19161Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-693/20 P.cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19162Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-693/20 P.cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19163Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-690/20 P.cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19164Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-690/20 P.cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19165Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-682/20 P.cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19166Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-682/20 P.cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19167Case C-693/20 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection — Remedies against the conduct of the inspection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 19 — Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Article 3 — Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations — Starting point of the Commission’s investigation)cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19168Case C-690/20 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon, Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection — Remedies against the conduct of the inspection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 19 — Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Article 3 — Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations — Starting point of the Commission’s investigation)cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19169Case C-682/20 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — Les Mousquetaires, ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection — Remedies against the conduct of the inspection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 19 — Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Article 3 — Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations — Starting point of the Commission’s investigation)cjeu_case · 9 mars 2023
19170Case T-125/23: Action brought on 8 March 2023 — Synapsa Med v EUIPO — Gravity Products (Gravity)cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19172Case C-142/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 March 2023 by Hecht Pharma GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 January 2023 in Case T-346/21, Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Officecjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19173Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Violetta Prigozhina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family of a person responsible for actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-212/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19174Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Violetta Prigozhina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family of a person responsible for actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-212/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19175Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Salim Selahaddin Gönenç v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TERMORAD ALUMINIUM PANEL RADIATOR – Earlier Benelux word mark THERMRAD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-172/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19176Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Salim Selahaddin Gönenç v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TERMORAD ALUMINIUM PANEL RADIATOR – Earlier Benelux word mark THERMRAD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-172/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19177Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-98/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19178Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-98/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19179Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-96/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023
19180Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-96/22.cjeu_case · 8 mars 2023