17081Case C-335/22, A (Tax on the marketing of securities): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — A, SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law — Directive 2008/7/EC — Article 5(2)(b) — Indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Stamp duty on services relating to the placement of bonds and commercial papers on the market)cjeu_case · 19 июля 2023 г.
17082Case T-416/23: Action brought on 18 July 2023 — Evroins inshurans grup v EIOPAcjeu_case · 18 июля 2023 г.
17084Case T-93/23: Order of the General Court of 18 July 2023 — Court of Auditors v Allianz Insurance Luxembourgcjeu_case · 18 июля 2023 г.
17085Case C-454/23, K.A.M.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Dikastirio Diethnous Prostasias (Cyprus) lodged on 18 July 2023 — K.A.M. v Republic of Cypruscjeu_case · 18 июля 2023 г.
17086Case C-451/23: Action brought on 18 July 2023 — Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 18 июля 2023 г.
17087Case T-428/23: Action brought on 17 July 2023 — ABN AMRO Bank and ABN AMRO Hypotheken Groep v SRBcjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17090Case T-409/23: Action brought on 17 July 2023 — Sulberg Services v Councilcjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17091Case T-408/23: Action brought on 17 July 2023 — Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank v SRBcjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17092Case T-399/23: Action brought on 17 July 2023 — ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17093Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Canai Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-280/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17094Order of the Court of 17 July 2023.#Canai Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-280/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17095Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-270/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17096Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 17 juillet 2023.#Topcart GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-270/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17097Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17098Order of the Court of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17099Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-94/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.
17100Order of the Court of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-94/23 P.cjeu_case · 17 июля 2023 г.