SIXTY-SIXTH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY
A66/68 23 May 2013
Second report of Committee B Committee B held its second and third meetings on 23 May 2013 under the chairmanship of, respectively, Mrs Kathryn Tyson (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) and Dr Poonam Khetrapal Singh (India). It was decided to recommend to the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly the adoption of the attached nine resolutions and one decision relating to the following agenda items: 21. Financial matters 21.2 Status of collection of assessed contributions, including Member States in arrears in the payment of their contributions to an extent that would justify invoking Article 7 of the Constitution One resolution 21.3 Special arrangements for settlement of arrears: Tajikistan One resolution 21.4 Scale of assessments for 2014–2015 – Report of the Director-General One resolution entitled: – Scale of assessments for 2014‒2015 One resolution entitled: – Foreign exchange risk management 22. Audit and oversight matters 22.1 Report of the External Auditor One resolution
A66/68
23.
Staffing matters 23.5 Appointment of representatives to the WHO Staff Pension Committee One decision
24.
Management and legal matters 24.1 Follow-up of the report of the Working Group on the Election of the DirectorGeneral of the World Health Organization One resolution 24.2 Real estate One resolution 24.3 Agreements with intergovernmental organizations One resolution 24.4 Reassignment of South Sudan from the Eastern Mediterranean Region to the African Region One resolution
2
A66/68
Agenda item 21.2 Status of collection of assessed contributions, including Member States in arrears in the payment of their contributions to an extent that would justify invoking Article 7 of the Constitution The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the reports on status of collection of assessed contributions, including Members in arrears in the payment of their contributions to an extent that would justify invoking Article 7 of the Constitution, and special arrangements for settlement of arrears;1 Noting that, at the time of opening of the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, the voting rights of Central African Republic, Comoros, Grenada, Guinea-Bissau and Somalia were suspended, such suspension to continue until the arrears of the Members concerned have been reduced, at the present or future Health Assemblies, to a level below the amount that would justify invoking Article 7 of the Constitution; Noting that Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi and Sierra Leone were in arrears at the time of the opening of the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly to such an extent that it was necessary for the Health Assembly to consider, in accordance with Article 7 of the Constitution, whether or not the voting privileges of those countries should be suspended – for Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan at the opening of the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, and for the remaining eight Member States at the opening of the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly, DECIDES: (1) that in accordance with the statement of principles set out in resolution WHA41.7 if, by the time of the opening of the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly, Antigua and Barbuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Jordan, Malawi, and Sierra Leone are still in arrears in the payment of their contributions to an extent that would justify invoking Article 7 of the Constitution, their voting privileges shall be suspended as from the said opening; and in accordance with resolution WHA59.6 and resolution WHA61.8 if, by the time of the opening of the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan, respectively, are still in arrears in the payment of their rescheduled assessments, their voting privileges shall be suspended automatically; (2) that any suspension that takes effect as set out in paragraph (1) above shall continue at the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly and subsequent Health Assemblies until the arrears of Afghanistan Antigua and Barbuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi and Sierra Leone have been reduced to a level below the amount that would justify invoking Article 7 of the Constitution; (3) that this decision shall be without prejudice to the right of any Member to request restoration of its voting privileges in accordance with Article 7 of the Constitution. 1
Documents A66/30 and A66/55.
3
A66/68
Agenda item 21.3 Special arrangements for settlement of arrears: Tajikistan The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the report by the Secretariat on the status of collection of assessed contributions,1 and the request of Tajikistan;2 Noting that Tajikistan has outstanding contributions of US$ 366 513; Considering the request of Tajikistan to reschedule this balance over the period 2013 to 2022; 1. DECIDES to allow Tajikistan to retain its voting privileges at the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly on the following conditions: Tajikistan shall pay its outstanding arrears of assessed contributions, totalling US$ 366 513 over 10 years from 2013 to 2022, as set out below, in addition to payment of its annual assessment for the current year; Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total US$ 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 651 36 654 366 513
2. DECIDES that, in accordance with Article 7 of the Constitution, voting privileges shall be automatically suspended if Tajikistan does not meet the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 above; 3. REQUESTS the Director-General to report to the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly on the prevailing situation; 4. REQUESTS the Director-General to communicate this resolution to the Government of Tajikistan. 1 2
Document A66/30. Document A66/45.
4
A66/68
Agenda item 21.4 Scale of assessments for 2014–2015 The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the report on the scale of assessments for 2014–2015,1 ADOPTS the scale of assessments of Members and Associate Members for the biennium 2014–2015 as set out below.
Members and Associate Members Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China
WHO scale for 2014–2015 % 0.0050 0.0100 0.1370 0.0080 0.0100 0.0020 0.4320 0.0070 2.0741 0.7981 0.0400 0.0170 0.0390 0.0100 0.0080 0.0560 0.9981 0.0010 0.0030 0.0010 0.0090 0.0170 0.0170 2.9342 0.0260 0.0470 0.0030 0.0010 0.0040 0.0120 2.9842 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.3340 5.1484
1
Document A66/31.
5
A66/68
Members and Associate Members Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati 6
WHO scale for 2014–2015 % 0.2590 0.0010 0.0050 0.0010 0.0380 0.0110 0.1260 0.0690 0.0470 0.3860 0.0060 0.0030 0.6750 0.0010 0.0010 0.0450 0.0440 0.1340 0.0160 0.0100 0.0010 0.0400 0.0100 0.0030 0.5190 5.5935 0.0200 0.0010 0.0070 7.1416 0.0140 0.6380 0.0010 0.0270 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0030 0.0080 0.2660 0.0270 0.6660 0.3460 0.3560 0.0680 0.4180 0.3960 4.4483 0.0110 10.8338 0.0220 0.1210 0.0130 0.0010
A66/68
Members and Associate Members Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia (Federated States of) Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of Korea Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation Rwanda
WHO scale for 2014–2015 % 0.2730 0.0020 0.0020 0.0470 0.0420 0.0010 0.0010 0.1420 0.0730 0.0810 0.0030 0.0020 0.2810 0.0010 0.0040 0.0160 0.0010 0.0020 0.0130 1.8421 0.0010 0.0120 0.0030 0.0050 0.0620 0.0030 0.0100 0.0100 0.0010 0.0060 1.6541 0.2530 0.0030 0.0020 0.0900 0.0010 0.8511 0.1020 0.0850 0.0010 0.0260 0.0040 0.0100 0.1170 0.1540 0.9211 0.4740 0.0010 0.2090 1.9941 0.0030 0.2260 2.4382 0.0020 7
A66/68
Members and Associate Members Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Tajikistan Thailand The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Total 8
WHO scale for 2014–2015 % 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0030 0.0010 0.8641 0.0060 0.0400 0.0010 0.0010 0.3840 0.1710 0.1000 0.0010 0.0010 0.3720 0.0040 2.9732 0.0250 0.0100 0.0040 0.0030 0.9601 1.0471 0.0360 0.0030 0.2390 0.0080 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0440 0.0360 1.3281 0.0190 0.0010 0.0060 0.0990 0.5950 5.1794 0.0090 22.0000 0.0520 0.0150 0.0010 0.6270 0.0420 0.0100 0.0060 0.0020 100.0000
A66/68
Agenda item 21.4
Foreign exchange risk management The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the report on foreign exchange risk management;1 Recognizing the need for ensuring long-term matching between currencies of income and expense, 1. DECIDES: (1) that the currency of assessed contributions will from 2014 be denominated half in United States dollars and half in Swiss francs, calculated at the time of the approval of the Programme budget and of the amount of the Programme budget to be financed from assessed contributions; (2) that this measure will concern all Member States for whom the total amount of annual assessed contributions is US$ 200 000 or greater, with Member States whose total annual assessed contributions are less than US$ 200 000 continuing to be assessed solely in United States dollars; 2. DECIDES to amend Financial Regulation 6.6 to read as follows: 6.6 Where the total of annual assessed contributions for a Member is US$ 200 000 or greater, that Member’s contributions shall be assessed half in United States dollars and half in Swiss francs. Where the total of annual assessed contributions for a Member is less than US$ 200 000, that Member’s contributions shall be assessed in United States dollars only. The contributions shall be paid in either United States dollars, euros or Swiss francs, or such other currency or currencies as the Director-General shall determine. 3. FURTHER DECIDES that the foregoing changes to its Rules of Procedure shall take effect from the closure of its Sixty-sixth session.
1
Document A66/32.
9
A66/68
Agenda item 22.1
Report of the External Auditor The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the report of the External Auditor on the financial operations of the World Health Organization for the financial year ended 31 December 2012 to the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly;1 Having noted the report of the Programme, Budget and Administration Committee of the Executive Board to the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly,2 ACCEPTS the report of the External Auditor to the Sixty-sixth Health Assembly.
1 2
Document A66/34. Document A66/58.
10
A66/68
Agenda item 23.5
Appointment of representatives to the WHO Staff Pension Committee 1. The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly nominated Dr Viroj Tangcharoensathien of the delegation of Thailand as a member for a three-year term until May 2016 and the most senior alternate member, Mrs Palanitina Tupuimatagi Toelupe of the delegation of Samoa, as a member for the remainder of her term of office until May 2014. 2. The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly nominated Dr Mahmoud N. Fikry of the delegation of United Arab Emirates and Mr Alejandro Henning of the delegation of Argentina as alternate members of the WHO Staff Pension Committee for a three-year term until May 2016.
11
A66/68
Agenda item 24.1
Follow-up of the report of the Working Group on the Election of the Director-General of the World Health Organization The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly Having considered the report on the follow-up of the report of the Working Group on the Election of the Director-General of the World Health Organization,1 1. ADOPTS the Code of Conduct for the Election of the Director-General of the World Health Organization as set forth in Annex 1 to this resolution; 2. ESTABLISHES a candidates’ forum open to all Member States,2 as a non-decision-making platform for candidates, as set forth in Annex 2 to this resolution; 3. APPROVES the standard form for a curriculum vitae set forth in Annex 3 to this resolution, which shall be used henceforth by Member States proposing persons for the post of Director-General as the sole document to be submitted; 4. DECIDES that the curriculum vitae of each candidate shall be limited to [3500] words and shall also be submitted in electronic format in order to enable the Chairman of the Board to verify that this limit is not exceeded; 5. DECIDES to amend Rules 70 and 108 of the Rules of Procedure of the World Health Assembly and to add a new Rule 70bis, as set forth in Annex 4 to this resolution; 6. REQUESTS the Director-General: (1) to explore options for the use of electronic voting for the appointment of the Director-General, including the financial and electronic security implications thereof, and to report thereon, through the Executive Board, to the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly; (2) to consolidate a description of the overall process for the election of the Director-General in a single draft reference document with a view to submitting it, through the Executive Board, for the consideration of the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly.
1 2
Document A66/41. And, where applicable, regional economic integration organizations.
12
A66/68
ANNEX 1 CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION In resolution WHA65.15 concerning the report of the Working Group of Member States on the Process and Methods of the Election of the Director-General of the World Health Organization, the World Health Assembly decided, inter alia, that “a code of conduct, in line with Recommendation 7 of the report of the Joint Inspection Unit “Selection and Conditions of Service of Executive Heads in the United Nations System Organizations”, which candidates for the post of Director-General of the World Health Organization and Member States should undertake to observe and respect, will be developed by the Secretariat for consideration by the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly through the Executive Board.” This code of conduct (the “code”) aims at promoting an open, fair, equitable and transparent process for the election of the Director-General of the World Health Organization. In seeking to improve the overall process, the code addresses several areas, including the submission of proposals, the conduct of electoral campaigns by Member States and candidates, as well as funding and financial matters. The code is a political understanding reached by the Member States of the World Health Organization. It recommends desirable behaviour by Member States and candidates with regard to the election of the Director-General in order to increase the fairness, credibility, openness and transparency of the process and thus its legitimacy as well as the legitimacy and acceptance of its outcome. As such, the code is not legally binding but Member States and candidates are expected to honour its contents.
A. I.
General requirements Basic principles
The whole election process as well as electoral campaign activities related to it should be guided by the following principles that further the legitimacy of the process and of its result: due regard to the principle of equitable geographical representation, fairness, equity, transparency, good faith, dignity, mutual respect and moderation, non-discrimination, and merit.
13
A66/68
II. Authority of the Health Assembly and the Executive Board in accordance with their Rules of Procedure 1. Member States accept the authority of the Health Assembly and the Executive Board to conduct the election of the Director-General in accordance with their Rules of Procedure and relevant resolutions and decisions. 2. Member States that propose persons for the post of Director-General have the right to promote those candidatures. The same applies to candidates with regard to their own candidature. In the exercise of that right, Member States and candidates should abide by all rules governing the election of the Director-General contained in the Constitution of the World Health Organization, the Rules of Procedure of the World Health Assembly, and the Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board as well as in relevant resolutions and decisions.
III. Responsibilities 1. It is the responsibility of Member States and candidates for the post of Director-General of the World Health Organization to observe and respect this code. 2. Member States acknowledge that the process of election of the Director-General should be fair, open, transparent, equitable and based on the merits of the individual candidates. They should make this code publicly known and easily accessible. 3. The Secretariat will also promote awareness of the code in accordance with the provisions of the code.
B. I.
Requirements for the different steps of the election process Submission of proposals
When proposing the name of one or more persons for the post of Director-General, Member States should include in their proposal a statement to the effect that they and the persons proposed by them pledge to observe the provisions of the code. The Director-General will remind Member States accordingly when inviting Member States to propose persons for the post of Director-General in accordance with Rule 52 of the Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board.
II.
Electoral campaign
1. This code applies to electoral campaign activities related to the election of the Director-General whenever they take place until the appointment by the Health Assembly. 2. All Member States and candidates should encourage and promote communication and cooperation among one another during the entire election process. Member States and candidates should act in good faith bearing in mind the shared objectives of promoting equity, openness, transparency and fairness throughout the election process. 3. All Member States and candidates should consider disclosing their campaign activities (for example, hosting of meetings, workshops and visits) and communicate them to the Secretariat. Information so disclosed will be posted on a dedicated page of the WHO web site.
14
A66/68
4. Member States and candidates should refer to one another with respect; no Member State or candidate should at any time disrupt or impede the campaign activities of other candidates. Nor should any Member State or any candidate make any oral or written statement or other representation that could be deemed slanderous or libellous. 5. Member States and candidates should refrain from improperly influencing the election process, by, for example, granting or accepting financial or other benefits as a quid pro quo for the support of a candidate, or by promising such benefits. 6. Member States and candidates should not make promises or commitments in favour of, or accept instructions from, any person or entity, public or private, and should avoid any other similar action, when that could undermine, or be perceived as undermining, the integrity of the election process. 7. Member States proposing persons for the post of Director-General should consider disclosing grants or aid funding to other Member States during the previous two years in order to ensure full transparency and mutual confidence among Member States. 8. Member States that have proposed persons for the post of Director-General should facilitate meetings between their candidate and other Member States, if so requested. Wherever possible, meetings between candidates and Member States should be arranged on the occasion of conferences or other events involving different Member States rather than through bilateral visits. 9. Travel by candidates to Member States to promote their candidature should be limited in order to avoid excessive expenditure which could lead to inequality among Member States and candidates. In this connection, Member States and candidates should consider using as much as possible existing mechanisms (sessions of the regional committees, Executive Board and Health Assembly) for meetings and other promotional activities linked to the electoral campaign. 10. Candidates, whether internal or external, should not combine their official travel with campaigning activities. Electoral promotion or propaganda under the guise of technical meetings or similar events should be avoided. 11. After the Director-General has dispatched all proposals, curricula vitae and supporting information to Member States in accordance with Rule 52 of the Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board, the Secretariat will open on the WHO web site a password-protected forum for questions and answers, open to all Member States and candidates who request to participate in such a forum. The Secretariat will also post on the WHO web site information on all candidates who so request including their curricula vitae and other particulars of their qualifications and experience as received from Member States, as well as their contact information. The web site will also provide links to individual web sites of candidates upon request. Each candidate is responsible for setting up and financing his or her own web site. 12. The Secretariat will also post on WHO’s web site, at the time referred to in the first paragraph of Rule 52 of the Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board, information on the election process and the applicable rules and decisions, as well as the text of this code.
15
A66/68
III. Nomination and appointment 1. The nomination and appointment of the Director-General is conducted by the Executive Board and the Health Assembly, respectively, in accordance with their Rules of Procedure and relevant resolutions and decisions. As a matter of principle in order to preserve the serenity of the proceedings, candidates should not attend those meetings even if they form part of the delegation of a Member State. 2. Member States should abide strictly by the Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board and of the World Health Assembly and other applicable resolutions and decisions and respect the integrity, legitimacy and dignity of the proceedings. As such, they should avoid behaviours and actions, both inside and outside the conference room where the nomination and appointment take place, that could be perceived as aiming at influencing its outcome. 3. Member States should respect the confidentiality of the proceedings and the secrecy of the votes. In particular, they should refrain from communicating or broadcasting the proceedings during the private meetings through electronic devices. 4. In view of the secret nature of the vote for the nomination and appointment of the Director-General, Member States should refrain from publicly announcing in advance their intention to vote for a particular candidate.
IV.
Internal candidates
1. WHO staff members, including the Director-General in office, who are proposed for the post of Director-General, are subject to the obligations contained in the WHO Constitution, Staff Regulations and Staff Rules as well as to the guidance which may be issued from time to time by the Director-General. 2. WHO staff members who are proposed for the post of Director-General must observe the highest standard of ethical conduct and strive to avoid any appearance of impropriety. WHO staff members must clearly separate their WHO functions from their candidacy and avoid any overlap, or perception of overlap, between campaign activities and their work for WHO. They also have to avoid any perception of conflict of interest. 3. WHO staff members are subject to the authority of the Director-General, in accordance with the applicable regulations and rules, in case of allegations of breach of their duties with regard to their campaign activities. 4. The Health Assembly or the Executive Board may call upon the Director-General to apply Staff Rule 650 concerning special leave to staff members who have been proposed for the post of Director-General.
16
A66/68
ANNEX 2 CANDIDATES’ FORUM Convening and conduct of the forum 1. The candidates’ forum will be convened by the Secretariat at the request of the Executive Board as a self-standing event preceding the Board, and will be chaired by the Chairman of the Board, with the support of the Officers of the Executive Board. The Board will formally convene the candidates’ forum and decide its date at the session preceding the session at which the nomination will take place.
Timing 2. The candidates’ forum shall be held not later than two months in advance of the session of the Board session at which the nomination will take place.
Duration 3. The duration of the candidates’ forum will be decided by the Officers of the Board depending on the number of candidates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum duration of the forum shall be three days.
Format 4. Each candidate shall make a presentation of up to 30 minutes, which will be followed by a questions and answers session so that the overall duration of each interview shall be 60 minutes. The order of the interviews shall be determined by lot. The forum shall decide, upon the proposal of the Chairman, on detailed arrangement for the interviews. 5. Member States and Associate Members participating in the candidates’ forum will be invited to prepare questions for each candidate during the initial presentation. Questions to be asked to each candidate will be drawn by lot by the Chairman.
Participation 6. Participation in the candidates’ forum will be limited to Member States1 and Associate Members of the World Health Organization. 7. For those Member States or Associate Members which should not be able to attend, the candidates’ forum will be broadcast by the Secretariat through a password protected website.
Documentation 8. The curricula vitae of candidates and other supporting information provided in line with Rule 52 of the Rules of Procedure of the Board will be made available electronically to all Member States and Associate Members in the language versions provided on a password-protected web site. 1
And, where applicable, regional economic integration organizations.
17
A66/68
ANNEX 3 FORM FOR CURRICULUM VITAE
Family name (surname):
First/other names:
Attach recent photograph
Gender:
Date of birth (Day/Month/Year): Place and country of birth:
Citizenship: If you have ever been found guilty of the violation of any law (except minor traffic violations) give full particulars:
Civil status:
Number of dependants:
18
A66/68
Address to which correspondence should be sent:
Telephone:
Mobile phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
Degrees/certificates obtained: (Please indicate here the principal degrees/certificates obtained, with dates and names of institutions. Additional pages may be added.)
19
A66/68
Knowledge of languages
Mother tongue Arabic Chinese English French
Speak
Read
Write
For languages other than mother tongue, enter appropriate number from code below to indicate level of your language knowledge. If no knowledge, please leave blank.
CODE: 1. Limited conversation, reading of newspapers, routine correspondence.
Spanish Russian Others (please specify)
2. Engage freely in discussions, read and write more difficult material
3. Fluent (nearly) as in mother tongue
20
A66/68
Positions held Please indicate here the positions and work experience held during your professional career, with the corresponding dates, duties, achievements/accomplishments and responsibilities. Additional pages may be added.
Please state any other relevant facts that might help in the evaluation of your application. List your activities in civil, professional, public or international affairs.
21
A66/68
Please list here a maximum of 10 publications - especially the main ones in the field of public health, with names of journals, books or reports in which they appeared. An additional page may be used for this purpose, if necessary. (Please feel free also to attach a complete list of all publications.) Do not attach the publications themselves.
Please list hobbies, sports, skills and any other relevant facts that might help in the evaluation of your application:
22
A66/68
WRITTEN STATEMENT 1. Please evaluate how you meet each of the “Criteria for candidates for the post of the Director-General of the World Health Organization” (see attached sheet). In so doing, please make reference to specific elements of your curriculum vitae to support your evaluation. The criteria adopted by the World Health Assembly in resolution WHA65.15 are the following: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) a strong technical background in a health field, including experience in public health; exposure to and extensive experience in international health; demonstrable leadership skills and experience; excellent communication and advocacy skills; demonstrable competence in organizational management; sensitivity to cultural, social and political differences; strong commitment to the mission and objectives of WHO; good health condition required of all staff members of the Organization; and
(9) sufficient skill in at least one of the official working languages of the Executive Board and the Health Assembly. 2. Please state your vision of priorities and strategies for the World Health Organization.
23
A66/68
ANNEX 4 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY
Rule 70 Decisions by the Health Assembly on important questions shall be made by a two-thirds majority of the Members present and voting. These questions shall include: the adoption of conventions or agreements; the approval of agreements bringing the Organization into relation with the United Nations and with intergovernmental organizations and agencies in accordance with Articles 69, 70 and 72 of the Constitution; amendments to the Constitution; decisions on the amount of the effective working budget; and decisions to suspend the voting privileges and services of a Member under Article 7 of the Constitution. Rule 70bis The Director-General of the World Health Organization shall be elected by a clear and strong majority of members present and voting as set forth in Rule 108 of these Rules of Procedure. Rule 108 The Health Assembly shall consider the Board’s nomination at a private meeting and shall come to a decision by secret ballot. 1. If the Board nominates three persons, the following procedure shall apply:
(a) If in the first ballot a candidate obtains a two-thirds majority or more of the Members present and voting, this will be considered a clear and strong majority and he or she will be appointed Director-General. If no candidate obtains the required majority, the candidate having received the least number of votes shall be eliminated. If two candidates tie for the least number of votes, a separate ballot shall be held between them and the candidate receiving the least number of votes shall be eliminated. (b) In the subsequent ballot, a candidate will be appointed Director-General if he or she obtains a two-thirds majority or more of the Members present and voting which will be considered a clear and strong majority. (c) If no candidate receives the majority indicated in subparagraph (b), a candidate will be appointed Director-General if he or she receives in the subsequent ballot a majority of the Member States of the World Health Organization or more, which will be considered a clear and strong majority. (d) If no candidate receives the majority indicated in subparagraph (c), a candidate will be appointed Director-General if he or she receives in the subsequent ballot a majority or more of the Members present and voting, which will be considered a clear and strong majority.
24
A66/68
2.
If the Board nominates two persons, the following procedure shall apply:
(a) a candidate will be appointed Director-General if he or she obtains a two-thirds majority or more of the Members present and voting, which will be considered a clear and strong majority. (b) If no candidate receives the majority indicated in subparagraph (a), a candidate will be appointed Director-General if he or she receives in the subsequent ballot a majority of the Member States of the World Health Organization or more, which will be considered a clear and strong majority. (c) If no candidate receives the majority indicated in subparagraph (b), a candidate will be appointed Director-General if he or she receives in the subsequent ballot a majority or more of the Members present and voting, which will be considered a clear and strong majority. 3. If the Board nominates one person, the Health Assembly shall decide by a two-thirds majority of the Members present and voting.
25
A66/68
Agenda item 24.2
Real estate The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the report on real estate;1 Having noted the report of the Programme, Budget and Administration Committee of the Executive Board to the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly,2 APPROVES the construction of the new WHO sub-office in Garowe, Puntland Somalia.
1 2
Document A66/42. Document A66/62.
26
A66/68
Agenda item 24.3
Agreements with intergovernmental organizations The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Considering Article 70 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization, APPROVES the proposed agreement between the World Health Organization and the South Centre.
27
A66/68
Agenda item 24.4
Reassignment of South Sudan from the Eastern Mediterranean Region to the African Region The Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Having considered the request from the Government of South Sudan for the inclusion of that country in the African Region,1 RESOLVES that South Sudan shall form part of the African Region.
1
See document A66/43.
28
A66/68
ANNEX EXTRACTS OF REPORTS OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEES 1. EXTRACT OF THE REPORT OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE EASTERN 1 MEDITERRANEAN, FIFTY-NINTH SESSION (CAIRO, 1–4 OCTOBER 2012) Application of the Republic of South Sudan for reassignment from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region to the WHO African Region Agenda item 9, Document EM/RC59/11, Decision 4 “… On 27 September 2011 South Sudan had become a Member State of WHO and fell within the geographical scope of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. South Sudan had requested to be reassigned from the Eastern Mediterranean Region to the African Region. … The Regional Committee decided to accept the request of the Government of South Sudan to be reassigned to the WHO African Region and requested the Regional Director to convey its decision to the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly 2 for consideration. 2. EXTRACT OF THE REPORT OF THE SIXTY-SECOND SESSION OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEE FOR AFRICA (LUANDA, 19–23 NOVEMBER 2012) Reassignment of the Republic of South Sudan to the African Region of the World Health Organization Agenda item 8, Document AFR/RC62/4 “… In accordance with World Health Assembly resolution WHA49.6, the Sixty-second session of the Regional Committee examined the request of the Republic of South Sudan and expressed the view that South Sudan be reassigned to the WHO African Region. The Regional Committee congratulated and welcomed South Sudan and requested the Regional Director to convey its view, through the Director-General of WHO, to the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly for consideration …”
8.2
8.
=
=
=
1 2
Document EM/RC59/14-E. Document EM/RC59/13, decision no. 4.
29