13601Case C-88/24: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia n.º 1 de Fuenlabrada (Spain) lodged on 2 February 2024 – A.B.D. v Bankinter Consumer Finance, E.F.C., SAcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13602Case C-87/24, Gaso and Conexus Baltic Grid: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 2 February 2024 – AS Gaso and AS Conexus Baltic Grid v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisijacjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13603Case C-86/24, CS STEEL: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě - pobočka v Olomouci (Czech Republic) lodged on 2 February 2024 - CS STEEL a.s. v Generální ředitelství celcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13604Case C-85/24, BAWAG: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 2 February 2024 – Verein für Konsumenteninformation v BAWAG P.S.K. Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AGcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13605Case T-496/23: Order of the General Court of 2 February 2024 — Mhana v Councilcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13606Case T-492/23: Order of the General Court of 2 February 2024 — Makhlouf v Councilcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13607Case T-491/23: Order of the General Court of 2 February 2024 — Makhlouf v Councilcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13608Case T-490/23: Order of the General Court of 2 February 2024 — Makhlouf v Councilcjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13609Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Zentiva k.s. and Zentiva Pharma GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-609/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13610Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Zentiva k.s. and Zentiva Pharma GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-609/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13611Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Zakłady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-608/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13612Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Zakłady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-608/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13613Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-607/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13614Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-607/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13615Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-604/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13616Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-604/23 P(R).cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13617Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/23 P.cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13618Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/23 P.cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13619Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/23 P.cjeu_case · 2 février 2024
13620Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/23 P.cjeu_case · 2 février 2024