Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
14741

Case T-506/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Pitk Pelotas (CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT — Earlier EU word marks and international registration of a word mark CROSSFIT — Earlier EU word mark CROSS — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Non-similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
14743

Case T-333/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Khan v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ — Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP — Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
14744

Case T-19/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Shape of a scooter) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a scooter — Absolute ground for invalidity — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
14758

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2023.#L.T.L v Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court and to set out the relationship between the provisions of EU law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-373/23.

cjeu_case ·
14759

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2023.#L.T.L v Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Montana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court and to set out the relationship between the provisions of EU law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-373/23.

cjeu_case ·