Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
17482

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 27 June 2023.#Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-77/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
17483

Order of the Court of 27 June 2023.#Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-77/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
17484

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2023.#Finalgarve – Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA v Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraestruturas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-24/23.

cjeu_case ·
17485

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2023.#Finalgarve – Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA v Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraestruturas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-24/23.

cjeu_case ·
17491

Case C-334/23, flightright: Order of the President of the Court of 27 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Laudamotion GmbH (Air transport — Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights — Extraordinary circumstances — Covid-19 pandemic — Cancellation of numerous flights — Profitability — Economic reasons — Protection of the health of crew members — No administrative prohibition)

cjeu_case ·
17493

Case C-24/23, Finalgarve/ Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Finalgarve — Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA v Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraesruturas (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·