Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
14462

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark A’PEAL – Earlier national word mark APIRETAL – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the marks at issue – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-56/23.

cjeu_case ·
14463

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark A’PEAL – Earlier national word mark APIRETAL – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the marks at issue – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-56/23.

cjeu_case ·
14464

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Light Tec Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a star – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-10/23.

cjeu_case ·
14465

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Light Tec Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a star – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-10/23.

cjeu_case ·
14466

Case T-56/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2023 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Ahlberg-Dollarstore (A’PEAL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark A’PEAL — Earlier national word mark APIRETAL — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No link between the marks at issue — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
14467

Case T-10/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2023 — Light Tec v EUIPO — DecoTrend (Lampshade) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a star — Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Article 63(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard)

cjeu_case ·
14468

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Proceedings brought by P. G.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court's existing case-law – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – International and territorial jurisdiction in contractual matters – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Claim for compensation by air passengers for the cancellation of a flight – Article 5(1)(c) – Article 7(1)(a) – National legislation providing for other grounds of jurisdiction in favour of consumers.#Case C-319/23.

cjeu_case ·
14469

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Proceedings brought by P. G.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court's existing case-law – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – International and territorial jurisdiction in contractual matters – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Claim for compensation by air passengers for the cancellation of a flight – Article 5(1)(c) – Article 7(1)(a) – National legislation providing for other grounds of jurisdiction in favour of consumers.#Case C-319/23.

cjeu_case ·
14474

Case C-319/23, Avdzhilov: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — P.G. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) — International and territorial jurisdiction in contractual matters — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Claim for compensation by air passengers for the cancellation of a flight — Article 5(1)(c) — Article 7(1)(a) — National legislation providing for other grounds of jurisdiction in favour of consumers)

cjeu_case ·