Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness for health service planning

726 Bull World Health Organ 2018;96:726–728 | doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.217794 Perspectives The World Health Organization (WHO) Universal eye health: a global action plan 2014–2019 calls for the generation of evidence on the magnitude and causes of visual impairment as well as on eye care services, to plan towards universal eye health.1 The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (commonly called RAAB) is cited in the document as a standard method for generating this epidemiological evidence. Description of the assessment The rapid assessment is a standardized population-based survey method to as- sess the prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among the population older than 49 years.2 This survey method also generates service indicators, including cataract surgical coverage and cataract surgical outcome; to date, it has been used in over 330 surveys across 70 countries worldwide, providing a substantial contribution of data used to calculate global blindness estimates.2,3 The rapid assessment of avoidable blindness was developed by the Inter- national Centre for Eye Health at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, and evolved from the Rapid Assessment of Cataract Surgical Ser- vices.4 The assessment provides a simple, low-cost, open-access and epidemiologi- cally robust method to collect data to in- form eye-care programmes and policies with the aim of reducing or eliminating avoidable blindness. This assessment has several key strengths. First, it focuses on the popula- tion older than 49 years, where blindness prevalence is highest, thereby requiring a substantially smaller sample size than all-age population-based surveys. Sec- ond, it uses simple examination tech- niques and has low equipment needs, and is therefore low-cost and time- efficient, while providing comparable estimates to an all-age survey.2,5 Third, it has an open-access data entry and analysis software that provides robust, autogenerated analysis reports of key eye health indicators disaggregated by sex and age. These data assist assessment users in eye health service planning. The standardized reports ensure that find- ings from these assessments worldwide and over time are comparable, and the collation of data and reports online in an open repository means that they are accessible.6 For quality assurance, the assess- ment includes a certified trainer scheme, and trainers are available throughout most of the world. To be certified as a trainer, candidates must attend a one- week, face-to-face training of trainer’s workshop and then train a rapid as- sessment team under the supervision of a senior trainer. The new trainers are then available to train survey teams and support them to prepare for and under- take rapid assessments and interpret the generated data. Updating the method The International Centre for Eye Health is currently collaborating with Peek Vision7 and CBM International,8 with input from a wider technical and stakeholder group, to update several components of the overall method and develop the seventh version of the rapid assessment of avoidable blindness. Digitalization and new technology The seventh version of the assessment will use paperless mobile data entry connected to a cloud-hosted, web-based system available via browser. Users will have the option of using Peek Acuity, a validated smartphone-based visual acuity test.9 Users will be able to access the system without needing to install software, maintain databases or use a particular operating system. Data will be held centrally, providing a higher degree of data quality assurance and potential for cross-survey analysis. All existing assessment indicators will be viewable and downloadable via websites, facilitat- ing real-time views of the gathered data. Dashboard views of surveys in progress will also allow for real-time overview of survey progress and completeness. New interactive, web-based methods of visualizing the assessment’s data will be provided via a configurable web ap- plication to support data interpretation by eye health decision-makers. Additional information Additional data for inclusion in the rapid assessment are also being tested. These data reflect the needs outlined in Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development,10 including dimensions of equity, coverage and qual- ity. For example, new social variables will be tested to expand the monitoring of inequitable service access and to iden- tify which population groups are being left behind. Age and sex are already col- lected in the existing tool, and additional measures of socioeconomic status, place of residence and disability will be field tested. If possible, the tool will allow the addition of other characteristics ap- propriate in a particular context, such as ethnicity or migrant status. Additional coverage indicators such as refractive error correction coverage and effective cataract surgical coverage, which com- bines post-operative visual outcome with coverage, will also be explored.11 Use of data for planning In practice, assessments’ data and reports are not always used in action- able eye health plans at the district or national level. A recent review of 279 surveys registered in the rapid assess- ment of avoidable blindness repository determined that only half of these had published the surveys’ findings.12 Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness for health service planning Islay Mactaggart,a Sarah Wallace,a Jacqueline Ramke,a Matthew Burton,a Andrew Bastawrous,a Hans Limburg,a Muhammad Babar Qureshi,b Allen Fostera & Hannah Kupera a London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT London, England. b CBM International, Cambridge, England. Correspondence to Islay Mactaggart (email: islay.mactaggart@lshtm.ac.uk). (Submitted: 11 June 2018 – Revised version received: 16 July 2018 – Accepted: 16 July 2018 – Published online: 10 September 2018 ) 727Bull World Health Organ 2018;96:726–728| doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.217794 Perspectives Rapid assessment of avoidable blindnessIslay Mactaggart et al. A key component of the updated seventh version of the assessment is the development of a formal planning module to support the use of the as- sessment’s data in creating effective eye health plans. To support this planning module, a qualitative study was recently undertaken at the International Centre of Eye Health under the supervision of a technical advisory group that includes epidemiologists, ophthalmologists, service planners and representatives of international organizations. This study included semi-structured interviews with rapid assessment users and eye health planners (two overlapping but distinct groups), a scoping review of available tools to support the use of survey data in planning and a review of a selection of current eye health plans.13 Key criteria for the translation of data outputs into effective planning are being synthesized from this work, and a theory of change for using the assessment to support planning is being developed and refined. A rapid assessment of avoidable blindness planning module is cur- rently being developed based on the outcomes of this study. The module is focused at the district planning level and will complement existing tools such as WHO’s eye care service assessment tool,14 which is used at the national lev- el.15 The assessment’s planning module recognizes the importance of identify- ing a local “eye health champion”, such as a senior stakeholder in a position of sufficient authority, to engage further stakeholders across and beyond the eye health sector. The module synthesizes important practical elements of plan- ning.16 For example, the module focuses on ensuring inclusion of the full range of stakeholders whose influence is required for the successful funding, approval and implementation of an eye health plan within the wider health system. Such stakeholders include the health ministry, local government, eye health staff, pub- lic health representatives, local service providers (private and government), non-eye health representatives, patient representative groups, WHO and other international organization representa- tives, and nongovernmental organiza- tions. The module also emphasizes the need to incorporate stakeholders across different roles, such as decision-makers, implementers, funders and eye health service users, and to be clear on how they will be involved from the outset. The module includes situational analysis guidance and templates, to support rapid assessment of avoidable blindness users in collating data re- quired for effective planning beyond that provided by the assessment. The module acknowledges that collation of human resource, financial and service-use data can be challenging, and provides practical advice on both the minimum data needed to support planning and on how this data can be acquired. The module emphasizes the epidemiological gaps in the rapid assessment of avoidable blindness as a comprehensive eye health planning tool, such as how and where to incorporate data on childhood blindness or visual impairment, or on myopia in those younger than 50 years, and how to balance the assessment’s district-level data with national planning objectives. In addition, the planning module, which will be supported by an optional additional training module that allows certified trainers to act as planning facil- itators, supports users in interpreting the data to identify priorities and formulate a realistic action plan within a planning workshop. The module describes the im- plications of key assessment indicators, such as sex disparities or interpretation of the cataract surgical coverage. The module also provides practical guidance on organizing a planning workshop following synthesized principles from the eye health sector and the results of the key informant interviews described above.17 The planning module, along with other components of the seventh ver- sion of the rapid assessment of avoid- able blindness, will greatly increase the capacity of this method to support eye health planning. All new features of this version will be field tested in an iterative process, with a view to formally launch- ing the platform of the seventh version of the assessment at the end of 2019. We anticipate that these changes will improve the relevance of the rapid assessment of avoidable blindness for the decades to come by increasing the quality of data collected and will sup- port effective planning of programmes, at district-level, for the prevention of avoidable blindness. ■ Competing interests: None declared. References 1. Universal eye health: a global action plan 2014–2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Available from: http://www.who.int/blindness/ actionplan/en/ [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 2. Kuper H, Polack S, Limburg H. Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness. Community Eye Health. 2006 Dec;19(60):68–9. PMID: 17515970 3. Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al.; Vision Loss Expert Group. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 09;5(9):e888–97. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214- 109X(17)30293-0 PMID: 28779882 4. Limburg H, World Health Organization Programme for the Prevention of Blindness. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Available from http:// www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67847 [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 5. Dineen B, Foster A, Faal H. A proposed rapid methodology to assess the prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2006 Feb;13(1):31–4. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/09286580500473787 PMID: 16510344 6. RAAB Repository [internet]. The Netherlands: RAAB; 2018. Available from: http://raabdata.info [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 7. Peek Vision [internet]. England: Peek Vision; 2018. Available from: https:// www.peekvision.org [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 8. CBM International [internet]. Germany: CBM; 2018. Available from: https:// www.cbm.org [cited 2018 Jun 15]. 9. Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone-based visual acuity test (peek acuity) for clinical practice and community-based fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):930–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/ jamaophthalmol.2015.1468 PMID: 26022921 10. Resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In: Seventieth United Nations General Assembly, New York, 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations; 2015. Available from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/ RES/70/1&Lang=E [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 11. Ramke J, Gilbert CE, Lee AC, Ackland P, Limburg H, Foster A. Effective cataract surgical coverage: an indicator for measuring quality-of-care in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS One. 2017 03 1;12(3):e0172342. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172342 PMID: 28249047 12. Ramke J, Kuper H, Limburg H, Kinloch J, Zhu W, Lansingh VC, et al. Avoidable waste in ophthalmic epidemiology: a review of blindness prevalence surveys in low and middle income countries 2000–2014. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;25(1):13–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09286586. 2017.1328067 PMID: 28886260 728 Bull World Health Organ 2018;96:726–728| doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.217794 Perspectives Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness Islay Mactaggart et al. 13. Ramke J, Zwi AB, Silva JC, Mwangi N, Rono H, Gichangi M, et al. Evidence for universal eye health plans. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Oct 1;96(10):695–704. 14. Eye care service assessment tool. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/blindness/publications/ECSAT_EN.pdf [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 15. Eye care service assessment tool. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/blindness/publications/ecsat/en/ [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 16. Schmeer K. Stakeholder analysis guidelines policy toolkit for strengthening health sector reform – Section 2, stakeholder analysis guidelines. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance; 1999. Available from: http://www.who. int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33/en/ [cited 2018 Jun 1]. 17. Global blindness: planning and managing eye care. London: International Centre for Eye Health; 2018. Available from: http://iceh.lshtm.ac.uk/global- blindness/ [cited 2018 Jun 1]. Corrigendum In: Cantelmo CB, Takeuchi M, Stenberg K, Veasnakiry L, Eang RC, Mai M, et al. Estimating health plan costs with the OneHealth tool, Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 July 1;96(7):462–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.203737 on page 466, Fig. 3, should be as follows: Fig. 3. Projected health programme costs in 2016 versus 2020, Cambodia 2020 (Total health programme budget US$ 318 million) 2016 (Total health programme budget US$ 276 million) Reproductive, maternal and newborn health Child health and immuzation Noncommunicable diseases Malaria and dengue Mental health Tuberculosis Nutrition HIV Other programmes US$ 4 308 878 (1%) US$3 279 708 (1%) US$ 38 976 229 (14%) US$ 92 884 071 (34%) US$ 14 472 102 (14%) US$ 29 015 672 (9%) US$ 29 508 760 (9%) US$37 936 561 (12%) US$ 52 346 437 (17%) US$ 63 103 174 (20%) US$ 63 033 377 (20%) US$ 6 257 158 (2%) US$ 10 354 793 (14%) US$ 26 240 325 (8%) US$ 44 642 264 (16%) US$ 26 427 056 (10%) US$ 27 158 793 (10%) US$ 23 879 809 (9%) HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; US$: United States dollars. Note: Other programmes include eye health, promotive health, leprosy and infectious disease control.