15361Case C-744/22, Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia: Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nessebar — Bulgaria) — ‘Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia EAD’ v PQcjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15362Case C-764/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 October 2023 — Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of aluminium flat-rolled products originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Importer — Locus standi — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15363Case C-591/22, L. (Gallus gallus): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — L. VOF v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hygiene of foodstuffs — Reduction of salmonella in breeding flocks of Gallus gallus — Regulation (EU) No 200/2010 — Annex — Point 2.2.2.2(c) — Routine sampling — Positive result — Confirmatory sampling — Exceptional cases — Doubt as to the results — Scope)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15364Case C-534/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 — Roberto Aquino v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Staff Committee of the European Parliament — Election of the president of the Staff Committee — Intervention by the Parliament in the electoral process — Lawfulness — Criteria — Statement of reasons)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15365Case C-325/22, Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — TS, HI v Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aid granted by Member States — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of an ‘undertaking’ — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery of unlawful aid — Decision (EU) 2015/456 — Swaps of forest land — Determining the ‘market value’)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15366Case C-186/22, Sad Trasporto Locale: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Sad Trasporto Locale SpA v Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Scope — Article 1(2) — Cableway installations — Direct award of a transport public service contract by a competent local authority to an internal operator — Transfer of the operating risk — Public service compensation)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15367Case C-147/22, Központi Nyomozó Főügyészség: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Criminal proceedings against Terhelt5 (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Article 54 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Principle ne bis in idem — Admissibility of criminal prosecution for corruption of an accused person in one Member State after the closure of the criminal proceedings brought against him in respect of the same acts by the public prosecutor’s office of another Member State — Conditions which must be satisfied in order for the accused person’s trial to be regarded as having been finally disposed of — Condition of an assessment of the merits of the case — Requirement for a detailed investigation — No questioning of the accused person)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15368Case C-88/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 — QB v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4(1)(a), second indent — Temporary staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions for granting — Main occupation — Work done for another State)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15369Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023.#Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 13 – Criminal procedure – Scope – Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of International Property Rights (TRIPS) – Article 61 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 51(1) – Implementation of EU law – Powers – Article 49(1) and (3) – Legality and proportionality of penalties.#Case C-655/21.cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15370Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023.#Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad - Nesebar.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 13 – Criminal procedure – Scope – Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of International Property Rights (TRIPS) – Article 61 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 51(1) – Implementation of EU law – Powers – Article 49(1) and (3) – Legality and proportionality of penalties.#Case C-655/21.cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15371Case C-655/21, G. ST. T. (Proportionality of the penalty for trade mark infringement): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 13 — Criminal procedure — Scope — Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence — Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) — Article 61 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 51(1) — Implementation of EU law — Powers — Article 49(1) and (3) — Legality and proportionality of penalties)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15372Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 19 octobre 2023.#MK contre Lufthansa CityLine GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Travail à temps partiel – Directive 97/81/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à temps partiel – Clause 4, point 1 – Principe de non-discrimination des travailleurs à temps partiel – Principe du pro rata temporis – Pilotes – Rémunération au titre du temps de service de vol supplémentaire – Seuils de déclenchement identiques pour les pilotes travaillant à temps plein et pour les pilotes travaillant à temps partiel – Différence de traitement.#Affaire C-660/20.cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15373Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 October 2023.#MK v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Part-time work – Directive 97/81/EC – Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination of part-time workers – Principle pro rata temporis – Pilots – Remuneration for additional flying duty hours – Identical trigger thresholds for full-time and part-time pilots – Difference in treatment.#Case C-660/20.cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15374Case C-660/20, Lufthansa CityLine: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — MK v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Part-time work — Directive 97/81/EC — Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC — Clause 4.1 — Principle of non-discrimination of part-time workers — Principle pro rata temporis — Pilots — Remuneration for additional flying duty hours — Identical trigger thresholds for full-time and part-time pilots — Difference in treatment)cjeu_case · 19 октября 2023 г.
15375Case T-1041/23: Action brought on 18 October 2023 — Mendes v EUIPO — Actial Farmaceutica (BIFIDOBACTERIUM BREVE DSM24732)cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15376Case T-1024/23: Action brought on 18 October 2023 — London EV v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15377Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 October 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Application to intervene – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Application submitted by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy – Interest in the result of the case – Grant of application to intervene.#Case C-585/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15378Order of the Court of 18 October 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-345/23 P.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15379Order of the Court of 18 October 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-345/23 P.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.
15380Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#VU and IT v EUROBANK BULGARIA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) and Article 4 – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language – Bank loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Term that places the exchange risk entirely on the consumer – Advantage not specifically agreed upon for the benefit of the credit institution resulting from the conversion, into the settlement currency, of the amount of the loan expressed in the currency of the account – Article 6 – Consequences of a finding that a contractual term is unfair.#Case C-117/23.cjeu_case · 18 октября 2023 г.