Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
15201

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-282/22.

cjeu_case ·
15202

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-282/22.

cjeu_case ·
15205

Case T-665/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2023 — SkinIdent v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10 — National trade mark and international registration of earlier word mark SKINIDENT — Earlier company name Skinident — Relative grounds for refusal — Absence of a likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Sector proximity — Application of national law by EUIPO — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
15207

Case T-282/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2023 — Mazepin v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
15209

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#Alexander Zaytsev and Bremino-Grupp TAA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-563/21 and T-564/21.

cjeu_case ·
15210

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#Alexander Zaytsev and Bremino-Grupp TAA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-563/21 and T-564/21.

cjeu_case ·
15213

Joined Cases T-563/21 and T-564/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2023 — Zaytsev and Bremino-Grupp v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States — Inclusion of the applicants' names on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
15215

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 November 2023.#Bimbo, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-473/23 P.

cjeu_case ·