17721Case T-568/22: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2023 — XNT v EUIPO — Exane (EXANE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark EXANE — Earlier company name EXANTE — Domain name ‘exante.eu’ — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17722Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Criminal proceedings against VB and VB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(4) – Right to be present at the trial – Proceedings conducted in absentia – Reopening of the proceedings – Notice to the person convicted in absentia of his or her right to have the proceedings reopened.#Joined Cases C-430/22 and C-468/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17723Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Criminal proceedings against VB and VB.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(4) – Right to be present at the trial – Proceedings conducted in absentia – Reopening of the proceedings – Notice to the person convicted in absentia of his or her right to have the proceedings reopened.#Joined Cases C-430/22 and C-468/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17724Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#E. contre Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Principe de coopération loyale – Principe d’effectivité – Impôt perçu par un État membre en violation du droit de l’Union – Violation constatée à la suite d’un arrêt de la Cour – Droit au versement d’intérêts sur le trop-perçu – Réglementation nationale limitant le droit au versement d’intérêts à la période allant jusqu’au trentième jour suivant la publication de l’arrêt de la Cour au Journal officiel de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-322/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17725Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#E. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principle of sincere cooperation – Principle of effectiveness – Tax levied by a Member State in breach of EU law – Breach established following a ruling of the Court of Justice – Right to be paid interest on the overpayment – National legislation limiting the right to the payment of interest to the period running until the thirtieth day following the publication of the ruling of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union.#Case C-322/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17726Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG v TW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(a) – Cancellation of a flight – Article 8(1) – Obligation to provide assistance – Concept of ‘re-routing’ – Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight – COVID‑19 pandemic – Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance – Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight – Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight.#Case C-49/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17727Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG v TW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(a) – Cancellation of a flight – Article 8(1) – Obligation to provide assistance – Concept of ‘re-routing’ – Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight – COVID‑19 pandemic – Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance – Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight – Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight.#Case C-49/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17728Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 June 2023.#Google Ireland Limited and Others v Kommunikationsbehörde Austria (Komm Austria).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society services – Article 3(1) – Principle of control in the home Member State – Article 3(4) – Derogation from the principle of free movement of information society services – Concept of ‘measures taken against a given information society service’ – Article 3(5) – Possibility of a posteriori notification of measures restricting the free movement of information society services in urgent cases – Failure to provide notification – Enforceability of those measures – Legislation of a Member State imposing on providers of communication platforms, whether established on its territory or not, a set of obligations relating to the monitoring and notification of allegedly unlawful content – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media services – Video-sharing platform service.#Case C-376/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17729Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 8 June 2023.#État belge v Autorité de protection des données.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point 7 of Article 4 – Concept of ‘controller’ – Official journal of a Member State – Obligation to publish as they stand company documents prepared by companies or their legal representatives – Article 5(2) – Successive processing of the personal data contained in such documents by several separate persons or entities – Determination of responsibilities.#Case C-231/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17730Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 8 June 2023.#BU v Comune di Copertino.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Allowance in lieu of days of leave not taken at the end of the employment relationship – National legislation prohibiting payment of that allowance in the event of the voluntary resignation of a public servant – Control of public expenditure – Organisational needs of the public employer.#Case C-218/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17731Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 8 June 2023.#Criminal proceedings against Unknown individuals.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice delle indagini preliminari presso il Tribunale di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Articles 7, 8, 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to those data requested by a national authority having competence to prosecute offences of aggravated theft – Definition of the concept of ‘serious offence’ the prosecution of which is capable of justifying serious interference with fundamental rights – Competence of the Member States – Principle of proportionality – Scope of prior review by a court of the requests to access the data retained by providers of electronic communications services.#Case C-178/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17732Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 8 June 2023.#X and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 15 – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Taking into account of factors relating to the applicant’s individual position and personal circumstances and to the general situation in the country of origin – Humanitarian situation.#Case C-125/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17733Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 8 June 2023.#CDIL ̶ Companhia de Distribuição Integral Logística Portugal, SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Article 34 TFEU – Quantitative restrictions on importation – Measures having equivalent effect – National legislation limiting the quantity of cigarettes which can be released for consumption during a given period to a maximum corresponding to the monthly average of the quantities released for consumption in the preceding 12 months – Article 36 TFEU – Justification – Combating tax avoidance and abusive practices – Protection of public health – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 7 – Time at which excise duties become chargeable – Release for consumption of excise goods – Article 9 – Chargeability conditions and applicable rate of excise duty – Applicable quantitative limit exceeded – Excess – Application of the rate of excise duty in force on the date on which the declaration of discharge is lodged.#Case C-96/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17734Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 8 June 2023.#Criminal proceedings against NR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Criminal proceedings brought in rem – Order that no further action be taken adopted by a public prosecutor’s office – Admissibility of later criminal proceedings brought in personam in respect of the same facts – Conditions to be satisfied for it to be held that a person has been finally acquitted or convicted – Requirement for a detailed investigation – No interview of a potential witness – No interview of the person concerned as a ‘suspect’.#Case C-58/22.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17735Joined Cases C-430/22 and C-468/22, VB (information for a person convicted in absentia) and Another: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against VB (C-430/22), VB (C-468/22) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 8(4) — Right to be present at the trial — Proceedings conducted in absentia — Reopening of the proceedings — Notice to the person convicted in absentia of his or her right to have the proceedings reopened)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17736Case C-322/22, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — E. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of sincere cooperation — Principle of effectiveness — Tax levied by a Member State in breach of EU law — Breach established following a ruling of the Court of Justice — Right to be paid interest on the overpayment — National legislation limiting the right to the payment of interest to the period running until the thirtieth day following the publication of the ruling of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17737Case C-49/22, Austrian Airlines (Repatriation flight): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Austrian Airlines AG v TW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(1)(a) — Cancellation of a flight — Article 8(1) — Obligation to provide assistance — Concept of ‘re-routing’ — Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight — COVID-19 pandemic — Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance — Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight — Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17738Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#PAO Severstal and Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 18(1) – Necessary information – Absence – Article 9(4) – ‘Lesser duty rule’ – Target price – Profit margin of the Union industry – Establishment – Selection of the most recent representative year – Article 2(9) – Construction of the export price – Injury to the Union industry – Application by analogy – Calculation of the underselling margin – Statement of reasons.#Joined Cases C-747/21 P and C-748/21 P.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17739Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#PAO Severstal and Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 18(1) – Necessary information – Absence – Article 9(4) – ‘Lesser duty rule’ – Target price – Profit margin of the Union industry – Establishment – Selection of the most recent representative year – Article 2(9) – Construction of the export price – Injury to the Union industry – Application by analogy – Calculation of the underselling margin – Statement of reasons.#Joined Cases C-747/21 P and C-748/21 P.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.
17740Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#LM contre KP.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marque de l’Union européenne – Contentieux devant le juge national – Compétence des tribunaux des marques de l’Union européenne – Règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 124 – Action en contrefaçon – Article 128 – Demande reconventionnelle en nullité – Objet de cette demande – Article 129, paragraphe 3 – Règles de procédure applicables au même type d’actions relatives à une marque nationale – Principe de l’autonomie procédurale.#Affaire C-654/21.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2023 г.