Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
16121

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 October 2023.#European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Steel products market – Import of certain steel products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Prolongation of a safeguard measure – Necessity – Threat of serious injury – Adjustment measures – European Union interest – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-598/21.

cjeu_case ·
16124

Case T-598/21: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2023 — Euranimi v Commission (Protective measures — Steel products market — Imports of certain steel products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Admissibility — Prolongation of a safeguard measure — Necessity — Threat of serious injury — Adjustment measures — Interest of the European Union — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
16126

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 October 2023.#Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 – Absence of an EFSA conclusion – Transparency obligation – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA – Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case – Interim report on an ongoing study – Precautionary principle – Burden of proof and matter to be proved – Manifest error of assessment – Applicability of the read-across approach and of the weight-of-evidence approach – Possibility of relying on the ECHA and EFSA guidelines.#Case T-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
16127

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 October 2023.#Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 – Absence of an EFSA conclusion – Transparency obligation – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA – Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case – Interim report on an ongoing study – Precautionary principle – Burden of proof and matter to be proved – Manifest error of assessment – Applicability of the read-across approach and of the weight-of-evidence approach – Possibility of relying on the ECHA and EFSA guidelines.#Case T-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
16128

Case T-77/20: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2023 — Ascenza Agro and Industrias Afrasa v Commission (Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 — Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 — Absence of an EFSA conclusion — Transparency obligation — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA — Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case — Interim report on an ongoing study — Precautionary principle — Burden of proof and matter to be proved — Manifest error of assessment — Applicability of the read-across approach and of the weight-of-evidence approach — Possibility of relying on the ECHA and EFSA guidelines)

cjeu_case ·
16135

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 October 2023.#Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Jurisdiction of the Court – Article 267 TFEU – Admissibility – National legislation concerning the order for dealing with applications – Deferring delivery of a judgment and its notification to the parties – Interpretation necessary to enable the referring court to give judgment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-327/22.

cjeu_case ·
16136

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 October 2023.#Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Jurisdiction of the Court – Article 267 TFEU – Admissibility – National legislation concerning the order for dealing with applications – Deferring delivery of a judgment and its notification to the parties – Interpretation necessary to enable the referring court to give judgment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-327/22.

cjeu_case ·
16139

Case C-327/22, PROM-VIDIJA: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske — Croatia) — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Second paragraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Principle of judicial independence — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 267 TFEU — Admissibility — National legislation concerning the order for dealing with applications — Deferring delivery of a judgment and its notification to the parties — Interpretation necessary to enable the referring court to give judgment — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·