1841Case C-403/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1842Case C-401/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Cargolux Airlines v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition by object – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1843Case C-386/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Martinair Holland v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1844Case C-385/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1845Case C-382/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1846Case C-381/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Japan Airlines v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1847Case C-380/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1848Case C-379/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1849Case C-378/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – British Airways v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Characterisation – Single and continuous infringement – Taking into account the effects of the single and continuous infringement as a whole)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1850Case C-375/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a worldwide cartel)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1851Case C-370/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Air France-KLM v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Parent company and subsidiaries – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in force in third countries – Equal treatment – Duration of participation in the single and continuous infringement – Evidence – Participation in the various components of the single and continuous infringement)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1852Case C-369/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Air France v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in force in third countries – Equal treatment – Duration of participation in the single and continuous infringement – Evidence – Participation in the various components of the single and continuous infringement)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1853Case C-367/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Air Canada v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy)cjeu_case · 26 февраля 2026 г.
1854Case C-132/26, Camille: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2026 – Camille ASBL v RTcjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.
1855Case C-129/26, Rakoś: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku (Poland) lodged on 25 February 2026 – A.D.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.
1856Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Loco-Soft Vertriebs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Mein Autohaus – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-485/25.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.
1857Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Loco-Soft Vertriebs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-485/25.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.
1858Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Empreinte v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a corkscrew – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to sound administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-437/25.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.
1859Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Empreinte v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-437/25.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.
1860Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#PFP Monaco v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BRAMANI – Earlier EU word mark BRAHMA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-298/25.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2026 г.