Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications, Second Meeting, Manila, Philippines, 25-29 October 1993 : report

Report Series number: RS/94/GE/24(PHL)

English only

REPORT INTERREGIONAL COMMITTEE ON POLICY AND COORDINATION OF PUBLICATIONS, SECOND MEETING

Convened by: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC Manila, Philippines 25-29 October 1993

Not for sale Printed and distributed by: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific Manila, Philippines May 1994

•RO!WPltO LIBBAB1' Un.niJn, P~

2 .2 JUN 1994

CONTENTS

SUMMARY .................. ..................... . ... .. ... .. ...... .. ... . ... ... .... ............ .......... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .................... ... ... .. .. ......... ......... ............. ................. .. 2

1.1 Opening of the meeting ................ ..... ... .. ....... ... ...... .. ....................... ...... 2 1.2 Election of Officers ..... .. ................... ................ ... .... .... .... ....... .. .. .. .. ...... 3 1.3 Adoption of Agenda and Programme of Work ............................................. 3 2. PROCEEDINGS .......................... . ........ . .......... .... ... ... .... . ................ ..... 3

2.1 Progress reports on development in the various publishing programmes and countries ....... .. .. .... ........ ..... .. .................. . ....... 3 2.2 Report and Recommendations of 1992 Meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications ............ ... ..................... .... ....... .. .............. ... .............. ... .. . 16 2.3 HBI medium-term programme ............................... .... .. .......................... 17 2.4 Extrabudgetary funding possibilities for HBI activities ...... ........ ... ..... ... .. ... ... 19 2.5 Translation of WHO publications .......................... .................. .. ........... .. 20 2.6 Distribution & Sales .......................................... ... .. ............. ........... .... 22 2.7 Role of Health Literature, library and other related services in extending access and disseminating information ... ....... .... . .... ........ 23 2.8 Publications Policy ......................................................................... .... 25 2.9 Other matters .......................... . .............................................. ........... 28 2.10 Closure of the meeting ........................................................................ 29 3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........ ................. .. ............ 30

ANNEXES: Annex 1 - Agenda ..... .... .... ............ .... .. .. .... ........... ................ ..................... 33 Annex 2 - List of participants ......................... ..... .. ...................................... 35

Key words : Publications I Publishing I Information services I Health information I Western Pacific I Philippines

REPORT OF THE INTERREGIONAL COMMITTEE ON POLICY AND COORDINATION OF PUBLICATIONS SECOND MEETING

SUMMARY The second meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications was held at the WHO Regional Oftice for the Western Pacific, Manila, from 25 to 29 October 1993. It was attended by representatives from WHO Regional Oftices (AMRO, EMRO, EURO, SEARO and WPRO) as well as from Headquarters (Chief, PUB/HQ, Health and Biomedical Information). The objectives of the meeting were: to review progress on developments in the various publications programmes and 1. countries; to evaluate current experience with the Global Medium-Term Programme for 2. Health Information Support, 1990-1995, and to make proposals in the light of the Ninth General Programme of Work; 3. to examine extrabudgetary funding possibilities for HBI activities;

to review translation of WHO publications into ofticial and non-ofticial 4. languages; 5. to review promotion and distribution of publications;

to discuss the role of health literature, library and other related services in 6. extending access and disseminating information related to WHO publications; and 7. to review publications policy .

The meeting recognized the need for an impact assessment in light of the critical importance of evaluating and improving the usefulness of WHO and country publications in the areas of biomedical and public health. The Conclusions and Recommendations section presents an analysis of the needs related to policy and plans of works in the light of the Ninth General Programme of Work, electronic publishing, information dissemination, information collection and cataloguing, extrabudgetary funding, health information in local languages, the strengthening of the Expert Advisory Panel on HBI, the enhancement of the network of HBI collaborating centres and HBI collaboration. Several proposals and recommendations are made on legal, technical, financial and developmental aspects in the light of the 1993 Interregional Meeting.

- 2-

1. INTRODUCTION The second meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications was hosted by the WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific and held in the WPRO offices from 25 to 29 October 1993. WHO Regional Offices (AMRO, EMRO, EURO, SEARO and WPRO) were represented, as well as the Health and Biomedical Information (HBI) staff from headquarters (Chief, PUB/HQ). The agenda is presented in Annex 1 and the full list of participants in Annex 2. 1.1 Opening of the meeting

Opening the meeting, Dr S.T. Han, WHO Regional Director for the Western Pacific, welcomed participants and noted that this was the first opportunity for WPRO to host a meeting of this Committee in Manila. He noted that as resources diminished, the role of publications would become increasingly important and it was imperative to renew our efforts to reach and support the primary health worker. The fragmentation of health problems, ranging from an aging population to relatively new diseases such as AIDS placed new stress on targeting the right audience with the right information, in the right form and language. In the prevention and control of disease, the right information also had to reach the isolated areas which needed it most. HBI is an essential element of WHO activities and we must continue to emphasize its importance at the planning and budgeting stage of in-country and intercountry projects. But the right information is only part of the equation. A country's ability to disseminate, its language of major use, its library network, information systems and media must all be considered. Dr Han was pleased to note specific items on the agenda of crucial importance: the local language subsidy scheme, new ways of funding HBI activities in these times of restraint and the new information technologies and their applicability to publications work. He wished all participants a fruitful meeting and was looking forward to the resulting recommendations . Mr David Thompson, Chief, PUB/HQ expressed his pleasure at being in WPRO again and brought good wishes both from Dr Jardel, ADG, and Dr Lyagoubi-Ouahchi, Director, HBI. He also took the opportunity to congratulate Dr Han on his recent re-election as Regional Director of the Western Pacific Region. He added that Dr Lyagoubi very much regretted not being able to attend this meeting and would very much like to visit the Western Pacific Region in 1994. He emphasized the importance of the Committee's meeting for coordination and the exchange of information with a view to making best use of scarce resources. Headquarters was watching the HBI activities in the Western Pacific region with great interest, particularly its need for publications in local languages as HBI was presently trying to obtain extrabudgetary funds for this activity.

- 3-

1.2

Election of Officers

Dr Judith Navarro, Coordinator, Publications Programme, AMRO, was elected Chair and Dr Barbara Zatlokal, Publications Officer, WPRO was elected Rapporteur. 1.3 Adoption of Agenda and Programme of Work

The agenda was amended with the following changes: removal of AFRO from the presentations and addition of a presentation from HQ. A discussion of the 1992 Report and · Recommendations was added; Distribution and Sales (DSA) discussion became a separate item and all matters of Publications Policy were grouped under item 11. Also added were two items proposed by HQ on the role of HBI Collaborating Centres and the Expert Advisory Panel and on a new brochure being prepared by HQ on HBI activities, both included under item 12 (Other matters). The tina) agenda (Annex 1) retlects these changes. 2. PROCEEDINGS 2.1 (1) Progress reports on development in the various publishing programmes and countries AMRO

In her introduction Dr Judith Navarro, AMRO, expressed her appreciation for the invitation to WPRO. She added that Dr Han was to be complimented on the great progress in Publications in WPRO. It was his vision and that of his administration that was responsible for this development. She also commended the Publications Unit on an active and promising programme. Emphasizing a dynamic past year, Dr Navarro pinpointed the restructuring of the AMRO secretariat into five divisions and three special programmes as the single most important event of 1993. Publications was one of these special programmes, reporting directly to the Regional Director. Dr Navarro spoke only of editorial and DSA activities, as library-matters would be discussed elsewhere. The work breakdown in AMRO is 70% editorial, 15% DSA and 15% library, and the editorial section was staffed by eight editors (two English, six Spanish), one Publications Officer and tive G-staff. The AMRO Publishing Programme emphasis on addressing national capabilities grew out of the Eighth General Programme of Work and was now stressing more direct work with individual countries. This had been a slow process, as there was no strategic plan for publications work at the country level, but in 1993 a real opportunity had arisen: AMRO has published Health Conditions in the Americas every four years since 1952, and for the 1994 edition, the Publishing Programme has been invited to contribute for the first time a chapter on the publishing sector in the Americas. While researching that contribution, the Programme had found little information on publications or bibliographic information in the Latin American and Caribbean countries. It was realized that more had to be known about the sector in the Region, to better understand their Programme's niche, know their counterparts, and to inform

- 4-

and structure technical cooperation to countries. Three studies were undertaken: (1) an analysis of subjects covered in 48 journals from the Region in Index Medicus to provide a comparison between the issues on which .publications· in the countries are publishing and the priorities established by, governments; (2) -a bibliometric study of journals included in LILACS and (3) a facsimile and telephone survey of 49 editors of health science journals enquiring about operations, problems and requirements iri the area of technical cooperation. The editors, all of whom shared a great sense of isolation, cited similar problems: the need for better authors, better editorial staff, more equipment and greater communications. AMRO proposed to address some of these needs at a meeting of journal editors in 1994 that would bring those editors together to discuss norms and standards in the publishing industry, peer review and ethics in publishing, and ways to strengthen regional ties among editors. AMRO continued to respond to individual country requests in the area of scientific writing and publishing, and had carried out assignments in Mexico, Costa Rica, Honduras, Cuba and Spain over the years. AMRO was countering the reduction in budget and staff in various ways. Editing, translation and typesetting were often done in the less-expensive countries of the Americas. A longer roster of vendors and more aggressive bidding of contracts had resulted in lower costs across the board. Decisions regarding the acceptance of book manuscripts entailed an evaluation by the originating unit, a costing for production, a PUB opinion, and the final deter111ination of the Regional Director. The computerized peer review system for journal articles showed that, up front, 5% of articles were accepted, 5% were rejected, and the remaining 90% of articles were submitted to a formal review process. AMRO had reduced peer review time from what was on occasion as long as three years to six months; most articles were published within a year. '!'~

Until 1993 there had been no DSA policy at AMRO. Oft'en units felt they owned the print run if they had contributed to production costs. Attempts were now being made to standardize operations and publish information on where publications could be obtained. Publications are sent to decentralized centres - PAHO Publications Centers - in a number of the countries. In DSA, there was movement towards a greater decentralization of distribution by creating networks of national institutions that would be used to assure effective distribution of PAHO publications. AMRO was working on how to designate a publications centre and how to establish rights and responsibilities. AMRO would like to establish a national network in each country and showed- an example of a country profile which would serve to provide a greater understanding of the context in which it worked. In answer to Mr Thompson's query on how arti~les were chosen, and whether some PAHO Boletfn articles might be published in the WHO Bulletin, where they would get broader exposure, Dr Navarro said that American articles in WHO publications were often chosen · because of their particular relevance to the Americas.

-5-

Mr Thompson was pleased that sales were an important consideration in AMRO and asked which publications went to Publications Centres. For AMRO, sales were still an indication of value, and Publications Centres received only core collections. Book and journal distribution was based on specific criteria, but AMRO (not PUB) also contributed to infrastructure building such as furniture and equipment. These centres were usually hospitals, health centres and universities. Mr Zielinski, Manager, HBI, EMRO found it interesting how different regions reached out to the same targets and was happy to see "developing national capabilities" included among them. He found the analysis of journals particularly interesting. WHO was well positioned to do such a study if time permitted. Among the many bodies linking science writers he mentioned the International Federation of Science Editors. Was AMRO interested in linking up with them? He emphasized the importance of a country's requirement in establishing country profiles and wondered how to assess indicators of use at a country level. Mr Frank Theakston, Publications Manager, EURO, was impressed with the scale and scope of the AMRO publications programme. He was particularly interested in the ability of the programme to release editors to assist countries in various ways; with EURO's very limited resources this would be impossible. Dr Navarro responded that AMRO would be measuring this more in the future for the same reasons, but at present the costs were subsidized by PAHO representatives in the countries. He was very interested in country profiles and how they could be applied to his new countries. EURO has a network of documentation centres which are more related to sales agents than to libraries and he questioned whether libraries should not become more pro-active. Dr Nina Mattock, Reports and Documents Officer, SEARO, asked about publications policy in AMRO and how publications were funded, as in SEARO publications were funded by the relevant programmes. Mrs Alison Rowe, Editor, WPRO, asked who decided the house style in AMRO. She explained that in WPRO the Editor works on official documents and mission reports but not publications. Dr Navarro said that all editors in AMRO were reaching editorial consensus, through the work of the STAND Committee. Mrs Rowe pointed out that there was a distinct WPRO house style and that HQ style was seen as interesting but not definitive. She wanted more background on how editors work in other regions. Who determines what is said and how? Dr Navarro emphasized the greater and growing importance of marketing and promotion, with sales a valid indicator of the value of the published products. Moreover, in 1993 PAHO lost its free franking privilege, which would add $125 000 to costs in 1994. Dr Barbara Zatlokal, Publications Officer, WPRO asked to what extent peer review was carried out on book manuscripts. She seemed to be getting in at the beginning stages of a manuscript with field testing, questionnaires, rewriting, etc. How far back should one get involved in the publishing/development process? Dr Navarro explained that in AMRO any field testing was carried out by the units and technical appropriateness was assumed upon receipt of the manuscript. The Regional Director at AMRO had always been very supportive of the publishing programme, responded efficient! y, and was the major reason why there was such progress in AMRO publications.

-6-

Dr Zatlokal was particularly interested in country profiles. WPRO's CHIPS was a picture of the health situation. WPRO would like to have something similar for the publishing picture and hoped that the promotional database could be a starting point. This would develop the country profile aspect from a DSA point of view. An element of CHIPS could address the publishing sector. (2) EMRO

Mr Christopher Zielinski, Manager, HBI, EMRO emphasized that EMRO publishes arid produces documents in great numbers, there are over 50 publishing projects in various stages of development at present, but that he would focus on issues peculiar to EMRO. A new graphics assistant post at the top of the G-staff level had been established and was equipped to handle both English and Arabic desktop publishing. Following one of the recommendations of the 1992 meeting, the EMRO Health Services Journal (HSJ) was to be used as an experiment in accepting advertising in a WHO journal. There was also a possibility that HSJ may be amalgamated with the EMRO Epidemiological Bulletin and Drugs Digest to create an EMRO version of the PAHO Boletin. Dr Navarro suggested that they not call it "Bulletin", as this sounded too institutional and might detract from its acceptance as a scholarly journal. The HBI umbrella in EMRO included Library Services, Publications, DSA, Public Information and Language Services. Support at country level for HBI activities was very satisfactory, country budgets were increasing and now 17 countries had a budget for HBI activities. In 1992/93 $480 000 was allocated to the countries for HBI activities; in 1994/95 it would be $740 000. The main problem in supporting countries opting to have increased HBI activities was the administrative strain on HBIIEMRO. All EMRO country activities and national planning initiatives were funded from country budgets. An intercountry meeting in February 1993 provided guidelines on how to formulate an HBI plan. It demonstrated that the concept of HBI was not well understood at the country level. A similar meeting in Morocco in April 1994, was to be aimed at Francophone countries (Note: this has now been postponed to 1995). HBI hoped for participation from HQ and France and that both AFRO and WPRO could represent francophone countries within their regions. In anticipation of the discussion on fund-raising, he felt that there was no lack of money but rather a lack of good projects for external funding requests. Both AGFUND and the Islamic Development Bank seemed interested in funding HBI projects within EMR. He emphasized the importance of determining a country's information requirements and mentioned some of the advantages of establishing country profiles to this end. A noteworthy problem was how to assess indicators of information use at country level. In explaining the CD-ROM project EXTRAMED, he stated that it was meant to be a "Third World ADONIS" and contained information "extra to MEDLINE", -scanned images of journals, with 209 journals having joined the EXTRAMED Consortium to date. In future there would be no more financial involvement from EMRO, which would just oversee the project. EXTRAMED contained information on tropical diseases, communicable diseases, etc. which were not well covered in MEDLINE. Dr Robey, Regional Adviser in Health Information (HIN), WPRO, disagreed about lack of coverage of these topics in MEDLINE. However, EMRO said that backers were convinced there was a market.

-7-

EURO was interested in the graphic artist and requested a post description. He also expressed interest in the meeting of francophone countries in Morocco and very much hoped that EURO could be represented. In response to AMRO's question on how to respond to a 60% increase in country level budgets, EMRO said that, since to some extent these larger budgets were being used for more supplies (in terms of quantity rather than range), this could be accommodated -just - within existing staffing capabilities. Other activities were to be carried out using consultants. AMRO noted that in many countries information was produced in a very entrepreneurial way. Often there were pockets of activity which flourished precisely because there was no central planning. EMRO agreed that a national HBI plan was not needed everywhere. For example in Saudi Arabia, the needs assessment noted that there were 14 different health systems, and that it might be hard to attract donors to such a rich country. Saudi Arabia was requesting technical assistance in drawing up a directory of HBI resources available, by means of a workshop to be funded from the country budget . Mr Thompson said that the HQ Publications Committee had approved a trial of advertising in the EMRO Health Services Journal sometime ago. He noted that an international compendium of standard HBI country profiles which included languages, etc., would be valuable. EMRO agreed that the country protiles should contain an element on languages as in EMRO there were 69 languages spoken by groups larger than 15 000 people. Dr James Robey, Regional Adviser, HIN/WPRO, stated that in many countries, libraries were in agencies associated with education and not those responsible for health planning. Was it not our role to transmit information? HBI should not be a self-serving programme; this was what medical libraries did and developing countries could not afford that. He wondered how to get WHO publications beyond the medical school library and to the primary health care level and suggested closer work with technical programmes to find out their needs at country level. He noted that most health plans did not mention health literature. He also asked what EXTRAMED was for. Was it realistic for developing countries? Did it include the grey and fugitive literature which was so important to developing countries? Did it not duplicate existing databases? EMRO emphasized that CD-ROMs were going to be world-wide in several years and gave several striking examples. He considered it a particularly good medium for researchers in developing countries. In answer to Dr Navarro's question about the relationship between HIN and PUB in WPRO, Dr Robey stated that PUB had always been part of HIN within the Medium-Term Plan and that there had always been an interest in producing publications hut no volume in the past. Also little was done to penetrate the region with health literature. Dr Zatlokal's mission to Viet Nam was specifically to study distribution of health publications at the country level. He and Dr Zatlokal also answer to different directors, which gives some indication of a lack of understanding of the HBI umbrella. Dr Robey continued that the problem with publications was that they often responded to the interest of the technical unit and not the audience. An English publication in Lao People's Democratic Republic was useless. They had become more pro-active since the PUB position was established in WPRO and needed to produce a classitication of publications directed at

-8-

health workers. Mr Zielinski noted that the fact that PUB was not part of HBI in WPRO was already a striking divergence from other regions. In response to Dr Zatlokal's enquiry about Funds in Trust, Mr Zielinski explained that originally the fund was created with a $100 000 donation from the Arab Council of Ministers of Health to make medical education more Arabic. It was now a mini-revolving fund paying for reprints, and lived off income generated by sales. Dr Navarro said that it was AMRO's perception that journals already included in international bibliographic databases were, for the most part, First World, written in English and peer-reviewed. But many journals in AMRO are not peer reviewed. Should they be included in the proposed EXTRAMED database without jeopardizing its integrity? Were we creating a Third World ADONIS? Mr Zielinski said that before monitoring could be started, country indicators had to be established. He was going to be working at the London School of Economics in 1994 to try and establish a system of indicators for later application. Mr Zielinski agreed with Dr Robey that most WHO publications were not aimed at the Primary Health Care sector, but this was a general problem of WHOs list. (3) EURO

In introducing his report on the EURO publications programme. Mr Theakston explained that there had been no significant changes in structure or function since the previous meeting in Alexandria. The continued freezing of the post of Administrative Officer, under which the documentation units (including Publications) were supposed to be grouped, had resulted in little if any development of a coherent publications and documentation service. This, together with decentralization of responsibilities to the technical units, had led to something of a vacuum in the Office that PUB was often called on to fill. Despite these difficulties, however, there had been some success in forming a clearer picture of publications plans, thus enabling PUB to become involved with proposals at an earlier stage. A new and expanded Data Sheet was intended to provide information both for the Publications Committee and for PUB in making a comprehensive job of the production and dissemination of books. The Data Sheet would eventually be made electronic on the new LAN computer system. A product management system was being introduced by which one editor, in collaboration with the relevant technical programme, would be responsible for seeing a book through all stages of production and dissemination. The desktop software had been upgraded, and a draft post description had been submitted for the recruitment of a designer/typesetter to work on books and provide design expertise for the whole office. The network of WHO documentation centres in the European Region now comprised 25 centres in 22 countries, and was seen as a key element in making information better known in the countries of the Region. In November the Regional Office was to host the first meeting of the heads of the documentation centres. One big challenge being faced by the Office was that of communicating with the republics of the former Soviet Union. Suddenly, Russian had come from being a political formality to a working linguafranca that linked all these new Member States.

- 9-

Mrs Alison Rowe, Editor, WPRO was very interested in the EURO Regional Director's report in the new informational format. WPRO would need to decide how it would present the material in its Regional Director's report and who the audience for this material would be. Mr Theakston said that the EURO report was meant to promote the office to those who did not know EURO and they were presently building up a distribution pattern for this report. Mr Thompson questioned whether public relations should be the work of the Publications Unit. The forthcoming meeting on documentation centres in Copenhagen would be important. Considering the political changes in Member States in EURO, would there be a change in the level of publishing and a switch in emphasis from developed to developing countries of Central Asia and the former USSR? Replying to several speakers, Mr Theakston said that in some cases texts were published simply because PUB produced them. Similar products (though usually unedited) could be and often were produced by the technical programmes as "glossy documents". The difference between publications and documents remained vague in many people's minds. Dr Mattock, SEARO, asked how EURO screened proposals. Did they ask for ideas in advance? Could a programme in publications be planned in advance? Mrs Rowe asked about the audience for the shorter version of RD's report. Was it distributed as aPR document? She mentioned that the WHO Response on Global Change stated that WHO must look at its image and then we needed to show an accountable face to the outside world. This report seemed to be doing that. Dr Navarro asked how PUB was involved at the planning stage. She liked the idea of a health information centre/health culture in EURO. All programmes needed to think of the "carrot" that would motivate the distribution centres to promote WHO publications, and usually that carrot was prestige. Dr Robey asked how the documentation centres were designated. Were they formal or informal and what were their resources? In reply, Mr Theakston said that the WHO documentation centres in Europe were designated by the Regional Office following discussion with suitable national centres. Although the terms of reference (submitted as Annex 5 to the EURO report) were identical for all centres, not all would be able to fulfill all the criteria. A few of the documentation centres were also WHO depository libraries. Dr Zatlokal was also interested in the information vacuum described by EURO, which she also perceived in WPRO and was being requested to fill to some extent. Mr Theakston replied that the vacuum was to some extent the result of decentralization, whereby technical programmes often needed advice on documentation matters. In the absence of an Administrative Ofticer, it was the individual documentation units that were called on to provide such advice. PUB tended to be particularly involved owing to its broad expertise in production matters, especially design and printing. The question that needed to be answered was how best to make use of the extremely limited (and shrinking) documentation resources; if new roles were to be played, then either the traditional ones had to be reduced or additional resources provided. In any case, clear priorities needed to be set. Other regions did not have documentation centres (except AFRO), but had large numbers of depository and focal point libraries, which were meant to be active two-way

- lO-

partners with EURO. Many countries in Eastern Europe were working from zero and would not be able to fulfill the functions foreseen by the documentation centres. This was a relatively new EURO initiative and the Terms of Reference of Documentation Centres laid out the ideal requirements. EMRO asked whether these centres were supported by Headquarters and whether there was a problem with the number of centres. Mr Thompson emphasized that Headquarters was always happy to find good new addresses where WHO material would be made available to large numbers of readers. "Information culture" means INFORMATION. It was important to remember that EURO has no WR offices; only CLOs. (4) SEARO

Dr Nina Mattock, Reports & Documents Officer, SEARO began her report by noting that SEARO had recently completed a study of its last ten years of publishing, which demonstrated very erratic activity. Most publications were given away free and the usefulness of publications was demonstrated by requests for reprints and translations. The HELLIS Committee had worked out a new draft publishing policy over the past year. Often the Publications Unit had no idea what HELLIS would approve until it had reached the manuscript stage, which created much waste. Translations were increasing rapidly, mostly of HQ publications, but there was also some interest in a SEARO publication on Essential Drugs and a publication on how to evaluate health research proposals which seemed very popular outside the region. In DSA activities, SEARO had new distributors in Delhi and Indonesia. Thailand continued to create problems by demanding outrageous discounts so an agent had yet to be designated. SEARO had reprinted titles produced by EURO (1) and WPRO (1) and needed a computer programme to track sales activities. During the question period Mr Thompson suggested using other organizations as distribution relays to facilitate sales. In the case of Thailand, which bargained hard and wanted unreasonable discounts, he suggested granting a large discount, but from the developed country price, or that agents be encouraged to charge what they wish locally, in keeping with the local market. Mr Zielinski noted that relatively recent SEARO publications were being reprinted by local publishers. Was there no general public audience for these SEARO-published texts? He wondered why a distributor was needed in Delhi, as they had a regional office with a sales unit there. Was this distributor considered a sales agent? His experience was that Thailand had few English speakers and that large discounts were required to compensate for low sales. Mr Theakston felt that publishing policy should be as flexible as possible. He also mentioned that the number of EURO books being translated into vernacular languages at present was very low, and was interested in the distributors used by SEARO. Dr Robey asked if there were any national representatives on the HELLIS committee. Were the publications produced doing any good? He suggested that there was no cost recovery on consultants, so why should there be on publications? Dr Navarro emphasized that there was a great need to assess the usefulness of HQ and Regional Offices' publications through an impact study. This could be a possible future

- 11 -

agenda item for this committee: evaluating general public health information vs original research (two types of publications content). In responding to the questions, SEARO said that the new policy had the same target audience as did HQ, and agreed that perhaps Regional Offices should also target the general public with their publications. A distributor had been designated in Delhi to share the sales workload in SEARO. Interest in translations in India had mainly been elicited through the efforts of Mr Sundaram (DSA) during trips, conferences, visits to the offices etc. Most translations into SEARO languages were subsidized by Headquarters. (5) WPRO

Dr Zatlokal, Publications Officer, WPRO, outlined the processes of publishing and distribution and sales currently in place. For example, acquisitions took various forms, from working on a proposal with a unit to a completed manuscript. The Publications Officer became involved at various stages, often helping form the structure for a contract, doing costings several years before the actual need for budgeting purposes, and often managing the project for the unit, throughout its development, evaluation and production. The Publications Officer was also often involved in re-writing, managing illustrators, writing preface, foreword and notes, restructuring, bibliography, etc. In many cases, units had to be educated in elements of the publishing process such as peer review. WPRO was often called upon to publish guidelines for country standardization. It is to the Regional Director's credit that WPRO was also working to produce material for the primary health level. This often took the form of teaching materials which were tield-tested by the unit as a document before consideration as a manuscript, both for quality and marketability. The Publications Officer was often called upon to consult on public relations materials for units. Initially Publications took all requests to build up credibility and to show the units the various functions of a publishing unit. However, WPRO already had a full publishing programme for 1994, urgent projects would come up and some units would be disappointed because of lack of staff and tlexibility within the Publications Unit. Unresolved issues in WPRO were as follows: many units still did not understand the difference between a document and a publication and much unnecessary work went into documents; there was a total lack of planning of publishing activities within WPRO; approvals were convoluted, misunderstood and often repeated. Units often did not understand that a book was not as flexible as they would like it to be and that a certain amount of translation and adaptation, would be necessary for local and district consumption. The concept of field-testing vs evaluation by peers, both of which were being applied, could possibly require the rewriting of the terms of reference of the Expert Advisory Panel to include an evaluatory function. PUB was still selling the idea of joint publishing as manuscripts that technically belonged to WHO were often lost due to lack of funding for production. However, on the positive side, publications were being considered more frequently by the units to support their programmes; production and often the bulk purchase of publications were often included in future budgets; in some cases promotional money was also included in the production budget but only for the publication in question. PUB actively solicited translations of WHO publications into local languages from commercial publishers, associations, etc. In response to SEARO, WPRO had a newly revised

- 12 -

computerized inventory which also produced invoices. The WPRO inventory, with the agreement of Chief, DSA/HQ, was purely promotional. All sales were out of the promotional inventory and tagged as such, making it easier to keep only one inventory. Two new agents had been designated in Malaysia (University Coop Bookstores) and Singapore (Information Publications). Hong Kong had the same outrageous discount demands as Thailand and WPRO was hunting out a university bookstore, although the choice was not very broad in Hong Kong. Promotional work was being done in magazines such as Asian Hospitals, Asian Medical News and with Excerpta Medica. Unfortunately, there were no funds available for promotions and WPRO was reduced to the time-consuming use of HQ facilities (for film) or begging. WPRO felt it was very short-sighted not to have a small promotional budget when some of the channels in WPR were so lucrative: subscriptions of health journals often reached 25 000 in the region, International Travel and Health was being promoted by American Express in tive countries and conferences often reached levels of 4000 delegates. Conferences often required a take-away for delegates as the cheapest exposure and WPRO had no funds for reproduction of flyers in such quantity. An April 1993 presentation to WRs and CLOs on DSA activities was a revelation and led to a major exercise in mailing list review. Often addresses used by HQ were not perceived as being the effective ones by the WRs and new addresses were presented. A questionnaire was sent to nongovernmental organizations in Cambodia, VietNam and Lao People's Democratic Republic to assess their health information support needs, ability to buy in bulk and translation potential. A health information support study of Viet Nam revealed a great need for more coordination in dissemination, exchange of information and publications translation, as well as an active ongoing use of World Health Forum materials in translated, adapted form by local health authority newsletters. During the Question Period, Mr Theakston noted that WPRO seemed to have the same problem as EURO, a focal point for information services. EURO offered advice on re-writing in response to how much PUB should do for the units. The best way was to educate them to do it themselves, as well as drawing guidelines on how to produce a manuscript. EURO was putting this information on its new LAN. As for planning, it was absolutely essential that the Publications Unit have a budget. As to joint publishing, copyright in EURO was bilateral or nothing and in cases of bilateral, EURO always held the copyright. Mr Zielinski suggested that WPRO use freelancers to do some of the editing and writing work on manuscripts. He also enquired how much of the print run went to the unit. Dr Zatlokal responded that the unit received up to one-third of the print run, but paid for all production. Free distribution through the Publications Unit was 200, as well as the unit's own list. Mr Zielinski noted that, in EMRO, when technical units paid for a publication, they were obliged to pay for 1000 sales copies in addition to the copies they used for their initial bulk free distribution. Subsequently, they paid for further copies just like any customer, even if they were intended for free distribution. He also wanted to know how Chinese translations by the People's Medical Publishing House were coordinated with Headquarters. Dr Zatlokal said that WPRO was copied on all correspondence between PMPH and Headquarters and that in the case of regional publications

- 13 -

PMPH was offered the right of first refusal. Mr Zielinski requested a copy of the VietNam mission report which resembled a National Planning Needs Assessment. Mr Thompson asked how the second edition of WPRO's Standard acupuncture nomenclature differed from the Proposed standard international acupuncture nomenclature published by Headquarters. Dr Zatlokal said that the strength of the title was in its multilingual list which ensured that all countries practicing acupuncture were synchronized in use of meridians and points. Mr Thompson noted that there were some new Vietnamese translations on the list, and he liked the idea of local adaptation of World Health Forum articles into Vietnamese. The Republic of Korea was now actively translating WHO books, and there were also new translations into Bahasa Malaysia. He agreed that Information Publications in Singapore which also carried OECD, World Bank and UMI publications, was the best possible local agent. He was particularly interested in more translations into Lao, which were very slow in coming. In response to Mr Thompson's query as to whether WPRO ever received feedback about sales of International Travel and Health, PUB responded that the orders were routed directly to Geneva, which had not provided information. Mr Thompson felt that feedback was important as the lifetime of the book was short and Headquarters could better manage its print runs if it knew which promotions were successful. Dr Mattock, SEARO, was very interested in PUB's VietNam mission report, requested a copy and a copy of the DSA questionnaire sent to nongovernmental organizations in Cambodia, Lao People's Democratic Republic and VietNam . Dr Navarro, AMRO, noted that apparently work needed to be done in educating units as to their partnership role in publishing and also suggested outsourcing work for 1994. Concerning her questions about the Viet Nam report, Dr Zatlokal said that the original request had been made to WHO by the government and that the recommendations went directly to the government of Viet Nam. Dr Navarro also suggested that PUB institutionalize peer review by means of the data sheet. Dr Zatlokal pointed out that the data sheet was often filled out by authors who list their colleagues which did not constitute peer review . WPRO would very much like to develop a database of peer reviewers cross-referenced by specialization. Dr Navarro also wondered if it would not be a good idea to put some books that might have a short "lifespan" on the Internet. Mr Zielinski suggested that a promotions and distribution budget be created within the budget for each specific title. EMRO added 7% to all its estimates which required a special sticker and budget line. He underlined that the budget line was generally provided by the unit. PUB/WPRO was planning guidelines for units in the near future and would also consider putting this information on the LAN. As to peer review, problems arise when there was no regional advisor in a given field. In such cases Expert Advisory Panel evaluators were used but they were not paid. This was another unresolved issue, although Dr Navarro felt that acknowledgement should suffice. Mr Zielinski suggested budgeting for freelancers in the costing and planning process to relieve some of the workload of editing, etc.

- 14-

(6)

Headquarters

Mr Thompson (Chief, Office of Publications) referred to the difficult economic situation both in Europe in general and in the Division of Health and Biomedical Information at WHO Headquarters in Geneva. Resources had been substantially cut, and it was a question of tailoring the work to resources or to work more, although staff had tried to choose the latter. There was considerable frustration as no investment could be made to use technology to improve the situation. The core units of HBI dealt with publications, translation, distribution & sales and library services. There had so far been no changes in structure. Posts had been frozen or cut. Official Records needed more temporary help, as it had too little core staff. The Periodicals unit was trying to keep WHO Drug Information alive but the French version had been abolished on the premise that most scientists read English. There was a new emphasis on timeliness of journals, particularly difficult for World Health which depended on theme issues. The WHO Bulletin and World Health Forum continued to be peer reviewed, and the unit made every effort to provide a valuable critique of articles submitted, even if they were rejected. Because of lack of time, there was a broad tolerance of differences in reference styles, although some corrections were always made. After much debate, it had been decided to continue the World Health Statistics Quarterly. Late delivery of journals was a serious problem and could lead to loss of contidence among clients. The second instalment of the printing budget for 1992-1993 had been sharply cut, and withheld until late 1993. There were at present four book editors, instead of the required five. Technical units often could not answer editorial questions on their own manuscripts, there were fewer technical staff and many had problems with drafting in English, thus delaying response and slowing down production. Much of the Oftice of Publications' time was spent on prepublication advice. Among time-consuming projects, ICD-10 had been greatly delayed and volume 2 was not out yet. Volume 3 was still in debate with the unit. Sales for 1993 were US$ 7.1 million as opposed to US$ 7 million for 1992. Mr Thompson also listed some star performers over the past year, particularly the ICD-1 0 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. He would very much appreciate comments on the WHO Editorial Style Manual produced in 1993 and would like to publish a new edition within two years. There was a continued stress on good design for WHO publications. However, the Graphics unit was much solicited for non-publications work. Printers were now expected to return corrected diskettes with each print job. Documents in electronic form were not yet SGML tagged. Most editors and translators did not work on screen. The Publications Committee looked at and commented on all new WHO and regional publications after printing; these were listed in an annex to each set of minutes of the Publishing Committee. It also discussed policy matters, considered publication proposals from units and prioritized funding, though the availability of unit funds was not usually a criterion for selection. Outside publications were published under contractual arrangements which varied widely; royalties were secondary to obtaining the necessary copies for the originating programme. WHO did not yet belong to a reproduction rights agency. HQ was now occasionally farming out official language editions, but had not yet licensed any of its titles to ADONIS. It received 400-500 requests for permission to reprint extracts from its publications yearly, which indicated an increased knowledge of copyright laws as well as ever wider interest.

- 15 -

Conservatively, about 250 000 books were distributed each year in non-<>fficial languages. Headquarters was working to keep the local language translation subsidy scheme alive and agreed with Dr Han that it was tragic that such essential seed money was to disappear. HBI would try to make this up with a modest sum and add to it from extrabudgetary funds for the next biennium. Headquarters was considering the concept of fast-track publications involving less editing and formatting, which would be useful for urgently needed information for health workers, researchers and scientists. Mr Thompson encouraged continued contributions to HBI News, as it was important to keep in touch . The Publications Office would also like to do more by way of teaching medical and scientific writing, but often could not spare staff. The recent discussions on WHO's response to global change involved HBI , since a new annual report had been recommended al ong the lines of UNICEF's State of the World 's Children. The EURO report offered a possible model . Interagency collaboration continued to be good on the publishing front. UN Books in Print, which pl aced all agencies' books together by subject, contained an amazing array of books and publications and pointed to considerable overlap. PUB/HQ had particularly good relations with UNICEF, FAO, IAEA and IMO. In response to EMRO's query about the national value of free distribution, Mr Thompson said that it was five times the value of sales revenues. Mr Zielinski also praised the Editorial Manual, although it would be nice if it was electronic. He wondered if WHO journals could be put on EXTRAMED. He felt that teaching science writing was a very good HQ initiative. Mr Theakston said that in EURO editing on screen was not yet done. He mentioned that there were very few co-publishing contracts in EURO and they were trying to generate more royalties. He asked whether EURO could try to lay claim to royalty funds collected by Headquarters which should be available to the regions but are not. Mr Thompson responded that some EURO royalties already went into EURO's trust fund, not the Revolving Sales Fund; others were applied to reprinting EURO books. EURO was very interested in the concept of 'fast-track editing'. Mr Thompson said that fast-track publications might include such material as case studies, collections of articles, and titles that did not merit extended work and must be used immediately. PUB would probably include a modest disclaimer. Dr Zatlokal said that the WPRO Publications Committee looked at data sheets, and particularly the funding aspect, before approval of manuscript or proposal. It was more difficult to plan as essential manuscripts were often delayed and budgeted things went forward. EURO felt that budget should not play a role in choosing publications. Its Publications Committee should not consider cost but importance within the programme. Mr Zielinski added that EMRO does not bring budget questions into its Publications Committee discussions as publications should not be budget-driven. When an important publication lacks funds, RD's Fund should be considered. In response to SEARO's query about the pros and cons of editing on screen, Mr Thompson distinguished between journals and books. It did not seem very practical for

- 16-

books which required too many changes; in general the UN system was not using it. However, it offered many advantages when an editor had freedom of action, as when writing journal articles. AMRO added that six out of its eight editors work on-screen full time without any problem. One advantage of this is that it creates a tina! disc version for future use. 2.2 Report and Recommendations of 1992 Meeting of the Interregional Committee on Pol ky and Coordination of Publications

The progress in implementing some of the recommendations of the First meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications, held in Alexandria in October 1992, was reviewed. Recommendation 1: Meetings of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications should include the participation of, and presentations by, international publishing experts, when specific agenda items merit it. Dr Zatlokal felt that the recommendation had not seemed practical at the time and she did not see this meeting as the occasion for a trade show. Needs of the regions are so different that it would be difficult to find one demonstration to suit all. Mr Zielinski felt there were always many possibilities for suppliers to be asked to give a presentation and it would be easy to find local suppliers. Mr Theakston said that all recommendations should be specific and realistic that this one was not particularly specitic. Dr Robey said that the programmes should have more interest in their own publications. They should work with units to produce, use and monitor use and should consider themselves a service. Concerns such as automation, production and where publications tit into the health system should involve units as well. HBI was a service and could not measure itself without the input of others. Mr Zielinski pointed out that HBI was different in different regions and in WPRO only the publishing function was represented. Mr Thompson said that the Committee might benefit from the presence of the Chairman of the Publications Committee of the host oftice at each session to discuss the oft-ice's approach to publications. Dr Robey agreed and added that it would have been good to have some programme people on the agenda. The Publications Unit must fit itself into a larger context. He added that the newly-formed Publications Committee initially had trouble establishing itself with representation from the programmes. Mr Thompson said that the HQ Publications Committee was programme-oriented in membership; its policy stressed linkages with health learning materials, health education, public information, etc., implying a total information effort. AMRO saw the publishing function as a partnership with the technical programmes; often publishing people have a better idea of the programme's information needs: the 8th General Programme of Work states that the function of publishing needs a 'dispassionate publishing professional' to help the unit take better aim with health information. Dr Robey emphasized the importance of teaching governments how to improve their support programmes, not just giving them a publication.

- 17-

Recommendation 2: Agenda item on role of health literature, library and other related services An item on this subject had been included as Item 10 of the 1993 Agenda. Recommendation 3: Local translation subsidy scheme This recommendation was discussed under Item 7.2 of the 1993 Agenda. Mr Thompson noted that Headquarters was seeking to reinstate the budget line for this scheme on a modest level with the idea of feeding it later. In the face of budget cuts, the item would need constant vigilance, because national translations were such a growth field. Recommendation 4: Submitting written reports to Interregional meetings Mr Theakston felt that this would still be useful if possible. Dr Robey reinforced the recommendation for written reports. Recommendation 5: The provision of equipment, consultancy and training for improvement of publishing and distribution activities and exchange of information Mr Zielinski felt it would be useful to lodge and retain this recommendation for future citing. Recommendation 6: Agenda item on "Policy and practices related to electronic publishing" This recommendation was discussed under item 8 of the 1993 Agenda. Recommendation 7: Trial advertising in Health Services Journal Mr Zielinski said that all hurdles had been cleared and EMRO was awaiting clearance from Headquarters. Mr Thompson confirmed that EMRO had been given qualified approval, on the understanding that such a labour-intensive activity could be handled. This decision had been reflected in the minutes of the HQ Publications Committee. Recommendation 8: Policy statement on HBI News Subsequent issues had been prepared in the light of the Committee's policy proposals. Recommendation 9: That each region and DSA/HQ be represented at all future meetings of this Committee The Chairman stated that it would be useful to reinforce this item for future reference, if necessary. 2.3 HBI medium-term programme

The Chairman initiated discussion by asking who the medium-term plan was for? Was it internal? for governments? She felt that the audience should dictate the recommendations and asked what were its deadlines?

- 18 -

Mr Thompson noted that the global medium-term programme for health information support (HBI/MTP/88.1) was an internal document and that it covered a five to six year period. He asked the Committee whether it felt that radical new approaches would be needed for the next medium-term programme. Mr Zielinski said that originally all regions had been invited to create their own medium-term plans, while feeding into the general process. EMRO seemed to be the only region to take the General Programme of Work literally in its injunction to assist countries to frame their HBI national plans. Should the medium-term plan be global? regional? What Was the motivation behind it? Its main purpose may be to help us focus our thinking and give us some justification for launching new projects. Dr Robey stated that all information in the eighth and ninth General Programme of Work became public and we should ask ourselves how to improve it as part of a larger document. It also does not address the inter-country programmes as much as WPRO does internally. Mr Thompson said that one objective was to break down activities by organizational level; HQ had attempted to follow this programme. Mr Theakston said that EURO did not intend to stick to these targets which had been replaced with the new targets book. Dr Navarro thought the document, while objective, was too detailed and constrictive. It should start with a situational analysis and project a view to the future; she also agreed with Dr Zatlokal that it was too ambitious. Target I was possible to achieve in some countries but not in others that were more democratic. A new introduction needs to be written which could serve as a springboard for future plans, which would put everything under one umbrella, and help inform and channel WHO's expertise. Information science technology was undergoing great change especially in libraries. Forecasting was a major problem, and she suggested importing an information expert to help evaluate the impact of information technology on HBI work. It was hard enough to forecast for one year, let alone until the year 2000. AMRO was getting away from exclusive focus on primary health care. She quoted a recent report from the World Bank which emphasized the importance of investing in secondary level health care. The HBI report should at least recognize other levels of health care. Mr Thompson emphasized that a mission statement could be valuable. A well-written medium-term plan could support HBI activities both internally and outside. Mr Theakston mentioned that the EURO programme was structured according to the 38 regional targets, which had recently been updated and published as the new targets book. Dr Navarro felt that such a plan should be predictive rather than evaluative. An analysis of research in Latin America showed that there was no such thing as First vs Third World research- research was research. There was something patronizing in this plan towards the Third World. Also, did Headquarters have a schedule? If the meeting was created to obtain funding should it have a team of experts and where would they come from? Where would WHO get the resources? The medium-term plan is subordinate to the Ninth General Programme of Work, which will be presented to the World Health Assembly in May 1994.

- 19-

She suggested that for the next interregional meeting we look at the medium-term plan with drafts of national, regional and global narratives. Mr Theakston asked if the Committee could really influence this document. Who would write it and when? Mr Zielinski said that the document was not binding but asked if it had a purpose? The whole process should be tied to HFA2000, but would it be? Mr Thompson suggested that HBI should take its cue from the Ninth General Programme of Work. There was still an emphasis on primary health care but the climate waS changing. The Chairman asked if Headquarters needed anything from this committee to take back with him because she would prefer to go back and consult as to needs and directions with AMRO. Mr Thompson said that he had gathered that the regions did not use the document. 2.4 Extrabudgetary funding possibilities for HBI activities

Mr Thompson introduced this item by referring back to the latest issue of HBI News and commended SEARO on wise advice, as well as mentioning comments from other regions and HBI in Headquarters. Headquarters had begun to formulate suggestions for presentation to potential donors and he circulated a first checklist of funding proposals for projects that could be implemented immediately. Mr Zielinski was very impressed with SEARO's regularized approach to funding on an ongoing basis. He also mentioned Investors for Health, explained problems associated with official governmental routes and that he had sought the advice of the Islamic Development Bank. He emphasized that contacts should be made personally and said that most projects supported by the Islamic Development Bank are tripartite, providing money, training and expertise by different agencies. Foundations were always a good source: the World Bank was ready to fund infrastructure projects, the Ford Foundation was funding educational software. Often very poor countries considered HBI activities a low priority. Dr Navarro had interpreted this item as money extra to her budget, since Publications Programmes could benefit from funds in the technical programmes, which received significant support outside the regular budget: 52% of AMRO's funds were extrabudgetary. It was in the unit's best interest to tind funds for publishing services at the beginning of a project. Other sources were RD's Development Fund and other institutions who might want to copublish. In AMRO when other institutions were involved, the Publications Programme always retained control of editorial production. Although AMRO recognized the importance of outside funding, she outlined some of its problems, such as the orchestrating of funds from various sources, particularly in poor countries, meeting deadlines of the funding institution which often upset work flows, and coordination of the project. She emphasized that money was never a problem if a project merited being published. Mr Theakston said that in EURO, PUB did not have the resources to carry out fundraising on a scale needed to run the publications programme. However, the technical programmes were now generating substantial extrabudgetary funding, and PUB should perhaps

-20-

concentrate on obtaining a share of those funds for publishing materials emanating from those programmes. Dr Robey said that WPRO was better off with extrabudgetary funding of the units and that we should not overlook the private sector as a donor, such as pharmaceuticals distributors, pharmacies, etc. Mr Thompson said that bilateral agencies were often reluctant to focus on HBI programmes within WHO, because they were considered core regular budget activities and too essential to rely on the uncertainty of bilateral funding. An example of possible outside collaboration was the coming meeting between the Asian Development Bank and WHO; the importance of HBI activities had been recognized in earlier meetings. Ongoing HBI projects that had received funding from outside sources were the African Index Medicus, WHOTERM and the American Cancer Society, which funded the IARC Monograph Series on CD-ROM. It was important to keep control of activities and not allow priorities to be distorted. Care should also be taken in accepting funding from the private sector and acknowledgement should be discreet. Dr Zatlokal described the work of Excerpta Medica in Hong Kong which publishes a newsletter to doctors entirely paid for by pharmaceuticals companies, but with no acknowledgement to them. The companies consider this a service to the medical profession in updating their knowledge of new medication. 2.5 (1) Translation of WHO publications Official languages

Mr Thompson introduced this item and described translation work in HQ. There was parity in the use of English and French though some book series were not translated from the original. Most governing body documents were translated into six languages, in certain cases just two. Arrangements for the Russian and Chinese editions of publications were still contractual. He questioned how the current pace could be maintained with reductions in staff and increased demand; it was a case of either selecting work to be done or using outside publishers for translations. WHO Drug Information now appeared only in English; this could be justified by the large number of English subscriptions and the fact that most scientists read English. Spanish had been handed over to the Spanish Government and Headquarters hoped to do the same with French. In spite of the attrition of posts in the oftice of Language Services and a distinct need to keep essential services going (English, French and Spanish), there were not enough expert translators for scientific material outside WHO. Translation seemed to be the biggest problem in both human resources and funding within the HBI area. Mr Theakston said that EURO had to cope with four official languages (English, French, German and Russian) and provide the relevant translation services. However, the complement of translators had been reduced to the extent that it was now virtually impossible to translate books in house. Thus most books were published by the Office in English and attempts were being made to find publishers for the other official languages, especially Russian, for which there was increasing demand.

- 21 -

Mr Zielinski said that EMRO had two services: translation of office correspondence and reports from/to Arabic/English/French (with four translators) and a publishing programme for new Arabic publications. All freelance translators had their particulars (including evaluative data) stored on a computer program. Mr Charles Raby, Translator-Reviser, WPRO, described the Translation Unit which has two translators who work mainly on official documents, rarely on publications. The unit also administers and develops TRATERM, a terminology database. Miss L. Batista, Translator/WPRO, asked how TRATERM could cooperate with WHOTERM at Headquarters. Mr Thompson said that no doubt TER/HQ would be glad to discuss collaboration with WPRO. Dr Robey said that the problem was how to support the countries to produce the publications themselves, especially in the absence of paper and equipment. Dr Navarro said that the AMRO/HBI programme did not include the Translations Unit, although HBI handled most of the published translation of the Regional Office. Translation into Spanish constituted over half of its publications. Editors also served as translators. To cut costs, AMRO contracted out translation to Latin America where the quality was excellent and the rates more reasonable. (2) Non-official languages

This item was introduced by Mr Thompson. Translations of WHO publications into non-official languages were an important extension of HBI activities and Headquarters considered this a priority for extrabudgetary funding. The HBI funding proposals he had circulated contained a special section on funding of local translations. Although there was great interest in this programme in, for example, Viet Nam, Brazil, Nepal, Japan, Italy, Indonesia, Germany and India, there were obvious gaps in places such as Burma. SEARO responded that this could be either piracy or due to the fact that educated Burmese speak good English. Mr Thompson offered lists of contracts completed or outstanding for translation rights from over 50 countries with 20% of titles enjoying a subsidy, 60% translating on their own and 20%, in developed countries, paying royalties. Headquarters would like to see more activity in Lao People's Democratic Republic, which would probably receive a full subsidy. There could also be a measure of support from regional oftices for such activities. In the 1992-1993 biennium, US$320 000 had been paid in subsidies for 154 books, with an average of US$ 2000. Mr Thompson invited the Committee to reiterate its support for the maintenance of the subsidy scheme. Dr Robey suggested removing Malaysia and the Republic of Korea from the list of priority countries, as they could pay for themselves, and requested including Pidgin for the South Pacific countries. Dr Navarro said that she has always been impressed by the breadth and scope of this programme and congratulated Mr Thompson and Dr Corrigan. It was important to recognize that non-official languages played a more important role in some regions than in others. Dr Robey expressed great support for this scheme and asked if Chinese and Vietnamese requests for translation came through WPRO. Who decided on the translations in VietNam? He suggested that the $25 000 spent on translations in Viet Nam may have gone further if

- 22-

spent in-country. He also had various suggestions on how to obtain funds if the scheme was not reinstated: taxing book sales in developed countries, extrabudgetary funds, etc. Dr Zatlokal also added her support for this excellent scheme, but said that we could be more pro-active with the many nongovernmental organizations in-country, some of which were willing to pay for translation, printing and distribution of WHO publications. Mr Zielinski commended the excellent support for this scheme from Mr Thompson and Dr Corrigan and outlined other sources of funding for translation in EMRO. He also asked that Punjabi be added to the list of priority languages. Dr Mattock asked how the size of the grant was determined. Mr Theakston requested clarification on future use of the fund and was pleased that it was now suggested that Eastern European languages might be included. He wanted to know the protocols for selecting regional publications within this scheme, whether they would receive a subsidy and on what it would depend. Mr Thompson said that each individual subsidy was relatively small, based on a proportion of the cost estimates. Mr Zielinski also emphasized the need to obtain printing estimates in countries before providing the subsidy amount to ensure correct pricing. Mr Thompson continued that the Vietnamese translations were prepared by institutions in the country and published by the medical publishing house. They could perhaps have gone through the Collaborating Centre for HBI (CIMSI), but he was not aware that the centre had ever shown interest in WHO publications. 2.6 (1) Distribution & Sales General discussion of DSA matters

The Chairman invited the regions to initiate discussion in response to the DSA paper distributed earlier. Mr Zielinski expressed frustration that DSA funds to the regionalized DSA in EMRO had been cut off after a plan of action had been prepared and he felt the DSA position was being wasted. Dr Zatlokal voiced similar frustration, particularly as there was no budget for promotions from WPRO and very lucrative possibilities were being passed by. The Chairman regretted the absence of Mr Wieboldt, Chief, DSA/HQ, and mentioned that AMRO did most of its own promotion, distribution and sales. SEARO said that they had asked for little, so received little, although DSA/HQ paid for the three general service DSA staff in SEARO. EURO has no direct DSA activities because all is handled by Headquarters. Often people want to know how their books are doing and EURO cannot reply as they receive no figures. There may also be danger of duplication of promotional efforts but there was no way of knowing. Mr Thompson responded with some details of DSA activities in Headquarters. Chief, DSA/HQ was shortly to attend a EURO meeting on documentation centres which would deal mostly with free distribution. Mr Wieboldt also hoped to visit all the regional offices with DSA activities in 1994. There was a commitment to share a communal UN stand at the Zimbabwe Book Fair. Mr Thompson mentioned that the WPR publication, Health Research Methodology had enjoyed good sales and was to be reprinted shortly under the Revolving Sales Fund. The current value of HQ inventory was US$20 million which could probably be reduced if "on demand" publishing was adapted for the backlist. DSA would welcome more information from regional offices on their publishing programmes well in advance so that it could plan promotions. Mr Wieboldt had cautioned against broadening the scope of the

- 23-

Interregional Committee too much beyond basic publishing topics and thanked the Committee for discussing DSA matters at this meeting. Dr Zatlokal said that it would be helpful to know periodically whether promotional activities were influencing sales figures per region. The Chairman suggested that all those concerned with DSA questions formulate questions to Chief, DSA/HQ to be forwarded by Mr Thompson. (2) WPRO Presentation of promotional database

Dr Zatlokal presented a demonstration of this mailing database which was targeted specifically at promotion, although it also contained a detailed calendar on conferences and activities. The database was designed to interact with all technical units in the region and permitted sharing of mailings, lists and other information. Mr Theakston expressed great interest and wanted EURO's Distribution staff to have a demonstration of this package which was perceived by all as being practical, easy to use and well targeted to the promotional needs of DSA in both HQ and many of the regions. In response to AMRO's query, Dr Zatlokal said that all units had not yet been instructed in use of the database, only a few units which had been included on an experimental basis. Certainly instruction was envisioned as an essential part of its introduction into general use within WPRO. Mr Murdoch, Informatics Services Officer, underlined the importation aspects of the programme which would save tedious keying in of addresses already on systems throughout WPRO. Dr Zatlokal emphasized that the database had an important coordinating function between Publications and the various technical units in the region. In response to queries on how to separate promotion and free distribution, she explained that all were tagged accordingly for select mailings. Dr Navarro said that AMRO had been working on something like this for years but had not made much progress and she was pleased that this system was to he shared with other regions. Dr Zatlokal gave the example of mailing list duplications which were revealed during the recent review exercise with WRs. Mr Murdoch reiterated that such a system would facilitate the mailing function, even for large offices such as at Headquarters. He emphasized that the database was in FoxPro and that such expertise was available throughout regional oftices of WHO. The next step would he to develop a client-server capability, however the use of such a version would require compatible software and hardware. ln response to Mr Thompson's question on keeping in touch, he said that the last ITO meeting which attempted to redetine coordination was two and a half years ago. As part of the WHO Response to Global Change effort, there was a request for information on systems throughout WHO. The Publications Unit could certainly coordinate among themselves as the use of this particular programme was very specitic. 2.7 Role of Health Literature. library and other related services in extending access and disseminating information

Dr Robey, who introduced this item, emphasized the importance of information exchange, and the importance of detining the audience: the health worker, district level and below. The other important element was timeliness, particularly relevant for statistics used in decision making.

- 24-

He also felt that the focus of the technical units needed to be changed, keeping in mind the needs at the primary health level. Often health information material was in the wrong language, on the wrong technical level. He wondered (as in EMRO) where we should put our money: on Expert Committee documents, or on basic, graphic learning materials. The Technical Discussion which followed the Regional Committee in WPR had brought out the need to change the product, gear it more to health delivery and to work on a better distribution system. The HBI mission to VietNam was meant to help the country improve its publications and products and their distribution. It was much more important to talk with the countries, not among ourselves. Mr Zielinski appreciated the voice of experience as to applicability of products, and was particularly interested in finding out how to obtain more information from two Collaborating Centres in WPR, as a new one had just been designated in EMRO. EMRO had always supported publishing at the grass roots level, but 95% of headquarters' publications did not answer this need. There were many target audiences, and dictionaries and textbooks also had their niche. Mr Thompson said that the HQ book Management of Severe and Complicated Malaria displayed by Dr Robey was a good example of what HBI should be doing. Establishing the right level of readership for HQ publications was given due emphasis in the current mediumterm programme; while the emphasis was on immediately applicable practical texts, WHO's unique position in normalization activities could not be ignored. Dr Robey pointed out that HQ seemed very interested in relations with research institutions and universities and that they may lose touch with the primary health care level of slowly-developing countries. HBI priorities had to be different for each region because they had different profiles of developed/developing countries. But there was a need for support from HQ, particularly in the level of publications being produced, the local language subsidy, etc. The various members then described their own library activities and particular problems. EMRO had a catalogue of audiovisual materials on a database done in collaboration with the Health Learning Materials adviser, which could be shared with other countries. Mr Zielinski requested a recommendation to produce a list of WHO's informal materials. An example of using technology was EMRO's new POLIOFAX (polio statistics regularly sent out to the countries in a specially-designed fax newsletter). Dr Navarro explained that AMRO had three library services: building the institutional memory, much of the documentation of which was contributed to BIREME and LILACS and which include information from the PAHO Country Offices; providing interprogrammatic assistance to strengthen library information centres within the programmes; and oft"ering user services in response to the expressed information needs of staff members. The Library was concerned about the loss of its traditional role as information provider given the possibility of direct user access to information electronically. AMRO would support a recommendation for the creation of a database of WHO materials, which may just be a question of merging what is already available in Headquarters and the regions. She would also like to have a focal point for this material.

-25-

Dr Robey emphasized that the WPRO library was used mostly by outside local student users and consultants. Dr Zatlokal mentioned a proposal to the Library Committee that all holdings be catalogued on the LAN, including those of individual units. This would have to be coordinated at purchase point. 2 .8 (1) Publications Policy Translation vs adaptation

Mr Thompson, who introduced this item which was originally suggested by AFRO, commented on the types of text that could be translated directly and those that were suitable for adaptation. He added that adaptation could often make a translation more meaningful and useful for country readers. Dr Navarro asked if the new WHO copyright statement allowed for adaptation, but Mr Thompson said he would rather not include that to avoid misunderstandings. When translators adapted or added to texts, they were asked to include an explanation in the footnotes or foreword. In response to Mrs Rowe's question about the number of requests for translation, Mr Thompson said that although some units abandoned their texts after publication, many others helped to seek out translation possibilities in the countries. (2) Coordination of health information support at the country level

Introduced by Dr Mattock, this item outlined SEARO needs to improve dissemination procedures, to use different information centres of different organizations, HELLIS information points, etc. An example was the information branch of ESCAP in Bangkok, where coordination could be improved. There had originally been an arrangement between GPA, the funder, and UNESCO, which had the facilities but this was no longer the case. SEARO wanted to improve interagency coordination and wondered if other regions had experience of interagency dissemination. She also felt that there could be more coordination with nationals. SEARO did not determine the needs of the countries in the production of publications. (3) Evaluations of publications programme with a view to policy changes

In this item, proposed by SEARO, Dr Mattock said that in SEARO the only means of evaluation of publications was to look at reprint rights, translations rights, and sales figures. Otherwise, there was no way of knowing whether a publication was effective. Dr Zatlokal said that a publication was never considered by the WPRO Publications Committee unless the manuscript had been either peer-reviewed or field-tested by the unit concerned. The results of both evaluations and questionnaires were presented to the Publications Committee to assure both the need and the audience for the information. (4) Greater synchronization of Headquarters and regional publications

In presenting this item, Dr Mattock asked whether we were all synchronized or not, as in SEARO data sheets from other Regional Offices arrived just prior to printing of the manuscript, which was too late to send comments. SEARO also circulated its data sheets just prior to publications.

-26-

Dr Zatlokal responded that data sheets were sent to HQ and at least two regions at the beginning of the acquisitions process. These were usually reviewed by the technical units involved and were highly regarded by the Publications Committee. She also emphasized the need to respond to publications needs globally when producing a regional publication and supported this call for synchronization. Mr Zielinski said this one item would need an entire session and again emphasized the value of a needs assessment which provided a survey of valid information and target audiences, created a wish list for common publications and created priorities for translation. However, these needs assessments had never been undertaken with the countries themselves. Mr Theakston admitted gaps in the Publishing Programme but said they were hard to fill with a small programme. Usefulness of publications was evaluated more on the level of sales and demand. Dr Navarro supported the importance of assessments to determine the usefulness of proposed publications in addressing country health information needs. Dr Robey was concerned about evaluating the output of publications and felt we should find out the objectives of each unit in preparing a publication. There was a great need for manuals for institutions which trained health workers. We should look at what we produce and for whom. Selling publications is a failure; they should either be given away or budgeted for by the programmes. Mr Theakston conceded that within Dr Robey's definition this was a failure but price put a value on things. EURO's publications programme was going to change significantly now and more was being done for the new developing countries, particularly in form and level. Mr Thompson agreed that evaluation and impact studies were important and said that texts should be exchanged with the regions, sent to outside reviewers, tield-tested, and tinally evaluated by the Publications Committee to ensure consistency with policy and needs. Some indicators of success were free distribution, sales, reviews, replies to questionnaires, requests for reproduction rights, translations, and citations in the literature. However, a general theory of assessment of the impact of publication - which would include presentation of the material was lacking. He felt that some of the greatest topical needs were in hospital management, nursing and textbooks at the intermediate level and manuals for training. There was clearly disparity between needs and what was published. (5) Signed vs unsigned publications

Dr Zatlokal introduced this item which had been submitted by AFRO . In presenting both sides of the issue, she said that as a technical organization WHO needed to maintain a high level of consultants and experts who were encouraged to work on various projects because of future publishing potential. On the other hand, WHO was a service organization and, as such may not see the need to set out one individual over another in authorship. In WPRO staff authors were not mentioned, although consultant authors were cited in the Foreword. The acknowledgements are considered a catch-all for various other contributing individuals. Mr Theakston said that this issue had never been seen as a problem in EURO. Authors and editors were normally mentioned, especially on technical books, and this included staff members. Dr Navarro agreed that the inclusion or exclusion of an author's name was dictated by the nature of the publication, whether it was organizational or technical. Mr Zielinski said

- 27-

that in EMRO the author was always included and a name may add prestige in some cases. He felt that staff authors should be encouraged unless the work was multi-authored, edited or only supervised. Mr Thompson said there was no written policy, but if experts were to be kept alive intellectually, their intellectual product must be a.;knowledged in some way. The practice in HQ was to include authors' names if proposed by the programme concerned; names also seemed preferable bibliographically. Sometimes it was helpful to be able to put an author's name on a work, to distance the organization a little from the text; authored books contained standard disclaimer.

a

Dr Navarro said that in AMRO, the practice was not to credit editors by name, as their work was considered the product of anonymous international service. (6) Publishing policy and practices related to electronic publishing

Mr Zielinski introduced this item and emphasized that the topic included more than just desktop publishing, but also future-proofing and electronic monitoring, tracking and merging. He emphasized that we should all have a copy of everything we produce electronically, both at Headquarters and in the regions, we should facilitate the use of each others databases and convert information into a PC format for easier use in the regions. EMRO was very pleased with the exchange of information between EMRO and WPRO over the last few months and emphasized that he has not been able to get a copy of the DSA/HQ mailing list for EMRO. Conversion of the DSA/HQ promotional catalogues from PageMaker to dBAse format has also not been easy. Mr Thompson said that HBI had been trying to draft an electronic publishing policy, but views had been divergent. Any final report of the group concerned would be circulated to the Committee when available. Dr Navarro mentioned that Health Conditions in the Americas in 1994 would be electronically tagged and that the perception was that AMRO was on the cusp of an electronic revolution. In producing electronic books, it was important to consider the value added, primarily the ability to manipulate the text internally and the provision of search facilities. Probably the most likely candidates for electronic products would be reference material. She had suggested to the Regional Director in AMRO that an "information tsar" or "tsarina" be appointed to coordinate these technological developments among the affected technical units. Mr Zielinski said that EMRO was considering using WHOTERM as an Arabic searching tool and ultimately would like a composite Index Medicus for all regions. Dr Robey said that over the years WPRO had bought large numbers of CD-ROM readers for countries which never used them (particularly China) because of lack of training or funds for buying CDs. He questioned what we were to do in the ten years it would take the developing countries to catch up. Dr Navarro responded that the countries could catch up very quickly; over 90% of AMRO's manuscripts were now being submitted on disc, and they were often from small centres in Latin America. Dr Zatlokal emphasized that each country was at a different level of development and we could not discount the great awareness of electronic media in Latin America, or the lack of it in some countries in WPRO and AFRO. But this was all a question of degree and that was why we had to assess a country's need, and why we had discussed needs assessments and

-28-

country publishing potential profiles to such an extent earlier in this meeting. Perhaps a stronger electronics component should be considered in the country publishing profiles. In answer to AMRO's question, Mr Thompson outlined what the group on electronic publishing had discussed. Some of the issues were: What were countries' needs? Can WHO do it? How could it do it better than others? Was it an opportunity? How would the future affect WHO? Who were the users? What level of equipment was needed in the countries? What would be the timing for our investment in different media? What would be the choice ~f content? In which language? What was the place of a database such as WHOTERM? Should CDs be created by subject, from whatever source? Or should they be compilations of different WHO material? Should they be archival? What about copyright? What about self-publishing? Must WHO insist on standardized software? Would the work be done outside WHO? On what terms would information on InterNet be given away, or placed on a commercial database on another network? What would be the value-added element? Would it include indexing, interaction, full search? Where did document delivery services fit in? Should all material be licensed? Which services would WHO belong to? Would electronic publications be easily available? Could the printed versions be stopped? How would pricing work? A perfect candidate for such media would be ICD-10 and its applications; the Weekly Epidemiological Record should also be made available on-line or on diskette. It seemed that Headquarters was moving towards SGML and exploitation of digitalizing. HQ print contracts now included the return to WHO of corrected diskettes of all material. 2.9 (1) Other matters Role of Collaborating Centres and Expert Advisory Panels in HBI

Mr Thompson introduced this item and said that HQ was seeking the collaboration of the regions. There were apparently seven HBI Collaborating Centres in the world, of which four were known to HQ to be active: one for health legislation, one for terminology, and two for publishing and library matters in China. Three of the seven were in the Western Pacific Region. Headquarters had little information on these centres, and they were not evenly distributed geographically or in their activities. Secondly, WHO could benefit from a stronger Expert Advisory Panel on HBI matters. Although one existed, it needed rebuilding with people who could contribute real publishing expertise. Mr Thompson suggested placing an item on the agenda for 1994 under which progress in tinding appropriate new members could be reported. Such experts might come from centres already doing related work. He would welcome greater interaction with Collaborating Centres. Dr Robey said that we should use different Collaborating Centres for different purposes. For example, Beijing had played an important role in medical and health library work; it was the central node of 13 medical school libraries and had created CBLARS, a Chinese equivalent of MEDLARS. They also did much information work of world interest, especially in traditional medicine. As for the Collaborating Centre in Viet Nam, CIMSI was originally created to take the focus away from the Science and Technology Academy. As a francophone Collaborating Centre it had worked well in networking with Lao People's Democratic Republic and Cambodia but did not relate to South Pacitic francophone countries. CIMSI has done considerable in-country work such as translating medical texts for use by the Hanoi Medical School.

- 29-

Mr Zielinski said that he thought Collaborating Centres were global, not regional and wanted to know if it was a tortuous path to designate them. He was very interested in more information from WPRO in developing his Collaborating Centre in Iran. Dr Robey felt there was some confusion in gathering of information on Collaborating Centres by both HQ and the regions and he mentioned that the Regional Director's Report for 1992/93 contained all information by programme; all HBI Collaborating Centres were under Health Information. Mr Thompson proposed that the Committee formulate a recommendation with a view to strengthening the network of Collaborating Centres and the Expert Advisory Panel, with due attention to criteria for selection. (2) Brochure on planning of HBI activities

Mr Thompson explained that HQ would like to produce a brochure describing the various activities in HBI, since an explanation of the work of HBI programmes and their importance was clearly needed. He invited contributions from all regions. EURO and EMRO had both prepared brochures already, and felt they could send in their own material for incorporation. AMRO, SEARO and WPRO undertook to forward information. (3) Update of WHOTERM

Mr Thompson drew attention to the update on WHOTERM prepared by TERIHQ and circulated to the Committee. Some 100 copies of WHOTERM had been requested and 50 sold in 8 countries. Some funding had been given by the German government, and a partner bad been identified to prepare a Windows version with advanced features. All users were invited to forward their comments to the Terminology Task Force based in TER. (4) Invitation to the Third Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications (1994) SEARO kindly extended an invitation that the next meeting be held in SEARO in October, 1994 and hoped that all would attend.

2.10 Closure of the meeting In closing the meeting the Regional Director, Dr Han, again emphasized the importance of the HBI programme within the larger scheme of WHO activities. If other programmes ceased to exist, the HBI programme should continue. It was a pillar mandate of WHO and he would pursue it as a personal interest. When a publication was produced in the Western Pacific region he always wanted to see clearly-defined targets that would reach the periphery of health services, to be used daily by field workers. At HQ, publications had a different role to play: they had a normative function in addition to the HBI state-of-the-art information which was naturally the role of works generated by HQ. He reiterated his support to the publications programme and particularly to the publications programme in the Western Pacitic region.

- 30-

In her closing remarks, the Chairman praised Dr Han's understanding of the importance of publications and his commitment to the HBI programme, which exists to benefit countries and their populations by providing critical information that can help solve health problems and build health services. She reported a very productive week and indicated that the results would be submitted to the respective executive committees of the regions. She remarked that ten years ago WPRO had been considered the "weak sister" in the family of WHO HBI publications programmes but that real progress had been made in the Region during Dr Han's administration. WPRO was now a full partner in WHO's efforts to disseminate information, an example of WPRO's emerging leadership in the area was the development of the recently created promotional database, from which all the regions could now benefit. Mr Thompson added in his closing remarks that it was a great privilege to hold publications discussions in WPRO. He particularly thanked Dr Han for his hospitality, the facilities and his support for operational practical HBI activities at the periphery, as well as for his clear analysis of the needs of that periphery. He also complimented him on the development of the promotional database, stating that WPRO had much to share with Headquarters. He emphasized that the exchange of information between regions was important and beneficial to WHO as a whole and would provide a platform for improved visibility for future HBI activities globally. The electronic path was indeed promising for the Organization. Finally, the Committee's work was an important part of the continuing review of HBI activities throughout WHO. 3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (1) The Committee recognized that, in light of the critical importance of evaluating and improving the usefulness of WHO and country publications in the areas of biomedical and public health, an item on impact assessment be included in the agenda for the Third Meeting of the WHO Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications in 1994. (Coordinator: AMRO) (2) The Committee proposed that an international compendium of country HBI profiles using a common format and common indicators be developed to assess the national, regional and global health information sectors and that progress be reported at the 1994 meeting. (Coordinator: EURO) (3) The Committee recommended that the regional oftices and HQ prepare policy statements and plans of work in the light of the Ninth General Programme of Work for consideration at the 1994 Interregional Meeting with a view to developing an integrated medium-term programme work plan. (Coordinator: HQ) (4) The Committee emphasized the need for a common approach to the many complex issues associated with electronic publishing and related applications. These include legal, technical, financial and developmental aspects. The Committee recommended that all endeavours towards the formulation of a common approach be circulated among all HBI programmes for comment and that this item be reviewed regularly by the Committee.

- 31 -

(5) The Committee recognized that in considering information dissemination at country level, core lists of HBI materials (publications, documents, audio visual and informal media such as posters, wall-charts, etc) be prepared for (a) district/teaching hospitals and (b) primary health care centres. The Committee recommended that HQ explore the possibility of collecting and cataloguing the informal materials produced by WHO in all its offices, particularly posters, wall-charts and other ephemeral information products aimed at the health workers and populations at the periphery of health services. (6) The Interregional Meeting is the best, and currently the only, forum available for all regional publications programmes to discuss DSA activites jointly. Given the difficulties experienced in developing regional DSA activities during the current biennium, largely as a result of budgetary constraints, participants expressed the wish that priority be given to the participation of a DSA/HQ staff member at the Interregional Meeting. (7) The Committee noted that HBI was not traditionally a programme that benefited from extrabudgetary resources for global and national activities. Given the present financial climate, it was recommended that all HBI programmes pursue opportunities for securing extrabudgetary funding for HBI activities, and report the results of such efforts. (8) After reviewing the successful implementation of the Local Languages Subsidy Scheme and recognizing the growing need for health information in local languages, the Committee reiterated the comments in Recommendation (3) adopted at its first session in 1992, and strongly urged that every effort be made to continue and expand the scheme, drawing on both regular budget and extrabudgetary sources. (Coordinator: HQ) (9) The Committee recognized the need to reactivate and strengthen the Expert Advisory Panel on HBI. It was suggested that each region identify suitable experts, in the light of stated criteria, and put forward proposals for appointment to the Director, HBI, for circulation. Procedures for designation would be pursued at various levels and a progress report would be submitted to the Committee's next session. (10) Welcoming HBIIHQ's proposal to enhance the network of HBI Collaborating Centres, as well as further propositions for membership, at the same time the Committee recognized the need for further study of this issue. The Committee recommended that an item on Collaborating Centres be placed on the agenda for the 1994 meeting. By that time, the Committee will have sought clarification of areas in which future HBI collaboration is needed, the criteria for selection of an HBI Collaborating Centre, and the procedures to be followed for designation.

- 33-

ANNEX 1 1993 Meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications 25-29 October 1993, Manila

AGENDA 1. 2. 3. 4. 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Opening of the meeting Election of officers Adoption of the agenda and programme of work Progress reports on developments in the various publications programmes and countries: AMRO/PAHO EMRO EURO SEARO WPRO HQ Report and recommendations of the 1992 Meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications HBI medium-term programme (Suggested by Chief, PUB/HQ) Evaluation of current experience with the Global Medium-Term Programme for Health Information Support, 1990-1995 (document HBI/MTP/88.1) Proposals for the format of the next MTP in the light of the Ninth General Programme of Work Extrabudgetary funding possibilities for HBI activities (Suggested by Chief, PUB/HQ) Translation of WHO publications into: Official languages Non-official languages

5. 6. 6.1

6.2 7. 8. 8.1 8.2

- 34-

Annex 1 9. 9.1 9.2 10. Promotion and distribution of publications General discussion of DSA matters WPRO promotional database demonstration (suggested by WPRO) Role of health literature, library and other related services in extending access and disseminating information related to WHO/HQ and Regional Office publications (from the 1992 Report of the Committee) (suggested by WPRO) Publications Policy

11.

11.1 Translation vs. Adaptation of WHO publications (suggested by AFRO) 11.2 Coordination of health information support at regional/country level (suggested by SEARO) 11.3 Review and evaluation of the impact of the publications programme, with a view to making policy changes (suggested by SEARO) 11.4 Greater synchronization of HQ and regional publications policy and operational strategies (suggested by SEARO) 11.5 Signed vs unsigned publications in WHO: Policy and implications (suggested by AFRO) 11.6 Policies and practices related to electronic publishing (from the 1992 Report of the Committee) 12. Other matters

12.1 Role of Collaborating Centres and Expert Advisory Panels in HBI 12.2 Brochure on HBI activities: Contributions by regions 12.3 Update of WHOTERM 13. Closure of the meeting

- 35-

ANNEX2

1993 Meeting of the Interregional Committee on Policy and Coordination of Publications Meeting 25-29 October 1993, Manila

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Mr D.H. Thompson, Chief, PUB/HQ Dr J. Navarro, Chief, HBI/AMRO Mr C. Zielinski, MHI/EMRO Mr F. Theakston, PUB/EURO Dr N. Mattock, RDOC/SEARO Dr B. Zatlokal, PUB/WPRO, Operational Officer Dr J. Robey, Regional Adviser, Health Information (HIN), WPRO, CoOperational Officer Mrs A. Rowe, EDT/WPRO Mr C. Raby, TRA/WPRO Mr L. Murdoch, ISO/WPRO Ms L. Batista, TRA/WPRO

DISTRIBUTION LIST

Regional Director DPM DSP DET DHP DPC DPP HIN ISO EDT(2) TRA (R) TRA (B) PIO COR LIB REG Director, PLL/HQ Chief, PUB/HQ Chief, DSA/HQ REG/HQ PUB/AFRO Chief, PUB/AMRO HBI/EMRO PUB/EURO RDOC/SEARO