Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
18208

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#« Balgarska telekomunikatsionna kompania » EAD contre Direktor na Direktsia « Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika » – Sofia.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 185 – Régularisation des déductions de la TVA payée en amont – Biens mis au rebut – Vente ultérieure en tant que déchets – Destruction ou élimination dûment prouvées ou justifiées.#Affaire C-127/22.

cjeu_case ·
18209

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#'Balgarska telekomunikatsionna kompania' EAD v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' - Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 185 – Adjustment of deductions of input VAT – Goods written off – Subsequent sale as waste – Destruction or disposal duly proved or confirmed.#Case C-127/22.

cjeu_case ·
18210

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#KY v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 77 – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Transfer of national pension rights to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Article 2 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Pension calculation – Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – The ‘minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Request for reimbursement of the portion of the transferred pension rights not reflected in the EU pension amount – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-100/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
18211

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#KY v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 77 – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Transfer of national pension rights to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Article 2 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Pension calculation – Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – The ‘minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Request for reimbursement of the portion of the transferred pension rights not reflected in the EU pension amount – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-100/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
18212

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#Kapniki A. Michailidis AE contre Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE), et Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Règlement (CEE) no 2062/92 – Article 3, paragraphe 3 – Validité – Organisation commune des marchés – Tabac brut – Primes accordées aux acheteurs de tabac en feuilles – Réduction de ces primes en fonction de la quantité de tabac de classes, de catégories ou de qualités inférieures achetée – Principes de non-rétroactivité et de protection de la confiance légitime.#Affaire C-99/22.

cjeu_case ·
18213

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 – Article 3(3) – Validity – Common organisation of the markets – Raw tobacco – Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco – Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased – Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-99/22.

cjeu_case ·
18214

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#ALD Automotive s.r.o. contre DY.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2011/7/UE – Lutte contre le retard de paiement dans les transactions commerciales – Article 6 – Montant forfaitaire minimum de 40 euros à titre d’indemnisation pour les frais de recouvrement exposés par le créancier – Retards de paiement concernant les contrats à exécution successive – Indemnisation forfaitaire due pour chaque retard de paiement – Obligation de donner plein effet au droit de l’Union – Obligation d’interprétation conforme au droit de l’Union – Principes généraux du droit privé national.#Affaire C-78/22.

cjeu_case ·
18215

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#ALD Automotive s.r.o. v DY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payments in commercial transactions – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 as compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor – Late payment regarding contracts for successive performance – Fixed compensation due in respect of each late payment – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation of interpretation in compliance with EU law – General principles of national private law.#Case C-78/22.

cjeu_case ·
18216

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#UZ contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principes relatifs au traitement – Responsabilité du traitement – Article 6 – Licéité du traitement – Dossier électronique relatif à une demande d’asile établi par une autorité administrative – Transmission à la juridiction nationale compétente via une boîte postale électronique – Violation des articles 26 et 30 – Absence d’accord déterminant la responsabilité conjointe du traitement et de la tenue du registre des activités de traitement – Conséquences – Article 17, paragraphe 1 – Droit à l’effacement (“droit à l’oubli”) – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Droit à la limitation du traitement – Notion de “traitement illicite” – Prise en compte du dossier électronique par une juridiction nationale – Absence de consentement de la personne concernée.#Affaire C-60/22.

cjeu_case ·
18217

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principles relating to processing – Controllership – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Electronic file compiled by an administrative authority relating to an asylum application – Transmission to the competent national court via an electronic mailbox – Infringement of Articles 26 and 30 – No arrangement determining joint responsibility for processing and maintaining the record of processing activities – Consequences – Article 17(1) – Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’) – Article 18(1) – Right to restriction of processing – Concept of ‘unlawful processing’ – Taking into account of the electronic file by a national court – Absence of consent of the data subject.#Case C-60/22.

cjeu_case ·
18218

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 4 May 2023.#Gesamtverband Autoteile-Handel e.V. v Scania CV AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Market for motor vehicle repair and maintenance information services – Regulation (EU) 2018/858 – Approval and market surveillance of repair and maintenance information services for motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles – Article 61(1) and (2) – Annex X, point 6.1 – Independent operators – Information ‘easily accessible in the form of machine-readable and electronically readable data sets’ – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(1)(c) – Processing of personal data – Legal obligation on car manufacturers to make vehicle identification numbers (VIN) available to independent operators.#Case C-319/22.

cjeu_case ·
18219

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 4 May 2023.#Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides, OFPRA v SW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Person registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) – Conditions for that person to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2011/95 – Cessation of UNRWA protection or assistance – Failure to provide medical care – Conditions.#Case C-294/22.

cjeu_case ·
18220

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 May 2023.#TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – SARS-Cov-2 virus – Quarantine measure – Impossible to carry over the paid annual leave granted for a period coinciding with a period of quarantine.#Case C-206/22.

cjeu_case ·