16961Case T-109/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Innovation (frutania) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark frutania — Earlier EU figurative mark Frutaria — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16962Case T-67/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Guma Holdings v EUIPO — XTB (XTRADE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative mark XTRADE — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16963Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Inadmissibility.#Case T-601/21 DEP.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16964Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Inadmissibility.#Case T-601/21 DEP.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16965Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Passo Lungo – Earlier national word mark Doppio Passo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-745/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16966Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Passo Lungo – Earlier national word mark Doppio Passo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-745/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16967Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Troy Chemical Company BV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the adoption of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of legal advice – Overriding public interest.#Case T-662/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16968Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Troy Chemical Company BV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the adoption of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of legal advice – Overriding public interest.#Case T-662/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16969Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the outline of a bear – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-638/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16970Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the outline of a bear – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-638/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16971Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the outline of a bear – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-591/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16972Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the outline of a bear – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-591/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16973Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland and Guangdong Camel Apparel Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark CAMEL CROWN – International registration of the earlier figurative mark camel active – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-562/21 and T-590/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16974Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland and Guangdong Camel Apparel Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark CAMEL CROWN – International registration of the earlier figurative mark camel active – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-562/21 and T-590/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16975Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – National implementing measures – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Decision to exclude an installation exclusively using biomass – Duty of diligence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Plea of illegality – Paragraph 1 of Annex I to Directive 2003/87.#Case T-269/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16976Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Arctic Paper Grycksbo AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – National implementing measures – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Decision to exclude an installation exclusively using biomass – Duty of diligence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Plea of illegality – Paragraph 1 of Annex I to Directive 2003/87.#Case T-269/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16977Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Installations producing a product which is not covered by a product benchmark – No direct substitutability between the products – Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning those installations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Duty of diligence – International obligations and commitments of the European Union – Plea of illegality.#Case T-244/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16978Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Installations producing a product which is not covered by a product benchmark – No direct substitutability between the products – Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning those installations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Duty of diligence – International obligations and commitments of the European Union – Plea of illegality.#Case T-244/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16979Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#SMA Mineral AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Installation using an intermediate product covered by a product benchmark – Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning that installation – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-215/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.
16980Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#SMA Mineral AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Installation using an intermediate product covered by a product benchmark – Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning that installation – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-215/21.cjeu_case · 26 июля 2023 г.