.6 5.4 7.2 3.6 3.6 4.4 7. 5 10 . l 10. l 10 . l Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 i. a 2 .7 3. l 3.7 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Total 3.6 6. l 10.5 9 .7 11. 4 14.3 19 . 2 22.5 23.5 24 . 5 TOTAL ALL ROADS Maintenance 3.1 7. 5 14.7 22 . 9 25.7 28.2 29.8 30.9 31. 9 32.9 Upgrading 0.0 1. 4 3.4 20.2 l 9. l 23.5 24.2 22.5 19.0 19.0 Rehabilitation 22.0 30. 7 39.5 26.3 25.3 18.9 17.2 10 . l 10. l 10. l Culvert Program 0.0 0.2 1. a 2.7 3.1 3.7 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 TOTAL 25 . l 39.8 59.4 72. l 73 . 2 74.3 75 . 5 67. 9 65.3 66.3 @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 million (1990 dollars) by 5" p.a . Donors assumed to provide a constant $50 million p . a . Note : Detai Led assumptions and calculations in Table 5 . TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - 48 - Annex VIII - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS Page 27 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 MAINTENANCE Asphalt concrete highway km in existence - start period 72 72 72 82 100 136 186 237 288 340 km under maintenance 0 72 72 . 82 100 136 186 237 288 340 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 1,000 2,000 3,000 4, 000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 $ cost resealing/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 % km resealed/yr 0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% average $ cost/km/yr 0 2,000 3,600 5,100 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 5,650 total $ cost ( '000) 0 144 259 418 566 771 1,054 1,337 1,628 1,919 foreign exchange component 70% 70% 73% 74% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 7E.% 2 Bitumen highway - ZBR km in existence - start period 682 716 750 740 722 686 636 585 534 482 km under maintenance 50 278 512 740 722 686 636 585 534 482 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 2,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3, 500.. $ cost resealing/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 % km resealed/yr 0% 5% 10% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% average $ cost/km/yr 2,000 3,600 4,650 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 5,225 total $ cost ('000) 100 1,000 2,382 3,867 3,771 3,582 3,321 3,058 2,789 2,520 foreign exchange component 70% 7 3% 75% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 3 Bitumen highway - other km in existence - start period 651 751 871 1,011 1,365 1,688 2,022 2,325 2,602 2,829 km under maintenance 0 334 677 1,011 1,365 1,688 2,022 2,325 2,602 2,829 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ cost resealing/km 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 % km resealed/yr 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% average $ cost/km/yr 0 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 total $ cost ('000) 0 1,108 2,249 3,357 4,532 5,603 6,713 7,719 8,640 9,394 foreign exchange component 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 4 Unrehabilitated bitumen highway km in existence - start period 571 437 303 203 122 41 0 0 0 0 km under maintenance 50 100 153 203 122 41 0 0 0 0 $ cost routine maint/km/yr 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $ cost resealing/km 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 % km resealed/yr 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% average $ cost/km/yr 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 total $ cost ('000) 150 150 301 458 609 366 124 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 5 Gravel highway-Class A km in existence - start period 1,005 1,072 1,320 1,780 1,810 1,795 1,556 1,253 976 749 km under maintenance 503 754 1, 131 1,780 l, 810 1,795 1,556 1,253 976 749 $ cost routine/km/yr 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,0 00 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ cost regravelling/km 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 km regravelled (every 3 yrs) 168 251 377 593 603 598 519 418 325 250 average $ cost/km/yr 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 3,333 total $ cost ( '000) 1,675 2,513 3, 769 5,933 6,035 5,984 5,187 4,176 3,252 2,495 foreign exchange component 73% 73% 73% 73% 7 3% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 6 Gravel highway-Class B km in existence - start period 573 598 698 948 1,133 1,351 1,615 1,836 1,836 1,836 km under maintenance 287 430 645 948 1,133 1,351 1,615 1,836 l, 836 l, 836. $ cost routine/km/yr 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 $ cost regravelling/km 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 km regravelled (every 4 yrs) 72 107 161 237 283 338 404 459 459 459 average $ cost/km/yr 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 total $ cost ( 'ooo) 637 956 1,434 2,109 2,522 3,007 3,593 4,085 4,085 4,085. foreign exchange component 73% 73% 73% 73% 7 3% 73% 7 3% 73% 73% 73% 7 Gravel highway-Class C km in existence - start period 345 353 385 635 796 981 1,205 1,552 1,552 l, 552 km under maintenance 173 259 385 635 796 981 1,205 1,552 1,552 1,552 $ cost routine/km/yr 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 $ cost regravelling/km 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 km regravelled (every 5 yrs) 35 52 77 127 159 196 241 310 310 310 average $ cost/km/yr 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 total $ cost ('000) 273 409 608 1,003 1,257 1,550 1,904 2,452 2,452 2,452 foreign exchange component 73% 73% 73% 73% 7 3% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73%  - 49 - TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) Annex VIII Page 28 of 31 CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 8 Unrehabilitated gravel higt,way km in existence 3,889 3,789 3,389 2,389 1,739 1,109 568 0 0 0 km under maintenance 1,000 1,500 2,250 2,389 1,739 1,109 568 0 0 0 $ cost routine-average/km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost spot improvements-avg/km/yr 100 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 average$ cost/km/yr 200 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 total$ cost ('ODO) 200 750 2,250 2,389 1,739 1,109 568 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 9 Rehabilitated feeder road km in existence - start period 571 871 1,321 1,921 2,225 2,527 2,893 3,522 4,366 5,210 km under maintenance 29 407 975 1,921 2,225 2,527 2,893 3,522 4,366 5,210 $ cost routine/km/yr 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $ cost regravelling/km 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 km regravelled (every 6 yrs) 5 68 162 320 371 421 482 587 728 868 ., average $ cost/km/yr 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 total$ cost ( 'ODO) 31 441 1,056 2,081 2,410 2,737 3,134 3,815 4,730 5,645 foreign exchange component 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 62% 10 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program km in existence - start period 0 0 50 450 981 1,510 2, 151 2, 794 3,382 3,971 km under maintenance 0 0 50 450 981 1,510 2, 151 2,794 3,382 3,971 average $ maintenance cost/km/yr 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 t otal$ cost ('ODO) 0 0 20 180 392 604 860 l, 117 1,353 1,589 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 11 Unreh~bi litated feeder road - basic culvert program km in existence - start period 0 0 50 450 900 1, 611 2,471 3,514 4,503 5,492 km under maintenance 0 0 50 450 900 l, 611 2,471 3,514 4,503 5,492 average $ maintenance cost/km/yr 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 total$ cost ('ODO) 0 0 15 135 270 483 741 1,054 1,351 1,647 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 12 Unrehabilitated feeder road, no culvert program km in existence - start period 19,763 19,463 18,913 17,513 16,228 14,686 12,819 10,505 8,083 5,661 km under maintenance 0 0 2,000 5,000 8,000 12,000 12,819 10,505 8,083 5,661 average$ maintenance cost/km/yr 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 total$ cost ('ODO) 0 0 400 1,000 1,600 2,400 2,564 2,101 1,617 1,132 foreign exchange component 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% UPGRADING 13 Bitumen highway - AC overlay km bitumen highway strengthened 0 0 10 18 36 50 50 52 52 52 $ cost/km 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 total$ cost ( '000) 0 0 600 1,093 2,177 3,000 3,011 3,091 3,091 3,091 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 91% 91% 100% 100% 103% 103% 103% 14 Gravel highway-Class A - bituminize km gravel highway bituminized 0 20 40 273 242 293 303 277 227 227 $ cost/km 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 total$ cost ('ODO) 0 1,400 2,800 19,122 16,931 20,497 21,226 19,403 15,903 15,903 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 91% 81% 98% 101% 111% 114% 114% REHABILITATION 15 Bitumen highway - ZBR km bitumen highway rehabilitated# 34 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 total$ cost ('COO) 5,100 5,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 91% 91% 110% 100% 100% 100% 100% 16 Bitumen highway - other km oitumen highway rehabilitated# 100 100 100 81 81 41 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110, coo 110, coo total$ cost ('COO) 11,000 11, coo 11,000 8,903 8,869 4,558 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% percentage of unconstrained case 100% 100% 100% 81% 81% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100%  - 50 - Annex VIII TABLE 5. UGANDA - PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ROAD PROGRAM - DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS ANO CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) Page 29 of 3I CONSTRAINED BY FINANCE CASE 3@ 90/ 9 l 91/92 92 / 93 93/94 94 / 95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 17 Gravel h1ghway-Class A km gravel highway rehabilitated 67 268 500 304 227 54 0 0 0 0 $ cost/km 25,000 25 , 000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 total$ cost ('000) l, 675 6,700 12,500 7,588 5,669 l, 343 0 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX lOOX 76X 76X 92X lOOX lOOX lOOX lOOX 18 Gravel highway-Class B km gravel highway rehabilitated 25 100 250 185 218 264 221 0 0 0 $ cost/km 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 total$ cost ('000) 500 2,000 5,000 3,709 4,356 5,274 4,421 0 0 O• foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lDOX lOOX lOOX 66X 66X 79X lOOX lOOX lOOX lOOX 19 Gravel highway-Class C km gravel highway rehabilitated 8 32 250 161 185 224 347 0 0 0 . $ cost/km 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 total$ cost ('000) 120 480 3,750 2,413 2,778 3,363 5,201 0 0 0 foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X 75'.\ 75X 75X 75'.\ 75X perce~tage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX lOOX 51X 50X 61'.\ lOOX lOOX lOOX lOOX 20 Feeder road km rehabilitated 300 450 600 304 302 366 629 844 844 844 $ cost/km 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 total$ cost ('000) 3,600 5,400 7,200 3,642 3,628 4,392 7,548 10, 132 10, 132 10, 132 foreign exchange component 75X 75X 75X 75X 75'.\ 75X 75'.\ 75X 75X 75X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX lOOX 51X SOX 61'.\ 105'.\ 141'.\ 141X 141X CULVERT PROGRAM 21 Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 400 607 605 732 800 800 800 800 $ cost/km 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3 ,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 total$ cost ('000) 0 150 1,200 l, 821 1,814 2,196 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 foreign exchange component 65X 65'.\ 65'.\ 65X 65'.\ 65X 65X 65X 65'.\ 65X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX lOOX 76X 76'.\ 9zx lOOX lOOX lOOX lOOX 22 Unrehabi l i tated feeder road - basic culvert program km feeder roads installed 0 50 400 526 786 952 1, 200 1,200 1,200 1,200 $ cost/km 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 l, 600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 l , 600 tOt3l $ cost ('ODO) 0 80 640 842 1,258 1,523 1,920 1,920 1,920 1,920 foreign exchange component 65X 65'.\ 65X 65'.\ 65'.\ 65'.\ 65'.\ 65X 65X 65X percentage of unconstrained case lOOX lOOX lOOX 66X 66X 79X lOOX lOOX lOOX 1DOX @ Constrained by amount of total government and donor resources. Government funds assumed to grow from a base of $20 million (1990 dollars) by 5X p.a. Donors assumed to provide a constant $50 million p.a. • Includes minor reconstruction, such as minor reallignment, construction of deteriorated and insufficient structures .  - Jl Annex VIII TABLE 5 (CONTINUED) - NOTES TO DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS Page 30 of 31 1. Asphalt concrete highway This type of highway 1s treated separately because it is of a higher standard of construction and the whole Life maintenance costs will be higher. The initial Length is the part of the Northern Corridor from Kampala to Jinja, subsequently increased by roads that are strengthened by AC overlays in future. The Long term routine maintenance cost is 2X of the typical new capital value of $250,000 per km. 2. Bitumen - ZBR Refers to parts of the Northern Corridor that are not AC surfaced and includes the Link from Mbarara to Zaire via Equator Road. These roads carry significantly higher traffic than those in the rest of the country and will require correspondingly more maintenance and earlier strengthening. The total Length is reduced as strengthened Lengths move into category 1. Resealing costs will be the same for both categories . ,3. Bitumen highway - other ALL other rehabilitated bitumen highways, of a Lower standard. The total Length increases as gravel highways are upgraded by bituminisation. It is assumed for simplicity that no roads in this category are overlaid . This will not be strictly true but any differences are not Likely to affect the overall totals. Maintenance costs will be Lower than for the higher . two categories • because the traffic is Lighter, some of the roads are narrower and the general standards are not so high. 4. Unrehabilitated bitumen highway Unrehabilitated bitumen highways will gradually reduce as more are rehabilitated from Category 16. In the meantime, it is assumed that none will be resealed but in order to keep them serviceable a higher routine maintenance cost will be incurred ($3,000/km/yr, against $2,000 / km/ yr for rehabilitated highways) . 5. Gravel nighway - Class A This refers to rehabilitated gravel highways. These have been sub-divided into their respective classes since the different standards imply significantly different maintenance costs . RegraveLLing Class A roads has been based on a 9m width of embankment, for example. Costs are based on regraveLLing with 100mm thickness, which is Likely to be a minimum requirement every 4 years for this class of road and these costs may be found to be higher in practice. The total Length increases as more roads are rehabilitated (from Category 17) 6. Gravel highway - Class B The proportion of Class B highways is based on the existing inventory of Class II gravel highways and the expectation that future proportions will stay much the same even though individual roads move between classes. Routine maintenance costs are equivalent to 4X of the capital value of $20,000 per km (as for the other classes). RegraveLLing is based on a width of 7 . 6m . A frequency of every 5 years implies gravel Losses of only 20mm per year, which is Likely to be a minimum figure . 7. Gravel highway - Class C The initial Class C Length is based on existing proportions but the rate of rehabilitation is assumed to be Less since initial work would be concentrated on the higher classes . RegraveLLing costs are based on a 6 . 4m width and a frequency of every 6 years, implying a Loss rate of 17mm per year. 8. Unrehabilitated gravel highway The proportion of unrehabilitated gravel highway reduces as further Lengths are rehabilitated from Categories 17,18 and 19. A minimum level of maintenance to preserve passability is assumed, based on spot repairs but no complete regravelling. 9. Rehabilitated feeder road The rehabilitated feeder road Length is based on the existing inventory and increases as further Lengths are rehabiliated. The maintenance costs are similar to those for gravel highways but reduced for the lower standards. RegraveLLing is costed on a weighted average width of 4.85m between the four recommended classes of feeder road, based on the proportions . given in the existing inventory. 10. Unrehabilitated feeder road - normal culvert program In the proposed culvert program, it is assumed that half of the roads dealt with would have the normal number of culverts installed to ensure proper drainage when the road is eventually rehabilitated . The Level of routine maintenance is fixed at $400/km/yr which should enable the drainage system to be kept open and functioning, with occasional spot repairs to preserve accessibility. 11 . Unrehabilitated feeder road - basic culvert program The other half of the roads in the program would have only the basic culverts installed in key Locations to restore accessibility, in order to maximise the Lenght of road opened up. The routine maintenance allowance is therefore at a Lower Level because of the Lesser number of culverts (though not proportionately, because of the higher incidence of spot repairs) . . ,  - 52 - TABLE 5 (CONTINUED) - NOTES TO DETAI LED ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS (CON TI NUED) .~nnex VIII Page 31 of 31 12. Unrehabilitated feeder road - no culvert program Since the culvert program would not deal with all the roads at once, some maintenance a llowance has been made f or the roads that would not have had any rehabilitation . The Length gradually reduces wit h the de l etton of more roads i n Categories 20,2 1 and 22. Maintenance is fixed at a _a1inimum possible Level of $200/km/y r simply to maintain accessibi l ity. UPGRADING 13. Bitumen highway - AC overlay A proportion of the most heavily trafficked roads (generally those on t he Northern Corridor ) wi l l require strengthen i ng during the next few years because the cumulative pavement L oading wil l exceed their design strength. Th i s will add to the stoc k of asphaltic concrete surfaced roads (Category l ). Although the operation i s technica l ly upgrading, it is as important as r egu l a r maintenance since if it is not carried out , the road wil l fai l and the investment will be L ost. It has been assumed that overlay i ng would start in 3 years time and gradua lly bui Ld up to an output of 50km per year. 14. Gravel highway - Class A -bituminize In the same way that heavily Loaded bituminous highways will require o verlaying in the near future, the most heavi ly trafficked gravel highways will reach traffic Levels at which t hey shou l d economica l ly be bituminised (some of them are a l read y at this Level). By definition, these roads are Like l y to be Cl ass A highways. They should alread y have been ma intained to a good standard and not require any significant reconstruct i on before surfacing. A cost of $50,000 / km has been assumed and the treated Lengths are deleted from the stock of Class A grave l hi ghways a nd added to that of bituminous roads (Catego ry 3 ) . REHABILITATION 15. Bitumen highway - ZBR The Lengths in this Category refer to the Li nk to Zai re from Mbarara. It has a l ready bee n rehabilitated as far as Isha ka and is being continued towards Equator Road. The work is already effectively cormiitted and when completed, there wi l l be no f u r ther Lengths of the ZBR network to rehabilitate . 16. Bitumen highway - other The Lengths in this category are based on the present development program and it is assumed that rehabilitation_of al l r ema i ning bitumen highways will be completed i n 7 years. The unit cost of $150,000 / km assumes that some of t he future roads will be rehabilitated to Lower standards than the present wo rk, in Li ne with t he Lower designated c l asses of suc h roads. 17. Gravel highway - Class A The average rate of rehabi litation of grave l roads in the present projected deve l opment program i s about 150km per yea r . It has been assumed that this could be increased to a tota l of 250 km per year, of wh i ch 100km would be Cl ass A roads. A unit cost r ate of $25,000/ km has been taken. 18. Gravel highway - Class 8 It has been assumed that 100km of Class B gravel highways wou ld be re hab il itated per year a nd that the un it cost for t h i s Lowe r standard would be $20 , 000 per km. 19. Gravel highway - Class C 50km per year has been assumed as the output of rehab i litation of Cl ass C roads s i nce the work is Li kely to be concent r ated on the two higher classes. The unit costs for this class of road should be signif ica ntly Less - say, $15,000/ km. 20. Rehab i litated feeder road The assumed output for the rehabilitation of feede r roads is 300 km per year wh ich is app rox imate ly the same r a t e as is being achieved now. The un it cost rate of $12,000 is based on a weighted a verage between the r especti ve c l asses, whi ch is a bout 75% of the Lowest highway standard (Class C). CULVERT PROGRAM 21 . Unrehabil i tated feeder road - normal culve rt program ' Normal ' culverting is estimated t o be about 2 cu lve rts per ki lometer. The unit r ate is based o n c ulverts of 7m . Length , corrresponding to the we i ghted a verage road embankment width of 4.85m. 22. Unrehabilitated feeder road - basic cul vert program 'Basic' culverting is est i mated to be about one cul vert per ki lometer. The un it cost rate i s proport i onatel y sl i ghtl y more because of the mi nor ancillary works that would be associated with each culve rt .  - 53 - Annex I X UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Uganda Road Design Standards 1990 Nin Finished C1rri19ew1y Shoulder Road Reservation Approxi1111te Re111arks width width width width capacity .. Type Class (Ill) (Ill) <•> <•> CPCU/day) HIGHWAYS Bitu111en 1 7.0 1.5 10.0 40 9,000 Bitumen 2 6.0 1.5 9.0 30 6,500 Bi tu111en 3 5.6 1. 0 7.6 25 5,500 Gravel A 6.0 1.5 9.0 30 6,500) Corrrespond to Gravel 8 5.6 1. 0 7.6 25 5,500) for 111e r 1 , 2 , 3 Gravel C 4.0 1.2 6.4 15 < 2,000) classes FEEDER ROADS Gravel 1 6.7 ,. 5 9.7 n/a > 250 Capacity In vehicles/day Gravel 2 6.0 0.0 6.0 n/a 100-200 Capacity in vehicles/day Gravel 3 5.0 0.0 5.0 n/a 50-100 Capacity in vehicles/day Gravel 4 4.5 0.0 4.5 n/a < 15 Capacity in vehicles/day Source: Ministry of works end Ministry of Local Governaent !!..2.lt!. Ca) Bitumen roads are specified to have a 15 year design life Cb) Feeder road standards are raco111111endation1 only, fro• the !FAD project Draft Report, April 1990, and 111ay subsequently be aodified.  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links Link Link Na111e Type Class Length ADT Pave111ent Nod. Date of No Ck•> Score Struct. Reconst/ Nu111ber ruction HOINA DISTRICT 1 Hoi111a IC a f u River GR 1 17. 5 64 2. 00 1975 2 Hoi111a . Buhi•ba GR 1 12. 0 125 1. 83 1985 3 Hoi111a . Pachwa GR 1 52.0 48 1. 62 1985 4 Pachwa - Nuz I z i River GR 1 45.0 67 1 . 16 1985 5 6 Nol•• - Naaindl/Hoi•• Bdr on Na1indi Rd Buhi11ba - Buluko GR GR 1 2 9.5 31 . 0 145 21 4.00 2. 00 1988 1983 7 Buluko - 1Caku11iro GR 2 61 . 0 21 1. 30 1983 8 1Caku111iro - Nku1i River GR 2 1 0. 6 9 2.00 1983 9 Hoi•a - Ila k I River GR 3 35.0 17 2. 34 1983 Sub-total for dl1trict 2 74. 0 ICABALE DISTRICT 11 ICabale ICabale/Nbarara Bdr PR 1 29.0 440 3. 4 1989 V, ~ 12 ICabale - ICatuna PR 1 22.0 418 4.00 3. 4 1987 13 ICabale - lku•ba GR 1 20.0 240 4.00 1987 14 lku11ba - IC I 1oro GR 1 50.0 422 3.80 1987 15 IC I 1oro - Rutsura (Zaire Bdr) GR 1 21. 5 402 3. 00 1987 16 1Cl1oro - Rwengvi (Rwanda Bdr) GR 2 8.3 1.00 1975 Sub-total for district 151. 0 ICAIAROL E DISTR(CT 17 Fort Portal . Hi111a PR 1 43. 0 287 3.47 3. 4 1975 18 Hi 11a . ICasese/lCabarole Bdr PR 1 18. 0 759 3. 58 3. 4 1975 19 Fort Portal - ICyenjojo (paved sections) PR 1 22.0 230 2.00 3.4 1975 20 Fort Portal - ICyenjojo (gravel sections) GR 1 38.0 230 2.03 1975 21 ICyenjojo - ICabarole/Nubende Bdr GR 1 51. 6 63 2.59 1975 22 ICyenjojo . Nuzizi River GR 1 38.0 67 3. 00 1975 23 Fort Portal - 1C1111wenge GR 2 62.0 137 1. 32 1980 24 1Ca111wenge - ICabarole/Nbarara Bdr GR 2 10.0 208 1. 00 1980 25 Fort Portal - Ito j o GR 3 27. 0 107 1 . 63 1975 26 Ito j o - Bundibugyo GR 3 45.0 17 1. 49 1975 27 Ito j o - Ntoroko GR 3 50.0 15 1 . 00 1975 28 Fort Portal - IC i ju r a GR 3 37. 0 63 1. 81 1983 Sub-total for district 442.0 "1:l ;:t> Ill ::, (JQ ::, ro ro >-' :x: X 0 H'l \D ..  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links Link Link Na111e Type Class Length ADT Pave111ent Mod. Date of No ( k"') Score Struct. Reconat/ Nu111ber ruction KASESE OISTRl~T 30 Kaae1e - Kaae1e/Kabarote Bdr PR 1 12. 0 759 2.67 3.4 1975 31 Kaaeae - Equator Rd Jct PR 1 22.0 178 3.95 3.4 1975 3Z Equator Rd Jct - Lake George Rd Jct PR 1 1 0. 0 215 3.96 3.4 1975 33 Lake Geoge Rd Jct - ICatanguru PR 1 6.0 215 3. 93 3.4 1975 34 Katunguru - t1haka PR 1 52.0 172 3.4 1990 35 Equator Rd PR 1 311.0 165 3. 00 3. 4 1990 37 K111eae - KI I e111be PR 3 6.0 738 3.00 3.4 1975 38 Katanguru . lahaaha (Zaire Bdr) GR 2 117.0 1. 00 1975 39 Lake George Rd Jct . ICatwe GR 2 20.0 56 3.00 1980 40 Kat we - Katojo GR 2 19.2 37 1. 00 19113 41 L II k e George Rd GR 3 16. 7 6 3.00 19110 Sub·totat for district 289.0 \Jl \Jl MASINO I DUTRICT 42 Kafu Bridge - Rwekunye PR 1 19. 0 147 2. 74 3.4 19110 43 Rwekunye - IC I gu111ba PR 1 12. 2 213 3.00 3.4 19110 44 Klgu111ba - K• r u111a Bridge PR 1 56. II 212 2. 75 3.4 19110 45 Mas Ind I - Kafu Bridge GR 1 39.3 112 3.66 1986 46 lhalndl . 1Cl1anja GR 1 7.0 116 2.57 19113 47 Ki1anjl . KI gu111ba GR 1 32. 0 82 2. 75 19113 48 Naalndi . Maalndi/Hoi1u Bdr GR 1 43. 0 138 4.00 19118 49 N111 Ind I . Rwekunye GR 2 36.3 14 1 . 20 1980 50 Rwekunye - Maaindi Port GR 2 7.0 77 2. 00 19110 51 Naa Ind i - Bi i so GR 3 46.0 53 2.00 19113 52 B 11 ao - Buku111I GR 3 9.0 24 2. 00 19113 53 Buku111i . Butlaba GR 3 7.7 5 2.00 19113 54 8uku111I - But I•• GR 3 42.0 16 1. 19 19113 55 Bui I ae - Wanaeko GR 3 II. 0 19 2.38 19113 56 Butisa - Park Jct GR 3 18.5 5 3.00 19110 57 Park . Para• GR 3 8.0 9 0.00 58 Klaanja - Park on Masindl Perea Rd GR 2 39.3 34 2.52 1975 59 Bi i so . Waky River GR 3 9.0 17 1 . 00 1975 Sub-total for district 440.0 "cl Ill ::, > OQ ::, (I) (I) X N ::-< 0 H) '°  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of HOW Maintained Road Links Link Link Na11e Type Cla11 Length ADT Pave11ent Mod. Date of No ( k II) Score Struct. Recon1t/ Number ruction MBARARA DISTRICT 60 Mbarar• . Nakaite PR 1 5 7. 0 635 3.4 1990 61 Nakalte . Mberere/Meseka Bdr PR 1 6.0 638 3.4 1990 62 Mbarare . Ntun11e110 PR 1 58.0 703 3.4 1990 63 Ntunge110 . Rubeere PR 1 16. 0 258 3.4 1990 64 Rubeare . ICebele/Mberera Bdr PR 1 23.0 258 3.4 1990 65 Mberare . Bu1henyi PR 1 53.0 5 74 3.4 1990 66 Bushenyi . I shake PR 1 8.0 5 74 3.4 1990 67 Ntungaao . 1Cege11be GR 2 14. 0 40 2.36 1980 68 1Caga11be . l1heke GR 2 38.7 6 2.12 1980 69 Mberera . Nsongesi GR 2 51. 0 252 2.84 19 75 70 Nsongesl . IC i keg et i GR 2 14. 0 21 1 . 93 19 75 71 IC i k age ti . ICefunzo GR 2 31. 2 15 2.08 19 75 72 ICafunzo . Ntunge1110 GR 2 25.8 87 1. 59 1975 73 Mbarare . lbande GR 2 64.0 339 3.02 1980 74 lbanda . Mberare/lCeberole Bdr GR 2 32 .0 208 3.56 1980 75 Nakalte . ICa zo GR 2 69.0 64 3. 75 1987 \Jl 76 77 ICa zo . lbande ICa zo . ICabago le GR GR 2 2 33 .0 41. 9 78 99 • 91 3.89 1987 1987 °' 78 1C•11••be . Rukung Ir I GR 3 35.7 100 1 . 68 1990 79 ICafunzo . Mer••• Hill (R11enda Bdr) GR 3 6.0 39 2.92 1980 80 Nsongesl . Tanzania Bdr GR 3 14. 0 6 1. 43 1980 81 IC i k •11• ti . Murungo Ferry GR 3 2.8 2. 00 1980 82 Mbarere . (Nsongesi·ICebale) PR 1 2.0 0.00 2. 5 Sub-total for district 696.0 ARUA DISTRICT Arua . Pek11ech GR 1 132. 0 Wendi . Yu111be GR 1 63. 0 Ayivu . ICoboko GR 1 87. 0 Arue . Rhino Ce11p GR 2 66.0 ICoboko . Oreb• (Sudan Bdr) GR 2 19. 0 Arue Vurre <Cus to111 Post) GR 2 16. 0 Sub-total for district 383.0 "d ~ oq Ei :::i rt) rt) >: I.,.) :x 0 rt, I.D  . UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links LI nk Link Na•e Type Class Length ADT Pave•ent Mod. Date of No <k•> Score Struct. Reconat/ Nuaber ruction !iULU DISTRICT Gulu . Pakwach GR 1 121. 0 ICaru•• . Ol II i yo GR 1 55.0 Gutu . Niaute GR 1 106.0 Attak . laropl GR 1 64.0 Gutu . As we GR 1 40.0 Cuato• Corner Layibt GR l 4.0 Bobl . Ayer GR l 55.0 Gulu . Patlko GR l 29.0 Gulu Airfield GR l 4.0 Gulu . ICa ru111a PR 1 78.0 2.5 Sub · total for district 556.0 IClfGUN DISTRICT \Jl -..J Achol ibur . Aswa·Gulu GR 1 42 . 0 IC I t11u• . Acholibur GR 2 19.0 1Cit11u• . Palabek·Atlak GR 2 108.0 IC I t11u• . ICoputh GR l 128.0 IC I t11u• . Nustn110 GR l 80.0 Sub·total for district 377. 0 LI RA DI STRIP Lira . Sorott GR 1 54. 0 Corner IC I l ak . Adtlan11 GR 2 64.0 Lira . IC i tau .. GR 2 98.0 Li re . Apac GR 2 63. 0 Apac . Masindl Port GR 2 79.0 Agwa ta . Aduku GR 2 32 .0 Lira . Alo I GR 3 32. 0 Agwata . 1Cachun11 GR 3 10. 0 Dokolo - Naaasale GR l 811. 0 Lira ICaadi n i PR 1 64.0 2.5 Lira Soroti PR 1 6.0 2. 5 L i ra IC it II UIII PR 1 6. 0 2.5 Li r • Bypass PR 2 3.0 2. 5 Sub · total for district 599.0 ~~ ()Q ::I (1) :>< :x 0 t-'ti \0  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links Link Link Neae Type Cla11 Length ADT Paveaent Nod. Date of No (It•) Score Struct . lecon1t/ Nu•ber ruction NOTO DISTRICT Leropi . Noyo-Yu111be GR 100. 0 Sub-total for district 100.0 ICANPALA !!!STRICT 113 ICa•pala . Nutuno PR 1 22.0 4,099 4. 1 1990 114 Nukono - Luga 1 I PR 1 24.0 2,1411 4. 1 1990 115 L ugai I . Njeru Pl 1 29.0 2, 3111 4. 1 1990 117 ICaapala . Npi 9 I PR 1 45.0 3,430 3.4 19119 1111 Npl SI I . Bu11a111a Pl 1 33. 0 1,395 3.4 19119 119 Buwa•• . 1Caton11• Bridge Pl 1 29.0 1 , 395 3. 4 19119 90 ICa•pala Jct . 1Ca111pala/Nubende Bdr PR 1 4 7. 0 1112 4.00 3.4 19119 91 ICaapale . lo•bo Pl 1 31. 0 1,246 4.00 3.2 92 Boabo . Luwero PR 1 32. 0 1,073 3.09 3.4 1990 93 94 Luwero - Nekasongole Naka1on9ola . IC a f u Bridge Pl Pl 1 1 53 .0 55 . 0 455 260 2. 711 3. 04 3.4 3.4 1990 1990 \Jl 00 95 ICaapala . Busunju Pl 1 57 .0 601 3.2 1990 96 ICa•pale . Entebbe PR 1 34. 0 4,013 4.00 3.2 1990 97 Entebbe . Airport Pl 1 5. 0 2, 1112 4. 00 1990 911 Nultono . IC a I ag I Pl 2 111. 0 9114 4.00 191111 99 IC al ag I . Bultoloto Pl 2 29.0 792 4.00 2.5 19117 100 autoloto . ICayunga Pl 2 3.7 745 4.00 2.5 19117 101 Bukoloto . Njeru PR 2 43.0 5411 4.00 2.5 19117 102 Ka•pala . Gayeia Pl 2 20. 1 595 3.95 2.5 19119 103 Gayaia . ICa I ag i PR 2 14. 5 109 3. 59 1 91111 104 Gayeza . Na11ulon9e GR 3 9.4 2911 3.36 19115 105 ICayunga . Nebuganyl GR 2 20 . 0 205 3. 70 19117 106 ICayunga . Bale GR 3 45 . 9 406 4. 00 19117 109 1 11 Border - Lagail Buw••• . ICetebo Port GR GR 2 9.0 11. 0 174 70 0.00 1. 00 1975 11 2 Nultono Railway Rd PR 3 4.3 469 4.00 2. 5 19115 11 3 Npl SI i Loop GR 3 3.6 31111 2.67 19115 114 Ni tel a Maria Loop GR 3 4.4 11 7 2.45 19110 11 5 ICe•pale . Port Bell PR 3 6.7 10, 61111 3. 76 3. 2 1 91111 11 6 1Ce111pe la . Gabe PR 3 9.2 10,414 4.00 3.4 191111 117 Nakindye lodge Rd PR 3 2.0 4.00 3.4 191111 r (lQ 0 H, \.0 ;:l (1) >: ~ ..  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links Li nit Li nit N••e Type Class Length ADJ Pavement Mod. Date of No (k111) Score Struct. Reconst/ Nu111ber ruction KAMPALA DISTRICT (Cont) 118 Tank Hi l l ltd Pit 3 2. 6 3,777 4.00 3. 4 1988 119 Mulago Hospital ltd PR 3 .6 1 . 00 3.4 1980 120 ICy••bogo Estate Rd PR 3 3. 8 2.79 3. 4 1982 121 Pope Paul VI Rd PR 3 7. 1 3. 55 3. 4 1982 122 Capetown VI l la Rd PR 3 1.9 3. 79 3. 4 1980 123 Mbuya Pol Ice Poat GR 3 1.7 1 . 41 1980 124 ICaaeae It/ Wy Access GR 3 15. 0 .40 1980 125 ICalule . la•unanfka GR 3 12 . 8 2.62 1980 126 Butabfka Hospital PR 3 3. 0 1. 6 7 3. 4 1980 127 Iuka•• RI fl e GR 3 8.0 128 Bwerenga Wireless GR 3 4.0 Sub-total for district 810.0 MASAICA DISTRICT 129 Ma1aka . ICatonga Bridge PR 1 35.0 1,395 3.4 1990 V, 130 Ma1aka - Lyantonde PR 1 611. 0 5116 3. 4 1990 \.D 13 1 lyantonde - Mbarara/Masaka Bdr PR 1 3. 0 638 3. 4 1990 132 Ma1aka . ICyotera PR 1 42.0 5 12 4.00 3. 2 1989 133 ICyoter• . Mutakula GR 1 45.0 179 3. 89 1989 134 Ma1aka . V tl le Marfa PR 2 11.6 304 4.00 3.5 1989 135 Villa Merle . Nkonze GR 2 94.4 247 3. 02 1980 136 Ville Marfa - ICekoge PR 2 11 . 6 143 3. 2 1990 137 lhs•k• . Bukekete GR 2 36.6 196 2.24 1980 Sub-total for district 34 7. 0 MUBEIIDE DISTRICT 138 Mubende . Kitenge CICivumulo> GR 1 17. 0 125 1990 139 ICitanga . (ICfvu•ulo) . Myenzy GR 1 50.0 125 1990 14 0 Myenzi - Mltyana GR 1 15. 0 314 1990 141 Mityana . K••P•la/Mubende Bdr (Mp i II i ) PR 1 14. 0 812 4.00 3. 4 1988 142 Mubende . Lusa lire GR 1 16.0 74 2. 00 1990 143 Lusa lira . Nabingor• GR 1 14. 0 54 1 . 21 1990 144 llabingor• - ICebarole/Mubende Bdr GR 1 4.0 63 1.00 1990 145 IC• f u River . IC i bog a GR 1 65.5 169 4.00 1985 '"ti :i,, Ill ::l 00 ::l ro ro :x Q\ :x: 0 H, \.D  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of HOW Maintained Road Links Link Link Na11e Type Class Length ADT Pave11ent Nod. Date of No Ck•> Score Struct. Reconat/ Nu11ber ruction NUBENOE DISTRICT (Cont) 146 IC i bog a . Buaunju GR 1 17. 0 169 1.118 19115 146 IC I bog a . Buaunju 11 GR 1 50.0 169 2 . 46 19115 14 7 Nubende . Nkuay River GIi 2 19. 0 9 0.00 1975 1411 llablngora . 1Caaa11bya GR 3 111. 0 21 2.00 19110 14 9 1Caaa11bya . Nkonze GR 3 20.6 5 2. 51 19110 150 ICaaa•bya . Lusatlra GR 3 15. 7 J3 1. 29 19110 15 1 Nuaozl 11 /wy Rd GR 3 19. 2 13 1. 26 19110 152 llynazl Railway GR 3 5.0 21 0.00 1975 Sub·total for district 360 JINJA DISTRICT 107 II j e ru . Border PII 3 5 . II 1. 0 0 11 0 •• t I way Approach GR 3 3.0 1. 67 3.4 153 Jlnja . I gang a PII 1 36.0 2,721 3 . 91 3.4 19115 O' I gang a . Nakai••• 0 154 PR 1 5. 0 1, 2611 4.00 3.4 19115 155 ll•k•l••• . Nuwayo PR 52.0 739 3 .115 3.4 19115 156 157 JI nh . Njeru II aka I awa . Tlrlnyi PR GR ' 1 1 1. 0 47.0 3,9011 365 4.00 4.00 4.1 191111 19118 1511 I gang• . ICa 11 ro PR 3 32 . 0 406 3. 311 3.4 191111 15 9 Jinh . IC aai.11 I PR 3 511. 0 4 75 4.00 3.2 19119 160 IC ••u I I . Nbula•utl GR 2 13 . 6 192 4.00 19118 161 ICa•uli . Na•aaagali GR 3 20.1 97 2 . 55 19115 162 ••tlway Approach to ICa•ul I GR 3 13. 0 21 1. 311 19110 Sub-total for district 2117. 0 ICQTIOO ~!STRICT lladunget . 1Capeli11oru·1Caabong GR 1 114. 0 IC ape Ii •oru . ICotfdo·Aditang GR 2 116.0 ICoputh . Oro111 GR 3 50.0 Sub·total for district 2110. 0  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links Link Link Na•e Type Claaa Length AD T Pave•ent Mod. Date of No ( k II) Score Struct. Reconat/ Nu11ber ruction MBA~~ DISTRICT 162 Mbale - Nkokonjeru PR 3 20.5 1 . 90 19 75 163 Nbale - Tororo/Mbale Bdr PR 1 24.0 25 7 2.65 1990 164 Mbale - . Naau1I PR 1 7.0 458 5.00 19119 165 Na11ual Nbale Sorotl Bdr PR 1 5.0 457 5. 00 1989 166 Naauai - Naaagu11ba PR 1 4.0 503 4.00 1975 167 Na11agu11ba . Sironko PR 1 14 .5 392 3.03 19 75 168 Slronko - Muya•be GR 1 1 0. 0 125 0.00 1989 169 Muyaabe . Nbale/Noroto Bdr GR 1 29.0 125 0.00 1990 170 Nbale - Kaaonkol I GR 1 9.0 363 0.00 1990 171 Nuyaabe - 1Capchor11a GR 2 30.0 141 4.00 1990 172 Kapchor11a . Sua• (Kenya Border) GR 2 76.0 79 2.66 1990 173 Nbale (JC t) Bubulo - GR 3 16.0 157 2.22 1985 174 lubulo . lududa Circular Rd GR 3 26 . 0 107 1 . 39 1985 175 lubulo . Maga I e GR 3 31 . 5 24 2. 4 1 1975 176 Na11agu11ba . Budadirl GR 3 18.6 205 2 . 12 1975 177 Nbale R/wy Station GR 3 3. 0 178 179 Nagode• . luau11bu Nbale . Nbuga110 GR GR 3 3 13. 0 11. 5 38 1. 62 1 . 52 1975 19 75 "' ,- Sub-total for district 349. 0 NQROTQ RUTRICT Naaalu . Chosen Cnr·Nadunge GR 1 122. 0 Noroto . Akiaia GR 1 79.0 Nadunget . 1Capell11oru·Layoro GR 1 65.0 Na11alu . Nabltaluk - Lokapel GR 2 52.0 Noroto . Lokitanyala GR 2 44.0 Norika . A11udat GR 2 34. 0 Sub-total for district 396.0 \0  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of MOW Maintained Road Links LI nk Link Na•e Type Cla11 Length AD T Pave111ent Mod. Date of No ( k•) Score Struct. Recon1t/ Nu•ber ruction JQROTI l!ISTRl~T Sorotl - Lira GR 1 67. 0 Sorotl - Moroto GR 2 aa.o Soroti R/wy Stat - Arapal GR 3 1 0. 0 Sorotl - Serere GR 3 27.0 Brook• Corner - Serere GR 3 11. 0 ICu•i - Ladot GR 3 28.0 Sorotl - Brook• Corner GR 3 24.0 Brook• Corner - ICu•I GR 3 4 7. 0 Serere - Bugondo GR 3 25.0 Sorotl - ICu•I PR 1 48.0 Sub-total for di1trlct 375 .o TQRORQ IUJTRHT 180 Tororo - Muwayo (Jonctlon) PR 1 31. 0 565 3 .84 3. 1 1985 181 Tororo - Malaba < Kenya Border> PR 1 11 . 9 483 3. 32 2.7 1985 (3\ 182 Bu1ia - Muwayo <Jct> PR 1 1 7. 1 515 4.00 3.8 1988 N 183 Tororo - Nagode• PR 1 17. 0 387 3.28 1989 184 Nagode• - Torro/Mbale Bdr PR 1 2.0 257 3.00 1989 185 Ti r I ny I - ICa•onko 11 GR 1 39.0 249 1989 186 Tororo - Bu1ia GR 2 26.0 160 1989 187 Bu1la - Majjanjl GR 3 28.0 114 1989 188 TI r I ny i - Palll1a GR 3 19.0 41 3.65 1975 189 Palll1a - Ladot GR 3 21. 0 26 1975 190 Palll1a - ICa•onkoll (Mbale) GR 3 45.0 38 2.50 1980 191 Tororo - Nagongera GR 3 18. 3 87 2. 11 1975 192 Tororo - Mal I k I Ii GR 3 3.0 39 1. 50 1975 Sub·total for district 278.0 TOTAL LENGTH 7,788.0 Source: Ministry of Work• and Ministry of transport data bases Notes: (a) Pave•ent Score i1 weighted average of condition inventory based on the range from 1.0 (Bad) to 5.0 (Excellent)  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s National Highway Rehabilitation International Routes Link l:i2.... Road Name Lenght CKm) Ei nanace Remarks Noctbecn toccidoc 181 Tororo-Malaba (Kenya Bdr) 11.9 p KfW/UG 180 Tororo-Muwayo (Jct) 31.0 p KfW/UG 182 Busia-Muwayo (JCT) 17 .0 p )Alternative route used )by POL vehic les from Busi a-Frontier (2 .0) p )from Nairob i 166 Nakalama-Muwayo 62.0 p KfW/UG 164 Iganga-Nakalama 6.0 p KfW/UG 163 Jinja-Iganga 36.0 p KfW/UG 166 Ji nj a-Njeru 1.0 p KfW/UG 86 Lugazi-Njeru 29.0 AC ADB 84 Mukono-Lugazi 24.0 AC IDA Hwy. III 0-- 83 Kampala-Mukono 22.0 AC/P IDA Hwy. III )19 km. aspha lt w )concrete 87 Kampala-Mpigi 46.0 p EEC 88 Mpigi-Buwama 33.0 p EEC 89 Buwama-Katonga Bridge 29.0 p EEC 129 Masaka-Katonga Bridge 36.0 p EEC 130 Masaka-Lyantonde 68.0 p EEC 131 Lyantonde-Mbarara/Masaka Bdr 3.0 p EEC 61 Nakaita-Mbarara/Masaka Bdr 6.0 p EEC 60 Mbarara-Nakaita 67.0 p EEC 62 Mbarara-Ntungamo 68.0 p EEC 63 Ntungama-Rubaare 16.0 p EEC 64 Rubaare-Kabale/Mbarara Bdr 23.0 p EEC 11 Kabale-Kabale/Mbarara Bdr 29.0 p EEC 12 Kabale-Katuna 22.0 p EEC Sub-total Northern Corridor 664.9  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s National Highway Rehabilitation International Routes Link ~ Road Name Lenght (Km) fjnan1c1 Remarks Addltion1I Link Io R11nd1 72 Kafunzo-Ntunga1110 26.8 G )Generally used 79 Kafunzo-Merama Hill 8.8 G )by loaded (Rwanda Bdr) )trucks because )of easier )gradients on )Rwanda side Sub-total Rwanda Link 31.8 Z•ic• Link p 86 Mbarara-Bushenyi 36.8 IDA Hwy. IV 88 Bushenyi-Ishaka 8.8 p IDA Hwy. IV 34 Katunguru-Ishaka 62.8 p ADB )Under rehabi li tation 33 Lake George Rd Jct-Katunguru 8.8 p )Not yet rehabilitated 0\ -I'- 32 Equator Rd Jct-Lake George Rd Jct 18. 8 p )Not yet rehabilitated 336 Equator Rd )38.8 p ) Sub-total Zaire Linke 187.8 Total ZBR Roads 864.8 IltRt S1i11111111u Asphaltlc concrete 72.8 Rehabilitated bitumen 882.8 Unrehabllitated bitumen 88.8 Crave I 32.8 TOTAL 864.8 Source: Ministry of Works data base  - 65 - Annex XI Page 3 of 4 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Other Bitumen Highways Rehabilitated Link Length No. Road Name (Km} Finance 90 Kampala Jct - Kampala/Mubende Bdr 47.0 IDA Highways III 91 Kampala - Bombo 31.0 IDA Highways III 112 Mukono Railway Road 4.3 IDA Highways III 115 Kampala - Port Bell 6.7 IDA Highways III 116 Kampala - Gaba 9.2 IDA Highways III 117 Makindye Lodge Road 2.0 IDA Highways III 118 Tank Hill Road 2.6 IDA Highways III 120 Kyambogo Estate Road 3.8 IDA Highways III 132 Masaka - Kyotera 42.0 IDA Highways III 141 Mityana - Kampala/Mubende Bdr (Mpigi} 14.0 IDA Highways III 159 J inj a - Kamuli 58.0 IDA Highways III 164 Mbale - Namusi 7.0 IDA Highways III 165 Namusi - Mbale Soroti Bdr 12.0 IDA Highways III 98 Mukono - Kalagi 18.0 KfW/UG 99 Kalagi - Bukoloto 29.0 KfW/UG 100 Bukoloto - Kayunga 3.7 KfW/Ug 101 Bukoloto - Njeru 43.0 KfW/UG 163 Mbale - Tororo/Mbale Bdr 24.0 KfW/UG 183 Totoro - Magodes 17.0 KfW/UG 184 Magodes - Torro/Mbale Bdr 2.0 KfW/UG 110 Railway Approach 5.0 UG 92 Bombo - Luwero 32.0 UK/UG 93 Luwero - Nakasongola 53.0 UK/UG 94 Nakasongola - Kafu Bridge 55.0 IDA Highways IV 95 Kampala - Busunju 57.0 UK/UG 96 Kampala - Entebbe 34.0 UK/UG 97 Entebbe - Airport 5.0 UK/UG 65 Mbarara - Bushenyi 53.0 IDA Highways IV 66 Bushenyi - Ishaka 8.0 IDA Highways IV 139 Kitanga - (Kivumulo} - Myanzi 26.0 UG (Barter deal} 140 Myanzi - Mityana 15.0 UG (Barter deal} TOTAL 704.0 Source: Ministry of Transport paper, October 12, 1989 Annex XI  - 66 - Annex XI Page 4 of 4 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s National Highway Rehabilitation Link Length No. Road Name (km) Finance Formal Reconstruction 133 1 Kyotera - Mutakula 45 IDA Highways III 157 1 Nakalawa - Tirinyi 47 IDA Highways III 170 1 Mbale - Kamonkoli 9 IDA Highways III 185 1 Tirinyi - Kamonkoli 39 IDA Highways III 186 2 Tororo - Busia 26 IDA Highways III 187 3 Busia - Majjanji 28 IDA Highways III 168 1 Sironko - Muyambe 10 UG 171 2 Muyambe - Kapchorma 30 UG 1 Pakwach - Arua 132 IDA Highways III Sub-total 366 Effected by MOW 1989[90 by Grading and Side Drain Clearing 1 723 2 517 3 317 Sub-total 1,557 TOTAL 1,923 Class Sunnnary Class 1 1,005 Class 2 507 Class 3 345 TOTAL 1,923 Source: Ministry of Works and Ministry of Transport swmnary lists  , UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Summary of On-going Road Development Projects Expenditure in USS 111i 11 ion Planned To end Ref Total June 1990/ 1991/ 1992/ 1993/ Carry finance No Description Project 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Over TR - 011 Reconstruction of 1 Ilk• f I rs t section of ICa•pala - Nasaka road (Link 87 > 17.5 14.9 2.6 EEC TR-09 Reconstruction of 1Cu1pal a - Ji nja (a) ADF <a>+(b> road ( 72k•) 20.1 19.4 0.7 (b) IOA High1uy IV 11 TR - (b) Reconstruction JI n j a - ICayuana (b)+(c) Tororo - Nbale 0-, Na•utere - Bus I a roads IC f II (,. 9 It 111 -..J ( C) Eastern Region roads •alntenance 9.1 5 • II 3.9 required) TR-12 Reconstruction (a) Nbarara - Ishak• (a) IDA (a)+(b) ( b) Ishak• - ICatunguru road• 111.11 6.3 9.3 3.2 (b) ADF (,. 1 st i 11 required) TR - 13 Reconstruction Nasaka - Nb1r1ra road 13. 7 II • II 4.9 EEC TR-14 Reconstruction Mbarara - ICabale road 16. 5 10 . 1 6.4 EEC TR-15 Training NOii personnel and i111proving maintenance capacity 64.9 51 • 4 7.9 5.6 IDA Mi ghwa y 111 TR- 16 Rehabi Ii tat I on and Maintenance of Rural GTZ Feeder Roads 92.5 13. 5 22.9 1 7. 5 14. 4 6.9 17.3 UNDP/UNCDF/ILO I DA/I FAD IDA Highway JV BADEA "CJ ~ OQ S' :::, JAICA (1) (1) :>< ,- ~ 0 H t-t, H u.)  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Summary of On-going Road Development Projects E•penditure in USS 11 I I I I on Planned To end Ref Total June 1990/ 1991/ 1992/ 1993/ Carry Finance llo De1crlptlon Project 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Over TR· 24 Rehabilitation of KCC and other Urban EEC Roads 34. 3 15. 8 4.4 4.9 3. 8 5. 4 IDA JAICA TR·25 Fea,ibility Study and Design of Pak11ach· Arua road 0.4 0.4 TR· 41 Road Re,ealing Unit: Entebbe Airport, "' (X) Wobulenzi ·Kafu and Ka11pala-Busunju road, 7.9 5.4 2. 5 ODA TR· 4 2 Recon,truction and bitu11inisation of IDB <Design only Maaindi-Apac·Lira·Kltgu11 road 60.8 0.8 6.0 24.0 24.0 6.0 at 0.8) TR·43 Feasibility studies for bitu11inisation ( II ) of PTA roads 3.8 ,. 9 ,. 9 ADB/ADF TR-44 Reconstruction and bitu11inisation of Mityana·Fort Portal road 4 7. 5 19. 3 7. 5 14. 3 6.4 UG (Barter deal) TR· 45 Upgrading/bitu11inistation of <a > Gayaza·Kalagi road ADI (Study and (b) lganga·Tirinyi-Mbale road 37. 3 0.7 0.6 1. 8 1 0. 8 5. 4 18. 0 design only, at ( C ) Tirinyi · Pallisa · Ku11i road 1. 3) r Pl ::l 00 ::l (1) (1) ~ :,,: 0 H H vJ  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Summary of On-going Road Development Proiects Expenditure in USS 111i l lion Planned To end Ref Total June 1990/ 1991/ 1992/ 1993/ Carry Finance No Deacriptlon Project 1990 1991 199Z 1993 1994 Over Tl· 49 Upgrade Npigi feeder road• fro111 ( N) Cla1a 3 to Cl••• z gravel 4. 5 0.9 2.9 0.7 UG U-50 Feaaiblllty atudy and des I gn for ( N) reconatructlon of Kafu-Karuaa road 0.3 0.3 Tl ·64 Reconstruction of all •• j or bridge• (]\ ( N) 6.6 0.2 0.4 1. 5 4. 5 KFW '° Tl -65 Rehabilitation and upgrading to Claa1 2 ( N> II ravel standard• of 50k111 Equator feeder road• 1. 1 0.9 0.2 ADB/UG TOTALS 459.0 173. 3 80.6 58.2 63.9 41.7 41 . 3 Source: Ministry of Econoaic Planning project profiles w  - 70 - Annex XIII UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Ministry of Works Road Maintenance Recorded Production Planned 1987/ 1988/ 1989/ 1990/ Operation 1988 1989 1990 1991 Bitumen road rehabilitation (km) 20 Bitumen road patching (km) 50 Total length bitumen road under maintenance (km) 188 Regravelling (km) 467 185 324 1,059 Gravel road patching (km) 56 Grading (km) 897 585 1,686 2,338 Opening side drains (km) 1,557 n/a Installing culverts (no) 135 1,203 1/ Total length gravel road under maintenance (km) n/a n/a 3,267 3,788 Source: Ministry of Works 1/ Estimated on the basis of 9• per culvert.  - 71 - Annex XIV Page 1 of 2 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Projected Future Traffic on Major Highways -------------------~--------------------------------- ------------------------------~----------------------- Estimated Link Ty- Cl- Length Pav Estiaated ADT in year: Struct Cu!MI lative ESA by !:!ear: Null!be~ FrOIII To pe ass (k111) width Nll11ber (111) 1993 1995 2000 1993 1995 2000 --------------------------------~-~---~- --------- ---------------- 115 Ka1pala Port Bell PR 3 6. 7 6.5 12373 13641 17410 3.2 3.BS 5.41 10.03 116 Ka11pala Gaba PR 3 9.2 6.5 12056 13291 16963 3.4 I.BS 2.63 4.89 93 Kapala Jinja PR 22.0 4745 5231 66n 4.1 10.38 16.38 34.22 96 Kapala Entebbe PR 1 34.0 6.5 4646 5122 6537 3.2 1,14 I. 79 3. 75 156 Ka111pala Jinja PR 1 1.0 4524 4988 6366 4.1 14.17 19.89 36.90 118 Tank Hill Road PR 3 2.6 6,5 4372 4821 6152 3.4 0.85 1.19 2.21 87 Kapala l'lasaka PR 1 45.0 6.5 3971 4378 5587 3.4 Ill.bl 15.63 30.56 153 Jinja Tororo PR 1 36.0 6.5 3150 3473 4432 3.4 13,Bl 17.00 29.64 BS Kapala Jinja PR 1 29.0 2756 3039 3878 4.1 6.14 9.69 20.25 97 Kaapala Entebbe PR 1 5.0 2526 27B5 3554 0.27 0.43 0.91 84 Ka11pala Jinja PR 1 24.0 2487 2741 3499 4.1 5.44 8.59 17.93 lLQ Ka111pala l'lasaka PR 35.0 6.5 1615 1780 2272 3.4 3.53 5.58 11.65 88 lia11pala l'lasaka PR 1 33.0 6.5 1615 1789 2272 3.4 4.31 6.36 12.43 99 Ka11pala l'lasaka PR 1 29.0 6.5 1615 1780 2272 3.4 4.31 6.36 12.43 154 Jinja Tororo PR 5.0 6.5 14o8 1618 2065 3.4 6.44 8,2Q 13.81 91 Ka111pala Katu PR 1 31.0 6 1442 1590 2030 ... 3 ·~ NA NA NA .,,, I ., 92 Kaapala Katu PR 1 32.IJ 6 1242 1369 1748 3.4 0.52 0.83 ... 98 11ukono liala91 PR .. ·~ 18.0 6.5 1139 1256 1603 2.5 0,69 0.96 1. 79 90 Kaapala l'h tyana PR 47.e 6 940 1036 1323 3.4 e.48 0.71 1.39 1'+1 liupala Ni t!:lana PR 1 14.0 6.5 941 1036 1323 3.4 1.17 1.64 3.05 99 Ka1pala-6ayaza <Kalagi-Kayunga) PR 2 29.IJ 6 917 1011 1290 2.5 0.b3 0.es 1. 52 30 Fort Portal Katunguru PR 12.0 6 879 969 1236 3.4 1.10 1.29 1.84 19 Fort Portal Katunguru PR 1 10.e 6 879 969 1236 3.4 1. 71 2.00 2.96 100 Ka111pala-6ayaza (Kalagi-Kayunga) PR 2 3.7 6 8o2 er.ii 1214 2,5 0.59 0.90 1.43 155 Jinja Tororo PR 1 52.e 6.5 ass 943 1204 3.4 3. 75 4.83 8.05 37 Kasese K1 ll!tlbe PR 3 6.0 6,5 854 942 1202 3.4 0.55 0.65 0.9] 62 l'lbarara Ntungaao PR 1 58.IJ 6.5 814 897 1145 3.4 1.85 2.91 6.09 131 l'lasaka Lyantonde-llbarara PR 3,IJ 6,5 739 814 1039 3.4 1.62 2,55 5.33 61 l'lbarara l'lasaka PR 1 6.0 6.5 739 814 1039 3.4 2. 76 4.36 9.10 b0 l'lbarara l'lasaka PR 1 57.0 6.5 735 ate 1934 3.4 2.10 3.31 6.91 95 Ka1pala Busunju-Hoi11a PR 1 57.0 6 696 767 979 3,2 0.36 0.57 1.18 102 (Gayaza-Kalagil PR .. ') 20.1 6 689 759 969 2.5 0.22 0.32 0,b3 130 Nasaka Lyantonde~barara PR 68.0 6.5 678 748 cr.i5 3.4 1.48 2.34 4,89 65 l'lbarara lshaka-Katunguru PR 1 53.IJ 5,6 664 733 935 3.4 IJ.b4 1.IJl 2.11 . 66 l'lbarara 180 Tororo Ishaka-Katunguru Jinja PR PR 1 1 0.e 31.0 5.6 6,5 664 654 7JJ 721 935 920 3.4 3.1 0.51 2.87 0,80 3. 7111 1.67 6,15 101 Bukoloto Kangulu•ira-Njeru PR 2 43.IJ 6 634 6W 893 2,5 0.44 0.59 1.05 182 Busia Buwayo PR 1 17.1 7 596 657 839 3.8 1.87 2.62 4.86 132 Nasaka - Kyotera ~tukula PR 1 42.IJ 6.5 593 653 834 3.2 IJ.25 e.36 0. 71 166 Nainusi Sironko PR 4.0 6.5 582 642 819 1.40 1.64 2.35 181 Tororo l'laalaba PR 1 11,9 7 559 616 787 2.7 2.45 3.16 5.26 159 Jinja Ka111.1li PR 3 s0.e e 5se 606 n4 3.2 e.32 e.47 0.92 112 Mukono Jukon i R/IIIY St. Rd PR 3 4.3 6.5 543 599 764 2.5 e.46 0.59 0.98 164 !'Ibale Ku•i PR 1 7.IJ 6.5 531J 585 74b e.46 0.67 1.32 165 r,baJe Ku1i PR 5.0 6.5 530 SBS 746 111.46 0.67 1.32 93 fi.a111pala Katu PR 53.0 6 527 581 741 3.4 0.36 0.56 1.18 11 Kabale Ntungao PR 29.0 509 562 717 3.4 1.36 2.01! 3.92 14 fi.abale-Kisoro BunaganalRutsural GR 50.0 6 489 539 687 1.38 e.s1 IJ.Q\ 12 Kabale Katuna PR 22.e 6.5 484 533 601 3.4 I. 73 2.34 4, l,~  - 72 - Annex XIV Page 2 of 2 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Projected Future Traffic on Major ijighways 158 l;aP3a lial ire PR 3 32.0 6 470 SIB bbl 3.4 0.32 0.45 0.33 106 lia\junga hale GR 3 45, 9 6.5 i+70 518 661 0. 34 0.47 "·33 15 ~aoal~-li1soro &Jnagana(Rutsura) 6R 21.5 6 465 513 655 0.18 0.24 0.42 167 Na111si Sironko PR I 14.5 6.5 454 500 639 3.13 3.66 5.24 113 Mpigi Loop 6R 3 3.6 6.5 449 495 b32 0.23 0.Ja 0.50 183 TorOl'O 11bale PR 17.0 6.5 448 494 b30 0.11! 0.15 0.30 • 157 .Buko.:-011 Terin!li 6R 47.0 6.5 423 466 595 0. ~'9 0.40 0. '75 170 11bale Terin!li GR 9.0 6.5 420 4b3 591 0.30 0.47 0,Q8 73 11barara Ibanda-rort Portal GR .. '> b4.0 6 392 43'3 552 0.89 I.DB 1.63 140 11it!lana "-ibende-Toro 6R 15.0 363 401 511 e.32 0.50 1.04 134 l'lasaka "-ibende PR .. '> 11.6 352 388 495 3.5 0.07 0.10 0.20 104 6a!;a:a Nalnulonge GR 3 9.4 6 345 380 4135 e. 10 0.21 0.34 17 Fort Portal Katunguru PR 43.0 6 332 366 467 3.4 0.51 0.5° e.ss Q4 liai;;~ala Kafu PR ~5.0 6 3Bl -·n ,)., .. 424 3. 4 0.13 0. :'0 0.42 63 Kabai! Ntungarr,o PR 16.0 299 329 420 3.4 0. 65 1.03 :.15 64 Kabale Ntun;amo PR 23.0 299 :m 420 3.4 0.65 1.03 ~.IS lti3 Tororo tlbale PR 24.0 6.5 298 328 419 0.21 0.J3 0.69 134 Tororo Neale PR 2.0 6,5 298 328 419 0.07 0. 10 0.20 6Q 111:larara Nsongensi Kabale GR 51.0 6.5 292 j22 410 0.35 0,41 0.59 135 Mbai! Ter1n!li GR 39.0 6.5 2BS 318 406 0. 07 0.10 0.19 135 Villa Nar1a 11ubende GR .. '> 94.4 6.5 286 315 402 NA NA NA 13 Kabale-Kisoro &Jnagana(Rutsura) GR 20.0 6 278 306 391 0.16 0.22 0.39 20 i=ort Portal 11ubende (boundar!lltGR 38.0 6 266 294 J7S 0.52 0.61 0.87 IQ Fort Portal 11ubende (boundaryltPR 2::. 0 6.5 266 294 375 3.4 0,52 e.61 0.87 33 Fort Portal Katunguru · PR 6.0 6 249 274 350 3.4 1.11 1.29 1.95 32 Fort Portal Katunguru PR 10.0 6 249 274 350 3.4 0.61 0.71 1.02 43 l\afu K191111ba PR 12.2 6.5 247 272 347 3.4 0.n 0.93 !. .. ~ 44 Kikuaba ~.a tu l i ki ,.e-Karuiu PR 56.8 6. 5 245 ~71 345 3.4 0.97 1.05 I. 58 24 Fort Portal Ibanda-Nbarara GR .. •, 10.0 5 241 265 339 0.38 0.46 0.70 74 ltoarara Ibanda-Fort Portal 6R .. '> 32.0 6 241 265 339 0.io 0.92 1.38 ms lia;iun;a Naou;an!li GR .. '> :.1." 6.5 237 262 334 0.11 0.14 0.:.:5 17b Naraaguriba &Jdadi ri 6R 3 18,6 6 237 262 334 0.:::: 0.26 0,J7 137 l'lasaka Bukakata 6R .. ,, 36.6 6,5 72.7 250 3l9 0.22 0.26 0.39 160 Ka1111li llbulaauti GR 2 13.b 6 ....... '>")') 245 313 !!.07 0.10 0.19 133 Kyotera 11utukula GR 1 45.0 6.5 207 228 2<?2 0.Hl "· 14 0. :'8 31 Fort Portal Katun;uru PR 1 22.0 6 206 227 2',10 3.4 0.95 1.12 1.6:, HJCI Old Kampala Rd io oe tound GR 9.0 201 222 29J NA t~ Nt. 34 l'1ba,.ara lshaka-Katunguru PR 5~.0 5.6 199 :'.:.'0 280 3.4 0.22 0.35 0. 72 1'+5 katu Fhver ~:i ooga GR 65.5 6.5 !96 216 275 0.34 0.44 0.;3 3~.36 Eouator Road PR .., 39.0 li,5 m 211 26q 3.4 0.19 0.31 0,64 186 Tororo Bus.a GR .. 2b.0 0 185 20it 261 0.07 0.10 0.20 li3 11bale Bui!Jda Circular Rd GR 3 16,0 6,5 192 200 256 0.26 0.33 0.55 4:: ~;atu Kigui:.ba PR 19.0 6.5 170 188 239 3.4 0.63 0.76 1.15 5 Ho1ma r.asindi GR 9.5 6 168 185 236 0.07 0. lB 0.1° 136 l'la;a~a V1 l la l'laria-l'lubence?R .. •, 11.6 6.5 100 193 233 3.2 0.02 0.03 0.07 Sa.irce: Ministry of Works data base ard 1900 traffic co.mts Notes (a) Traffic grMh projected at five percent per year (b) Roads listed in descending order of ftDT  - 73 - Annex XV Page 1 of 3 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Potential Main Highway Investments 1991-2000 Paved Roads Likely to Require Strengthening Estimated Cumula- Link Length tive ESA at stated No. From To (km) year (millions) \ By 1993 115 Kampala Port Bell 6.7 3.9 83 Kampala Mukuno 22.0 10.4 156 Jinja Njeru 1.0 14.2 87 Kampala Mpigi 45.0 10.6 153 Jinja Iganga 36.0 13.8 129 Masaka Katonga Bridge 35.0 3.5 88 Mpigi Buwama 33.0 4.3 89 Buwama Katonga Bridge 29.0 4.3 154 Ingaga Nakalama 5.0 6.4 98 Mukono Kalagi 18.0 0.7 99 Kalagi Bukoloto 29.0 0.6 100 Bukoloto Kayunga 3.7 0.6 155 Nakalawa Tirinyi 52.0 3.8 180 Tororo Muwayo (Junction) 31.0 2.9 101 Bukoloto Njeru 43.0 0.4 181 Tororo Malaba (Kenya Br) 11.9 2.5 112 Mukolono Railway Rd 4.3 o.5 164 Mbale Namusi 7.0 0.5 166 Namusi Namagumba 5.0 0.5 167 Namagumba Sironko 14.5 3.1 112 Mukono Railway Rd 4.3 0.5 ------ Sub-total for 1993 436.4 By 1995 116 Kampala Gaba 9.2 2.6 . 85 102 Lugazi Kampala Njeru Gayaza 29.0 20.1 9.7 0.3 Sub-total for 1995 58.3  - 74 - Annex XV Page 2 of 3 UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance for teh 1990s Potential Main Highway Investments 1991-2000 Paved Roads Likely to Require Strengthening Estimated Cumula- Link Length tive ESA at stated No. From To (km) year (millions) By 2000 96 Kampala Entebbe 34.0 3.8 84 Mukono Lugazi 24.0 17.9 141 Mityana Kampala/Mubende Bdr 14.0 3. 1 18 Kikagati Merama Hill 18.0 2. 0 (Rwanda Bdr) 62 Mbarara Ntungamo 58.0 6.1 131 Lyatonde Mbarara/Masaka Bdr 3.0 5.3 61 Nakaita Mbarara/Masaka Bdr 6.0 9.1 60 Mbarara Nakaita 57.0 6.9 130 Masaka Katonga Bridge 68.0 4.9 182 Busia Majj anj i 17.1 4.9 Sub-total for 2000 299.1 TOTAL 793.8 • Source: Derived from Annex XIV and average ESA per vehicle from 1990 traffic counts. Notes: (a) Assumed Traffic Growth 5% per year. ..  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Potential Main Highway Investments 1991-2000 Gravel Roads Estimated to Become Candidate for Bituminization (i.e., ADT exceeding 250 vehicles) Estimated ADT Link No, fr.om Lentb (Km) at stated year By 1993: 14 Iku•b• Kisoro 60. 0 489 UJ6 Kayunga Bale 46.9 470 16 Kisoro Rutsura (Zaire Bdr) 21.6 466 113 Mpigi Loop 3.6 449 167 Nakai aw• Ti rinyi 47.0 423 170 Mbale Kamonkol 1 9.0 420 73 Mbarara Ibanda 64.0 392 140 Myanzi Mityana 16.0 363 104 Gayua Kalagi 9.4 346 69 Mbarara Ibanda 61.0 292 186 Tirinyi Kamonkol i 39.0 288 136 Vi I la Maria Nkonze 94.4 286 13 Kabale Ikumba 20. 0 278 20 Fort Portal Kyenj oj o 38.0 266 Sub-total for 1983 1,407.8 By 1996: 24 Kamwenge Kabarole/Mbarara Bdr 10. 0 266 74 Ibanda Mbarara/Kabarole Bdr 32.0 266 106 Kayunga Nabuganyi 20. 0 262 176 Namaguba Badadiri 18.6 262 137 Masak• Bukakata 36.6 260 Sub-total for 1996 117.2 By 2Qff: 160 Kamul i Mbulamatl 13.6 313 133 Kyotera Mutakula 46.0 292 109 Border Lagazi 9.0 283 146 Kafu River Kiboga 66.6 276 186 Tororo Busi• 26.0 261 173 Mbale (Jct) Bubulo 16.0 Sub-total for 2000 176.1 TOTAL 1,700.1 Source: Derived from Table Annex XIV ~: (•) Assumed traffic growth five percent per year. L,.J  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Inventory of Feeder Road Network Classification Totals District I II III IV No. of No. Of No. Of No. Of No. of Links K111 Links K111 Links Km Links K111 Links Km Apac 6 276 6 193 2 96 13 664 Arua 1 47 22 636 9 206 32 888 Bundibugyo 1 19 7 183 16 186 23 387 Bushenyi 6 233 20 636 26 769 Gulu 1 74 u 333 16 407 Hoima 2 161 20 409 u 234 36 804 Ingaga 18 738 21 309 6 68 46 1,106 Jinja 7 213 3 29 10 242 Kabale 7 219 10 129 2 17 19 366 Kaba role 8 296 11 202 20 274 39 771 Kamul i 1 8 6 217 8 244 12 122 26 691 Kapchorwa 1 6 32 218 33 223 -...J Kasese 6 164 11 169 18 323 a, Kotido 2 99 6 163 6 173 13 426 Ku•i 2 22 9 208 3 63 7 69 21 362 Lira 9 322 17 291 3 69 29 682 Luwero 28 948 3 34 31 982 Masak• 7 3"" 18 444 26 744 Masindi 13 173 34 637 26 318 1 10 74 1,037 Mbale 4 67 23 164 12 9" 39 311 Mbarara 1 46 20 646 26 606 46 1,196 Moyo 6 107 4 62 6 73 4 68 18 29" Mpigi u 429 1,429 4 18 1,723 Mubende 6 208 17 668 6 138 2 29 30 933 Mukono u 422 13 246 7 9" 34 767 Nebbi 1 182 u 423 1 40 16 646 Rakai 2 196 6 169 1 24 9 378 Rukingirl 7 87 7 119 20 672 34 878 Soroti 12 399 32 630 2 22 46 961 Tororo 3 78 16 301 18 221 36 601 TOTALS: 61 1,762 348 10, 29" 382 7,613 61 769 862 20,334 ~ ::I Source: Ministry of Transport data base ro :,c: :x <: H • •  • UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Feeder Road Rehabilitation Kilometers Estimated Class Project District Rehabilitated Split (Km) 1988 1989 1990 Total 1 2 3 UNDP & !FAD Bushenyi 10 10 10 UNDP & !FAD Kabale 10 10 10 UNDP & !FAD Mbarara 150 35 20 205 45 160 UNDP & !FAD Rukungiri 10 10 10 UNDP Masaka UNDP Rakai GTZ Bundibugyo ) GTZ Hoima )10 100 25 135 135 GTZ Kabarole ) GTZ Kasese ) BADEA Mpigi 50 25 31 106 106 -..J BADEA Mubende 50 50 50 -..J BADEA Mukomo JAICA Iganga ) JAICA Jinja ) 37 8 45 30 15 JAICA Kamuli ) IDA Kapchorwa IDA Mbale IDA Tororo Total 260 197 114 571 270 301 Source: AFDB Report "Uganda Rural Feeder Roads Study", August 1990. Notes: (a) 25 percent of the planned output for 1990 has been included in the total.  UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Develoment & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s FUEL IMPORTS AND PRIVATE VEHICLE FLEET 12.fil 12..8.Z. ~ 12.6A ~ l9..6Q 12.fil 1.2M 1.2.8..2. Fuel Imports (000 mt): Aviation Fuel 15.0 17.0 18.1 16.5 17.4 17.5 20.5 23.2 22.6 Gasoline 46.7 44.3 49.4 55.7 57.2 75.7 75.7 84.1 84.8 Auto Diesel 46.7 51.1 61.0 53.4 64.6 80.3 94.0 99.7 88.5 Private Vehicle Fleet: -..J Cars 10,700 9,800 10,100 10,400 10,800 11,600 12,300 12,700 13,000 00 Pick-ups 3,700 3,400 3,700 4,200 4,500 5,200 5,900 6,600 7,400 Mini buses 700 700 1,200 1,700 1,700 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,400 Buses 600 600 600 600 600 500 600 600 600 Trucks 3,600 3,500 3,400 3,200 3,100 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,700 Motorcycles 4,200 3,900 4,300 4,400 4,400 4,300 4,200 4,200 4,200 Other 2,200 2,100 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,900 3,100 3,400 3,700 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Total 25,600 24,100 25,900 27,200 27,700 29,400 31,300 32,900 34,900 :i:- ::I ::I (I) ~ :,<: <: H H H • •  • UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Air Sector: Traffic Statistics 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 Uganda Airlines Corporation: International Services Revenue Passenger km (million) 123 134 112 70 96 114 73 103 Passenger Land Factor (%) 41 38 38 44 64 64 48 51 Domestic Services Revenue Passenger km (million) 4 9 6 9 84 80 57 87 Passenger Land factor(%) 48 52 48 53 65 79 69 67 -...J 1986 1987 1988 1989 \.0 Entebbe International Airport: Passengers Europe Flight 9,000 16,500 13,000 22,500 Africa Flight 42,000 59,000 63,000 68,000 Other International 8,500 8,000 6,000 5,000 Domestic 18,000 23,000 16,500 24,000 Total Passenger 77,500 106,500 98,500 119,500 Freight (mt) Loaded 20 1,923 1,350 2,023 Unloaded 3,850 7,235 7,039 5,768 Total 3,870 9,158 8,389 7,791 ~ ;:l (1) >: ><: H ><:  uu UGANDA TRANSPORT SECTOR MEMORANDUM Sustainable Development & Maintenance Priorities for the 1990s Annex xx lJCAIIOA AIRLINES CORPORATION: Operating Option• Net Operating Reaulta US 1'000 No Direct Pa . . enger Service• Year 1 Year 4 (i) U.h at Offical Rate Local Over•••• Total Local Over•••• Total Handling Oparationa 1648 2618 4266 2455 3958 6413 Freighter Operation• 1838 (1523) 2982 505 Saat Purchaaa ~3361~ ~2m~ 8631 4725 3906 8631 4725 3906 Total 12117 (5468) 6650 14068 (3244) 10824 (ii) Uah at Parallel Rat.a Local Over•••• Tot.al Local Over•••• Total Handling Operation• 824 2618 3442 1227 3958 5185 Freighter Operation• 919 (2442~ 1491 Seat Purchaaa ~3361~ ~2m~ ~986) 4315 4725 (409 4315 4725 409) Total 6059 (5468) 591 7034 (3244) 3790 Joint Venture Long Diatance Pa . . angar Service• Year 1 Year 4 (i) U.h at Offical Rat.a Local Over•••• Total Local Over•••• Total Handling Operation• 1648 2618 4266 2455 3958 6413 Freighter Operation• 1838 (1523~ 2982 505 F27 (3361~ (24n~ 713 (725 (13 964 (619 345 DCB 10688 (5974 4714 11611 (2250 9361 Net Opara ting Contribution H~~ 14887 7445 18012 16624 Overhead• (855) (2262) (855) ~1389~ 1406 (2262) Total 14032 (8849) 5183 17157 (2795) 14362 (ii) U.h at Parallel Rat.a Local Over•••• Tot.al Local a.,.,.•••• Total Handling Operation• 824 2618 3442 1227 3958 5185 F,-aighta,- Operation• 919 1491 F27 (3361~ (2442~ (24n~ ~986~ 356 (725 ~369 482 (629 137 DCB 5344 (5974 630 5805 (2250 3551 Net Operating Con tr i but ion ~I~~ 7444 1 9006 ~1389) 7618 Overhead• (428) (1834) (428) 1406) (1834) Total 7016 (8849) (1833) 8578 (2795) 5784 Solua Operation Long Di at.ance Pa . . . nger S.rvicea Year 1 Year 4 (i) U.h at Offical Rate Local a.,.,.•••• Total Local Dv•r•••• Total Handling Operation• 1648 2618 4266 2455 3958 6413 Freighter Operation• 1838 2982 505 F27 713 (33611 (725 (15231 (13 (24nl 964 (619 345 DCB 8323 ~~ (13933 8606 (10121 B737 3386 (7940 4224 (7128 ~1515~ 2905 Net Operating Contribution 16909 ~=~ (23342~ 19231 (15387~ 2843 Overheada (1229) (1831 (1229) (1831 (3060) Total 14680 (25173) (10493) 18002 (18218) (217) (ii) U.h at Parallel Rat.a Local Over•••• Tot.a I Local Over•••• Total Handling Operation• 824 2618 3442 1227 3958 5185 Freighter Operationa 919 1491 F27 356 (33611 (725 (24421 (369 (24n~ ~986~ 482 (629 137 DCB 4162 (13933 9n2 4303 (10121 (5818) 8737 1693 (7940 ~6247 2112 (7128) (5017) Net Operating Con tr i but ion 7955 (23342~ (15387~ 8386 (16387~ Overhead• ~&n2) (615) (1831 (2446 (615) (1831 2446) Tot.a I 7340 (25173) (17833) 9001 (18218) (9218) " .  IBRD 2288A 30· UGANDA ,. TRANSPORT SECTOR +----+- R:01lroods - - - Fe<Ties (Plonnedl - - - Fem.. (Exishng) Rood,, Primary b.tumen Primary g,CJ¥ol Secondo,y bttumen Secondary grOlfol Tertiary bitumen K EN YA Tertiory g,CJ¥el - -- Other roads ~ Rr\'et"s (!j) Notional cop,tol JINJA@ Dostroct cop,tol, District~1e1 - ·- lnten1ahonol boundones Airfield, 10 ,o MILE!. 0 10 1· 1· Z A I RE //~ 0- ~ ../ r .. i I \~\. .I i ' , iI ...> ,,.,. ._,_ .... ,,___.., ,,-, _....,.. a •_...._ ... ,_--. ., .. ,...,.#IICII ~ ~ .................... ,,..._.... _.,""-._... .... ........................ .,.,_~~ . . ......... . ,,,. M!tW . . . . .,,. . ................ r~ c.-.,.. ...,. ....,,._. ,,. , . .,. ,.. . . . . ) ....... ............ .......,,_, .. ~.....__ • .._ y ~--""' ........... \/ // · ; RUKUNGIRI RAIC A I ® I / I,' ~ .J,I ~ - ;' I' "MutuloAa _ _ __ __ __ __ __ __ ,_ ,_ , '\.. TANZ ANIA \ \.'\ N DA ~ ''°""'°'' 31' JANUARY 1991 .i '